le le see it maymay



le       
                               le

                       le
 le                                                                                                  le
                                               le

Quote from: Numb Digger on February 03, 2015, 10:49:37 AM

Quote from: Epsira on February 03, 2015, 10:46:38 AM

Quote from: Ushan on February 03, 2015, 10:41:39 AM

Quote from: Tyger on February 03, 2015, 10:07:40 AM

Quote from: Ushan on February 03, 2015, 01:10:06 AM

Quote from: Tyger on February 02, 2015, 01:20:02 PM

Quote from: Numb Digger on February 02, 2015, 12:54:39 PM

tfw gravelord nito is a good guy

and you murdered him

And Sif :"(

When the hell is killing a dog a good thing?

it's not. You kill him to rob the grave of his best friend . It's awful

Why would you do that?!

Kick ass weapons.
And a ring so you won't be swallowed by darkness.

I remember that sword being a pretty lame weapon, though. Dark Souls is weird in that a lot of the earlier weapons you get in the game are the best, and a lot of the weapons you think would be OP (like dragon or boss weapons) are complete and utter shit.

If you have the right stats for the weapons I think they're viable.
But you can get most of the best weapons I know of from the beginning. It also makes sense with the design choice for the upgrade system, From wanted players to stick with a weapon and master it over the course of the game, and putting out good weapons early would incite players to keep them.

Like the Black Knight weapons, for instance.

Yeah, I'm glad they did that. Dark Souls 1 had a lot of interesting and great design decisions.

le post le me le mes

le       
                               le

                       le
 le                                                                                                  le
                                               le

Quote from: Numb Digger on February 03, 2015, 10:47:58 AM

Quote from: G2 Hunt on February 03, 2015, 10:46:54 AM

Its really fucking stupid to bash something for being 'edgy' anyway.

I guess that goes for an opinion

Agreed. I think the stigma is really stupid. I like a lot of stuff that is considered "edgy" - but I'm capable of joking about it.

yee in hell Dinofag

ok kinder

Its really fucking stupid to bash something for being 'edgy' anyway.

I guess that goes for an opinion

Agreed. I think the stigma is really stupid. I like a lot of stuff that is considered "edgy" - but I'm capable of joking about it.

Quote from: Numb Digger on February 03, 2015, 08:02:30 AM

Enjoy what little of life you can, even if it is full of suffering.

You see, though, that's precisely what I'm saying. Like, yeah. Do that.

But why drag others into it? You don't have to have kids to enjoy your life--I would argue that kids tend to do the exact opposite.

I wasn't planning on having kids for the precise reason that they have a tendency to make life unenjoyable - not to mention the fact that I think there are too many people on the planet. So I suppose I am contributing to the cause of anti-natalism unwillingly.

Would anti-natalism apply to animals? Surely we can't know if an animal wants to be born willingly, and I'm guessing you won't exactly have a good time if you aren't born human in this world.

Of course, I would advocate the demise of humans if we ever develop robotics that are superior to our species.

Quote from: Numb Digger on February 03, 2015, 07:49:52 AM

Quote from: Nagato on February 03, 2015, 06:48:58 AM

Quote from: Numb Digger on February 03, 2015, 06:45:52 AM

Quote from: Nagato on February 03, 2015, 06:44:44 AM

Such a serious thread.

It is a serious thread. As you can see, I am typing in Times New Roman to prove how seriously serious this discussion is.

Global warming and climate change both refer to the observed century-scale rise in the average temperature of the Earth's climate system and its related effects. Multiple lines of scientific evidence show that the climate system is warming.[2][3] More than 90% of the additional energy stored in the climate system since 1970 has gone into ocean warming; the remainder has melted ice, and warmed the continents and atmosphere.[4][a] The observed increases in global average surface temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide have been much faster in recent decades than the natural changes of previous millennia, and levels are now higher than at any time for hundreds of thousands of years prior.[5][6]

Scientific understanding of the cause of global warming has been increasing. In its fourth assessment (AR4 2007) the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reported that scientists were more than 90% certain that most of global warming was being caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases produced by human activities (anthropogenic).[7][8][9] In 2010 that finding was recognized by the national science academies of all major industrialized nations.[10]

Climate model projections were summarized in the 2013 Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) by the IPCC. They indicated that during the 21st century the global surface temperature is likely to rise a further 0.3 to 1.7 °C (0.5 to 3.1 °F) for their lowest emissions scenario using stringent mitigation and 2.6 to 4.8 °C (4.7 to 8.6 °F) for their highest.[12]

Future climate change and associated impacts will vary from region to region around the globe.[13][14] The effects of an increase in global temperature include a rise in sea levels and a change in the amount and pattern of precipitation, as well as a probable expansion of subtropical deserts.[15] Warming is expected to be strongest in the Arctic, with the continuing retreat of glaciers, permafrost and sea ice. Other likely effects of the warming include more frequent extreme weather events including heat waves, droughts, heavy rainfall, and heavy snowfall;[16] ocean acidification; and species extinctions due to shifting temperature regimes. Effects significant to humans include the threat to food security from decreasing crop yields and the loss of habitat from inundation.[17][18]

