This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Dapper Droid
121
« on: December 03, 2016, 12:37:38 AM »
But there are.
>Star Trek
>Good or relevant after Jew Jew
>New series being shown only on a paid subscription service that is not mainstreamed
>Filled with SJW content, going overboard evenf or Star Trek
>SJW advertising of the show
The show won't make it past half the first season before its canned.
Okay? The point is that it's canon. Muslims exist in the Star Trek universe.
SJWs are on the right side of history, btw
>Muslim crewmember >Series takes place right before TOS >A time when everyone tips their fedora Breaking canon before they even start, top kek. also >We love gays and trannies, >lets import people that want to kill gays and trannies Either you'll breed out of existence, or your brown friends will throw you off roofs. You won't be apart of history for more than a generation if you get your way.
122
« on: December 03, 2016, 12:30:59 AM »
But there are.
>Star Trek >Good or relevant after Jew Jew >New series being shown only on a paid subscription service that is not mainstreamed >Filled with SJW content, going overboard even for Star Trek >SJW advertising of the show >Star Trek being good after Deep Space 9 The show won't make it past half the first season before its canned.
123
« on: December 03, 2016, 12:22:31 AM »
124
« on: December 03, 2016, 12:20:28 AM »
> It's a "He couldn't even pleasure his wife, so she cheated on him" episode
125
« on: December 02, 2016, 10:40:11 PM »
>A multiplayer game with no story and 3 million terabytes of porn won
>Liking notindianajones man
This thread is cancer.
126
« on: December 02, 2016, 04:04:18 PM »
I have to wonder if people who say BF1 isn't as in depth as past battlefield games have actually played past battlefield games.
"I'm just going to make a vague statement instead of explaining my point and adding to the discussion."
Please, elaborate.
I don't think I really have to considering what you've posted. If you seriously think that BF1 and SWBF play the same you've never played either and are probably basing this off of youtube videos you've seen or something.
Also anyone who thinks that BF3 and 4 had depth because they had a shit ton of useless crap to unlock (and I say useless because there were maybe 10 viable weapons in the game and each one had one or two optimal set ups attachment wise) doesn't know what depth is.
Nice job completely avoiding the subject.
127
« on: December 02, 2016, 02:26:43 PM »
>Dissenting opinion
>Having the same opinion as every liberal college campus student and cultural marxist It's different from yours, and those of everyone else here, which is what "dissenting" means.
"Sorry mom I failed English"
>One a site filled with trannies and weebs >Thinks its conservative outside a few shitposts "Gee doc, I just have a hard time picking up on social interactions."
128
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:57:58 PM »
Not in a Democratic-Republic. Don't like it? Go somewhere else.
Staying here because I like how my dissenting opinions trigger you.
>Dissenting opinion >Having the same opinion as every liberal college campus student and cultural marxist "You don't understand mom, I'ma #freethinker2k16"
129
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:56:24 PM »
Halo 4's multiplayer was a fucking abomination what are you talking about.
I enjoyed Halo 4's multiplayer. It wasn't good, but it was enjoyable. Post-TU Halo 4 is actually pretty fun. No infinity slayer, no load outs. Feels like a more refined version of Reach. Dominion was super fun, I don't know why that didn't continue over to Halo 5.
130
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:47:05 PM »
131
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:40:34 PM »
I have to wonder if people who say BF1 isn't as in depth as past battlefield games have actually played past battlefield games.
"I'm just going to make a vague statement instead of explaining my point and adding to the discussion." Please, elaborate.
132
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:29:56 PM »
Why should a single city, who's dependent on government "gib me dats", and who's people have never had to work labor in their life, have rule over the majority of the country. Needs of the many > Needs of the few.
Not in a Democratic-Republic. Don't like it? Go somewhere else.
133
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:24:12 PM »
Why not have popular vote? Because San Fransico's life style shouldn't be the rule on which we choose to build our country on.
Yes it should.
Why should a single city, who's dependent on government "gib me dats", and who's people have never had to work labor in their life, have rule over the majority of the country. Ignoring all the politcal aspects alone, just difference in culture is enough. A person in Commiefornia voting to ban all guns and let muslims fuck their wife doesn't know a single thing about having to shoot Coyotes that come into your backyard or killing a bear that wondered into your town.
134
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:19:15 PM »
They think Pepe shitposting is Russian agents.
135
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:03:15 PM »
Isn't the whole point to prevent sprawling cities like New York and LA from swinging every election in their favour?
