This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΗΣ
Pages: 1 ... 626364 6566 ... 256
1891
« on: March 08, 2016, 01:30:42 PM »
From a moral standpoint I get where you're coming from fam, but from a legislative perspective trying to criminalize abortion is an absolute logistical nightmare.
Which is why I advocate a reversal of the normalization before any attempt to act against it. Nobody cares about the holocaust if they don't realize that jews, gypsies and slavs are human beings. The propaganda and bullying must be shut down before we can have an honest conversation. Right now any criticism of abortion is forced into the realm of misogyny and women's rights- a realm it has very little to do with.
1892
« on: March 08, 2016, 01:05:11 PM »
>Dehumanize unborn children
lmao
>dehumanize jews lmao they do it themselves amirite? fucking kikes trying to keep the aryan race from controlling their wealth hahahaha >dehumanize kulaks lmao they do it themselves amirite? fucking kulaks holding all the land instead of letting the proletariat control it hahaha >dehumanize unborn children lmao how are they even people lol they can't speak up or act to defend themselves XD
1893
« on: March 08, 2016, 01:02:03 PM »
REAL NIGGA RIFLE
>implying
1894
« on: March 08, 2016, 12:58:04 PM »
3. Dismantling and destruction of institutions that provide abortions, as well as the social movement seeking to dehumanize unborn children. why would this be in your top 5
my abortion beliefs aren't even in my top 20
Well, your abortion beliefs tie into the greater scheme of anti-natalism, right? So they'd only be a component. Since coming to Christianity I've found myself placing greater value on human life. I've gotten more empathetic. With that going on, I have to be more serious about the wanton destruction of life that goes on worldwide. Abortion is a part of that, and is in fact the last normalized form of killing in the Western world. Even defending oneself from an attacker with lethal force becoming a taboo, but it's a woman's right to destroy a developing child on a whim? That is troubling.
1895
« on: March 08, 2016, 12:54:06 PM »
3. Dismantling and destruction of institutions that provide abortions, as well as the social movement seeking to dehumanize unborn children.
I'm curious for your reasoning here.
I've come around to the position that abortion is murder. I've so far been presented with nothing to credibly suggest there is some arbitrary development date where a fetus *becomes* a human being based on the development of a certain organ or feature. I have, in fact, been pushed further toward and anti stance since I've encountered a few people who suggested that a fetus did not become a human and get "rights" until it was physically born. All of this strikes me as an attempt to otherize and dehumanize infants in order to legitimize and normalize their destruction- not unlike what genocidal regimes do to ethnic minority groups. Frankly, I think women's rights have nothing to do with it. If a fetus is a human being, it is never acceptable to kill one (excepting very special circumstances). If it is not a human being, it is likely always acceptable to destroy one, regardless of muh body muh choice. If you really cared that much about freedom from coercion, you'd be an anarchist.
1896
« on: March 08, 2016, 12:43:05 PM »
Bullpup is the betamax of firearms design.
1897
« on: March 08, 2016, 12:15:16 PM »
For some reason that I haven't yet figured out, it's considered "fallacious" to simply point out that people ought to be more civilized in modern times than they were in the past (because of a greater and more developed understanding of the world).
It's called Whig history.
1898
« on: March 08, 2016, 12:14:34 PM »
1. Defense and maintenance of America's international hegemony, including sorting out the conflicts in Ukraine and the Levant. 2. Preservation of individual firearms rights. 3. Dismantling and destruction of institutions that provide abortions, as well as the social movement seeking to dehumanize unborn children. 4. Efforts to combat poverty, especially by providing resources for socioeconomic mobility rather than offering handouts. 5. Integration and citizenship for immigrants coming from places like Mexico and Latin America who share the same base values as indigenous Americans.
1899
« on: March 07, 2016, 10:51:00 PM »
1900
« on: March 07, 2016, 10:38:30 PM »
/tv/ tells me it got unfucked but I'm cautious.
1901
« on: March 07, 2016, 05:45:43 PM »
Reminder to NEVER vote blue in a local election.
1902
« on: March 07, 2016, 04:23:51 PM »
1903
« on: March 07, 2016, 03:09:45 PM »
I'm ok with investing $1.5t a year into the well-being of our people.
Too bad YOU don't have 1.5 Trillion a year to invest, brah.
1904
« on: March 07, 2016, 03:05:28 PM »
I really hate to admit the fact that, aside from the first minute and select comments across the video - mostly the "HURR DURR SOCIETY HATES WHITE MEN" bullshit - I can't really disagree with the overall message
My friend, welcome to the libertarian party.
