Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - DAS B00T x2

Pages: 1 ... 933934935 936937 ... 1254
28021
The Flood / Re: Are automatic weapons all that dangerous?
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:59:52 PM »
...Well, yeah. A gun that can fire half a dozen bullets in one second is probably more likely to kill somebody than a gun that fires just one bullet per trigger-squeeze.

Debatable.

It's down to cartridge, recoil, weight of the firearm, and shooter ability.

There is a reason why they call it "Full Retard."

Yeah, but at the end of the day the odds of six pieces of burning-hot metal getting fired in rapid succession is more likely to kill someone than just one.
That would be a viable point to make if we were debating the effectiveness of muskets vs. LMG's.

28022
The Flood / Re: Are automatic weapons all that dangerous?
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:58:03 PM »
It's designed to put a shitload of rounds downrange to make the enemy stay in cover so that your men can move forward and then kill the enemy with their semi-auto AR's.
Man, now I'm convinced that it's logical to sell them to ordinary civilians.
Brotip: your typical sandy hook dude is gonna do more damage with a semi-auto weapon than a full auto any day.

28023
The Flood / Re: (☠) "you cared enough to respond"
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:56:31 PM »
I say I don't care about a lot of topics.

I also jump on Tblocks for posting "sigh" in every gun thread ever.

TL:DR, Verby wins.

28024
The Flood / Re: Are automatic weapons all that dangerous?
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:55:00 PM »
Machine guns are actually designed for the purpose of killing people efficiently and quickly.
LOL fucking no.
It's designed to put a shitload of rounds downrange to make the enemy stay in cover so that your men can move forward and then kill the enemy with their semi-auto AR's.

28025
The Flood / Re: Are automatic weapons all that dangerous?
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:53:55 PM »
Eh.

Automatic fire is more for suppressing an enemy than actually killing them. If you can keep the enemies head down you can get a team out to flank them and neutralize them. That's one of the big reasons why a SAW gunner is in every rifle squad. They put enough volume of fire downrange to let the other guys get into a position to kill the bad guys.

Even when you move onto Machineguns like the M240, M60, etc... It's mostly down to suppressing the enemy rather than killing them.



I see no civilian practical purpose for Full retard other than it being fun and awesome. I'd never own a full retard gun because I'd never afford the ammo. Though of the Hughes amendment was repealed and NFA took a nose dive and all new rifles were select fire, I guess I'd have one.

I'd much rather be pumping rounds downrange in semi-automatic. I care more about shot placement over volume of fire.
Itt: Kraut says what I say less drunkenly and we #shrek everyone else.

28026
The Flood / Re: Are automatic weapons all that dangerous?
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:52:46 PM »
The only point of a gun that large is to kill a lot of people in a small amount of time.
>we need vidya for fun but you can't kill paper or beer cans for entertainment
>hunting isn't a thing
>target shooting isn't fun
>sporting clays isn't an age old pastime

Class pls, I thought you were better than Max.


If you really need a gun like this for shooting beer cans, deer, or any other target, you need to rethink your life.
>not wanting a glorious Stoner master LMG to enshrine and go dakadakadaka at the ranges with.

It's really no different than people owning 200+hp cars. You don't need to go 0 to 60 in four seconds flat, and you may lose control and kill someone doing it.

28027
The Flood / Re: american police
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:49:24 PM »
car mustve been black

invisible and black

so at night this occurred
i still don't fully understand this post
Can't see a nigger at nt unless he smiles. igh

28028
The Flood / Re: (☠) "you cared enough to respond"
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:46:30 PM »
I'm lazy and intoxicated. Recap of pages four to now, please.

28029
The Flood / Re: Are automatic weapons all that dangerous?
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:45:45 PM »
The only point of a gun that large is to kill a lot of people in a small amount of time.
>we need vidya for fun but you can't kill paper or beer cans for entertainment
>hunting isn't a thing
>target shooting isn't fun
>sporting clays isn't an age old pastime

Class pls, I thought you were better than Max.

28030
The Flood / Re: Are automatic weapons all that dangerous?
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:38:45 PM »
Can you kill thirty people in sixty seconds with  a knife?
Yes.

