Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - clum clum

Pages: 1 ... 217218219 220221 ... 382
6541
The Flood / Re: Is it wrong to date my sister?
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:31:17 PM »
im confused

I'll rape you. But only if you consent.

6542
The Flood / Re: (☠) "you cared enough to respond"
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:28:43 PM »
It's really not.
wow

i've never met someone who literally thinks that two things that are completely different

aren't completely different

amazing

a-

-mazing

It's not amazing. It's a viewpoint of another person - albeit the correct viewpoint.

6543
The Flood / Re: (☠) "you cared enough to respond"
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:25:25 PM »

6544
Serious / Re: The big bang and the origins of the universe
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:21:23 PM »
As a general rule though I place very little to no stock in intuitive arguments about what is likely the most unique instant in all of space and time, so you can feel free to just dismiss anything I say about it really

This is why science isn't based on philosophical rhetoric

I find it all very hard to grasp. I get a really weird, funny feeling in my head when I delve too deep into thought about it.

6545
The Flood / Re: (☠) "you cared enough to respond"
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:15:54 PM »
If you truly didn't care you wouldn't feel compelled to post in the first place.
caring to let people know that you don't care
and caring about the topic at hand

are two different things

It's really not.

6546
The Flood / Re: (☠) "you cared enough to respond"
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:08:57 PM »
oh
get removed

Why don't you get removed? What exactly makes you more valid over me?

6547
The Flood / Re: (☠) "you cared enough to respond"
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:07:03 PM »
oh

6548
Serious / Re: The big bang and the origins of the universe
« on: January 15, 2015, 05:58:03 PM »
prior the creation of our universe
Do you understand that this phrase is nonsense?

It is nonsensical, but it's hard to describe it any other way. Birth, perhaps?

Also, any sensible person shouldn't rule out the possibility of a deity, either. I'm not religious, by the way, but we cannot be absolutely sure. Maybe this "deity" is unlike anything depicted in our religions. Maybe there's no afterlife, and we aren't any more special to it than a hydrogen atom.

I see string theory as the most likely candidate for the cause of the universe, though.

We may never know.

6549
Serious / Re: The big bang and the origins of the universe
« on: January 15, 2015, 05:48:50 PM »
I'm not smart enough to debate this
If there is an infinite amount of time prior to us being here, there's no way for us to be here because that infinite amount of time, by definition, couldn't have passed.
Why do you assume we couldn't be here?
I'm not assuming. If there is an infinite amount of time before the occurrence of something, that something cannot occur because the time logically couldn't have passed yet--and it never would pass.

That is an assumption, though. What makes you think this just isn't our time to be here? We're pretty close to killing ourselves off and them we will be just another blip in the universe.

Time changes on perception, so if there was an infinite amount of time before us, we wouldn't exist right now because that infinite amount of time could not have passed (bear with me, time is an incredibly complex thing).

For example, heat death is the demise the universe will most likely meet predicting the current shape of the universe (flat). Before this final energy state is reached, the only things left (as everything else will have decayed or have been destroyed by quantum tunneling) in the universe will be supermassive black holes. These eventually evaporate, as they emit Hawking radiation. The deaths of these black holes will take an immense amount of time, but because they are the only objects left in the universe, this immense amount of time will happen instantaneously.

If time is infinite, though, that doesn't negate the opportunity for us to be apart of it. Time is definitely a complex subject, and many don't even believe it exists at all. It's definitely not linear as we perceive it.

Agreed, its definitely nowhere near as linear as we perceive it.

Maybe an infinite amount of time has passed, but we just can't tell because we don't know how it properly works. Ugh, it's so confusing thinking about it.

6550
Serious / Re: The big bang and the origins of the universe
« on: January 15, 2015, 05:38:43 PM »
I'm not smart enough to debate this
If there is an infinite amount of time prior to us being here, there's no way for us to be here because that infinite amount of time, by definition, couldn't have passed.
Why do you assume we couldn't be here?
I'm not assuming. If there is an infinite amount of time before the occurrence of something, that something cannot occur because the time logically couldn't have passed yet--and it never would pass.

