This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - God
Pages: 1 ... 171819 202122
541
« on: September 14, 2014, 11:57:57 AM »
If you want to raise your kids without hitting them, go right ahead.
But why should you tell other people how to raise their kids?
Because this is a threat to the child's safety and well-being?
Having a few cuts/bruises is a threat to a childs safety?
I guess every single child in the world is having their safety threatened.
Lets say that someone molested their kid because they were molested themselves and thought it was okay. It doesn't threaten the child's physical safety, so would you still say not to tell them how to raise their kids?
542
« on: September 14, 2014, 10:12:47 AM »
 The beating allegedly resulted in numerous injuries to the child, including cuts and bruises to the child’s back, buttocks, ankles, legs and scrotum, along with defensive wounds to the child’s hands. So none of this seems excessive to you?
543
« on: September 14, 2014, 09:31:44 AM »
Red God standing by. 
544
« on: September 14, 2014, 01:17:32 AM »
What foul force drives men to do such things.
545
« on: September 14, 2014, 12:41:42 AM »
Here we go again. 
546
« on: September 14, 2014, 12:37:32 AM »
So...I have an 8 year old with down syndrome so I'm trying to figure out what you're trying to imply? Are you making it out to be an insult? Because if that's the case you should have just stated your dissatisfaction like an adult. Now you truly look like an ass. And I can say that because this child with trisomy 21 is my life. Well, you managed to ruffle up at least one person.
547
« on: September 13, 2014, 11:09:14 PM »
 *Tips fedildo.
548
« on: September 13, 2014, 11:05:14 PM »
 Good luck pulling this one out.
549
« on: September 13, 2014, 10:55:09 PM »
Oh internet, the wacky world of wonder.
I don't even, this is a thing, my fucking god.
And there's more. So much more.
550
« on: September 13, 2014, 10:26:02 PM »
Oh internet, the wacky world of wonder.
551
« on: September 13, 2014, 10:20:19 PM »
552
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:39:51 PM »
I was waiting for you to post that one. 
553
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:31:29 PM »
SC said the AoC should be lowered to 14. How is he correct that the shittiest of Europe is a good model?
So Germany and Italy are some of the shittiest countries in Europe? What about France, Sweden, Iceland or Denmark where the AoC is 15? I think it's been proven to pretty much everyone else on this forum that you're full of shit, so this will be my last post on this topic.
554
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:18:08 PM »
Except that isn't true. It's not hard to fact check while on the internet.
What? There are four countries with AoC laws higher than 16. . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#mediaviewer/File:Age_of_Consent_-_Global.svg
Have you suffered brain trauma or something?
We're talking about Europe here.
So look at Europe and count...
 Are you fucking colorblind? Green = 18, Brown = 17 Dark blue = 16 Blue = 15 Light blue = 14 Cyan = 13 Does Europe look green or brown to you?
556
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:14:07 PM »
exploitation
Adults having sex with 14 year olds is exploitation. I'm well aware of the word and how it's used.
Some old man trying to get into a 14 year old's pants? Not really exploitation, but certainly creepy. Though that's just as creepy as if an old man is trying to have sex with an 18 year old, or a 16 year old.
But a 16-18 year old dating a 14 year old? A teenager dating a teenager? No, the older kid shouldn't be branded a sex offender for the rest of his life for that.
It's exploitation because they're too young to be making decisions that may ultimately ruin their life. I wouldn't support the AoC if it was only in place because I found it creepy.
Do you think that Europe is an immoral shithole then? There are only a couple of European countries with AoC over 16 and they for the most part laugh at how prudish Americans are.
Except that isn't true. It's not hard to fact check while on the internet.
 Image is a little outdated since Spain recently raise it from 13 to 16. Of course there are conditions, in Germany it is 14, but only if the other partner is under 21.
557
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:06:45 PM »
exploitation
Adults having sex with 14 year olds is exploitation. I'm well aware of the word and how it's used.
Some old man trying to get into a 14 year old's pants? Not really exploitation, but certainly creepy. Though that's just as creepy as if an old man is trying to have sex with an 18 year old, or a 16 year old.
But a 16-18 year old dating a 14 year old? A teenager dating a teenager? No, the older kid shouldn't be branded a sex offender for the rest of his life for that.
It's exploitation because they're too young to be making decisions that may ultimately ruin their life. I wouldn't support the AoC if it was only in place because I found it creepy.
Do you think that Europe is an immoral shithole then? There are only a couple of European countries with AoC over 16 and they for the most part laugh at how prudish Americans are.
558
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:58:38 PM »
Leave it to Le Dustin to ruin somebody else's thread.
Mr. P said this wasn't a serious thread, so it's fine.
