481
The Flood / Re: Some guy is restarting Arby 'n' The Chief
« on: August 28, 2014, 02:59:26 PM »
That basketball player episode is hilarious lol.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 481
The Flood / Re: Some guy is restarting Arby 'n' The Chief« on: August 28, 2014, 02:59:26 PM »
That basketball player episode is hilarious lol.
482
The Flood / Re: UK Embassy 'accidentally' rubs the war of 1812 in the yanks faces :^)« on: August 28, 2014, 02:56:01 PM »
Counter to popular belief no one "won" the war of 1812. The war just carried on until their was no reason to fight anymore as the conditions that had setup the conflict had been resolved in Europe. Though the burning of the white house was probably the most brought up subject over here in the UK when anyone talks about Canada. Simply because the Canadians try to take credit for one of our Generals handiwork.
483
Serious / Re: Let's have a little chat about the police state, shall we?« on: August 27, 2014, 11:53:45 PM »
Based. 484
The Flood / Re: Urban Dictionary terms that make you LOL (GRAPHIC CONTENT)« on: August 27, 2014, 10:19:26 PM »Quote floordrobe Quote khloe kardashian 485
Serious / Re: Council turns blind eye to crime out of fear of being called "racist"« on: August 27, 2014, 10:08:18 PM »Yeah I know about the whole term usage, but everything else you say makes no sense. Nobody controls these people and tells them how to act. They make their own little cities all on their own. Well your own post kind of says what I was trying to get across. There is no compunction to integrate into the British common culture so immigrants do not. This is why we have such a problem with second generation immigrants rejecting British common culture and being radicalised. Whether it's for Islam, Communism, Nationalism etc. etc. 486
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 27, 2014, 09:41:10 PM »487
Serious / Re: Ukraine update: The Rebellion Strikes Back.« on: August 27, 2014, 02:13:43 PM »
The Donbask(sp?) battalion of the Ukrainian army supposedly lost 50% of it's fighting strength to desertion on the way to the front lines. And the Rebels are getting ready for a proper tank battle with in excess of 400 70's to modern era tanks.
488
Serious / Re: Council turns blind eye to crime out of fear of being called "racist"« on: August 27, 2014, 02:07:18 PM »What the hell are you even talking about? 1) Foreign immigrants have been told by PC crowd that they should make no attempts to integrate with the common culture and so basically have their own cities. While I don't care what language they speak in their own homes etc. convincing multiple generations of Britons that it is wrong to be apart of the British common culture is asking for disaster. Unfortunately for common sense the PC crowd continuously attacks the "immigrants should assimilate into the common culture and be left alone beyond that" viewpoint. 2) Asian is the newspeak term for predominantly Muslim countries in shitholeistan. East Asian is the newspeak term for all the actual Asians lol. 490
Serious / Re: Council turns blind eye to crime out of fear of being called "racist"« on: August 27, 2014, 01:18:51 PM »
And even after this people who say that assimilation is the only practical course of action when dealing with immigrants will still be called racist.
P.S. before someone says they weren't pakis understand that "Asian" is newspeak for predominantly Muslim countries in the middle of shitholeistan. e.g. Bangladesh and Pakistan are "Asians" but turkey is not. 491
Serious / Re: Well, Boris Johnson just destroyed our constitution in one swift blow« on: August 27, 2014, 01:16:46 PM »I don't see why you can't just blacklist certain conflict areas for travel, and only allow professional journalists to go. This right here. Also because of the peculiarities of our constitution you can't really "destroy" it, merely go against the spirit of the constitution. 492
Serious / Re: Rape statistics won't improve until women stop getting drunk« on: August 26, 2014, 08:03:27 PM »Nobody cares. We all know you're just an alt of Kinder. Shut up.Joke's on you, I'm actually lonepaul. Fucking #rekt 493
The Flood / Re: plug.dj: good news and bad news« on: August 26, 2014, 07:01:27 PM »
Maintenance. God damnit!
494
Gaming / Re: I have brought glory to the USSR« on: August 26, 2014, 06:50:40 PM »
Hey slash. Stop spending all your mil monarch points or you'll be left behind tech level wise. mil tech 5, 6 and 7 are absolutely essential so you shouldn't be spending mil power on a ideas/non-essential generals etc. for the first sixty or so years from start date. If you had kept up with mil power you would have been able to beat Venice in the first coalition war. Now that I'm a free nation though I'll be able to come down with and help you with any further coalition wars. I just need a better economy before I become lord of death for Muscovy. I want Kola!
