This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Alternative Facts
Pages: 1 ... 242243244 245246 ... 306
7291
« on: November 24, 2014, 08:41:59 PM »
North Dakota.
Seriously, who the hell wants to live here?
7292
« on: November 24, 2014, 08:40:43 PM »
This thread takes stupidity to a whole new level.
Advanced stupidity.
7293
« on: November 24, 2014, 08:37:30 PM »
Although, police are civilians and have privacy rights. Only should be used when dealing offical business with the public
... Great. Thanks for sharing the obvious.
7294
« on: November 24, 2014, 08:36:45 PM »
They already wear mics I think....or at least the one who pulled me over last did. Putting a camera on each one would be expensive and easily covered up in a struggle.
Not sue if that's viable.
We're already paying them to be in, to many, amounts to military level gear. I'm sure we can find money to ensure that situations like this case don't happen again.
7295
« on: November 24, 2014, 08:32:52 PM »
The officer has not been indicted.
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
All you want to say?
JUSTICE HAS BEEN SERVED
Okay. Well, hopefully this does promote the campaign that people want police to wear a body camera.
7296
« on: November 24, 2014, 08:28:54 PM »
The officer has not been indicted.
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
All you want to say?
7297
« on: November 24, 2014, 08:25:46 PM »
The officer has not been indicted.
7298
« on: November 24, 2014, 07:20:35 PM »
I can't imagine them indicting the officer.
I haven't read - what are the charges, and are they allowed to indict on anything lesser?
7299
« on: November 24, 2014, 06:55:10 PM »
After the problems that arose in the earlier thread, the entire staff wants to make clear that shit slinging, personal attacks, etc. will not be tolerated in any regard. You all know the rules for this forum, and if not, we suggest you read them here before you even consider replying. The mods will be watching this thread carefully, and issuing warnings or further punishments as necessary. Keep it civil, keep it clean, and keep it appropriate. SourceST. LOUIS — Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon issued an urgent plea for calm Monday as prosecutors prepared to announce whether a grand jury has indicted Darren Wilson, the white Ferguson, Mo., police officer whose fatal shooting of an unarmed black teenager sparked days of turbulent protests.
While Nixon (D) said he didn’t know what the grand jury has decided, he expressed the fervent hope that “regardless of the decision, people on all sides will show tolerance and mutual respect.’’ Saying he had visited on Monday with Ferguson residents, Nixon said “It’s understandable that they, like the rest of us, are on edge waiting for the decision.’’
But the governor made clear that acts of violence will not be tolerated. “We are making sure that the necessary resources are on hand to protect lives, to protect property and to protect free speech, he said at a news conference, adding that he has deployed the Missouri National Guard to provide security at police stations, fire houses and utility substations.
St. Louis County executive Charlie Dooley issued a similar plea for protesters to remain peaceful. “I want people to think with their heads and not their emotions,’’ he said. “I do not want people in this community to think they have to barricade their doors or take up arms. We are not that kind of community.’’
The strongly worded statements spoke to the growing concern in a community that has been bracing for protests if Wilson does not face charges in the August shooting death of 18-year-old Michael Brown, which triggered a frank conversation about race and police interaction with African Americans.
The decision will be announced Monday night, the county prosecutor’s office said. The office gave no details about what the grand jury has decided. Brown’s family has been notified of the announcement but has not been told about the grand jury’s decision, family attorney Benjamin Crump said.
The grand jury’s decision is the latest turn in a case marked in the national consciousness by the stunning images of clashes between protesters and police wearing riot gear and deploying tear gas in the days after Brown’s death. Details of the grand jury’s deliberations have leaked out in recent weeks, angering the Brown family and protesters who saw it as a signal that no charges would be filed.
Although a parallel federal civil rights investigation of the shooting is continuing, federal investigators have all but concluded that they do not have a case against Wilson, law enforcement officials have said. Federal investigators are also conducting a broader probe of the Ferguson Police Department.
