This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΗΣ
Pages: 1 ... 666768 6970 ... 256
2011
« on: February 27, 2016, 10:05:09 PM »
"I'm literally a slave to my own Self."
"Atheists", everybody.
I genuinely don't know what the fuck you're trying to say.
Literally being such a slave to your basic instincts that you find the notion of abstaining from sex ridiculous.
2012
« on: February 27, 2016, 09:42:23 PM »
2013
« on: February 27, 2016, 08:33:05 PM »
College/University is fucking dirt cheap here Teehee
no
My sister attends college for $37,000 a semester.
Stop complaining.
Where does she go, fucking princeton?
2014
« on: February 27, 2016, 08:30:41 PM »
"I'm literally a slave to my own Self."
"Atheists", everybody.
2015
« on: February 27, 2016, 07:58:23 PM »
Looking forward to it
I posted this meme first faggot
2016
« on: February 27, 2016, 02:12:04 PM »
>TFW no game set in Sassanid or Achaemenid Persia >TFW no game set in the Parthian Empire >TFW no game set in the Seleucid Empire >TFW no Tamerlane FPS game being an Asiaboo is hard.
2017
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:56:39 PM »
Based on the definition of a fetus and the definition of a child. The actual act of giving birth is the only objective method to determine the difference. None of those wishy-washy windows of weeks of development.
So a fetus, hours before birth, fully functional and capable of surviving outside of the mother, is not a person. While one at the exact same developmental stage, having been "born", is a person, by virtue of having passed through the birth canal.
Correct.
We don't issue birth certificates before people are born. You become a legally-recognized person upon birth.
That's arbitrary as fuck. Why on earth would you an issue a BIRTH certificate if someone hasn't been BORN yet? An appeal to previous legal practice for this shit is inane.
2018
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:51:49 PM »
Based on the definition of a fetus and the definition of a child. The actual act of giving birth is the only objective method to determine the difference. None of those wishy-washy windows of weeks of development.
So a fetus, hours before birth, fully functional and capable of surviving outside of the mother, is not a person. While one at the exact same developmental stage, having been "born", is a person, by virtue of having passed through the birth canal.
2019
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:47:56 PM »
>worrying about high caloric content
LMAO ENDOMORPH DETECTED
2020
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:44:49 PM »
Negligent discharge.
2021
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:43:02 PM »
Obviously a fetus is not a child,
This is not obvious at all. In fact, over all the abortion discussion I've seen here, I have not seen any clear reasoning behind this other than an appeal to biology based on the development of certain physical features.
A fetus becomes a child upon birth.
And you come to this conclusion based on what?
2022
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:36:39 PM »
Obviously a fetus is not a child,
This is not obvious at all. In fact, over all the abortion discussion I've seen here, I have not seen any clear reasoning behind this other than an appeal to biology based on the development of certain physical features.
2023
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:33:45 PM »
More German shilling. Spooks still makes no sense in that context.
Stirner makes creative use of the German word "geist", which can mean spirit, ghost, spook, etc.
The point is bullshit fixed ideas that people imagine and worship as though these ideas were gods.
I understand what you were going for, but geist is not the same as spook. It's closer to spirit, especially in the context you were using.
My point stands.
2024
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:27:17 PM »
More German shilling. Spooks still makes no sense in that context.
Stirner makes creative use of the German word "geist", which can mean spirit, ghost, spook, etc. The point is bullshit fixed ideas that people imagine and worship as though these ideas were gods.
2025
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:25:52 PM »
Yes.
If you can't even afford to care for yourself, you cannot afford to care for an extra dependent. You're going to severely complicate your own life and the life of the child by bringing them into that kind of living environment.
This reasoning makes sense in the context of family planning.
It is retarded reasoning for abortion.
So if someone living in poverty finds themselves to be pregnant, they should carry the pregnancy? That's a great plan...
If someone living in poverty finds themselves, as a consequence of their own actions, in a situation where they can save money and stress by killing someone, they should do it? Spoiler I use this reasoning because you have so far been using the word "child", which generally indicates that it is a person.
2026
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:22:00 PM »
Yes.
If you can't even afford to care for yourself, you cannot afford to care for an extra dependent. You're going to severely complicate your own life and the life of the child by bringing them into that kind of living environment.
