1
The Flood / Re: long or short?
« on: November 17, 2016, 02:01:55 PM »
You look like spongebob in the bottom one.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1
The Flood / Re: long or short?« on: November 17, 2016, 02:01:55 PM »
You look like spongebob in the bottom one.
2
Gaming / Re: Pokemon Thread (Massive Spoilers Page 49 and Beyond!)« on: November 16, 2016, 10:42:46 AM »So Nintendo are dishing out permanent bans for people who played the leaked/pirated version of sun/moon online. The tears on /vp/ are delicious. I mean, what were they expecting? 3
Serious / Re: Trump to be coached by Obama, surprised by "scope of job."« on: November 15, 2016, 09:41:46 AM »
That isn't surprising, especially when you consider the fact that Trump's body language after that meeting with Obama suggests that he learned something.
4
Gaming / Re: Pokemon Thread (Massive Spoilers Page 49 and Beyond!)« on: November 14, 2016, 09:11:18 AM »Defend this 5
Gaming / Re: Pokemon Thread (Massive Spoilers Page 49 and Beyond!)« on: November 14, 2016, 08:57:24 AM »>No Sceptile Dragon Pulse Wtf, Gamefreak? Ugh, this really annoys me. It's always 1 step forward and 2 steps back with them. 6
The Flood / Re: Starting the atkins diet tomorrow« on: November 13, 2016, 07:35:25 PM »Skipping meals and the like won't help you lose weight, because not only do you risk running into starvation mode (where your body holds on to every little bit of fat it can get), but also the fact that starving yourself will make you eat more later to compensate.that makes sense, I wish I would've known about that months ago tho Well, the more you know. If Atkin's doesn't work for you, just know that eating like 2 calories a day is extremely bad for your health and won't give you the results you're looking for. 7
The Flood / Re: Starting the atkins diet tomorrow« on: November 13, 2016, 07:22:48 PM »
Skipping meals and the like won't help you lose weight, because not only do you risk running into starvation mode (where your body holds on to every little bit of fat it can get), but also the fact that starving yourself will make you eat more later to compensate.
8
Serious / Re: If you're not even willing to consider the possibility of Trump being benevolent« on: November 13, 2016, 03:40:14 PM »Nobody ever asked Clinton or Obama if they would accept the results, yet they both did so with grace and professionalism You can tell that Trump is the submissive one of the two in these pictures, and Obama is asserting his authority over him. 9
Gaming / Re: I bought Dark Souls 3« on: November 13, 2016, 03:37:13 PM »
Eugh, I got this game a while back, and it felt like it was just pandering to Dark Souls 1 fans the whole time with "HEY LOL REMEMBER DIZ IN THA FIRST GAEM?". I eventually traded it in -- something I don't normally do with games.
My biggest complaints about it by far is the lack of poise, and the removal of many good features that came with Dark Souls 2 (since that game got an overwhelming amount of hatred, and I assume after gauging their reaction, From just said "whelp, that game sucks balls, lets just try and retcon it out of the series"). Also, if you pick the Knight, you get the best weapon and armor set in the game, and you'll never need to use anything else, from a technical viewpoint. 10
Serious / Re: Still down/exhausted about the election?« on: November 13, 2016, 03:27:50 PM »Does shit like this happen with every presidential election? 11
The Flood / Re: what's this name again?« on: November 13, 2016, 01:06:36 PM »
Mike "You have nothing to fear if you're not queer" Pence
12
Serious / Re: Trump's cabinet« on: November 12, 2016, 08:19:28 AM »Damn you are one retarded motherfucker.Anyway, if people decide to wake up, make an effort on conserving the environment, and it turns out I was wrong, and we actually save it? Good. Wonderful. I couldn't be happier about being wrong.Then why do you rule it out altogether, though? There's thousands upon thousands of experts and scientists out there who are vastly more knowledgeable on this topic than you or I will ever be. The fact that they still present solutions, support policy reducing pollution and that we're still seeing a ton of research appearing on this topic should kind of tell us that no, this isn't a done deal and that we're not guaranteed to be irreversibly fucked by an environmental catastrophy soon. Your comments would suggest that the entire scientific world has thrown their hands in the air and went "well, might as well just stop caring altogether because we're fucked", when that really couldn't be farther from the truth. So yeah, I'd say that it's extremely valid for people to still care about who we put in charge of our environmental policy and that even though we've already caused some irreversible damage to the environment, leaving its future up to people who have literally made a living on selling pseudo-science and "fighting" environmental protectionists is a pretty damn bad idea. Lol, fuck off. At least I'm generating discussion, and not posting shit about Deci getting raped. 13