If Wilson is not charged, government officials have discussed emergency plans in the event of a violent reaction, while protest and community leaders have mapped out their response in hopes of avoiding the unrest that exploded after Brown was killed.
In an interview with ABC News that aired Sunday, President Obama called for calm.
“Well, I think, first and foremost, keep protests peaceful,” he said. “You know, this is a country that allows everybody to express their views, allows them to peacefully assemble to protest actions that they think are unjust. But using any event as an excuse for violence is contrary to rule of law and contrary to who we are.”
There's more to the story regarding preparations by police and protestors, feel free to read by going to the link above.
7300
« on: November 24, 2014, 05:57:54 PM »
Cheat, you know how I feel on the subject, but I'll post it here.
Frankly, I don't see many users excited about Penguin Party. There isn't that desire or excitement to it that people had when waiting for Anarchy to come around. Honestly, our biggest problem with Anarchy was when the spillover happened (And boy, did it happen), the staff couldn't quite handle it well because our rules at the time were so vague, so open ended, and so unclear. Out of this situation came the revised rules that have worked well.
Honestly, I'd like to see one more attempt at the original Anarchy, with the new limits that you stated in the OP - and with the stipulation that if it gets extremely out of control, we'd have permission to shut it down before the end of the weekend. If you guys can handle not being absolute monsters, it will go well. If not, you only reaffirm our reasoning for having Penguin Party in the future.
7301
« on: November 24, 2014, 05:47:34 PM »
-Celebrities don’t deserve the right to complain about the paparazzi -We need to stop giving a fuck about feelings. If a person gets offended then oh fucking well, get the fuck over it -Affirmative action should be illegal -Al Sharpton should be arrested for inciting riots and destruction of property -Militias have the right to patrol the border and shoot on sight -Bring back corporal punishment in schools -Some kids are just plain stupid and will have to be left behind -Repeal ObamaCare and make it illegal for the government to pass similar taxes -Legalize prostitution -Self-defense and gun ownership is a natural right -Politicians don't deserve to be paid or have a salary -People should not be expected to pay taxes if the government can't balance the budget -Life begins at conception -Religion is a basis for morals -Gold standard is the only hope for the world economy -Free trade agreements purposely exploit 3rd world countries -Stop foreign aid and prioritize the nation before others -Build a fucking wall and deport people who are here illegally -Being able to comprehensible read and speak English should be a citizenship requirement -Endorse a Prostate Cancer Awareness month/Male History Month -Label groups like the KKK and New Black Panther Party as hate and terrorist organizations -Ban socialist and communist parties -Division of California into separate states -GMOs can't be trusted -Monsanto should be broken up for being a monopoly -Suicide is evidence of natural selection -People on government assistance should not be able to give birth -Not all cultures are equal -Prisoners should not be charged for murder if they kill somebody behind bars -A wife's first priority is to be in charge of the household and children -Diseases like cancer, diabetes, heart disease, etc is natures way of population control -We've gone overboard on vaccination -Men have equal say in abortion and raising children -Father should not be forced to pay child support if he wants an abortion -Women studies is one of the most retarded degrees a person can get -A person must pass a simple government test before getting a voter ID
I can think of more later.
*grabs popcorn*
Kinder, before I waste any time on this I just want to check one thing.
You identify as a libertarian right?
This is an opinion thread, not a political platform thread
Deflecting, Okay cool.
You expected otherwise?
Somebody needs to rewatch some VHS tapes of Reading Rainbow again
Nah. I'm good.
