Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Verbatim

Pages: 1 ... 397398399 400401 ... 1601
11941
The Flood / Re: greetings, earthlings 👽
« on: December 04, 2016, 09:05:39 PM »
YouTube

did you make this?

because i haven't laughed this hard at a youtube video in a good minute
yeah i made it, it was fun

11942
Gaming / Re: KNACK IS BACK
« on: December 04, 2016, 05:20:47 PM »
I'm biased for Metroid, but I'd still say Metroid 1 has aged pretty well for an 8-bit game.

NES games in general are timeless. The good ones, anyway.

11943
Gaming / Re: KNACK IS BACK
« on: December 04, 2016, 05:07:42 PM »
I don't really think any of them are highly debatable. At the time they were released they were all good games. It's true that not all of them have aged gracefully though.
Plenty of people can't stand 3D Mario platformers--Sunshine in particular is probably one of the least-liked Mario games in the core franchise. And Halo 1 flat-out sucked. Its multiplayer and its multiplayer alone carried it to its success.

They were popular, sure, and lots of people liked them--but you already know that this does not make a game good.

11944
The Flood / Re: Post irony
« on: December 04, 2016, 04:58:43 PM »
Quote
where I act intentionally ironic in a way that people can't even tell is sincere or not.
It's not ironic if it's what's to be expected.
Hence the distinction between irony and post-irony.

11945
Gaming / Re: KNACK IS BACK
« on: December 04, 2016, 04:29:54 PM »
As a side note I don't think a game being released at launch is a valid excuse. Off the top of my head I can think of three games that released at launch (maybe 4, but I didn't pay attention to the 360 launch so I don't know if gears was actually a launch title or not) that were still good games.

Halo:CE, SSBM, and Super Mario Sunshine.
I think you meant "well-received," because two of those are highly debatable.

11946
Gaming / Re: Hey Verbatim.
« on: December 04, 2016, 03:46:18 PM »
it's finals week

11947
Serious / Re: Why abortion should be legal
« on: December 04, 2016, 02:19:57 PM »
Abortion is murder
And that's why it's okay.

11948
You nerds have probably already saw this, but if you play both trailers at the same time, you'll notice that when the baby disappears in the first trailer, it appears at the exact same time in the second trailer.
of all people you should be kojimas biggest fan

considering your stance on the whole video games = art

even if he isnt the best artist, you should at least support him trying to push the industry in that direction
Absolutely. My only real gripe with Kojima is that he's such a shameless pervert, but as an artist/"visionary," I have nothing but respect for him.

11949
You nerds have probably already seen this, but if you play both trailers at the same time, you'll notice that when the baby disappears in the first trailer, it appears at the exact same time in the second trailer.

11950
Gaming / Re: KNACK IS BACK
« on: December 04, 2016, 01:06:57 PM »
Not sure how a game that was near universally panned got green-lit for a sequel, but ok.
Two words: Mark Cerny.

And I wouldn't call it "universally panned". It made some 4s, but then it made some 7s. Hopefully the sequel can patch up the problems.
Umm, the metacritc average is a 54. I also said "near universally" not universally. I'm well aware gamestops marketing magazine gave it a good score to sell copies.
"Pan" is a strong word. 20s-30s on Metacritic would be a universal pan.

11951
The Flood / Re: Pretty Decent Animals and Their Approximate Location
« on: December 04, 2016, 11:37:36 AM »
I'd give it a 6/10 for its direction, cinematography, and special effects--I especially enjoy watching household objects getting magicked around, because it makes me wish I had something like that. The CGI characters never looked real, but they were highly expressive and a lot of attention-to-detail was thrown their way. I always appreciate that stuff. Still, I found myself bored during all the action scenes because I just didn't really care that much.

What I hated the most were the characters--the fat horndog was absolutely insufferable, and the most ham-fisted attempt at creating an audience surrogate I've seen in a long time. His love interest--the Legilimens whose name I don't even remember--was also quite irritating to watch, mainly because she can't really act. While I appreciate that she was able to use her womanly charms to get her way without being overtly sexualized, her cutesy demeanor was enough to make me cringe overused verb all throughout her scenes.