Serious / Re: Trump's cabinet« on: November 11, 2016, 04:38:55 PM »Anyway, if people decide to wake up, make an effort on conserving the environment, and it turns out I was wrong, and we actually save it? Good. Wonderful. I couldn't be happier about being wrong.Then why do you rule it out altogether, though? There's thousands upon thousands of experts and scientists out there who are vastly more knowledgeable on this topic than you or I will ever be. The fact that they still present solutions, support policy reducing pollution and that we're still seeing a ton of research appearing on this topic should kind of tell us that no, this isn't a done deal and that we're not guaranteed to be irreversibly fucked by an environmental catastrophy soon. Your comments would suggest that the entire scientific world has thrown their hands in the air and went "well, might as well just stop caring altogether because we're fucked", when that really couldn't be farther from the truth. So yeah, I'd say that it's extremely valid for people to still care about who we put in charge of our environmental policy and that even though we've already caused some irreversible damage to the environment, leaving its future up to people who have literally made a living on selling pseudo-science and "fighting" environmental protectionists is a pretty damn bad idea. That's a fair point. I guess while we're still here it can't hurt to try. Although, I think that Trump's cabinet will become more educated on these issues as they settle down -- I'm sure it's common knowledge that these people are lacking in the experience department. But you know what? Experience can be gained, and I think we should give them a chance. 14
Serious / Re: Trump's cabinet« on: November 11, 2016, 04:26:02 PM »Like Flee said, it's still a heavily researched subject and many still believe that limiting the damage is a possibility. It's not already completely gone, either; ocean's still rising, ice is still melting, average temperature is still rising. If we don't do something about it, it might be catastrophic by 2100. But there would still be land, ice, etc, just significantly less.When your argument is "we've already done the damage, no point in trying anymore" it kind of is. It's not a matter of reversibility, it's limiting the damage we've already doled out, eg the Amazon will never be the same but we can at least preserve what's left.Can someone explain to me why everyone is making such a big deal about climate change deniers in office when the damage that has been done is irreversible?Should we leave forest fires alone once they've destroyed a few houses? Damage is already done, no point in trying to rein them in anymore at that point. Well, that's the optimistic side of it -- you also have the pessimists whose tone sounds like something along the lines of what I've been saying. 15
Serious / Re: Trump's cabinet« on: November 11, 2016, 04:23:19 PM »If I was nihilistic about this, it would mean that I would not care, nor would I post it to begin with.You also wouldn't do anything because it's physically impossible to go full nihilist. The bottom line is that you're still an attention-craving human being just like everybody else, and because you're an angsty twenty-something on the Internet, you still have some nihilistic tendencies. Like saying climate change doesn't matter because the world is fucked anyway. Call it "pessimistic defeatism" or whatever you want--I'll call it what it is.No, my argument is "we've already completely destroyed itThen you're just factually wrong. My stance on nihilism has changed quite a bit since I last posted here -- it's not something I really identify with anymore, for the record. Anyway, if people decide to wake up, make an effort on conserving the environment, and it turns out I was wrong, and we actually save it? Good. Wonderful. I couldn't be happier about being wrong. Only time will tell, though. 16
Serious / Re: Trump's cabinet« on: November 11, 2016, 04:14:41 PM »When your argument is "we've already done the damage, no point in trying anymore" it kind of is. It's not a matter of reversibility, it's limiting the damage we've already doled out, eg the Amazon will never be the same but we can at least preserve what's left.Can someone explain to me why everyone is making such a big deal about climate change deniers in office when the damage that has been done is irreversible?Should we leave forest fires alone once they've destroyed a few houses? Damage is already done, no point in trying to rein them in anymore at that point. No, my argument is "we've already completely destroyed it and then some, no point in trying anymore". 17
Serious / Re: Trump's cabinet« on: November 11, 2016, 04:11:18 PM »Nihilists belong in a landfill. There's a difference between being pessimistically defeatist about something, and being nihilistic about it. If I was nihilistic about this, it would mean that I would not care, nor would I post it to begin with. 18
Serious / Re: Trump's cabinet« on: November 11, 2016, 04:01:48 PM »Can someone explain to me why everyone is making such a big deal about climate change deniers in office when the damage that has been done is irreversible?Should we leave forest fires alone once they've destroyed a few houses? Damage is already done, no point in trying to rein them in anymore at that point. Global disruption and destruction of ecosystems can hardly be compared to a forest fire. 19
Serious / Re: Trump's cabinet« on: November 11, 2016, 03:48:04 PM »
Can someone explain to me why everyone is making such a big deal about climate change deniers in office when the damage that has been done is irreversible?
