This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΗΣ
Pages: 1 ... 121122123 124125 ... 256
3661
« on: October 15, 2015, 03:45:41 PM »
Of the current candidates, his ideas are the least impractical. Everyone agrees America is broken. Our system pools resources in the hands of the very few, and those with the means have demonstrated that they do not have the general population's best interest at heart. Industrialists up until the early 80's counted themselves as Americans first. That isn't the case. Main St America has suffered because of this. Bernie may not have the ideal solutions, but at least he's going in the right direction.
lol
Nigga you need those "industrialists", their tax dollars actually fund shit.
And if they're not Americans first anymore, good luck keeping them around once the soaking starts.
They're not staying now. You seem to be living under the impression they aren't already shipping jobs overseas and dodging their taxes.
And you think the solution is to demand they stay while also making conditions less favorable than they already are?
3663
« on: October 15, 2015, 12:00:29 PM »
We can't elect a liberal left wing president
It's never happened before
FDR didn't exist
We were also in the throughs of the worst global economic crisis.
Conditions now are not nearly as bad as then.
FDR didn't cause the Great Depression
It was already going on before he took office. After FDR was elected our economy went up.
lol if anything, FDR prolonged the depression.
3664
« on: October 15, 2015, 11:58:24 AM »
Seriously, FDR is among those who have done the most damage to this country
1. Alexander Hamilton
2. Keynes
3. Lyndon Baines "I'll have those niggers voting democrat for the next 200 years" Johnson
4. FDR
I like Bernie, I really do. He's a funny, adorable old man and I don't want to have to add him to this list.
3665
« on: October 15, 2015, 11:40:14 AM »
We can't elect a liberal left wing president
It's never happened before
FDR didn't exist
Yeah but FDR was terrible
3667
« on: October 15, 2015, 11:37:39 AM »
3668
« on: October 15, 2015, 11:37:16 AM »
can someone explain this meme
3669
« on: October 15, 2015, 11:35:15 AM »
Voting is immoral.
3670
« on: October 15, 2015, 11:32:21 AM »
Of the current candidates, his ideas are the least impractical. Everyone agrees America is broken. Our system pools resources in the hands of the very few, and those with the means have demonstrated that they do not have the general population's best interest at heart. Industrialists up until the early 80's counted themselves as Americans first. That isn't the case. Main St America has suffered because of this. Bernie may not have the ideal solutions, but at least he's going in the right direction.
lol Nigga you need those "industrialists", their tax dollars actually fund shit. And if they're not Americans first anymore, good luck keeping them around once the soaking starts.
3671
« on: October 15, 2015, 11:28:11 AM »
Debate me.
3672
« on: October 15, 2015, 08:22:06 AM »
They don't have the steak egg and cheese bagel
STEAK EGG AND CHEESE BAGEL IS THE ONLY GOOD MCDONALDS BREAKFAST
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
3673
« on: October 15, 2015, 06:35:06 AM »
just gonna leave this here
Whoever made this has literally no idea how rights work.
3674
« on: October 14, 2015, 11:08:03 PM »
This thread is Flood-tier.
3675
« on: October 14, 2015, 09:47:17 PM »
The notion of "representative" government is absurd.
You're absurd.
You're goddamn right.
3676
« on: October 14, 2015, 09:45:40 PM »
Further, life has no meaning. But to make it better, safer, and more comfortable for future generations. They didn't ask to be here--so we owe it to them to make the world a better place.
Everyone should get an easy walk through life. There is no value in making life more difficult for the sake of it.
To what end? Of what value is an experience with minimal or no adversity?
3677
« on: October 14, 2015, 09:36:01 PM »
cuck
this word has pretty much become the new "fgt"
no one even uses it close to its original meaning anymore
I have always used it consistently.
Statists think they need need big daddy government to watch over them like a cuck thinks he needs a bull to pleasure his woman.
It's an abandonment of personal responsibility and pride in exchange for an easy path through life.
it's kind of hilarious how "life not sucking" is synonymous with "living life easily" to you
it's like for you the absence of these struggles means you'd live pointlessly and without reason
when really someone who's actually a man would be able to find plenty way to utilize that new found time to build great things
youre the cuck
see now you're actually misusing the word. Further, life has no meaning. Unless you're a theist, there is really no point to anything, short of the biological imperative to reproduce. You're living pointlessly already, with or without your robin hood gibsmedats. Besides, you assuming that life would suck without the long dick of the state getting your wife off for you is as silly as a slave defending massa by arguing he'd be worse off without him.
3678
« on: October 14, 2015, 09:31:00 PM »
The notion of "representative" government is absurd.
3679
« on: October 14, 2015, 09:28:10 PM »
cuck
this word has pretty much become the new "fgt"
no one even uses it close to its original meaning anymore
I have always used it consistently. Statists think they need need big daddy government to watch over them like a cuck thinks he needs a bull to pleasure his woman. It's an abandonment of personal responsibility and pride in exchange for an easy path through life.