Seems pretty reasonable IMO.
Yeah, now we have fuckhead rural counties swinging the elections in their favor. Brilliant.
Literally the verry communism that the flag fondlers who support the EC claim to hate, evept instead of money, it's with political power.
I really don't see how that's a valid comparison.
"How dare those who produce most of our own country's exports have a say in the matter. Commiefornia and New York should rule the U.S." You know, I never heard the left bitching when the rustbelt was voting Democrat. Why not have a 1 state = 1 vote? Because Democrats are at a disadvantage. Why not have popular vote? Because San Fransico's life style shouldn't be the rule on which we choose to build our country on. The Electoral College is the only way everything is fair. If you get butthurt that the otherside wins sometimes, then don't live in America.
136
« on: December 02, 2016, 12:58:59 PM »
I own Mein Kampf and The Communists Manifesto. I despise socialism and Communism.
137
« on: December 02, 2016, 12:53:38 PM »
Your peculiarities are to be made fun of until they are proven to be an asset. If you are just peculiar, then it's ok to shun and ridicule you.
I agree, trannies should be gassed.
when you join a website just to troll
When you've been on this site since 2013 and just made a new account with the same name because you wanted to change the login.
when you join a site a year before it exists
When you mistype on a keyboard but can't go back to fix the mistake because someone has quoted you.
138
« on: December 02, 2016, 12:50:52 PM »
Aside from the special classes on the field, and spawning in vehicles, how does it feel like Battlefront? The sprint animation? It doesn't feel like Battlefront at all to me in terms of the movement and gunplay.
It is not as in depth as past Battlefield games. EA's Battlefront is a Battlefield game stripped down to the very basics. Battlefield 1 feels like it's in between Battlefront and Battlefield. This is because rather than taking Battlefield 4's engine and tweaking it, they took Battlefront's Engine and tweaked it to try and make it like a Battlefield game in order to save cost and time constraints. It's a good game, but you can tell it's not built off the Battlefield 4 Engine, and rather Battlefront's Engine. I's like Halo 3 and ODST. They are different games, have different mechanics, but are overall very similar in art style, animation, gun play, etc. Obviously BF1 and Battlefront have visual differences, but imagine Battlefield 1 with a Star Wars skin and see how different it is from the Battlefront game we got last year.
139
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:40:06 AM »
that's what life is
a series of down notes
Deep.
140
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:39:05 AM »
>Niggers are so stupid they don't even know how to spell nigger.
141
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:37:11 AM »
Prove me wrong.
142
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:30:59 AM »
No unification means people don't get along.
When people don't get along, tensions rise.
When tensions rise, people get violent.
When people get violent, others get violent.
When everyone is violent, you have a civil war.
When you have a civil war, the South shall rise again.
I am fine with this.
143
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:22:49 AM »
Religion, specifically Christianity, is a cornerstone in the foundation of Western Society. Religion is a way we can express ideas, philosophy, and morality. You cannot have a fruitful society without religion, look at the USSR for example. Atheism often ignores this aspect of religion and only focuses on "muh science", without understanding the politcal and social impact it has.
This is most likely due to said atheist not having regular social contact outside certain instances. They were never exposed to the positives of religion, because they lock themselves in their room all day. Therefore, they tend to focus on the self indulgent part of their belief system, instead of the good of the whole. This then leads to thoughts such as "Muh philosophy, muh star dust, muh 4 billion years". They never got involved with their Church. They never attempted to connect spiritually. They can only focus on what they have been exposed to.
If you're an atheist, not agnostic, but hardcore "There is no God" atheist, Take look at your life. In the past 6 months have you tried to be proactive and outgoing? Have done anything besides the daily routine and watch children's cartoons? Have you altered you body to try and be someone you're not?
Put aside some time this weekend. Go to a local Church session. Take in the surroundings, the mood of others, the sense of community.
You're a religious imposer, Loaf is an atheist one. Both are just as annoying.
Just let people believe what they want to without getting all self-righteous about it.
I am an atheist though. Doesn't mean I don't see the positives in religion. Not everyone needs to tip their fedora so hard their katana falls out of it's sheath.
Well, you don't need religion to have a good society. It certainly has its positives, especially giving people the will to live happily, but it's no necessity.
