Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Alternative Facts

Pages: 1 ... 244245246 247248 ... 306
7351
Why not consider countries in East Asia that are Muslim part of the Middle East too? It's ridiculous.

Some people do. The line split between North/South Africa isn't 100% definite, but it generally refers to any countries north of Sub-Saharan Africa, with the countries along the Mediterranean Sea being 100% in the bunch.

You can decide where that line is yourself, just telling you how it is.

7352
I'd transfer

Because your fraternity is shutdown for three weeks?

Yep.

Well then. Good thing you don't go there.

7353
I'd transfer

Because your fraternity is shutdown for three weeks?

7354
Then most people need to learn their geography.

Not so much geography, but geographical regions. North Africa has more in common (Debated) with the Middle East (Religion, Cultures, even skin tone) than Sub-Saharan Africa.

Not to mention there's Islam all throughout Africa and this attack was in Kenya.



Yes, but Islam is, for the most part, concentrated in the North. Sub-Saharan Africa is more Christian or Animism. Plus, Kenya is one of the countries divided between the two/three (See the map).

7355
Serious / Re: Sexual Assaults on US College Campuses.
« on: November 22, 2014, 01:18:22 PM »
Whelp. Don't know why I'm bringing this back buuuuuuuuuuut....

U-Va. president suspends fraternities until Jan. 9 in wake of rape allegations

Quote
University of Virginia President Teresa A. Sullivan said Saturday that she is suspending all campus fraternities through early January, acting days after a magazine published an account from the victim of an alleged 2012 gang rape inside a U-Va. fraternity house.

The suspension, Sullivan said in a statement posted to the university Web site, will continue until Jan. 9, when the spring semester is set to begin.

“In the intervening period we will assemble groups of students, faculty, alumni, and other concerned parties to discuss our next steps in preventing sexual assault and sexual violence on Grounds,” she said, using university parlance for its Charlottesville campus.

The university’s Board of Visitors will meet Tuesday to discuss the allegations, aired in a Rolling Stone magazine article, as well as policies and procedures on sexual assault, Sullivan said.

The article, which was posted online this week, describes a brutal sex assault that allegedly occurred in the Phi Kappa Psi house. The victim, who was given an alias by the magazine, said a fraternity member led her upstairs during a party and into a dark room, where several men raped her.

Her story roiled the campus Friday, raising doubts among students, faculty and parents about the way the case was handled by university administrators.

Elected officials, including Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) and Sen. Mark Warner (D), expressed deep concern in recent days about the allegations. The Charlottesville police are investigating the account.

7356
And this is why Islam and Christianity should never have been introduced to Africa, the fuckers take it way too seriously.

Backwards cunts.
Because they don't do this shit in the Middle East? Nice way to say "lolniggers" by the way. Really subtle.

Most people lump North Africa (Predominately Islam) in with the Middle East.

7357
Serious / Re: Who's responsible for the Great Recession?
« on: November 22, 2014, 01:05:18 PM »
Countries such as? Just curious - their recession likely stemmed from the recession of other countries - not internal problems.
I think Canada and Australia were the notable ones, but I can't find the fucking data at the moment >.>

Yeah - both of their recessions likely stemmed from the recessions in other countries, especially Australia.
Actually, if I remember correctly, Australia avoided a recession. But then, that's unsurprising given Australia's usual resilience to shit like this.

Canada also fared very well, too, mostly thanks to Mark Carney who was head of the Bank of Canada.

Spoiler
And who is now head of the Bank of England, suck it yanks!

Yeah, I was just gonna say. Here's some GDP numbers from 2009 - not the best indication, but countries in brown were countries in recession:



Canada had a minor hit, comparable to the US, but Australia actually saw growth. Not sure how the numbers look for 2010 and beyond.

7358
Serious / Re: Who's responsible for the Great Recession?
« on: November 22, 2014, 12:58:42 PM »
Countries such as? Just curious - their recession likely stemmed from the recession of other countries - not internal problems.
I think Canada and Australia were the notable ones, but I can't find the fucking data at the moment >.>

Yeah - both of their recessions likely stemmed from the recessions in other countries, especially Australia.

7359
Serious / Re: AMA about my opinions/beliefs/life
« on: November 22, 2014, 12:49:34 PM »
I don't go out and actively protest, I have an opinion.

And you're welcome to that opinion, no matter how archaic it might appear to others.


7360
Serious / Re: Who's responsible for the Great Recession?
« on: November 22, 2014, 12:48:38 PM »
The problems escalated for roughly twenty years, and then came crashing down.
I'm not sold on the whole bubble theses, it's too easy to retroactively say "Oh look, a bubble!" Not to mention, a few countries which did go into recession didn't even see a collapse of the housing market.

Countries such as? Just curious - their recession likely stemmed from the recession of other countries - not internal problems.

The markets were signalling poor performance prior to the crash, but - at least in my opinion - the government failed to respond.

