This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - DAS B00T x2
Pages: 1 ... 763764765 766767 ... 1254
22921
« on: April 27, 2015, 09:58:26 PM »
Seriously tho why do I know so many people from Finland?
I live in a city with more people in it than Finland and yet I know one person from Houston and SIX PEOPLE FROM FINLAND
HOW DOES THIS MAKE SENSE?
Because >Texas Oh boy am I dreading Texas when I go to visit my brother this fall...
22922
« on: April 27, 2015, 09:55:35 PM »
Ха-ха, очень смешно! Вы, люди, думаете, переводчик Google является настолько удивительным !?
Вы все пидарасы нужна мать Россия !
Better dead than Red Hitler should have allied with America in 1937
22923
« on: April 27, 2015, 09:53:05 PM »
OP, you can only say that if you're Hispanic and living in an area of the North East that is home to many, many old speakers of a bastardized German dialect. You see, these old men talking in harsh syllables easily offends the Hispanic, as they are frightened by the frequently harsh consonants. It upsets the Hispanic to great depth. enough for the caring and ethically friendly factory boss to ban the evil Germanic men from speaking their language, for they all know English quite well, while still allowing him and his friends to speak your smooth and flowing Spanish dialect, as some may struggle with the hard to grasp English language.
22924
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:56:47 PM »
That's fucked up beyond belief. How can you expect people to act nice before they get their morning coffee? That's just not possible.
I don't care how early it is. No one should EVER be rude to baristas/retail workers/servers/etc. They are there to help you, not to be your little bitch-fit target. I'm passive aggressive therefore I give them decaf muwahahaha!
There is a special place in hell for people who mess with someone else's coffee, and it's right next to Herman Goering's fat ass.
Hey, I only do it if they really really really piss me off. Like for instance this one random lady bullied two of our regulars and kicked them out of their spots because she had a "reservation" instead of asking politely I watched as she shoved the metal reservation sign into their faces and loudly said "MOVE NOW!" .She then continued to be a hassle, explained how she needed the extra boost and ordered an extra shot and made me write on the cup in HUGE ASS letters "EXTRA SHOT" when we have stickers that print out the drink with the modifications. I whispered to the barista making her drink "she's that cunt, decaf her ass" and they did and we all laughed.
Oh, well, women aren't people, so that's okay.
Wonderful reply. I'm not a total cunt because I will make a drink correct and if it doesn't taste right the first time I will remake it until the customer is happy. I have honestly only given decaf to two people in the three years I have worked at Starbucks.
Thanks, I worked hard on it.
22925
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:54:40 PM »
Das vs Luci
ew
Bring it on. I already #anallydevistated Kiyo.
22926
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:54:04 PM »
That's fucked up beyond belief. How can you expect people to act nice before they get their morning coffee? That's just not possible.
I don't care how early it is. No one should EVER be rude to baristas/retail workers/servers/etc. They are there to help you, not to be your little bitch-fit target. I'm passive aggressive therefore I give them decaf muwahahaha!
There is a special place in hell for people who mess with someone else's coffee, and it's right next to Herman Goering's fat ass.
Hey, I only do it if they really really really piss me off. Like for instance this one random lady bullied two of our regulars and kicked them out of their spots because she had a "reservation" instead of asking politely I watched as she shoved the metal reservation sign into their faces and loudly said "MOVE NOW!" .She then continued to be a hassle, explained how she needed the extra boost and ordered an extra shot and made me write on the cup in HUGE ASS letters "EXTRA SHOT" when we have stickers that print out the drink with the modifications. I whispered to the barista making her drink "she's that cunt, decaf her ass" and they did and we all laughed.
Oh, well, women aren't people, so that's okay.
22927
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:48:10 PM »
That's fucked up beyond belief. How can you expect people to act nice before they get their morning coffee? That's just not possible.
I don't care how early it is. No one should EVER be rude to baristas/retail workers/servers/etc. They are there to help you, not to be your little bitch-fit target. I'm passive aggressive therefore I give them decaf muwahahaha!
