Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - clum clum

Pages: 1 ... 484950 5152 ... 382
1471
The Flood / Re: Bumptious fucking frogs!
« on: December 05, 2015, 11:58:40 PM »
If this is suppose to trigger me Dumb Digger, it isn't working. Try something else.

I was just seeing if you could handle a bit of banter this time round lad

This is banter? I'm bored out of my fucking mind here.

good, because this now means that you won't get mad if someone gives you a benny aye lad??

You're on drugs lol.

no no sir im str8 edge

I'm so bored.

go to bed or do your homework or something productive

1472
The Flood / Re: Bumptious fucking frogs!
« on: December 05, 2015, 11:56:36 PM »
If this is suppose to trigger me Dumb Digger, it isn't working. Try something else.

I was just seeing if you could handle a bit of banter this time round lad

This is banter? I'm bored out of my fucking mind here.

good, because this now means that you won't get mad if someone gives you a benny aye lad??

You're on drugs lol.

no no sir im str8 edge

1473
Watch Kill La Kill. It's good plus there's eyecandy.

1474
The Flood / Re: Bumptious fucking frogs!
« on: December 05, 2015, 11:53:31 PM »
If this is suppose to trigger me Dumb Digger, it isn't working. Try something else.

I was just seeing if you could handle a bit of banter this time round lad

This is banter? I'm bored out of my fucking mind here.

good, because this now means that you won't get mad if someone gives you a benny aye lad??

1475
The Flood / Re: Bumptious fucking frogs!
« on: December 05, 2015, 11:50:21 PM »
If this is suppose to trigger me Dumb Digger, it isn't working. Try something else.

I was just seeing if you could handle a bit of banter this time round lad

1476
The Flood / Bumptious fucking frogs!
« on: December 05, 2015, 11:42:42 PM »


****SUCH BIG NOSES ***SUPER UGLY ***EXTRA HAIRY**SMELEY TOO**
AROGENT >>POMPUS**WHITE SAND TOWEL HEADS TAKING UP JESUS..ARMOS CANT BE SAVED SINCE THE ARE WALKING ROTTING DEAD..
ERASE THE ARMO GARBARE RACE NOW ...
MONEY GRUBBING FOOLS..
LEARN TO SPEAK CLEAR ENGLISH YOU ALIEAN ENVADING DIRT BALL..
NO MORE ARMOS ALLOWED INTO THE USA.
NUTER ALL ARMOS OF BREEDING AGE..
ARA!!ARA!!!HYE CRAP TO YOU !!

armenians smell like shit and have yellow spots all around there face for some reason so they decide to put on a shit load of make up or get plastic surgery. infact, 90% of armenians go to glendale so they can get plastic surgery. dam straight son neva guna date sum ugly armenian.

1477
Gaming / Re: What game would you rate 0/10?
« on: December 05, 2015, 08:55:27 PM »
I don't think I could, to be honest.

A 0/10 implies that the product failed to reach even the bare minimum required to even be considered a "game", and that there's just nothing even remotely interesting or redeeming about it at all, on any level.

I don't think I've played a game that bad, but I'm sure they're out there.

I've joked about giving games 0/10s in the past, but that's all a 0/10 means to me, really--it's like a "joke" score.
No one ever gives them out seriously, so it's hard to take you seriously if you're going to be that harsh.

So I try not to be that harsh.

What about Big Rigs: Over the road racing? Shit barely qualifies as a game.

Funnily enough, this thread was originally going to be "Does any game truly deserve a 0/10 score?" but I couldn't be bothered and I just scrapped it.

1478
The Flood / Re: Jesus Condom
« on: December 05, 2015, 08:43:20 PM »
Who wants to know?

1479
Gaming / Re: What game would you rate 0/10?
« on: December 05, 2015, 08:41:25 PM »
uhhhh i have no idea

BS Infinite maybe

I wouldn't give them a 0/10, personally, but god damn I just couldn't enjoy the Bioshock games at all.

1480
Gaming / What game would you rate 0/10?
« on: December 05, 2015, 08:13:28 PM »
T4R


1481
The Flood / its raining bad outside
« on: December 05, 2015, 07:56:02 PM »
and it's cozy, thank you based desmond



post cozy shit

I made a blog post, what the fuck are you going to do about it, eh lad???

1482
The Flood / Re: think of anyone before entering this thread
« on: December 05, 2015, 07:49:53 PM »
What if you think of yourself? What kind of abstract nonsense is that?

1483
The Flood / Re: Travelling Solo
« on: December 05, 2015, 07:47:29 PM »
I travel to your mom's house every night.

But that's not really solo since I carpool with a bunch of Niggers who also come to see your mom.

classic banter

1485
Serious / Re: Oh look, I was right.
« on: December 05, 2015, 07:33:03 PM »
Isn't this guy like super pro gun anarchist? I'm not sure it's really worth it to present my side of things if that's the case.

Ad hominem.
No I'm honestly just curious. That's what I heard. Some people have said it's really hard to argue these things with him, especially if he shoots down the exact definition of things. I'm too tired and sad (dog dying) to personally attack people.

I see, well, my mistake, sorry.

1486
Serious / Re: Oh look, I was right.
« on: December 05, 2015, 07:32:02 PM »
Isn't this guy like super pro gun anarchist? I'm not sure it's really worth it to present my side of things if that's the case.