Most likely.

7361
Serious / Re: AMA about my opinions/beliefs/life
« on: November 22, 2014, 12:46:28 PM »
Yes we have true marriages IMO.

Alright. Don't see how that exists, going off the origin of marriage, but okay.

And how exactly do I try and "stop" gay marriage?

Well, based on your online persona, you seem inclined to try and allow states to exercise bans on same-sex marriage.

7362
Serious / Re: AMA about my opinions/beliefs/life
« on: November 22, 2014, 12:44:05 PM »
I just find 2 people of the same sex together revolting. Its a fucked up thing to say (especially when one of my brothers is gay and married) but its just how I truly feel.

Believe me - I feel the same way about some heterosexuals marrying. That doesn't mean I believe in trying to stop them, because it's none of my damn business.

No the sanctity of marriage isn't ruined by celebs because they weren't entering into a true marriage anyway. A true marriage being religious.

So, now we have "true marriages"?

7363
Serious / Re: Who's responsible for the Great Recession?
« on: November 22, 2014, 12:42:34 PM »
Various groups - the government's policies which directly impacted various financial, banking, and housing sectors across the globe. The problems escalated for roughly twenty years, and then came crashing down.

I could find the mile long post I made debating Kinder on the subject, maybe later.

7364
Serious / Re: Nice guy GameStop
« on: November 22, 2014, 11:34:52 AM »
I mean. Businesses can get away with it, so they will.

It's shitty, yeah. But, welcome to our economy.

7365
Serious / Re: Biblical contradictions
« on: November 22, 2014, 10:58:33 AM »
YouTube


I feel like this video is perfect for this thread.

7366
Serious / Re: Biblical contradictions
« on: November 22, 2014, 10:48:28 AM »
It's a 2,000 year old book, written by man, to explain the unexplainable at the time.

Hence why I choose not to believe in most of it - so many contradictions that, one part is going to tell you the exact opposite of another part. Which am I supposed to follow, God?
Can't answer for Christianity, but Islam did have a nice little clause stating that whatever was written later is what you should follow.

No idea. I gave up on religion classes in seventh grade, so my knowledge on Biblical scripture and policy is not up to date.
I don't think anyone needs to be "up to date" on a millennia-old book.

Touche.

7367
Serious / House Intelligence Committee Releases New Benghazi Report
« on: November 22, 2014, 10:45:41 AM »
And guess what...they found nothing!

Quote
WASHINGTON -- Yet another detailed investigation into the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, has refuted claims that there was a coverup or that officials didn't do all they could at the time to save the four Americans killed that night.

The latest findings, released Friday, come from the declassified two-year investigation of the House Intelligence Committee, which conducted an exhaustive probe into the incident, including claims that the White House cooked up phony talking points for then-UN Ambassador Susan Rice.

The report did find that the State Department was unable to protect the facility in eastern Libya where Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others were killed, but also contradicts many of the charges leveled at the Obama administration in the days and years following the attacks.

Among its findings, the report says CIA personnel responded not just well, but heroically; that there was no "stand down" order, as some critics have claimed; there was no intimidation of witnesses by superiors; there was no intelligence failure prior to the attack; and that a "mixed group" of individuals, including some linked to al Qaeda, participated in the attack.

But perhaps the most significant conclusion is its finding that Rice's talking points -- a key focus of the Benghazi Select Committee empaneled by House Speaker John Boehner -- were not part of an attempt to conceal the severity of the incident.

According to the report, early intelligence that the attacks were sparked by an Internet video was "not accurate," but not intentionally so. And the report holds that the process that produced Rice's now-infamous talking points was flawed, resulting in errors rather than deliberate lies. Indeed, the report determined that the CIA had not sorted out the conflicting intelligence until two days after Rice appeared on television claiming the attacks stemmed from a protest.

In a joint statement accompanying the release of the report, Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) and the committee's top Democrat, Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (Md.), said its probe was extensive:

"For over two years, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence exhaustively investigated the September 11, 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi Libya. We spent thousands of hours asking questions, poring over documents, reviewing intelligence assessments, reading cables and emails, and held a total of 20 Committee events and hearings. We conducted detailed interviews with senior intelligence officials from Benghazi and Tripoli as well as eight security personnel on the ground in Benghazi that night. Based on the testimony and the documents we reviewed, we concluded that all the CIA officers in Benghazi were heroes. Their actions saved lives."

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), a member of the Intelligence Committee and the Benghazi Select Committee, said in a statement that the new document should finally close the door on the conspiracy chatter.

"It's my hope that this report will put to rest many of the questions that have been asked and answered yet again, and that the Benghazi Select Committee will accept these findings and instead focus its attention on the State Department's progress in securing our facilities around the world and standing up our fast response capabilities," Schiff said.

So far the Benghazi Select Committee, led by Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), has held one hearing focusing on the issue of securing diplomatic facilities.