I've been seeing this shit everywhere, but I don't even know what the gameplay is like for it. YouTube If you want a good players experience watch the above. If you want to see a average to sub-average players experience watch the below. Also check out the below if you want to see how multipayer feels. YouTube 495
Serious / Re: Your political opinions which make people rage« on: August 26, 2014, 06:33:51 PM »What countries are these officers going to be from? Is there a selection process or does each member nation get to appoint a set number of people? Any person from a member state can join the FedMil. So officers can originate from any member nation and control units from any nation (look at how that Dane motorised unit was folded into one of the German motorised brigades). Positions generally appointed by competence and seniority, any political appointments would be voted on by each member states leader. E.g. current field marshal/top general fucks up and is replaced by the next in seniority and the next in line for promotion to general gets into the lowest general position. The size of the top brass I would not be qualified to comment on, but as for the question of why would it be necessary: 1) to reduce wars of aggression. With offensive wars only being able to be declared by vote of each member states leader there is reduced risk of financial or other damage caused by a lack of negotiations. 2) most wars where western units fight in the past twenty years are coalition wars and in each instance serious issues have surfaced between the different militaries because of divergent combat doctrines influenced by the economic and geopolitical of each nation. A combined military branch separated from each of the coalition nations that can be more effectively utilised in these conflicts is a boon both to the military in terms of the effectiveness increase due to a single command structure and a shared combat doctrine but too the member states who are assured of another countries participation in any conflict where they are at threat. At this point I'd also like to say that I would support the replacement of the EU with a European FedMil. 496
Serious / Re: Your political opinions which make people rage« on: August 26, 2014, 04:33:59 PM »who's going to be in charge of this "federalized military" then? The generals and/or the field marshal. If you mean who is charge of setting it to war than a vote cast by each member states leader would suffice. Of course if one nation is attacked then auto-war. 497
Gaming / Re: Can anybody help me with texturing in blender.« on: August 26, 2014, 03:16:46 PM »498
Serious / Re: Rape statistics won't improve until women stop getting drunk« on: August 26, 2014, 03:15:14 PM »
The expansion of rape laws to be almost double speak doesn't help either.
499
Serious / Re: Your political opinions which make people rage« on: August 26, 2014, 03:04:16 PM »>want out of EU because muh sovereignty > arguing that a federalised military is the same as a political union Are you retarded? 500
Serious / Re: Read my fucking immigration paper you fucks« on: August 26, 2014, 03:00:07 PM »
I liked it. Could have used more sauce though.
501
Serious / Re: Britain denied key role in EU Commission, for not choosing a woman candidate« on: August 26, 2014, 02:46:03 PM »
Can we change the name yet to EUSR? Might as well get my Russian hat out and get ready to be sent to the
503
Serious / Re: Turns out liberals just do care more.« on: August 26, 2014, 02:41:02 PM »
Of course. This is why us Brits are such a shiter right now with feelings being placed above rationality, facts and codified rights.
504
Serious / Re: Your political opinions which make people rage« on: August 25, 2014, 11:01:10 AM »Sold. I never asked you to. I'd be interested to know which ones you disagree with though. 505
Serious / Re: Your political opinions which make people rage« on: August 24, 2014, 09:07:44 PM »I don't necessarily agree with all of those, but I like the overall tone of it >.> I think I left one out... > Anti-SJW 506
Serious / Re: Your political opinions which make people rage« on: August 24, 2014, 08:59:17 PM »Stopped reading there. > from Greece stopped reading right there. 507
Serious / Re: British opinion poll« on: August 24, 2014, 08:53:02 PM »Perhaps I wasn't clear <.< > Labour is retarded > Cameron's conservatives don't understand the meaning of the word "centre-right" > Lib-dem's are literal cancer who'll give us a depression if they got the legal system they wanted in the last election > Britain first/BNP are left wing fascists > mfw UKIP are called a joke 508
Serious / Re: Your political opinions which make people rage« on: August 24, 2014, 08:44:36 PM »
- Anti-EU
- Anti-UN (in it's current form) - Pro-NATO (this was controversial with all the hippies that want to see us get invaded lol) - Pro-federalised military of the British commonwealth (fuck you sjw faggots and your white guilt) - Pro-lower, flatter tax rate - Pro-abolishment of the welfare state - Pro-less government interference in business - Pro-private parties right to discriminate - Pro-fucking free speech and the abolishment of our current basis for thought crime laws. - Anti-Anglo/Amero special relationship (they only seem to want us to do stuff that hurts the power of the British nation without equal compensation) - Pro-nukes - Pro-nuclear power - Pro-military - Pro-commonwealth and British legacy (again, go fuck yourselves sjw) I can't think of anymore right now. 509
Serious / Re: More fearmongering from the pro-exit crowd« on: August 23, 2014, 03:30:32 PM »Over some issues, yes. But generally I'd like to see the United States of Europe someday >.> Fuck a united states of Europe. Us Brits have earned our own federalised commonwealth. 510
Serious / Re: Leading Scottish intellectual supports Yes Campaign« on: August 23, 2014, 03:28:03 PM »Man I gotta post a Braveheart GIF when I get on my computer. > Scots complain about Opresshun > mfw it was the Scottish who conquered England and not the other way around. |