28031
The Flood / Re: Are automatic weapons all that dangerous?
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:19:46 PM »
Eeeeeeeeeeeeehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

You can inflict more casualties in the technical sense spraying into a crowd with a full auto in a small amount of time, but keep in mind that casualty =/= death.

Honestly, full auto has no purpose in a handheald weapon aside from suppressive fire, and that's supposed to keep the enemy down so your guys can move.

In a typical mall, I could inflict more casualties and more death with a semi-auto AR than one capable of and set to full retard.

28032
The Flood / Re: Well, that just happened...
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:04:53 PM »
I think people need to calm down and not let it blow up into such a huge thing...the alt was banned and if the mods figure out who it really is then their main will get banned into oblivion too.

For all we know it could be one of the angry guys from offtopic or something. Either way freaking out about it is probably what they wanted.
What, you mean like Viltre?
No idea. But I mean chances are that it's someone who hates us or doesn't even frequent the site. Or maybe it was for a sick laugh or something.

I mean this is like...Blackbox level stuff.
I hope you're not comparing mutilated animals to CP

CP is on a whole nother dimension of fucked up
Honestly I think they're on the same level of fucked up. An animal being tortured, mutilated, and raped is pretty fucking bad compared to a little girl just standing there naked.

Both people should be arrested and locked up tight.
Just spreading pictures of mutilated animals is not nearly as bad as spreading pictures of CP, though. You can't argue with that.
I'd actually argue that uploading the picture of an animal that you cut open and bled to death, then proceeded to mutilate for no reason is actually worse than uploading a picture you took of a naked child.

The moment the later escalates to anything further though... instantly many times worse than the animal corpse.

28033
The Flood / Re: Axent Wear Cat Ears
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:01:19 PM »
They should come with a cat tail butt plug accessory.
I might buy them then.

28034
The Flood / Re: You know the drill.
« on: January 15, 2015, 08:00:06 PM »
Special.
She was a lovely little snub nose and I miss her dearly.

>.38 special
>Not .357 mag

Do you even wheelgun?

Or Southern Rock?
Do you even Donnie van Zant?
YouTube

28035
The Flood / Re: You know the drill.
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:54:53 PM »
Hey man, I liked to pretend I was a cowboy.
Except I had a .38 and not a .45
And it was a Smith and not a Colt.

lolonly.38.
Wait...
Yeah, put that in your nine and suck it.

Depends on what .38.

.380 might fit. .38acp is similar to 9 in case length. .38 special is to long unlike you.
Special.
She was a lovely little snub nose and I miss her dearly.

28036
The Flood / Re: You know the drill.
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:50:57 PM »
Hey man, I liked to pretend I was a cowboy.
Except I had a .38 and not a .45
And it was a Smith and not a Colt.

lolonly.38.
Wait...
Yeah, put that in your nine and suck it.

28037
The Flood / Re: Well, that just happened...
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:49:58 PM »
Did the image have penetration or was it just nudity. If it had penetration, it definitely needs to be reported. If it was a genital exhibition, it also needs to be reported. But if it was just some naked kid standing around then there isn't much weight behind it if it is reported.
It was just a nude kid. That was clearly forcibly made to pose
In what way? The exhibition of genitals is what make CP into CP. Nude children standing around doesn't count. I want to know if this is really something that we should be worrying about.
Yes, the genitals were visible, but at this point, I'm with Chronic.
We don't need the kind of attention 4chan gets.

As long as the genitals were not the focus of the image, we shouldn't have any real level of worry. If anything, I'm worried that this site might get shut down by whoever is hosting it because of someone reporting this incident. And what is chronic saying?

Either way, even things such as this can't be good for the well-being of the site.
The way it's been promptly dealt with should leave us with no issues from whoever is hosting us now.

28038
The Flood / Re: You know the drill.
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:45:46 PM »
That there looks like a GLOCK brand GLOCK chambered in 9GLOCKIMETER.

>tfw no more handfuns
>tfw my only handgun was a revolver so I couldn't have participated in this thread

scrub

But you got the 9glockimeter right.
Hey man, I liked to pretend I was a cowboy.
Except I had a .38 and not a .45
And it was a Smith and not a Colt.