That is an assumption, though. What makes you think this just isn't our time to be here? We're pretty close to killing ourselves off and them we will be just another blip in the universe.

Time changes on perception, so if there was an infinite amount of time before us, we wouldn't exist right now because that infinite amount of time could not have passed (bear with me, time is an incredibly complex thing).

For example, heat death is the demise the universe will most likely meet predicting the current shape of the universe (flat). Before this final energy state is reached, the only things left (as everything else will have decayed or have been destroyed by quantum tunneling) in the universe will be supermassive black holes. These eventually evaporate, as they emit Hawking radiation. The deaths of these black holes will take an immense amount of time, but because they are the only objects left in the universe, this immense amount of time will happen instantaneously.


6551
The Flood / Re: 100 Brock Lesnars VS 10 Silverback Gorillas
« on: January 15, 2015, 05:16:06 PM »
brock lensars easily

I'd say gorillas due to the fact they have some of the strongest jaws of any animal, not to mention their sheer physical strength and high pain threshold (especially when angry). Actually, even if it was 100 vs 10, but one gorilla at a time, you'd lose too many Brocks by the the 8th gorilla to finish them off.
ten brocks could easily hold down a gorilla though

Are you sure they'd even get close enough to hold it down? Gorillas have been observed ripping doors off cars and are fully capable of ripping limbs from a person.
But could they do it while fighting 9 other guys simultaneously? If the Gorilla can take the hits from 9 Brock Lesnars while ripping arms off, then that would work, but if it can't take that then well, y'know.

I think the Lesnars would have the benefit of better coordination and fighting technique. With those they could have a fair chance at winning.

Gorillas have extremely dense and thick bones, so they probably would be able to take a lot of hits. Their necks and head aren't even weak points due to this.
Eyeballs, Testes, Pressure Points, Temple? I'd imagine those would carry over as weak points on their anatomy, correct?

Most likely carry over as weak points. The pressure points are probably different though. I'm not entirely sure about the testes, either.

6552
The Flood / Re: 100 Brock Lesnars VS 10 Silverback Gorillas
« on: January 15, 2015, 05:10:07 PM »
brock lensars easily

I'd say gorillas due to the fact they have some of the strongest jaws of any animal, not to mention their sheer physical strength and high pain threshold (especially when angry). Actually, even if it was 100 vs 10, but one gorilla at a time, you'd lose too many Brocks by the the 8th gorilla to finish them off.
ten brocks could easily hold down a gorilla though

Are you sure they'd even get close enough to hold it down? Gorillas have been observed ripping doors off cars and are fully capable of ripping limbs from a person.
But could they do it while fighting 9 other guys simultaneously? If the Gorilla can take the hits from 9 Brock Lesnars while ripping arms off, then that would work, but if it can't take that then well, y'know.

I think the Lesnars would have the benefit of better coordination and fighting technique. With those they could have a fair chance at winning.

Gorillas have extremely dense and thick bones, so they probably would be able to take a lot of hits. Their necks and head aren't even weak points due to this.

6553
The Flood / Re: 100 Brock Lesnars VS 10 Silverback Gorillas
« on: January 15, 2015, 05:08:00 PM »
If the gorillas were pissed, they'd massacre whoever that dude is. They don't play.

Heck, I'd say 1 silverback vs 100 Brocks would be a close match.

6554
The Flood / Re: 100 Brock Lesnars VS 10 Silverback Gorillas
« on: January 15, 2015, 05:02:39 PM »
brock lensars easily

I'd say gorillas due to the fact they have some of the strongest jaws of any animal, not to mention their sheer physical strength and high pain threshold (especially when angry). Actually, even if it was 100 vs 10, but one gorilla at a time, you'd lose too many Brocks by the the 8th gorilla to finish them off.
ten brocks could easily hold down a gorilla though

Are you sure they'd even get close enough to hold it down? Gorillas have been observed ripping doors off cars and are fully capable of ripping limbs from a person.