Without religion, what we currently deem as moral starts to fade. Of course, due to our sense of morals being so institutionalized, it would take decades for something like that to happen in the west. When you look at less developed areas of the world though, atheism acts like the cancer that allows the cold to kill. It allows one of two things to happen: 1) Morals and family values start to fade. Things like cultural Marxism and ideologies similar to Communism start to flourish. These ideologies are never self sustainable and end up causing the country to collapse in on itself. 2)Makes a great wish for religious revival, which allows radicals ideologies to flourish with religion backing them, because the people wish so bad to reconnect spiritually. From this you get the Nazis, ISIS, etc. Could we possibly live in the future without religion? Maybe. As it stands at the moment however, that's an improbability. There are no positives of religion. Fuck your "sense of community." 
144
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:13:58 AM »
Your peculiarities are to be made fun of until they are proven to be an asset. If you are just peculiar, then it's ok to shun and ridicule you.
I agree, trannies should be gassed.
when you join a website just to troll
When you've been on this site since 2013 and just made a new account with the same name because you wanted to change the login.
145
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:11:10 AM »
Religion, specifically Christianity, is a cornerstone in the foundation of Western Society. Religion is a way we can express ideas, philosophy, and morality. You cannot have a fruitful society without religion, look at the USSR for example. Atheism often ignores this aspect of religion and only focuses on "muh science", without understanding the politcal and social impact it has.
This is most likely due to said atheist not having regular social contact outside certain instances. They were never exposed to the positives of religion, because they lock themselves in their room all day. Therefore, they tend to focus on the self indulgent part of their belief system, instead of the good of the whole. This then leads to thoughts such as "Muh philosophy, muh star dust, muh 4 billion years". They never got involved with their Church. They never attempted to connect spiritually. They can only focus on what they have been exposed to.
If you're an atheist, not agnostic, but hardcore "There is no God" atheist, Take look at your life. In the past 6 months have you tried to be proactive and outgoing? Have done anything besides the daily routine and watch children's cartoons? Have you altered you body to try and be someone you're not?
Put aside some time this weekend. Go to a local Church session. Take in the surroundings, the mood of others, the sense of community.
You're a religious imposer, Loaf is an atheist one. Both are just as annoying.
Just let people believe what they want to without getting all self-righteous about it.
I am an atheist though. Doesn't mean I don't see the positives in religion. Not everyone needs to tip their fedora so hard their katana falls out of it's sheath.
146
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:06:48 AM »
Your peculiarities are to be made fun of until they are proven to be an asset. If you are just peculiar, then it's ok to shun and ridicule you.
I agree, trannies should be gassed.
147
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:05:14 AM »
Metal is rock tho, just refined.
Also, >caring about a kids show
yeah man wtf why do I care about stuff that I like
I dunno, you should probably ask your physiologist that question, not me.
My physiologist said he studies human anatomy, not television.
What a normie.
148
« on: December 02, 2016, 01:04:23 AM »
Religion, specifically Christianity, is a cornerstone in the foundation of Western Society. Religion is a way we can express ideas, philosophy, and morality. You cannot have a fruitful society without religion, look at the USSR for example. Atheism often ignores this aspect of religion and only focuses on "muh science", without understanding the politcal and social impact it has. This is most likely due to said atheist not having regular social contact outside certain instances. They were never exposed to the positives of religion, because they lock themselves in their room all day. Therefore, they tend to focus on the self indulgent part of their belief system, instead of the good of the whole. This then leads to thoughts such as "Muh philosophy, muh star dust, muh 4 billion years". They never got involved with their Church. They never attempted to connect spiritually. They can only focus on what they have been exposed to. If you're an atheist, not agnostic, but hardcore "There is no God" atheist, Take look at your life. In the past 6 months have you tried to be proactive and outgoing? Have done anything besides the daily routine and watch children's cartoons? Have you altered you body to try and be someone you're not? Put aside some time this weekend. Go to a local Church session. Take in the surroundings, the mood of others, the sense of community.
149
« on: December 02, 2016, 12:39:53 AM »
Metal is rock tho, just refined.
Also, >caring about a kids show
yeah man wtf why do I care about stuff that I like
I dunno, you should probably ask your physiologist that question, not me.
150
« on: December 02, 2016, 12:36:25 AM »
Don't get me wrong, I like Battlefield 1 and it's really fun for what it is. However, it does not feel like a BATTLEFIELD game.
I hope this is just leftover residue from Battlefront, since they didn't tweak much between the engines, and not the future formula of the Battlefield series.
EDIT: Fuck all of the medics who don't revive or heal and fuck all of you faggots who quick respawn and don't let me revive you.
|
Show Posts