Actually that makes it even less cool. I came here to have fun. If Mr. P was fine with it he wouldn't have muted you.
559
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:56:43 PM »
Leave it to Le Dustin to ruin somebody else's thread.
560
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:08:45 PM »
If you disagree that exploiting children is bad, then yes, you are enabling pedophilia and child abuse. It has nothing to do with my stake in the matter, though I'm just glad the majority of society is against child exploitation.
That's not what people are disagreeing with you on. What people here are giving you shit for are the following: 1). That European age of consent laws support pedophiles and child exploitation. 2). Or you repeatedly saying this forum is okay with pedophilia, when the majority don't even disagree with #1.
561
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:40:55 PM »
The poll is your only piece of evidence you have to support you claim. Besides, there aren't even any votes for the ones actually involving children, how do you know if the people who weren't trolling aren't just European where the age of consent ranges from 14-16 with only a few exceptions.
I'm not making a claim here. I said twice in this thread already that I made the poll to figure out what the forum really believed on the subject, nothing more and nothing less.
*cue music* So here's the problem: it started off as a few people arguing about the things above. Later a much larger group of people began to defend them, which led me to believe either one of two things: that this forum is very argumentative and will argue with anyone on any stance just because they don't like the person; or two, that this forum has a legitimate pedophilic culture. it seems as if everyone on this forum is defending those who want to exploit children. a bunch of you are defending people who hold opinions that it's okay to exploit children. Sorry I didn't know it was bait to make a big deal out of the fact that people find it okay to exploit children. I must be such a troll for caring about it. I listed four opinions to see who agreed with them. And it appears as if there are multiple people that do and here you are still defending them. this argument is about how people hold the opinions listed in the top four poll options and people like you are defending them. That doesn't fly with me and frankly not the rest of society I said people were accepting of pedophilia And probably all just to get on the good side of the people who I pissed off by trying to fight the people who hold opinions that it's okay to exploit children. If I can't change those opinions who find it okay to have nude pictures of children or to have sex with a teenager, then I can only do what I can with the few opinions I have left. If this forum really wants to defend the exploitation of children then their stances need to be loud and clear. Frankly I'm just more concerned about the mental health here than my own reputation. If that's a problem for you then disassociate yourself from me. I honestly wouldn't care at this point. I don't think you actually went back to thread. As I said, people were arguing, mainly, that nude pictures kids and teens take of themselves should be allowed to circulate the internet. The main issue is the people going around saying nude pictures of children and teenagers circulating the internet isn't a bad thing, or worse, is a good thing Because it's not just a few guys, it's the massive amount of people defending them. I'm talking about this problem with the culture here Pedophile acceptance more specifically. I understand pedophiles can't help themselves. What can be helped is everyone else defending policies that exploit children. this forum is okay with pedophilia.
562
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:29:50 PM »
Except a poll is not a claim, dumbass. Meta is just trying to draw attention away from the results by saying I can't validate no one is trolling.
The poll is your only piece of evidence you have to support you claim. Besides, there aren't even any votes for the ones actually involving children, how do you know if the people who weren't trolling aren't just European where the age of consent ranges from 14-16 with only a few exceptions.
563
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:18:50 PM »
Cool story. It's not up to me to prove the people who voted are just trolling, nor is it even necessary.
>Makes claim >"It's not up to me to prove that it's true."
564
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:10:08 PM »
I'm gonna have to agree with Dustin on this issue. If you find little kids attractive, you need to seek help ASAP.
That's not what anybody has been saying though, look at the poll. Dustin is going after this whole forum because a few people said America should change it's age of consent laws to be like Europe's.
565
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:32:04 PM »
Wait, did Dustin really post nude pics? No, he just accused this forum of having "pedophilic culture" because a few users support lowering the age of consent by a couple years or are attracted to anime characters. Then went on to spam multiple threads on the same topic and made threats to have the police investigate this site's users.
566
« on: September 13, 2014, 03:58:25 PM »
Wow, that poll sure does reinforce the claim that this place is a haven for pedophiles.
567
« on: September 13, 2014, 01:22:10 PM »
568
« on: September 13, 2014, 01:17:45 PM »
What the hell happened to that site in general?
There's the huge ugly red banner for Centipede that makes the site look like it's under construction or a crime scene, and my mailbox is full of alerts from the group chats that won't go away.
569
« on: September 13, 2014, 11:02:49 AM »
I can point you to four users that spam drawings of sexualized pictures of children here.
Oh, so this whole time you've just been talking about anime. Gotta keep those pixels safe.
570
« on: September 13, 2014, 10:28:05 AM »
>That moment you have Nevada skies installed and this starts playing during a rainstorm.
Pages: 1 ... 171819 202122
|
Show Posts