There is a special place in hell for people who mess with someone else's coffee, and it's right next to Herman Goering's fat ass.
22928
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:42:17 PM »
That's fucked up beyond belief. How can you expect people to act nice before they get their morning coffee? That's just not possible.
22929
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:35:47 PM »
I've fapped to pretty much everything you casual vanilla sluts
mfw i bet you don't even pizza
22930
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:29:30 PM »
God, I wish somehing like this would happen in Philly or Reading. Even Harrisburg. I'd make the travel to hunt some big game.
22931
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:26:32 PM »
Looting a mall now
Good lord... what are these people hoping to accomplish?
22932
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:18:25 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
lolwut? There's so much stupid in that statement that it's nearly off the charts.
Please tell me how a country of 150 million could possibly effectively root out "the troublesome ones" from a population of 50 million. And not to mention the logistical problems with doing such a thing. Anyways, that statement is made out of pure, refined stupid.
The evidence is there. If you chose to believe otherwise, then I respect your decision.
Oh, please show me this "evidence".
I've already show you.
Here is a supplemental flyer though.
The wild claims that Arabs keep black in check and that Brazil led a campaign to root out all "problematic" black people without posting any sources proving that those claims are true?
That's not evidence, that's crap that conspiracy sites like to post. LOL
Observe social standings and social engineering and you'll note.
"I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There scarcely ever was a civilized nation of that complexion, nor even any individual, eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures amongst them, no arts, no sciences. On the other hand, the most rude and barbarous of the Whites, such as the ancient Germans, the present Tartars, have still something eminent about them, in their valour, form of government, or some other particular. Such a uniform and constant difference could not happen, in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction between these breeds of men. - Hume - of National Character, 1748
"In the hot countries the human being matures in all aspects earlier, but does not, however, reach the perfection of those in the temperate zones. Humanity is at its greatest perfection in the race of the whites. The yellow Indians do have a meager talent. The Negroes are far below them and at the lowest point are a part of the American peoples." - Kant - Physical Geography, 1756
What has changed since those times other than the now Americanized spelling of valor?
>citing books about black-white comparisons from the 18th Century as if they were legitimate
Here's an example of another massive crock of BS that was taken seriously by racial theorists at the time, and this was from the 19th and 20th Centuries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man
Except the philosophies of Kant, Hume, Schopenhauer, and the like have stood the test of time while the Pittdown man was quite scientifically debunked.
And there's not a single chance that all of those claims that anyone other than whites aren't human were made solely to justify colonial domination and enslavement? There's no empirical evidence whatsoever suggesting that blacks, Arabs, or whatever aren't human aside from crap made by fringe sources.
Who ever said that they're not human? They are. They're simply lesser humans.
"Lesser humans"
That doesn't even mean anything. You're either human or you aren't. There's no such thing as a "lesser" human. Proposing that such a thing exists are just toxic words that leads to violence.
All beings have a default value of worth
Not all beings are equal
How is this a hard concept to grasp?
Not all beings are equal, but that says nothing about their "worth". Implying that some groups people are somehow worth less than others are yet more wild claims which promote hatred and violence against others.
No. These ideas do not promote violence. That is the work of those who would corrupt the word of scientific truth for their own pleasure or social/political/monetary gains.
Cause nobody in history has ever used the fact that some races are "lesser" as a basis for genocide, no. That would be unreasonable.
That is their own failure, just as with those who would use Islam to spread war and destruction.
And it's not like that "scientific evidence" proving that other races are "lesser" came from those people who promoted genocide, slavery, and domination...
I know what you're referencing. Let's leave the wickedly corrupt "teachings" of the Nazi party out of this.
22933
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:16:04 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
lolwut? There's so much stupid in that statement that it's nearly off the charts.
Please tell me how a country of 150 million could possibly effectively root out "the troublesome ones" from a population of 50 million. And not to mention the logistical problems with doing such a thing. Anyways, that statement is made out of pure, refined stupid.
