Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - God

Pages: 123 45 ... 22
61
>Fighting over Transhumanism
>Robots took ur jerbs
>World War 3
>Corporations rule the world


This whole trailer is like one giant cliche.

62
The Flood / Re: Someone just fucking died and it's being streamed
« on: June 13, 2015, 11:30:14 AM »
Why the fuck is it blocked because of copyright?

Why would SME have a copyright on people overdosing? o_O


63
The Flood / Re: why do people have to like shit that i hate
« on: June 11, 2015, 11:12:54 PM »
Hate makes me strong.

64
The Flood / Re: Morty Thread
« on: June 10, 2015, 06:13:21 PM »
YouTube

65
The Flood / Re: when we say "pretty"
« on: June 06, 2015, 10:00:15 PM »
It's a sentence enhancer.

66
The Flood / Re: Falling into the Earth
« on: June 06, 2015, 09:53:37 PM »
Warning: The Sun is really bright.

It's the fucking sun what do you expect.

67
The Flood / Re: "Five men at atomic ground zero."
« on: June 06, 2015, 09:50:53 PM »
Imagine how different things could have been, if these men had only known of the weebery they would indirectly unleash upon the world.

68
The Flood / Re: Bang the user's avatar above you
« on: June 06, 2015, 09:47:42 PM »
I'll penetrate you bby

no plz

Lets see just how far that lip can split.

69
It's pretty much the equivalent of showing Jews behind a barbed wire fence and using the word "concentration".
Is it bad that reading this immediately made me imagine some orange juice brand called "Orange Jews now from Concentrate."

70
Serious / Re: Genesis 30:37-39
« on: June 06, 2015, 10:08:26 AM »
Well how else do you think zebras are made? You think they just pop out of some hole somewhere?

71
I have no idea how you construed my simple response into some sort of SJW crusade.

Sorry, after the first sentence I went on a tangential response to the article. Might as well take out your quote even.

72
The whole "they do x so they might as well do y" is one of the most annoying non-arguments I keep seeing people use in regards fiction. A fictional story that intends to be taken seriously needs to maintain suspension of disbelief. The easiest way to do it is to have the setting be derived from something familiar to the intended audience. That's the route the Witcher takes, it balances the absurdness of its fantastical elements by grounding it in the idea that "hey, this is supposed to be like medieval Poland as the pagans imagined it" thus making it easier to accept the fictional world.

Of course the mere existence of nonwhite characters in the Witcher would not break suspension of disbelief, but given the setting they would be at high risk of coming off as shoehorned in or even worse being token characters. Then there's also the reason why you don't see Aztec gods in God of War or samurai in Wolfenstein: while the developers could add them in, they don't fit in with with the setting's theme and thus I find it hardly reasonable to expect such alterations.

It goes both ways too, in settings like science fiction or modern day having diverse characters is typically what would be expected and in that case not having multiple races represented would be questionable. Same deal if was set somewhere that you wouldn't expect many white people yet all the main characters were white, that could be reasonably considered whitewashing. However covering all genres under such blanket standards is, if I may say, a toxic form of idea policing that's generally uncalled for.

73
The Flood / Re: Shia Labeouf - How to Become a Super Saiyan
« on: June 05, 2015, 12:50:52 AM »
My favorite so far:
YouTube

74
The Flood / Re: I actually found good defenses for pedophilia
« on: May 28, 2015, 05:34:36 PM »
There are two.

And quite frankly, if you're not fucking autistic, neither of them matter.
having kids is wrong
and little boys can't get pregnant. Verbatim confirmed NAMBLA member.

75
The Flood / Re: God cannot exist
« on: May 26, 2015, 06:59:31 PM »
I don't really listen to music anyway.

76
The Flood / Re: Anybody ever wanked in public?
« on: May 26, 2015, 06:53:37 PM »
Nope, I always make sure to wring out every drop each day before leaving the house.

77
The Flood / Re: Anime Thread :^)
« on: May 22, 2015, 05:22:34 PM »

78
The Flood / Re: This is the worst staged arrest I have ever seen.
« on: May 22, 2015, 04:54:48 PM »
Were there people who actually believed these were real?

79
The Flood / Re: Anime Thread :^)
« on: May 22, 2015, 10:29:12 AM »

>You will never have your fluids drained by a thirsty slime loli.

80
The Flood / Re: Anime Thread :^)
« on: May 22, 2015, 09:54:41 AM »
Question: Does it count as sexual objectification if they aren't human?


81
The Flood / Re: does anyone on sep7agon actually exist?
« on: May 20, 2015, 12:02:33 PM »
I know I don't.

82
Considering that spyware is software and thus nonphysical, no.

83
The Flood / Re: I swear this show is about terrorsm.
« on: May 18, 2015, 09:11:55 PM »
Dat animation doh.

84
Serious / Re: Is socialism solid in theory? No, I don't think so
« on: May 14, 2015, 11:30:02 AM »
So in other words Meta=right and Verby=wrong. Got it.

85
The Flood / Re: Too nukes? More like too few.
« on: May 13, 2015, 01:37:38 PM »
the only bad thing that came from that was the huge bloody meme with the loli's dumb outfit
TELL ME ABOUT HESTIA, WHY DOES SHE WEAR THE RIBBON?
Hestia la Bestia
*breastia

86
The Flood / Re: Too nukes? More like too few.
« on: May 13, 2015, 01:27:17 PM »
the only bad thing that came from that was the huge bloody meme with the loli's dumb outfit
TELL ME ABOUT HESTIA, WHY DOES SHE WEAR THE RIBBON?

87
The Flood / Re: The mods aren't online so post loli pics.
« on: March 28, 2015, 11:06:31 AM »
I know this is a bit of a necro-bump, but I found this gem and felt I needed to post it.



88
The Flood / Re: >he likes mechs but doesnt like battletech's designs
« on: March 28, 2015, 12:55:58 AM »
In a battle of the impractical, the battletech designs are more practical.

I'm not so sure. I'm not a mech fan so I'm not too familiar with battletech or armored core, but I see far more flaws in the battletechs looking through some of their images.



For starters, they all seem to share the same leg designs, with large thick limbs and circular joints. The problem with that is there appear to only be about 3-4 joints per limb, each of which bend all on the same plane. If the terrain was uneven there's no way it would be able to maintain it's balance, negating the point of even having legs.

Even worse, there doesn't even seem to be any room for the joints to rotate sideways, it shouldn't even be able to turn!


The armored core design is a whole different animal.



First off it appears to mimic human physique, one that we know can maintain balance and uneven terrain. Sure there are a lot more moving parts but look at its stance, the legs have a good range of movement around the hip joint and the knee and ankle joints appear to be able to pivot side to side.

It's a lot more complicated and less protected than the battletech legs, but at least they could actually walk.

Plus they are a lot closer to the kind of machines the military is actually developing:
YouTube


The joints do look too small for its size but I could accept it if it's operated by artifical muscles instead of hydraulics. The only thing i don't get is why it has such long arms and hands. Those would make balancing even harder and just having guns attached directly would be much more sensible. Seriously, why does a mech need hands?

89
The Flood / Re: >he likes mechs but doesnt like battletech's designs
« on: March 27, 2015, 11:44:57 PM »
what the fuck is that anime fantasy impractical bullshit

Are you implying a bipedal mech design is ever practical?

90
The Flood / Re: LMAO ANIME
« on: March 25, 2015, 04:48:18 PM »
Your just jealous because you're not faaaaaaaaaabulous.


Pages: 123 45 ... 22