28039
The Flood / Re: You know the drill.
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:40:07 PM »
That there looks like a GLOCK brand GLOCK chambered in 9GLOCKIMETER.

>tfw no more handfuns
>tfw my only handgun was a revolver so I couldn't have participated in this thread

28040
The Flood / Re: Well, that just happened...
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:36:19 PM »
Did the image have penetration or was it just nudity. If it had penetration, it definitely needs to be reported. If it was a genital exhibition, it also needs to be reported. But if it was just some naked kid standing around then there isn't much weight behind it if it is reported.
It was just a nude kid. That was clearly forcibly made to pose
That's it?

And here I thought I missed something interesting...

28041
The Flood / Re: My math teacher goes on #Offtopic
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:34:22 PM »
Did you call him a Newfoman desticle?

28042
Serious / Re: Your Thoughts on Reparative Therapy?
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:33:29 PM »
I would only condone this kind of therapy in areas of society where sexual impulses can potentially inflict detriment and pain to other people. Namely paedophilia.
But it doesn't work. I mean, do this, and now you've got a bunch of angry and even more frightened pedophiles who are more likely to be a danger to themselves or others.
Perhaps I need to change my wording.

What I mean when I refer to reparative therapy is to help patients cope, and to a certain extent, mitigate particularly sexual feelings (pernicious or otherwise) that they have towards children. I would never condone full on brainwashing and lobotomies, or whatever would be considered ethically dubious medical practice.

I think we can both agree it's a better alternative to just locking them up and expecting them to magically stop feeling sexual towards children because they did time.
Ah.

I agree whole-heatedly. That needs to me a more common sentiment.

28043
Serious / Re: Fighting over Donetsk Airport
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:18:27 PM »
Good to see the Ukranians holding Dontesk. A few months ago I was kinda worried they were about to fall under the surge of russian but not russian (swear on Putin's mom, sir) troops and equipment.

28044
Serious / Re: Your Thoughts on Reparative Therapy?
« on: January 15, 2015, 07:16:15 PM »
I would only condone this kind of therapy in areas of society where sexual impulses can potentially inflict detriment and pain to other people. Namely paedophilia.
But it doesn't work. I mean, do this, and now you've got a bunch of angry and even more frightened pedophiles who are more likely to be a danger to themselves or others.

28045
The Flood / Re: OFFICIAL CURRANTLY DOAN THRAEAD
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:46:27 PM »
currently litenan
Spoiler
YouTube

currently doin: makin airplanes in KSP

currently drinkin:
Spoiler

28046
The Flood / Re: Is it wrong to date my sister?
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:31:45 PM »
You know I actually went to high school with a girl that had sex with her first cousin. She didn't think there was a problem with it.
>Louisiana

28047
Hookah'd on Demonic Phonics.

28048
The Flood / Re: (☠) "you cared enough to respond"
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:26:13 PM »
I try not to let people know that I don't care when I don't have to. I prefer if they already know it according to the way that I act.

I do let people know sometimes, for the sake of clarity, however.
Ice mango, you ain't carin bout nuffin dou.

28049
The Flood / Re: Phone place is gonna "transfer" data to my new phone
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:24:27 PM »
This is why I keep all my porn on a flash drive.
I keep it in a very obvious photo album in my pictures folder for anyone who decides to guess my phone's password correctly to scar themselves with.

28050
The Flood / Re: Is it wrong to date my sister?
« on: January 15, 2015, 06:21:12 PM »
I REALLY don't need this
Is OP reminding you of those hot summer nights spent camping with your imouto?
It's more the time we went to a love hotel an- Oh.. You're still reading thinking we did?
How do you get love hotel from a horse pasture? The hell were you two doing?
Horses are dumb.
Ah, so your sister isn't very bright. Explains how you cohered her into this sick, incestuous fantasy of yours.
Don't call my sister a horse you ethical bastard
Shall I call her a pony instead? Are you one of them?
I'd rather let you throat fuck me than become a brony/pony fucker.
I'll be more than happy to.

Pages: 1 ... 933934935 936937 ... 1254