>Manchild party
No thanks, friendo
>freedom from an oppressive government >equated to rebelling against daddy 'cause he didn't let you hang our with your pot smoking friends This is why nobody takes leftists seriously.
Go read Atlas Shrugged or something
Oh please. The only Russians that I can stomach to read are Tolstoy and Nabokov.
>not Dostoevsky
1905
« on: March 07, 2016, 02:50:11 PM »
shit's gonna be memes for days
1906
« on: March 04, 2016, 06:13:17 AM »
Bottle green over feldgrau gets my dick hard.
Braungrau>Feldgrau
but door
Bottle green collars and boards
B U N D E S H E E R U N D E S H E E R
1907
« on: March 04, 2016, 05:05:45 AM »
your face when
1908
« on: March 04, 2016, 01:54:14 AM »
Tldr
The muslims were scared and confused "wtf are these crazy christian ghosts doing". Sent letters to prominent religious leaders to see if there was any sharia or qu'ranic policy on dealing with this shit, Imam be like "shit fam I got nothin'" so they hired local exorcists to put stakes in the corpses suspected to be vampires and cut the heads off and burned them and shit. Apparently burning worked every time. Stakes almost never worked.
1909
« on: March 04, 2016, 01:17:54 AM »
Wesley's theory is literally the best smoking with the windows down at 7-8pm in July song of the 2010s so far.
1910
« on: March 04, 2016, 01:11:46 AM »
1911
« on: March 03, 2016, 10:55:09 PM »
THAT
FUCKING
FORM
10/10 would choose as battle buddy
1912
« on: March 03, 2016, 10:31:13 PM »
Bottle green over feldgrau gets my dick hard.
Braungrau>Feldgrau
1913
« on: March 03, 2016, 10:02:06 PM »
1914
« on: March 03, 2016, 08:54:49 AM »
I am not exaggerating when I say I cannot listen to this song without tearing up.
Brutal. New Deftones soon as well.
The single they put out was great. I think it may turn out better than Koi No Yokan.
1915
« on: March 03, 2016, 08:39:50 AM »
You're confirming my argument. God created the rules for what is or is not sinful. Refusing to follow God's rules is sinful.
Sin did not conceptually exist until Man created it. Sin wasn't a *thing* until it first appeared. Sin still isn't a thing so much as a way to describe failing to do a thing.
Sin is literally violating God's will. So yeah, he kinda did create it.
This is the equivalent of saying the law didn't exist until criminals decided to break it. Fuck out of here with this circular logic.
The law and God's will did exist. Sin and criminality did not exist.
1916
« on: March 02, 2016, 10:21:00 PM »
WE
1917
« on: March 02, 2016, 10:19:33 PM »
You're confirming my argument. God created the rules for what is or is not sinful. Refusing to follow God's rules is sinful.
Sin did not conceptually exist until Man created it. Sin wasn't a *thing* until it first appeared. Sin still isn't a thing so much as a way to describe failing to do a thing.
What about the ability to sin, then? Or the potential for sinful behavior--did God create that?
Isn't this just begging the question?
Can one really create something through establishing the potential for it? Spoiler I was about to suggest that one could say a parent whose child murdered created the potential for that murder, but you'd probably be behind that completely.
1918
« on: March 02, 2016, 03:12:44 PM »
You normies probably haven't even stood in the exact spot he was murdered, didn't read his most important literary works in the original Latin and pronounce it "cee-sar" or say things like "Mark Antony". Literally plebeian as fuck.
Seriously though, he did a lot of things. Gotta be a bit more specific than that.
KEEKERO NOT SISERO ANGLO SHITS LEAVE
1919
« on: March 02, 2016, 02:58:54 PM »
WHO /PRACTICING/??
anglophobe degenerate leave reeeeeee
COME BACK TO THE TRUE CHURCH BARBARIAN
YOU ALREADY ESCAPED THE LATIN DECEIVERS
DON'T LET THE PROTESTANTS LEAD YOUR PEOPLE FURTHER ASTRAY
Your slavshit religion has no place in white Anglican Britain miscreant. Absolutely immoral.
DECIEVER ORTHODOXY IS FROM ROME. R O M A O M A ORTHODOXY CARRIES THE LEGACY OF ROME THROUGHOUT THE WORLD
1920
« on: March 02, 2016, 02:51:37 PM »
You're confirming my argument. God created the rules for what is or is not sinful. Refusing to follow God's rules is sinful.
Sin did not conceptually exist until Man created it. Sin wasn't a *thing* until it first appeared. Sin still isn't a thing so much as a way to describe failing to do a thing.
Pages: 1 ... 626364 6566 ... 256
|