The dialogue was also very weird. Since the film takes place in 20th century America, everyone but Newt naturally has an American accent--but the dialogue itself didn't seem very American. While everyone has the accent, they still talk like they're English, and I found this incredibly distracting. Apparently JKR doesn't understand how we talk? Eddie's muttered delivery as Newt certainly didn't help things.

Overall, while this most certainly is the weakest entry in the Harry Potter film canon by far, I think I did end up enjoying it a little bit more than you--if not just for the pretty pictures. I'm a sucker for good, rich, and detailed shots with a lot to swallow, and this film had plenty enough of them for me to warrant a 6/10--and for what it's worth, I thought Eddie Redmayne did a pretty good job with his role. I had never considered that he was autistic until you pointed it out, but even if he is, I wouldn't necessarily consider that a fault. He's clearly meant to be an eccentric fellow, and I thought Redmayne sold that characteristic as well as he needed to.

I'm welcome to having a sequel or two--but the notion that there's going to be five more kinda makes me sick to my stomach.

11952
Gaming / Re: KNACK IS BACK
« on: December 04, 2016, 11:14:13 AM »
granted, there's a few yet-to-be-released games that are all but guaranteed to be quality which i'm including in that equation nonetheless

even if you think everything that's currently out sucks (can't blame you), there's still plenty to look forward to

memes aside

11953
Gaming / Re: KNACK IS BACK
« on: December 04, 2016, 11:00:07 AM »
Shot through the heart and you're to blame
PS4 HAS NO GAMES
Would be funny if it didn't seem like every console has that problem this gen.
would be true if

it were true

11954
Serious / Re: Why abortion should be legal
« on: December 04, 2016, 10:58:00 AM »
Why shouldn't a women be punished with children for being irresponsible about unprotected sex?
Because you're bringing an innocent third party who has absolutely nothing to do with anything into the situation. So not only are you punishing the woman with a child for being irresponsible--you're also sentencing a newborn child to a guaranteed shit life for doing fuck all.

It's like giving someone a 2-year prison sentence for grand theft and then going, "Uh, you there, random guy--you're getting 2 years too."

"What? Fucking why?"

"Because if this woman hadn't been a thief, this never would have happened!"

That's your position.
Quote
The purpose of unprotected sex is procreation. You know full well going into it that there is a risk of having kids. Hence why she should just be sterilized after the abortion procedure so that the women can engage in as much degeneracy as she wants without fear of pregnancy, and less abortion procedures are performed overall. Everyone's happy.
People should sterilized after having an abortion, I agree with that. But then everyone should be sterilized.

11955
Serious / Re: Why abortion should be legal
« on: December 04, 2016, 10:48:53 AM »
I'm not even going to bother arguing your facile presuppositions at this point. We get it. You're an anti natalist. Now fuck off.
And being a "baby murderer" (translation: sparing someone a guaranteed shit life) has little to do with anti-natalism. I won't say it has nothing to do with it, but just because the subjects have some overlap doesn't mean that that's the angle I'm coming from with this argument. I'm sorry my beliefs are beginning to compel you, but maybe stop projecting your feelings towards it on me, because no one's talking about it but you.

Quote
There is a slew of contraceptives out there for people to use that renders the prospect of pregnancy impossible when combined
Yeah, and one of them is abortion. Whereas condoms and other forms of contraceptive are not absolutely guaranteed to work, the success rate for abortion is pretty fucking spectacular.

"Feel free to use all these contraceptives out there--except that one, because I find it morally icky."

It's no more or less morally icky than using a condom, birth control, or even being fucking abstinent. Like Winy said, the only consistent point of view for a pro-life person to have (or someone like you, who is pro-choice but has all these childish misgivings about it) is to have as much children as possible, because for every second you are NOT impregnating a woman, you're just taking more and more from an unborn children's shot at life. Now isn't that just horrible.