The evidence is there. If you chose to believe otherwise, then I respect your decision.
Oh, please show me this "evidence".
I've already show you.
Here is a supplemental flyer though.
The wild claims that Arabs keep black in check and that Brazil led a campaign to root out all "problematic" black people without posting any sources proving that those claims are true?
That's not evidence, that's crap that conspiracy sites like to post. LOL
Observe social standings and social engineering and you'll note.
"I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There scarcely ever was a civilized nation of that complexion, nor even any individual, eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures amongst them, no arts, no sciences. On the other hand, the most rude and barbarous of the Whites, such as the ancient Germans, the present Tartars, have still something eminent about them, in their valour, form of government, or some other particular. Such a uniform and constant difference could not happen, in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction between these breeds of men. - Hume - of National Character, 1748
"In the hot countries the human being matures in all aspects earlier, but does not, however, reach the perfection of those in the temperate zones. Humanity is at its greatest perfection in the race of the whites. The yellow Indians do have a meager talent. The Negroes are far below them and at the lowest point are a part of the American peoples." - Kant - Physical Geography, 1756
What has changed since those times other than the now Americanized spelling of valor?
>citing books about black-white comparisons from the 18th Century as if they were legitimate
Here's an example of another massive crock of BS that was taken seriously by racial theorists at the time, and this was from the 19th and 20th Centuries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man
Except the philosophies of Kant, Hume, Schopenhauer, and the like have stood the test of time while the Pittdown man was quite scientifically debunked.
And there's not a single chance that all of those claims that anyone other than whites aren't human were made solely to justify colonial domination and enslavement? There's no empirical evidence whatsoever suggesting that blacks, Arabs, or whatever aren't human aside from crap made by fringe sources.
Who ever said that they're not human? They are. They're simply lesser humans.
"Lesser humans"
That doesn't even mean anything. You're either human or you aren't. There's no such thing as a "lesser" human. Proposing that such a thing exists are just toxic words that leads to violence.
All beings have a default value of worth
Not all beings are equal
How is this a hard concept to grasp?
Not all beings are equal, but that says nothing about their "worth". Implying that some groups people are somehow worth less than others are yet more wild claims which promote hatred and violence against others.
No. These ideas do not promote violence. That is the work of those who would corrupt the word of scientific truth for their own pleasure or social/political/monetary gains.
Cause nobody in history has ever used the fact that some races are "lesser" as a basis for genocide, no. That would be unreasonable.
That is their own failure, just as with those who would use Islam to spread war and destruction.
22934
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:13:56 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
lolwut? There's so much stupid in that statement that it's nearly off the charts.
Please tell me how a country of 150 million could possibly effectively root out "the troublesome ones" from a population of 50 million. And not to mention the logistical problems with doing such a thing. Anyways, that statement is made out of pure, refined stupid.
The evidence is there. If you chose to believe otherwise, then I respect your decision.
Oh, please show me this "evidence".
I've already show you.
Here is a supplemental flyer though.
The wild claims that Arabs keep black in check and that Brazil led a campaign to root out all "problematic" black people without posting any sources proving that those claims are true?
That's not evidence, that's crap that conspiracy sites like to post. LOL
Observe social standings and social engineering and you'll note.
"I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There scarcely ever was a civilized nation of that complexion, nor even any individual, eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures amongst them, no arts, no sciences. On the other hand, the most rude and barbarous of the Whites, such as the ancient Germans, the present Tartars, have still something eminent about them, in their valour, form of government, or some other particular. Such a uniform and constant difference could not happen, in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction between these breeds of men. - Hume - of National Character, 1748
"In the hot countries the human being matures in all aspects earlier, but does not, however, reach the perfection of those in the temperate zones. Humanity is at its greatest perfection in the race of the whites. The yellow Indians do have a meager talent. The Negroes are far below them and at the lowest point are a part of the American peoples." - Kant - Physical Geography, 1756
What has changed since those times other than the now Americanized spelling of valor?