7302
« on: November 24, 2014, 05:26:34 PM »
-Celebrities don’t deserve the right to complain about the paparazzi -We need to stop giving a fuck about feelings. If a person gets offended then oh fucking well, get the fuck over it -Affirmative action should be illegal -Al Sharpton should be arrested for inciting riots and destruction of property -Militias have the right to patrol the border and shoot on sight -Bring back corporal punishment in schools -Some kids are just plain stupid and will have to be left behind -Repeal ObamaCare and make it illegal for the government to pass similar taxes -Legalize prostitution -Self-defense and gun ownership is a natural right -Politicians don't deserve to be paid or have a salary -People should not be expected to pay taxes if the government can't balance the budget -Life begins at conception -Religion is a basis for morals -Gold standard is the only hope for the world economy -Free trade agreements purposely exploit 3rd world countries -Stop foreign aid and prioritize the nation before others -Build a fucking wall and deport people who are here illegally -Being able to comprehensible read and speak English should be a citizenship requirement -Endorse a Prostate Cancer Awareness month/Male History Month -Label groups like the KKK and New Black Panther Party as hate and terrorist organizations -Ban socialist and communist parties -Division of California into separate states -GMOs can't be trusted -Monsanto should be broken up for being a monopoly -Suicide is evidence of natural selection -People on government assistance should not be able to give birth -Not all cultures are equal -Prisoners should not be charged for murder if they kill somebody behind bars -A wife's first priority is to be in charge of the household and children -Diseases like cancer, diabetes, heart disease, etc is natures way of population control -We've gone overboard on vaccination -Men have equal say in abortion and raising children -Father should not be forced to pay child support if he wants an abortion -Women studies is one of the most retarded degrees a person can get -A person must pass a simple government test before getting a voter ID
I can think of more later.
*grabs popcorn*
Kinder, before I waste any time on this I just want to check one thing.
You identify as a libertarian right?
This is an opinion thread, not a political platform thread
Deflecting, Okay cool.
You expected otherwise?
7303
« on: November 24, 2014, 03:21:03 PM »
Fucking hope it's a no indictment verdict
Forensics show that the wounds the punk suffered indicate his arms had been down, as that's where the entry points are located. The exit holes show when his hands are raised up, like the punk's friends is trying to lie about
I believe he was into rap, not punk.
No, he was a punk; as in a piece of shit. He robbed a store and assaulted the owner, it's more than certain his juvenile record is pilled high
Kinder, really. We know you support the cop - you don't need to call a dead teenager a piece of shit. Please try and act civil. Anyways, I'm off to class. Kiyo and the other mods can handle this.
7304
« on: November 24, 2014, 03:17:17 PM »
Yeah. Keep this thread civil, discussion as to the topic (And not attacking others opinions) and not using baiting language that is only asking for a fight. Such as the word punk, referring to a dead kid.
Thanks.
7305
« on: November 24, 2014, 03:15:14 PM »
-Celebrities don’t deserve the right to complain about the paparazzi -We need to stop giving a fuck about feelings. If a person gets offended then oh fucking well, get the fuck over it -Al Sharpton should be arrested for inciting riots and destruction of property -Militias have the right to patrol the border and shoot on sight -Bring back corporal punishment in schools -Some kids are just plain stupid and will have to be left behind -Repeal ObamaCare and make it illegal for the government to pass similar taxes -Politicians don't deserve to be paid or have a salary -People should not be expected to pay taxes if the government can't balance the budget -Life begins at conception -Religion is a basis for morals -Stop foreign aid and prioritize the nation before others -Build a fucking wall and deport people who are here illegally -Being able to comprehensible read and speak English should be a citizenship requirement -Ban socialist and communist parties -Division of California into separate states -GMOs can't be trusted -Suicide is evidence of natural selection -People on government assistance should not be able to give birth -Not all cultures are equal -Prisoners should not be charged for murder if they kill somebody behind bars -A wife's first priority is to be in charge of the household and children -We've gone overboard on vaccination -A person must pass a simple government test before getting a voter ID
These are just the ones I disagree with. Now for the really laughable ones. -Al Sharpton should be arrested for inciting riots and destruction of property -Militias have the right to patrol the border and shoot on sight -Build a fucking wall and deport people who are here illegally -Being able to comprehensible read and speak English should be a citizenship requirement -Ban socialist and communist parties -A wife's first priority is to be in charge of the household and children
7306
« on: November 24, 2014, 01:06:53 PM »
- Paedophilia isn't immoral. In what way? - Radical Muslims are probably some of the most dangerous people on the planet. I'm glad you specified Radical, and not just Islam in general. - Mental illnesses don't really exist. How so? - It could, hypothetically, be ethical to kill people for their opinions. Nope. - Adaptation is a better course of action for dealing with global warming. How so? - Immigration is almost universally good, and the process should be made much easier. Yes.