The House Armed Services Committee, the Senate Armed Services Committee and the State Department's independent review board have all come to similar conclusions, even before the House launched its Benghazi panel.

Seriously, can we stop wasting money trying to find impeachable offenses when, after two years of trying, there are none?

7368
Serious / Re: Biblical contradictions
« on: November 22, 2014, 10:43:00 AM »
It's a 2,000 year old book, written by man, to explain the unexplainable at the time.

Hence why I choose not to believe in most of it - so many contradictions that, one part is going to tell you the exact opposite of another part. Which am I supposed to follow, God?
Can't answer for Christianity, but Islam did have a nice little clause stating that whatever was written later is what you should follow.

No idea. I gave up on religion classes in seventh grade, so my knowledge on Biblical scripture and policy is not up to date.

7369
Serious / Re: Biblical contradictions
« on: November 22, 2014, 10:38:29 AM »
It's a 2,000 year old book, written by man, to explain the unexplainable at the time.

Hence why I choose not to believe in most of it - so many contradictions that, one part is going to tell you the exact opposite of another part. Which am I supposed to follow, God?

7370
The Flood / Re: rate my nameplate?
« on: November 22, 2014, 09:19:27 AM »
Feels like I'm at a rave.

7371
The Flood / Re: Florida is easily the shittiest state in the US
« on: November 22, 2014, 09:15:01 AM »
Montana is easily the shittiest, because it's so damn useless.
Great hunting grounds though.

Oh, you can get those in a ton of states.e

7372
The Flood / Re: Florida is easily the shittiest state in the US
« on: November 22, 2014, 09:10:18 AM »
Montana is easily the shittiest, because it's so damn useless.

7373
The Flood / Re: Congrats to our new Monitors, Sandtrap and Flee!
« on: November 21, 2014, 11:19:52 PM »
Set your watches folks. I give it a day and a half before I dun goof.

Place your bets!

Naww. We train you.

And if you do fuck up, we beat you into submission.

7374
The Flood / Re: ITT: Hot and Ready CP
« on: November 21, 2014, 11:06:00 PM »
BBQ Chicken Pizza or bust.


7375
News / Re: Apply to be a Monitor
« on: November 21, 2014, 11:04:42 PM »
Welcome to the Monitor team, the both of you. :)

7376
Serious / Re: More lawsuits. Now in immigration flavor.
« on: November 21, 2014, 06:09:58 PM »
Bravo. There is no Constitutional basis for this E.O nor is it relevant to his job as enforcer of the laws

Two things.

First, as the man said in his goddamn speech (In much nicer terms):

"Yo, Congress! You've been trying to fix this issue for twenty years but because you're fucking idiots, you refuse to do a damn thing! Therefore, I am passing these executive orders, which clarify deportation laws and who we will be deporting, until you idiots get your shit together and decide to pass a damn solution!"

Second, let's take a look at the explanation as to what executive orders do:

Quote
executive orders have significant influence over the internal affairs of government, deciding how and to what degree laws will be enforced, dealing with emergencies, waging war, and in general fine policy choices in the implementation of broad statutes.

There are dozens of laws on deportation. These executive order clarify to what degree they will be applied - namely, that this certain subsection of immigrants (Those who have been here five years, have children that are permanent residents, pass a background check, and pay taxes), will be shielded.

He IS NOT saying "Hey, Mexico! Open borders!"

7377
Serious / Re: Study: Religious Extremism is the #1 cause of terrorism
« on: November 21, 2014, 06:04:36 PM »
You mean it isn't poverty?

How could it not be poverty when the Pakistani middle-class have more terroristic tendencies, and when people from rich countries like Britain and Australia are drawn into these groups? How is it not poverty?

Yeah, fuck religion.
It's both.

But mostly religion. It's not like you get payed to blow yourself up.

Nah. Just to behead people.

7378
Serious / Re: AMA about my opinions/beliefs/life
« on: November 21, 2014, 06:02:55 PM »
Why do you seem so against same sex marriages, despite the fact that marriage (as a word, it's definition, and the practice) has evolved into history from an economic trade of "Give me five cows, and you have my daughter", to a set of benefits for couples in love and who wish to be together?

Does the sanctity of marriage get ruined by Britney Spears 72 hour marriage, or Kim Kardashian divorcing her husband in, like, three months?

7379
Serious / Re: what the fuck, Rand Paul?
« on: November 21, 2014, 04:19:41 PM »
Marco Rubio will probably win the primaries, anyway.

Not likely. He really shot down any chances with his support for the Gang of 8 Immigration Reform bill.

Honestly, the Conservative base has no interest in granting asylum or changing the policy - if you support it, you lost them.

7380
I love the thought of the admins telling everyone to go fuck themselves and changing avatars because of a holiday users may or may not celebrate.

>.>

They're onto us.

Pages: 1 ... 244245246 247248 ... 306