6555
The Flood / Re: 100 Brock Lesnars VS 10 Silverback Gorillas
« on: January 15, 2015, 04:59:46 PM »
brock lensars easily

I'd say gorillas due to the fact they have some of the strongest jaws of any animal, not to mention their sheer physical strength and high pain threshold (especially when angry). Actually, even if it was 100 vs 10, but one gorilla at a time, you'd lose too many Brocks by the the 8th gorilla to finish them off.

6556
The Flood / 100 Brock Lesnars VS 10 Silverback Gorillas
« on: January 15, 2015, 04:52:56 PM »


Which would win?

6557
The Flood / Re: OFFICIAL CURRANTLY DOAN THRAEAD
« on: January 15, 2015, 04:08:13 PM »
Doing? Coursework and then probably Shadow of Mordor
Listening? Nothing
Reading? Psychology Textbook, Biography of Churchill, Advanced Psychology Textbook, 'How2moonrunesstage2'
Drinking? Some tea that went cold ;_;
Eating? Nothing
Feeling? Meh
>whats with this ing shit

Iting aing commoning practicing.

6558
The Flood / Re: OFFICIAL CURRANTLY DOAN THRAEAD
« on: January 15, 2015, 04:06:29 PM »
Doing? Nothing. Probably going to play some Omega Ruby in a while.
Listening? Nothing. Maybe some Of Monsters And Men in a bit.
Reading? This forum and /b/.
Drinking? Nothing. Maybe some water or orange juice in a bit.
Eating? Nothing. Well, if you count chewing gum as eating then yes, I am.
Feeling? A mix of weird and neutral.

6559
The Flood / Re: Dank memes
« on: January 15, 2015, 03:10:20 PM »

6560
The Flood / Re: Dank memes
« on: January 15, 2015, 03:03:41 PM »
ebin af dude :^)


6561
The Flood / Re: I made a B.net account in 2002
« on: January 15, 2015, 02:54:07 PM »
Nigger, I've been lurking there since before it was created.

6562
The Flood / Re: where the fuck is anarchy
« on: January 15, 2015, 12:29:50 PM »
How do I get into anarchy? And what are the few rules for it?

Anarchy isn't open right now. When the time comes that it's open again, you can request the "Beyond the Sea" nameplate to gain access. The rules are simple. Nothing illegal or grey area like loli or CP.

6563
The Flood / Re: Android Masta Race!!
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:30:48 AM »
I wasn't aware apples contained blood.

6564
The Flood / Re: Tattoo thread
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:25:25 AM »
Someday I might get a tattoo. It's prolly gonna be a tramp stamp, though.

Here's an interesting one:

6565
My rooms walls are painted deep blue. Not my favourite colour, but I like it.

6566
The Flood / Re: You have 10 seconds to prove you're not an americunt
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:11:35 AM »
What popped up when I searched "freedom" in Google images.
First result for "US freedom comic" for me.



Based Google.
But those are supposed to be like that. Here we are.

One of them looks like a Klansman.
Do you have some sort of problem with racial purity?

Not at all. I happen to be an avid user of Stormfront.

6567
The Flood / Re: You have 10 seconds to prove you're not an americunt
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:06:14 AM »
What popped up when I searched "freedom" in Google images.
First result for "US freedom comic" for me.



Based Google.
But those are supposed to be like that. Here we are.

One of them looks like a Klansman.

6568
The Flood / Re: has anyone else noticed the recent influx of new users?
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:59:21 AM »
This is a good thing. I'm getting sick of looking at the same people over and over.

6570
The Flood / Re: There's a Sep7agon Wiki, apparently
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:55:42 AM »
Someone only had one lines worth of shit about me?

Come the fuck on.

In the other wiki that got taken down there was an entire paragraph written about you.

Pages: 1 ... 217218219 220221 ... 382