7307
« on: November 24, 2014, 12:48:01 PM »
So everyone but Icy is a journalist? Seems fishy.
I cry every night because of this quiz.  Oh well. I'll just go work for MSNBC.
7308
« on: November 24, 2014, 12:36:13 PM »
> TFW same beliefs as RC.
7309
« on: November 24, 2014, 12:33:25 PM »
7310
« on: November 24, 2014, 12:28:32 PM »
Progressivism 87.5 Socialism 62.5 Tenderness 56.25
Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a considerate principled egalitarian with few strong convictions. Honestly couldn't tell you what this means, but sure.
7311
« on: November 24, 2014, 12:23:26 PM »
How did you like the initiation?
7312
« on: November 24, 2014, 11:51:27 AM »
Or you know, the purpose of government is to work together to form a plan that makes everybody happy? Ideally, yes. Unfortunately, when faced with crises regarding Ebola in Africa, ISIS in Syria/Iraq, Russia and Ukraine - Hagel's strategies and beliefs simply did not reflect the ongoing problems in the world. Numerous Presidents have let go of Secretaries when their policies have not been well received or have not fixed problems they are meant to fix. This is nothing new, so again, stop making it like it is something only Obama has done.
7313
« on: November 24, 2014, 11:45:05 AM »
Guess I was wrong about Obama wanting to work with Republicans, seeing as he's firing the only one in his cabinet
That is totally logical thinking.
It actually is. Obama talks all big about gridlock and wanting to work with others but this proves he can't tolerate the ideas of others that are not his. Instead of working on a plan with Hagel, he just fires him
Or, you know, as Lemy said: Hagel's ideas and strategies simply do not coincide with what the military feels is necessary. This is not Obama saying "Fuck the Republicans", so kindly stop trying to make it out to be in hopes of an argument.
7314
« on: November 24, 2014, 11:34:00 AM »
Guess I was wrong about Obama wanting to work with Republicans, seeing as he's firing the only one in his cabinet
That is totally logical thinking.
7315
« on: November 24, 2014, 10:53:22 AM »
Since this thread has been brought back and the topics in the OP have already been...hotly debated, I'll try and add some new content for discussion when I have a moment.
7316
« on: November 24, 2014, 10:23:39 AM »
Wishing the day was over so that I could go home tomorrow.
7317
« on: November 24, 2014, 10:21:23 AM »
Story WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel handed in his resignation on Monday, the first cabinet-level casualty of the collapse of President Obama’s Democratic majority in the Senate and the struggles of his national security team to respond to an onslaught of global crises.
The president is to announce the resignation from the State Dining Room of the White House at around 11:15 a.m. Eastern time.
Administration officials said that Mr. Obama made the decision to remove Mr. Hagel, the sole Republican on his national security team, last Friday after a series of meetings between the two men over the past two weeks.
The officials characterized the decision as a recognition that the threat from the militant group Islamic State will require different skills from those that Mr. Hagel, who often struggled to articulate a clear viewpoint and was widely viewed as a passive defense secretary, was brought in to employ.
Mr. Hagel, a combat veteran who was skeptical about the Iraq war, came in to manage the Afghanistan combat withdrawal and the shrinking Pentagon budget in the era of budget sequestrations.
Now, however, the American military is back on a war footing, although it is a modified one. Some 3,000 American troops are being deployed in Iraq to help the Iraqi military fight the Sunni militants of the Islamic State, even as the administration struggles to come up with, and articulate, a coherent strategy to defeat the group in both Iraq and Syria.
