Quote from: Chakas on November 30, 2014, 11:01:06 PM

Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 30, 2014, 10:56:39 PM

Why not one that you can swap so it does anything?

That is easier said than done. You can't just go and convert an AR from one purpose to another without very special and expensive parts.

Make or find a better design that focuses on adaptability and allows easy swapping of barrel lengths and calibers.

I don't have a money tree in my back yard. Swapping barrels on ARs is a process that you can't do without tools and a workbench. And systems that allow for quick barrel changes are very new and expensive, with very specific requirements. If I wanted all those things, I would have gotten a difference rifle that already allows for that kind of thing. I'm building an AR, not some space gun.

T4R. Should I make a lightweight, minimalistic SHTF AR build or a much larger and longer range, scoped, target shooting build? Should I do that, or maybe even make a longer-ranged minimalistic SHTF AR?

Fucking Hunger Games wannabe motherfuckers stole the whole concept of their society from Tinkerbell. Unoriginal bastards cant' even come up with something as simple as that. They have to steal it from something as infinitely better as Tinkerbell canon. Examples below

Glorious Tinkerbell:


Divergent shit:

bump

I'm now going to watch that... For scientific purposes of course.

It's on Netflix.

which is a 3d CG movie....

It looks like shit.

I am Chakas

bump

I dun get it <.<

I tended to zone out whenever the whiny lil shit was on screen so that might explain why >.>

I think it's a gay sex joke, unless I'm wrong. This isn't actually what happened in the show.

Probably because you're a 48 year old that hangs on a forum of 12-25 year olds

This is the only good reason listed so far. Than you for that. Unfortunately, I have been called a pedo even before I revealed my age

It probably has something to do with your sexual attraction to child-like animated characters and an unpopular opinion thread back on B.net where, if I recall correctly, you ended up being banned and heavily critized for, among other things, advocating stuff like the legalisation of child pornography.

I already made statements regarding the Tinkerbell characters. Read the OP. that and watch the damn Tinkerbell movies. They are not childish.

Quote from: Byrne on November 27, 2014, 05:05:48 AM

Quote from: Flee on November 27, 2014, 05:03:47 AM

Quote from: Byrne on November 27, 2014, 04:59:38 AM

Quote from: Flee on November 27, 2014, 04:58:26 AM

advocating stuff like the legalisation of child pornography.

I do believe that was actually Lonepaul.

Nope. I clearly remember Chakas being banned for voicing some very unpopular opinions about child pornography and minors in general. Then, a day later, a new member joined that vehemently defended Chakas and had the exact same posting style and habits, but kept stating he totally wasn't him, despite the entire forum knowing better.

Really?
Shit.

Spoiler

I must've been out that day.

Yeah, I even think the second account was called "The son of Chakas" or something similar.

While their is an account by that name on B.net, it wasn't the alt I used at the time. There would be no mystery if I did. And the thread was about pedophilia, not CP.

It probably has something to do with your sexual attraction to child-like animated characters and an unpopular opinion thread back on B.net where, if I recall correctly, you ended up being banned and heavily critized for, among other things, advocating stuff like the legalisation of child pornography.

Which thread? I never actually made a thread advocating the legalization of child porn. I only made threads talking about pedophiles themselves. It's just that people got so emotional and heated over the damn threads containing the topic of pedophilia , or didn't even read the OP to those threads that they ended up assuming I was just a pedo trying to justify CP. Although I did post a flamebait thread once. It was some guy's opinion on CP that I copied and pasted. I didn't actually read it and the thread burned hard. It was a good flamebait. A hell of a lot more effective than most others.

Quote from: Chakas on November 27, 2014, 01:42:33 AM

Quote from: Jono on November 27, 2014, 01:25:44 AM

Quote from: Chakas on November 27, 2014, 01:23:44 AM

Quote from: Jono on November 27, 2014, 01:22:16 AM

They should remake the Hot Wheels movies after they remake this masterpiece. This game was fun as hell. I loved it so much.

I don't trust hotwheels to make videogames. The concept in an idea is a thought that makes anyone's inner child squee with excitement, but the execution of the creation of the games when it comes to Hot Wheels is cringe worthy. So much disappointment and lack of quality control.

Dude... did you even play this game? It was the best Hot Wheels game to ever come out. I played the ones on the PS2 and they were shitty compared to Turbo Racing.

Turbo Racing had the music, the car selection, the gameplay, the unlockables, and lasting appeal. I played the game nonstop as a kid. Its everything a Hot Wheels fan loves and enjoys.

but with all the same fantasy elements that Hot Wheels is known for. Things like the loopy tracks and fantasy cars.

That's what Turbo Racing is!

There's loops, jumps, and just about every type of crazy race track you can come up with. You can do backflips, frontflips, and barrel rolls with your car to increase your Turbo meter.

Here's a video of gameplay:

YouTube

I don't think you read all of what I said. I said if I were to play a Hot Wheels game, it would have to be more gritty and realistic, but still containing the fantasy elements that Hot Wheels is know for. Turbo racing may have the fatasy part, but it sure as hell doesn't have the realism part.