This reasoning makes sense in the context of family planning. It is retarded reasoning for abortion.
2027
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:17:06 PM »
2028
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:13:39 PM »
lmao what
link pls
2029
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:11:48 PM »
You can be a faggot and hop around saying shit like"I don't condone it but it's a choice", but that's fucking absurd, and still doesn't make you any less pro-abortion.
That's exactly what "pro-choice" means, you retard. Pro-choice is not pro-abortion.
Pro-choice is a politically-charged framing of the narrative to appeal to our cultural fetishization of "freedom" and "liberty". If you believe that abortion is morally wrong and is in fact the destruction of human life, to enable it is hypocrisy of the highest order. I'm not saying it isn't a thing people do or believe in. Of course people can hold that contradictory position, they're just fucking retarded for it.
2030
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:07:19 PM »
Stop. Saying. Spooked.
It doesn't make any fucking sense in this context.
"That weird sound in the attic spooked me" makes sense.
"Democracy is a spook" doesn't.
It makes perfect sense if your brain is capable of understanding that words can have multiple meanings based on context. "Mind is the name of the first self-discovery, the first undeification of the divine; that is, of the uncanny, the spooks, the “powers above.” Our fresh feeling of youth, this feeling of self, now defers to nothing; the world is discredited, for we are above it, we are mind. Now for the first time we see that hitherto we have not looked at the world intelligently [mit Geist] at all, but only stared at it." "To know and acknowledge essences alone and nothing but essences, that is religion; its realm is a realm of essences, spooks, and ghosts." "Man has not really vanquished Shamanism and its spooks until he possesses the strength to lay aside not only the belief in ghosts or in spirits, but also the belief in the spirit." "To make up for this, they saw in each other ghosts of another sort. The People is a higher essence than an individual, and, like Man or the Spirit of Man, a spirit haunting the individual – the Spirit of the People [Volksgeist]. For this reason they revered this spirit, and only so far as he served this or else a spirit related to it (as in the Spirit of the Family) could the individual appear significant; only for the sake of the higher essence, the People, was consideration allowed to the “member of the people.” As you are hallowed to us by “Man” who haunts you, so at every time men have been hallowed by some higher essence or other, like People, Family, and such. Only for the sake of a higher essence has any one been honoured from of old, only as a ghost has he been regarded in the light of a hallowed, a protected and recognized person. If I cherish you because I hold you dear, because in you my heart finds nourishment, my need satisfaction, then it is not done for the sake of a higher essence, whose hallowed body you are, not on account of my beholding in you a ghost, an appearing spirit, but from egoistic pleasure; you yourself with your essence are valuable to me, for your essence is not a higher one, is not higher and more general than you, is unique [einzig] like you yourself, because it is you. But it is not only man that “haunts”; so does everything. The higher essence, the spirit, that walks in everything, is at the same time bound to nothing, and only – “appears” in it. Ghosts in every corner! Here would be the place to pass the haunting spirits in review, if they were not to come before us again further on in order to vanish before egoism. Hence let only a few of them be particularized by way of example, in order to bring us at once to our attitude toward them. Sacred above all is the “holy Spirit,” sacred the truth, sacred are right, law, a good cause, majesty, marriage, the common good, order, the fatherland, and so on. Wheels in the Head Man, your head is haunted; you have wheels in your head! You imagine great things, and depict to yourself a whole world of gods that has an existence for you, a spirit-realm to which you suppose yourself to be called, an ideal that beckons to you. You have a fixed idea [fixe Idee]!"
2031
« on: February 26, 2016, 11:59:57 AM »
Politicians who vote for or advocate policies loosening restrictions on abortion, or working to make them more accessible and normalized.
lawl. Anyone who isn't staunchly pro-life is pro-abortion to you.
That's fucking gold.
The fuck is wrong with you? I'm not even pro-life myself, but I literally just gave my criteria for calling a politician pro-abortion, and nowhere did I imply that middle-grounders like myself are somehow unintentionally pro-abortion. If you advocate ease of access to abortion, you are pro-abortion. You can be a faggot and hop around saying shit like"I don't condone it but it's a choice", but that's fucking absurd, and still doesn't make you any less pro-abortion.