>citing books about black-white comparisons from the 18th Century as if they were legitimate
Here's an example of another massive crock of BS that was taken seriously by racial theorists at the time, and this was from the 19th and 20th Centuries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man
Except the philosophies of Kant, Hume, Schopenhauer, and the like have stood the test of time while the Pittdown man was quite scientifically debunked.
And there's not a single chance that all of those claims that anyone other than whites aren't human were made solely to justify colonial domination and enslavement? There's no empirical evidence whatsoever suggesting that blacks, Arabs, or whatever aren't human aside from crap made by fringe sources.
Who ever said that they're not human? They are. They're simply lesser humans.
"Lesser humans"
That doesn't even mean anything. You're either human or you aren't. There's no such thing as a "lesser" human. Proposing that such a thing exists are just toxic words that leads to violence.
All beings have a default value of worth
Not all beings are equal
How is this a hard concept to grasp?
Not all beings are equal, but that says nothing about their "worth". Implying that some groups people are somehow worth less than others are yet more wild claims which promote hatred and violence against others.
No. These ideas do not promote violence. That is the work of those who would corrupt the word of scientific truth for their own pleasure or social/political/monetary gains.
22935
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:09:42 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
lolwut? There's so much stupid in that statement that it's nearly off the charts.
Please tell me how a country of 150 million could possibly effectively root out "the troublesome ones" from a population of 50 million. And not to mention the logistical problems with doing such a thing. Anyways, that statement is made out of pure, refined stupid.
The evidence is there. If you chose to believe otherwise, then I respect your decision.
Oh, please show me this "evidence".
I've already show you.
Here is a supplemental flyer though.
The wild claims that Arabs keep black in check and that Brazil led a campaign to root out all "problematic" black people without posting any sources proving that those claims are true?
That's not evidence, that's crap that conspiracy sites like to post. LOL
Observe social standings and social engineering and you'll note.
"I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There scarcely ever was a civilized nation of that complexion, nor even any individual, eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures amongst them, no arts, no sciences. On the other hand, the most rude and barbarous of the Whites, such as the ancient Germans, the present Tartars, have still something eminent about them, in their valour, form of government, or some other particular. Such a uniform and constant difference could not happen, in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction between these breeds of men. - Hume - of National Character, 1748
"In the hot countries the human being matures in all aspects earlier, but does not, however, reach the perfection of those in the temperate zones. Humanity is at its greatest perfection in the race of the whites. The yellow Indians do have a meager talent. The Negroes are far below them and at the lowest point are a part of the American peoples." - Kant - Physical Geography, 1756
What has changed since those times other than the now Americanized spelling of valor?
>citing books about black-white comparisons from the 18th Century as if they were legitimate
Here's an example of another massive crock of BS that was taken seriously by racial theorists at the time, and this was from the 19th and 20th Centuries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man
Except the philosophies of Kant, Hume, Schopenhauer, and the like have stood the test of time while the Pittdown man was quite scientifically debunked.
And there's not a single chance that all of those claims that anyone other than whites aren't human were made solely to justify colonial domination and enslavement? There's no empirical evidence whatsoever suggesting that blacks, Arabs, or whatever aren't human aside from crap made by fringe sources.
Who ever said that they're not human? They are. They're simply lesser humans.
"Lesser humans"
That doesn't even mean anything. You're either human or you aren't. There's no such thing as a "lesser" human. Proposing that such a thing exists are just toxic words that leads to violence.
All beings have a default value of worth Not all beings are equal How is this a hard concept to grasp?
22936
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:06:01 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
lolwut? There's so much stupid in that statement that it's nearly off the charts.
Please tell me how a country of 150 million could possibly effectively root out "the troublesome ones" from a population of 50 million. And not to mention the logistical problems with doing such a thing. Anyways, that statement is made out of pure, refined stupid.
The evidence is there. If you chose to believe otherwise, then I respect your decision.
Oh, please show me this "evidence".
I've already show you.