Possible responses to global warming include mitigation by emissions reduction, adaptation to its effects, building systems resilient to its effects, and possible future climate engineering. Most countries are parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC),[19] whose ultimate objective is to prevent dangerous anthropogenic climate change.[20] The UNFCCC have adopted a range of policies designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions[21][22][23][24] and to assist in adaptation to global warming.[21][24][25][26] Parties to the UNFCCC have agreed that deep cuts in emissions are required,[27] and that future global warming should be limited to below 2.0 °C (3.6 °F) relative to the pre-industrial level.[27][c]

That sounds quite serious.

Doesn't it?

Yes. I will be taking this very seriously from now on. I mean that in most serious way I can.

Quote from: Numb Digger on February 03, 2015, 06:45:52 AM

Quote from: Nagato on February 03, 2015, 06:44:44 AM

Such a serious thread.

It is a serious thread. As you can see, I am typing in Times New Roman to prove how seriously serious this discussion is.

Global warming and climate change both refer to the observed century-scale rise in the average temperature of the Earth's climate system and its related effects. Multiple lines of scientific evidence show that the climate system is warming.[2][3] More than 90% of the additional energy stored in the climate system since 1970 has gone into ocean warming; the remainder has melted ice, and warmed the continents and atmosphere.[4][a] The observed increases in global average surface temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide have been much faster in recent decades than the natural changes of previous millennia, and levels are now higher than at any time for hundreds of thousands of years prior.[5][6]

Scientific understanding of the cause of global warming has been increasing. In its fourth assessment (AR4 2007) the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reported that scientists were more than 90% certain that most of global warming was being caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases produced by human activities (anthropogenic).[7][8][9] In 2010 that finding was recognized by the national science academies of all major industrialized nations.[10]

Climate model projections were summarized in the 2013 Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) by the IPCC. They indicated that during the 21st century the global surface temperature is likely to rise a further 0.3 to 1.7 °C (0.5 to 3.1 °F) for their lowest emissions scenario using stringent mitigation and 2.6 to 4.8 °C (4.7 to 8.6 °F) for their highest.[12]

Future climate change and associated impacts will vary from region to region around the globe.[13][14] The effects of an increase in global temperature include a rise in sea levels and a change in the amount and pattern of precipitation, as well as a probable expansion of subtropical deserts.[15] Warming is expected to be strongest in the Arctic, with the continuing retreat of glaciers, permafrost and sea ice. Other likely effects of the warming include more frequent extreme weather events including heat waves, droughts, heavy rainfall, and heavy snowfall;[16] ocean acidification; and species extinctions due to shifting temperature regimes. Effects significant to humans include the threat to food security from decreasing crop yields and the loss of habitat from inundation.[17][18]

Possible responses to global warming include mitigation by emissions reduction, adaptation to its effects, building systems resilient to its effects, and possible future climate engineering. Most countries are parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC),[19] whose ultimate objective is to prevent dangerous anthropogenic climate change.[20] The UNFCCC have adopted a range of policies designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions[21][22][23][24] and to assist in adaptation to global warming.[21][24][25][26] Parties to the UNFCCC have agreed that deep cuts in emissions are required,[27] and that future global warming should be limited to below 2.0 °C (3.6 °F) relative to the pre-industrial level.[27][c]

That sounds quite serious.

Such a serious thread.

It is a serious thread. As you can see, I am typing in Times New Roman to prove how seriously serious this discussion is.

Quote from: Numb Digger on February 03, 2015, 06:39:55 AM

Quote from: Elegiac on February 03, 2015, 06:34:59 AM

Quote from: Nagato on February 03, 2015, 06:28:27 AM

"Get your rat out" was just Gatsby being an ass to Kiyo, so I see why you'd like it.
"Bright eyed and bushy tailed" is a saying, not your catchphrase.

Gatsby has said it to various people over time.
'*Bright-eyed and bushy-tailed' is indeed a saying, but not one that was common before I introduced it. Since then it has been adopted and used for some time by both my admirers and detractors. Neutral parties also. For all intents and purposes it is my most memorable contribution, or even, my 'catchphrase' as you put it.


Don't try to chop logic with me

"Bright-eyed and bushy-tailed" is selection bias. Only you use it. Nobody else uses it, and to be quite frank, it's stupid.

Careful, he'll make a thread about why it's his.

Or I might get banned for disagreeing with him.

Quote from: Numb Digger on February 03, 2015, 06:31:07 AM

"Oh" deserves to be there.

Oh

oh

"Oh" deserves to be there.

Haha, that's an awesome sound.

Quote from: Numb Digger on February 02, 2015, 07:57:56 PM

haha loser i took one

thats illegal your gonin to jayl

oh