Ad hominem.
That's not an ad hominem. An ad hominem would be saying, "Yeah, well, as you can see, this guy's arguments are stupid as fuck because he too is a stupid fuck."

Luc is just saying that it's not really worth the time to argue with someone so far on the opposite end of the spectrum.

Please learn your fallacies before you use them.

That's literally what was said, though.

1487
Serious / Re: Oh look, I was right.
« on: December 05, 2015, 07:31:36 PM »
Guns really shouldn't be banned, and this is coming from someone in a place where they are. If you're going to commit a crime (murder, for example), you're going to commit a crime, gun or not.

Seriously, attack the person, not the weapon.
But as I said on the last page, a lot harder to kill a bunch of cunts with a sword.

Think the Sandy Hook Massacre would've gone down the same with if that dickfuck had come charging up to the schoolhouse with a scottish claymore?

He could have used a bomb - they're banned, aren't they?
And explosives also happen to be very easily made with rudimentary materials

But it's not like he could've come to the school with military grade C4. Home-made plastic explosives are usually pretty shit.

You could always put more effort into making a better bomb.

Also, guns are still quite easily obtainable in places where they are banned, if you are using them for criminal purposes.
Lmao, really now?

Because 30 grand is easily obtainable, eh?

The boys behind the Columbine massacre planted pipe bombs in the school, and had they succeeded in detonating, most people in the cafeteria at the time would have been killed.

1488
Serious / Re: Oh look, I was right.
« on: December 05, 2015, 07:29:55 PM »
Isn't this guy like super pro gun anarchist? I'm not sure it's really worth it to present my side of things if that's the case.

Ad hominem.

1489
Serious / Re: Oh look, I was right.
« on: December 05, 2015, 07:26:01 PM »
Guns really shouldn't be banned, and this is coming from someone in a place where they are. If you're going to commit a crime (murder, for example), you're going to commit a crime, gun or not.

Seriously, attack the person, not the weapon.
But as I said on the last page, a lot harder to kill a bunch of cunts with a sword.

Think the Sandy Hook Massacre would've gone down the same with if that dickfuck had come charging up to the schoolhouse with a scottish claymore?

He could have used a bomb - they're banned, aren't they?
And explosives also happen to be very easily made with rudimentary materials

But it's not like he could've come to the school with military grade C4. Home-made plastic explosives are usually pretty shit.

You could always put more effort into making a better bomb.

Also, guns are still quite easily obtainable in places where they are banned, if you are using them for criminal purposes.

1490
Serious / Re: Oh look, I was right.
« on: December 05, 2015, 07:23:14 PM »
Guns really shouldn't be banned, and this is coming from someone in a place where they are. If you're going to commit a crime (murder, for example), you're going to commit a crime, gun or not.

Seriously, attack the person, not the weapon.
And when you commit this crime with a knife you're far less likely to kill the same amount of people someone with a gun.

Let's not be retarded here. Most people shouldn't have guns.

Again, bombs are what I had in mind.

However, I do think that a background check (particularly in the areas of mental health) should be mandatory before being allowed to own a firearm (probably should've mentioned that at first tbh).

1491
Serious / Re: Oh look, I was right.
« on: December 05, 2015, 07:21:17 PM »
Guns really shouldn't be banned, and this is coming from someone in a place where they are. If you're going to commit a crime (murder, for example), you're going to commit a crime, gun or not.

Seriously, attack the person, not the weapon.
But as I said on the last page, a lot harder to kill a bunch of cunts with a sword.

Think the Sandy Hook Massacre would've gone down the same with if that dickfuck had come charging up to the schoolhouse with a scottish claymore?

He could have used a bomb - they're banned, aren't they?


1492
Serious / Re: Oh look, I was right.
« on: December 05, 2015, 07:17:31 PM »
Guns really shouldn't be banned, and this is coming from someone in a place where they are. If you're going to commit a crime (murder, for example), you're going to commit a crime, gun or not.

Seriously, attack the person, not the weapon.

1493
The Flood / Re: What is your favourite type of biscuit?
« on: December 05, 2015, 07:13:46 PM »
Good quality chocolate digestives are the shit.

The cheap ones make me want to kill myself.

1494
The Flood / Re: What is your favourite type of biscuit?
« on: December 05, 2015, 07:11:06 PM »
Oat biscuits. Holy fucking god I could just eat them all day. I'm like the cookie monster, except I'm the oat biscuit monster.

1495
Serious / Re: Oh look, I was right.
« on: December 05, 2015, 06:06:55 PM »
"There's no way to stop this from happening" - only first-world country where mass-shootings happen regularly
Almost nobody's actually saying that.

We're just saying your solution is retarded and overreaching.
What's Cindy's solution?
I mean, tbh, I like shooting guns, but let's be real - assault weaponry shouldn't be available to just have in your home.

Carry and use of high-caliber and automatic weaponry should be restricted for shooting ranges. You can argue that you might need a shotgun or a small pistol for self-defense, but I dunno what kind of thief would need to be put down with a Browning.

The recent shooting, for example, could have been done with a shotgun or a pistol. Would there be less victims? Maybe. Would people still die? Yes.

All guns kill you just as dead.

1498
The Flood / Re: I know what Luciana looks like
« on: December 05, 2015, 05:56:26 PM »

1500
The Flood / Re: oh man, my band name is p cool
« on: December 05, 2015, 05:53:58 PM »
pity reply

Pages: 1 ... 484950 5152 ... 382