11956
Gaming / Re: Street Fighter V Thread - Akuma Gameplay Released
« on: December 04, 2016, 10:23:06 AM »
Mika's getting nerfed hard in season 2, though, so it's all good.

11957
The Flood / Re: greetings, earthlings 👽
« on: December 04, 2016, 10:22:36 AM »
YouTube

11959
Serious / Re: Why abortion should be legal
« on: December 04, 2016, 10:18:32 AM »
People usually just say "You're a baby murderer," or throw out some other scary buzzwords to try to make me look like an inhumane psychopath.
Just to play devil's advocate here, pro choicers aren't exactly any better. Anyone with a modicum of pro life opinions gets shot down as a "woman hater" or "suppressing a woman's ability to choose" in the public sphere.
Because they are.

The difference is that being a "baby murderer" isn't a bad thing.

Quote
I also don't believe that we should immediately abdicate the woman's responsibility in her sexual behaviour.
Which is not what abortion does. What you're basically saying is that women deserve to be punished with children, which may be the most fucked up thing ever when you really think about it.

11960
Gaming / Re: Street Fighter V Thread - Capcom Cup 2016 LIVE
« on: December 04, 2016, 10:14:39 AM »
literally the one character i didn't want to see win, all year

worse than trump winning tbh
did that R. Mika player win?
yeah ::)

He deserves it, though. He really is one of the best players right now. It's just a shame, because the winner of Capcom Cup, apart from getting a huge prize pot, also gets to help design a new costume for a character of their choice. And he's probably gonna choose Mika instead of one his other characters, like Guile.

11961
Gaming / Re: Pokemon Thread (Massive Spoilers Page 49 and Beyond!)
« on: December 04, 2016, 03:13:34 AM »
Wow, game, thanks for not letting me heal before fighting Red! What the fuck.

11962
Gaming / Re: Street Fighter V Thread - Capcom Cup 2016 LIVE
« on: December 03, 2016, 11:49:01 PM »
Marvel's looking better than I thought it would. Still don't really give a shit about it though.

11963
Gaming / Re: Street Fighter V Thread - Capcom Cup 2016 LIVE
« on: December 03, 2016, 11:41:36 PM »
literally the one character i didn't want to see win, all year

worse than trump winning tbh

11965
Gaming / Re: Street Fighter V Thread - Capcom Cup 2016 LIVE
« on: December 03, 2016, 11:27:07 PM »
We have US vs. US @ Grand Finals. Unprecedented--especially from Ricki Ortiz of all players.

11966
Gaming / Re: Street Fighter V Thread - Capcom Cup 2016 LIVE
« on: December 03, 2016, 10:55:23 PM »
this fucking character is so beneath nuckledu

11967
Gaming / Re: Pokemon Thread (Massive Spoilers Page 49 and Beyond!)
« on: December 03, 2016, 10:40:57 PM »
i accidentally tapu lele

is there a way to battle it again

11968
Gaming / Re: Street Fighter V Thread - Capcom Cup 2016 LIVE
« on: December 03, 2016, 10:09:40 PM »
Watching Fuudo get 3-0'd just completes my night.

11969
Gaming / Re: Street Fighter V Thread - Capcom Cup 2016 LIVE
« on: December 03, 2016, 10:00:34 PM »
Has anyone been using Juri this tournament?
Nah. I don't even know one top player who uses her, tbh. General consensus is that she's ass.
noooo  :'(
Oh, she'll probably get buffed--all the DLC characters are a little underpowered.

Word on the street is that Mika's Irish whip is getting nerfed so that the wall-bounce ONLY happens in the corner, which pretty much guts her offense.

11970
Gaming / Re: Street Fighter V Thread - Capcom Cup 2016 LIVE
« on: December 03, 2016, 09:55:38 PM »
Has anyone been using Juri this tournament?
Nah. I don't even know one top player who uses her, tbh. General consensus is that she's ass.

Pages: 1 ... 397398399 400401 ... 1601