Here is a supplemental flyer though.
The wild claims that Arabs keep black in check and that Brazil led a campaign to root out all "problematic" black people without posting any sources proving that those claims are true?
That's not evidence, that's crap that conspiracy sites like to post. LOL
Observe social standings and social engineering and you'll note.
"I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There scarcely ever was a civilized nation of that complexion, nor even any individual, eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures amongst them, no arts, no sciences. On the other hand, the most rude and barbarous of the Whites, such as the ancient Germans, the present Tartars, have still something eminent about them, in their valour, form of government, or some other particular. Such a uniform and constant difference could not happen, in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction between these breeds of men. - Hume - of National Character, 1748
"In the hot countries the human being matures in all aspects earlier, but does not, however, reach the perfection of those in the temperate zones. Humanity is at its greatest perfection in the race of the whites. The yellow Indians do have a meager talent. The Negroes are far below them and at the lowest point are a part of the American peoples." - Kant - Physical Geography, 1756
What has changed since those times other than the now Americanized spelling of valor?
>citing books about black-white comparisons from the 18th Century as if they were legitimate
Here's an example of another massive crock of BS that was taken seriously by racial theorists at the time, and this was from the 19th and 20th Centuries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man
Except the philosophies of Kant, Hume, Schopenhauer, and the like have stood the test of time while the Pittdown man was quite scientifically debunked.
And there's not a single chance that all of those claims that anyone other than whites aren't human were made solely to justify colonial domination and enslavement? There's no empirical evidence whatsoever suggesting that blacks, Arabs, or whatever aren't human aside from crap made by fringe sources.
Who ever said that they're not human? They are. They're simply lesser humans.
22937
« on: April 27, 2015, 08:02:56 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
lolwut? There's so much stupid in that statement that it's nearly off the charts.
Please tell me how a country of 150 million could possibly effectively root out "the troublesome ones" from a population of 50 million. And not to mention the logistical problems with doing such a thing. Anyways, that statement is made out of pure, refined stupid.
The evidence is there. If you chose to believe otherwise, then I respect your decision.
Oh, please show me this "evidence".
I've already show you.
Here is a supplemental flyer though.
The wild claims that Arabs keep black in check and that Brazil led a campaign to root out all "problematic" black people without posting any sources proving that those claims are true?
That's not evidence, that's crap that conspiracy sites like to post. LOL
Observe social standings and social engineering and you'll note.
"I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There scarcely ever was a civilized nation of that complexion, nor even any individual, eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures amongst them, no arts, no sciences. On the other hand, the most rude and barbarous of the Whites, such as the ancient Germans, the present Tartars, have still something eminent about them, in their valour, form of government, or some other particular. Such a uniform and constant difference could not happen, in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction between these breeds of men. - Hume - of National Character, 1748
"In the hot countries the human being matures in all aspects earlier, but does not, however, reach the perfection of those in the temperate zones. Humanity is at its greatest perfection in the race of the whites. The yellow Indians do have a meager talent. The Negroes are far below them and at the lowest point are a part of the American peoples." - Kant - Physical Geography, 1756
What has changed since those times other than the now Americanized spelling of valor?
>citing books about black-white comparisons from the 18th Century as if they were legitimate
Here's an example of another massive crock of BS that was taken seriously by racial theorists at the time, and this was from the 19th and 20th Centuries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man
Except the philosophies of Kant, Hume, Schopenhauer, and the like have stood the test of time while the Pittdown man was quite scientifically debunked.
22938
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:53:39 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
lolwut? There's so much stupid in that statement that it's nearly off the charts.
Please tell me how a country of 150 million could possibly effectively root out "the troublesome ones" from a population of 50 million. And not to mention the logistical problems with doing such a thing. Anyways, that statement is made out of pure, refined stupid.
The evidence is there. If you chose to believe otherwise, then I respect your decision.
Oh, please show me this "evidence".
I've already show you.
Here is a supplemental flyer though.