2032
« on: February 26, 2016, 11:48:45 AM »
"Gamers don't like to think"
"Our core fanbase isn't profitable enough"
"Deep gameplay is too much work"
2033
« on: February 26, 2016, 11:44:31 AM »
ok i'm gonna buy a 3ds, not an xl because that's just gay
 lmao manlet detected
2034
« on: February 26, 2016, 11:36:40 AM »
>Every Pokémon shown in the concept art, except the wireframe, is an old Pokémon
>Red is in the last piece of concept art
Could this be a reimagining of the Kanto games? Perhaps set at a later time.
At first I was like, nah.
But the more I think about it... You might be onto something there, Ar.
The one thing we know about Sun & Moon right now is that they're allowing us to transfer our RBY Pokémon to them, via Pokémon Bank. That in itself could be hinting at something post-Kanto related, I think. It's just an oddly specific thing to announce--and it's the only thing they mentioned.
Then, of course, there's the obvious symbolic parallels between Red/Blue and Sun/Moon, respectively.
hmm
Aw fuck. This is probably it. 20 years and whatnot. Would be pandering at its finest.
2035
« on: February 26, 2016, 11:25:46 AM »
you americans are so lucky with food man, you guys have like waffle houses that serve waffle sandwiches with fried chicken
we only recently got a five guys
Five guys is great, but just the tip of the Amerifat iceburg. If you're ever in the Southeastern US don't miss your chance to eat at a Cookout. Shit is fucking glorious.
2036
« on: February 26, 2016, 11:19:11 AM »
B) Democracy is a spook
You appeal to it as if it has some intrinsic value. It doesn't. Democracy is only good based on the metric of usefulness to a society, and even in that context it is highly overrated. You're probably going to respond with something about how democracy is morally superior because of the "will of the people" or some shit like that, which is spooked as well.
2037
« on: February 26, 2016, 11:14:43 AM »
I've given up at this point and just reluctantly accepted Trump as my future president.
Very good Choice.
Why did you capitalize choice?
cause I'm pro Choice
Then you can't be a Republican.
That's not true. That is too much of a grey area to dictate what party you stand for. I know Democrats who are pro life, and Republicans who are pro choice.
This tbh senpai.
There is a small dissident faction of Christians in the democratic party who are at least intellectually consistent enough not to try to wiggle their way out of the whole "abortion is murder" thing.
Although the way they try to rationalize voting for pro-abortion politicians while at the same time believing that abortion is murder is fucking ridiculous.
And the pro-choice republicans are basically closet libertarians.
"Pro abortion politicians"
Who are you referring to, exactly?
Politicians who vote for or advocate policies loosening restrictions on abortion, or working to make them more accessible and normalized.
2038
« on: February 26, 2016, 03:22:53 AM »
a personal favorite
http://biblehub.com/ezekiel/23-20.htm
This is a metaphor for the unfaithfulness and ungodly behavior of Israelites from Samaria and Jerusalem.
2039
« on: February 26, 2016, 02:49:08 AM »
When men fight with one another, and the wife of the one draws near to rescue her husband from the hand of him who is beating him, and puts out her hand and seizes him by the private parts, then you shall cut off her hand. Deuteronomy 25:11-12
Oh yeah this is a great religion.
Yeah Judaism is kinda shit tbh
2040
« on: February 26, 2016, 12:30:53 AM »
Although the way they try to rationalize voting for pro-abortion politicians while at the same time believing that abortion is murder is fucking ridiculous.
It's either below other issues in scale of importance or they understand that the government is supposed to be secular and not legislate christian morality.
It's nothing to do with imposing "christian" morality on anybody. If you believe abortion is murder, legal abortion is equivalent to legalized murder. It is unfathomable to me how people can reconcile these things. This argument does not apply to the pro-life movement. It is largely a religious phenomenon, but it is neither exclusively christian, or even exclusively religious. There is nothing inherently un-secular about the notion that life begins at conception. Quite frankly, all these arbitrary dates given that are supposed to describe when the fetus "becomes a person" are a bit inane. It just seems like jumping through hoops for justification. Even worse is the appeal to women's rights, as if a hypothetical person's right to life doesn't transcend some spooked up "right to not have a baby". That said, I don't think there can be solid a secular justification for any person's right to life without appealing to the arbitrary.
Pages: 1 ... 666768 6970 ... 256
|
Show Posts