3680
« on: October 14, 2015, 09:24:49 PM »
If you don't oppose mass surveilance you're pretty much engaging in cuck mentality. Just saying.
Whatever the fuck that means.
How about this--if mass surveillance was conducted by robots instead of humans, conducting their duties efficiently and objectively, how would you feel about that? Electric eye vs. naked eye.
I don't see how you could oppose that.
Relying on an external factor to assure your safety is cuckoldry. This desire to "just let the state handle it" in so many aspects of life represents the death of masculinity and self-respect. Is a computerized monitor less likely than a man to be malicious? Sure, I'll acknowledge that. But you shouldn't want that. You should want to be in charge of your own person, your own safety. Because you can rely on no one if not yourself.
3681
« on: October 14, 2015, 09:10:53 PM »
If you don't oppose mass surveilance you're pretty much engaging in cuck mentality. Just saying.
3682
« on: October 14, 2015, 02:35:02 PM »
So did Colonel Sanders win or nah
non-scientific polls and twitter say yes by a huge margin
so this is either really good or really bad for bernie's future
Also remember that Sanders supporters demographic skews far younger than any other candidate in either party - more of them are on multiple social media pages. Not saying this'll change the results out it Sanders' favor, but going off a non-scientific poll is terrible.
Was thinking this myself Most *casual* democrat types don't follow this kind of thing. And those are the ones who will be voting against sanders.
3683
« on: October 14, 2015, 02:27:45 PM »
that shoop is gay as fuck i liked the original better when it said involved in africa
3684
« on: October 14, 2015, 02:24:10 PM »
Today's problems that tribes face are brought about solely by themselves, and not some grand government plot.
It's the repercussions of previous plots and the unwillingness of anyone to make any of it right.
So what exactly can be done, short of throwing them a fresh batch of gibsmedats? There are lots of problems and not many solutions.
3685
« on: October 14, 2015, 02:06:04 PM »
Still think the state should interfere in marriage, fam?
i think he's of the exact opposite opinion, actually
Still think the state should interfere in marriage, fam?
When did I say the state should be involved in marriage hombre?
That wasn't directed at anyone specifically
3686
« on: October 14, 2015, 01:50:42 PM »
Women should not be in infantry positions.
I don't care what bullshit equality argument you throw at me. Safety comes before any kind of tenuous quota someone has to fulfill.
If a woman is qualified to hold an infantry position, why shouldn't she be allowed to do it?
Detriment to unit cohesion and operational efficiency.
I don't understand how having mixed genders in infantry is detrimental to unit cohesion and efficiency.
We've been over this.
Social obligations demand men engage in self-sacrificial behavior to protect women, which can compromise not only the safety of other personnel, but also the success of the operation.
Social pressures also pressure men to save their friends, who they grow and develop with during their training, yet somehow that isn't a magically insane problem. Your hypothesis is flawed.
You aren't seriously equating the social dynamics between men and women to platonic same-sex friendship, are you?
If you seriously think that background social pressures of "women first" are more significant than the intense emotions surrounding brotherhood in arms then you are detached from reality.
dude what lol
3687
« on: October 14, 2015, 01:48:48 PM »
Women should not be in infantry positions.
I don't care what bullshit equality argument you throw at me. Safety comes before any kind of tenuous quota someone has to fulfill.
If a woman is qualified to hold an infantry position, why shouldn't she be allowed to do it?
Detriment to unit cohesion and operational efficiency.
I don't understand how having mixed genders in infantry is detrimental to unit cohesion and efficiency.
We've been over this.
Social obligations demand men engage in self-sacrificial behavior to protect women, which can compromise not only the safety of other personnel, but also the success of the operation.
Social pressures also pressure men to save their friends, who they grow and develop with during their training, yet somehow that isn't a magically insane problem. Your hypothesis is flawed.
You aren't seriously equating the social dynamics between men and women to platonic same-sex friendship, are you?
3688
« on: October 14, 2015, 01:45:47 PM »
Still think the state should interfere in marriage, fam?
3689
« on: October 14, 2015, 01:44:29 PM »
Women should not be in infantry positions.
I don't care what bullshit equality argument you throw at me. Safety comes before any kind of tenuous quota someone has to fulfill.
If a woman is qualified to hold an infantry position, why shouldn't she be allowed to do it?
Detriment to unit cohesion and operational efficiency.
I don't understand how having mixed genders in infantry is detrimental to unit cohesion and efficiency.
We've been over this. Social obligations demand that men engage in self-sacrificial behavior to protect women, which can compromise not only the safety of other personnel, but also the success of the operation.
3690
« on: October 14, 2015, 01:41:48 PM »
I missed it, how did BASED JIMMY do?
Pages: 1 ... 121122123 124125 ... 256
|
Show Posts