The wild claims that Arabs keep black in check and that Brazil led a campaign to root out all "problematic" black people without posting any sources proving that those claims are true?
That's not evidence, that's crap that conspiracy sites like to post. LOL
Observe social standings and social engineering and you'll note. "I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There scarcely ever was a civilized nation of that complexion, nor even any individual, eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures amongst them, no arts, no sciences. On the other hand, the most rude and barbarous of the Whites, such as the ancient Germans, the present Tartars, have still something eminent about them, in their valour, form of government, or some other particular. Such a uniform and constant difference could not happen, in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction between these breeds of men. - Hume - of National Character, 1748 "In the hot countries the human being matures in all aspects earlier, but does not, however, reach the perfection of those in the temperate zones. Humanity is at its greatest perfection in the race of the whites. The yellow Indians do have a meager talent. The Negroes are far below them and at the lowest point are a part of the American peoples." - Kant - Physical Geography, 1756 What has changed since those times other than the now Americanized spelling of valor?
22939
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:47:51 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
lolwut? There's so much stupid in that statement that it's nearly off the charts.
Please tell me how a country of 150 million could possibly effectively root out "the troublesome ones" from a population of 50 million. And not to mention the logistical problems with doing such a thing. Anyways, that statement is made out of pure, refined stupid.
The evidence is there. If you chose to believe otherwise, then I respect your decision.
Oh, please show me this "evidence".
I've already show you. Here is a supplemental flyer though.
22940
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:41:25 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
lolwut? There's so much stupid in that statement that it's nearly off the charts.
Please tell me how a country of 150 million could possibly effectively root out "the troublesome ones" from a population of 50 million. And not to mention the logistical problems with doing such a thing. Anyways, that statement is made out of pure, refined stupid.
The evidence is there. If you chose to believe otherwise, then I respect your decision.
22941
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:39:35 PM »
does futanari count
only full package loli futa counts.
22942
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:38:59 PM »
No wonder you lot are so fucked up.
22943
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:38:14 PM »
needs more djent and teenage angst.
my mom says i cant
go out with the neighbor's 7 year old
and im like shut up mom what do you know you're like 78 you dont know what's cool these days
I just wanted a pepsi One fucking pepsi... and a twelve year old girl and she wouldn't fucking give one to me
22944
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:36:59 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
Not really. The conditions faced by blacks in Latin America are nearly the same faced by blacks in the US. As in being transported in slave ships. And look at how different outcomes the two groups had. And no, blacks weren't really bred with Spaniards and natives on any significant scale. A full 33% percent of Brazil's population is completely black, and yet they don't really have problems there like how the blacks here have problems.
Because the brazilians were smart. They took out the troublesome ones. They controlled the gene pool. They wouldn't have let Malcom X live.
22945
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:33:28 PM »
needs more djent and teenage angst.
22946
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:28:25 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
Even if that were the case, which it isn't, you haven't said anything about Latin America and Africa. Which aside from northern Africa (which is already Arab-majority), there aren't any Arabs around to "hold" the blacks back.
And again, what you said made no sense. "It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around." is so arbitrary and stupid and is just an uneducated assumption at best.
Because they were bred with the Spaniards and natives. Domestic bovine are tempered nothing like their wild European ancestors.
22947
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:26:38 PM »
22948
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:16:59 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order.
In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
What you said right there was a social condition. So you pretty much explained in your own post that the behavior of black people here is due to social conditions rather than racial whateverism.
It's in their genes to go wild when machete wielding nutjobs screaming Allahu Ackbar aren't around.
22949
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:12:03 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Which can clearly explain how blacks in the US are significantly more rowdy than blacks in Europe, Africa, or Latin America.
#logic
Because in Europe the Muslims are keeping them in order. In America, we don't have the Islamic population for that.
22950
« on: April 27, 2015, 07:04:16 PM »
Nah, I'm more inclined to believe that hoodlum shenanigans are in ones DNA.
Pages: 1 ... 763764765 766767 ... 1254
|
Show Posts