Don't get me wrong, I believe climate change is very real, and I think protecting the environment is an important thing, but to say there's hope at this point is delusional -- you people are the REAL climate change deniers. 20
Gaming / Re: Anyone here playing Heroes of the Storm?« on: November 11, 2016, 02:48:23 PM »
I'm going to start playing it to get the skin on the 15th -- I could send you a recruit link if you want.
21
The Flood / Re: b-but warren is a BITCH I cant support a woman if she's not sunshine and roses!!« on: November 11, 2016, 02:30:50 PM »I never said anything differently. "Make my mind up"? What?LOL, the type of male youre describing is in such short supplyNEWSFLASHfuck the modern maleYou're one of them, though. The world isn't sunshine and rainbows for a reason, you cannot force something that does not exist, and you will only continue to make things worse for yourself and people around you if you do. Not that you will listen, because you are completely insane. 22
The Flood / Re: b-but warren is a BITCH I cant support a woman if she's not sunshine and roses!!« on: November 11, 2016, 02:26:11 PM »LOL, the type of male youre describing is in such short supplyNEWSFLASHfuck the modern maleYou're one of them, though. The modern male is the same as its been for centuries? Make your fucking mind up. Masculinity is what built civilization, and the world has become a markedly worse place with the advent of numales, you delusional retard. 23
The Flood / Re: b-but warren is a BITCH I cant support a woman if she's not sunshine and roses!!« on: November 11, 2016, 02:23:10 PM »By "one of them" I mean the feminized, submissive, mentally-ill males that are nothing short of an epidemic in today's society.get real No, you need to get real, fuckface. One day you will wake up from fantasyland. 24
The Flood / Re: b-but warren is a BITCH I cant support a woman if she's not sunshine and roses!!« on: November 11, 2016, 02:19:57 PM »NEWSFLASHfuck the modern maleYou're one of them, though. By "one of them" I mean the feminized, submissive, mentally-ill males that are nothing short of an epidemic in today's society. Class seems to have confused the "modern male" with real men, which he despises -- because he has gender dysphoria, and he projects his dissatisfaction with the biological sex he was assigned at birth onto other men. 25
The Flood / Re: b-but warren is a BITCH I cant support a woman if she's not sunshine and roses!!« on: November 11, 2016, 01:54:37 PM »fuck the modern male You're one of them, though. 26
The Flood / Re: 4chan is all right« on: November 10, 2016, 11:37:35 PM »Don't go on 4chan. That'll be the worst decision of your Internet life. What's so bad about 4chan? 27
The Flood / Re: trump vs america« on: November 10, 2016, 11:30:37 PM »
Vs. America? Trump IS America.
29
The Flood / Re: what a disgusting fucked up society« on: November 10, 2016, 05:40:33 PM »"I'm not racist guys I just love Trump cause he tells it like it is"Who are you to say who belongs in America and who doesn't, you fucking mongrel? I have family that has made the ultimate sacrifice for America. What have you done for America?Nah, you're racist. You just like to think I'm racist because I'm the big bad white man and only whitey can be racist, which is discrimination, which is racism.HAHAHA, no I'm not. Anybody can be racist. Your own race has nothing to do with it. You're not American either, Iranian. 30
The Flood / Re: 4chan is all right« on: November 10, 2016, 05:18:40 PM »
I remember seeing you on /fa/ once.
|