“The next couple of years will demand a different kind of focus,” one administration official said, speaking on grounds of anonymity. He insisted that Mr. Hagel was not fired, saying that he initiated discussions about his future two weeks ago with the president, and that the two men mutually agreed that it was time for him to leave.
But Mr. Hagel’s aides had maintained in recent weeks that he expected to serve the full four years as defense secretary. His removal appears to be an effort by the White House to show that it is sensitive to critics who have pointed to stumbles in the government’s early response to several national security issues, including the Ebola crisis and the threat posed by the Islamic State.
Even before the announcement of Mr. Hagel’s removal, Obama officials were speculating on his possible replacement. At the top of the list are Michèle A. Flournoy, a former under secretary of defense; Senator Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island and a former officer with the Army’s 82nd Airborne; and Ashton B. Carter, a former deputy secretary of defense.
A respected former senator who struck a friendship with Mr. Obama when they were both critics of the Iraq war from positions on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Mr. Hagel has nonetheless had trouble penetrating the tight team of former campaign aides and advisers who form Mr. Obama’s closely knit set of loyalists. Senior administration officials have characterized him as quiet during cabinet meetings; Mr. Hagel’s defenders said that he waited until he was alone with the president before sharing his views, the better to avoid leaks.
Whatever the case, Mr. Hagel struggled to fit in with Mr. Obama’s close circle and was viewed as never gaining traction in the administration after a bruising confirmation fight among his old Senate colleagues, during which he was criticized for seeming tentative in his responses to sharp questions.
He never really shed that pall after arriving at the Pentagon, and in the past few months he has largely ceded the stage to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, who officials said initially won the confidence of Mr. Obama with his recommendation of military action against the Islamic State.
In Mr. Hagel’s less than two years on the job, his detractors said he struggled to inspire confidence at the Pentagon in the manner of his predecessors, especially Robert M. Gates. But several of Mr. Obama’s top advisers over the past few months have also acknowledged privately that the president did not want another high-profile defense secretary in the mold of Mr. Gates, who went on to write a memoir of his years with Mr. Obama in which he sharply criticized the president. Mr. Hagel, they said, in many ways was exactly the kind of defense secretary whom the president, after battling the military during his first term, wanted.
Mr. Hagel, for his part, spent his time on the job largely carrying out Mr. Obama’s stated wishes on matters like bringing back American troops from Afghanistan and trimming the Pentagon budget, with little pushback. He did manage to inspire loyalty among enlisted soldiers and often seemed at his most confident when talking to troops or sharing wartime experiences as a Vietnam veteran.
But Mr. Hagel has often had problems articulating his thoughts — or administration policy — in an effective manner, and has sometimes left reporters struggling to describe what he has said in news conferences. In his side-by-side appearances with both General Dempsey and Secretary of State John Kerry, Mr. Hagel, a decorated Vietnam veteran and the first former enlisted combat soldier to be defense secretary, has often been upstaged.
He raised the ire of the White House in August as the administration was ramping up its strategy to fight the Islamic State, directly contradicting the president, who months before had likened the Sunni militant group to a junior varsity basketball squad. Mr. Hagel, facing reporters in his now-familiar role next to General Dempsey, called the Islamic State an “imminent threat to every interest we have,” adding, “This is beyond anything that we’ve seen.” White House officials later said they viewed those comments as unhelpful, although the administration still appears to be struggling to define just how large is the threat posed by the Islamic State.
7318
« on: November 24, 2014, 10:03:18 AM »
Not you guys, too.
So, you're saying there shouldn't be a limit?
If somebody's making specific threats to another individual, then that's the limit.
That's what this case is meant to decide then. Knowing the current Supreme Court, they're unlikely to do anything about this anyway. However, any action (Unlikely, unless Roberts surprises us) will be slim and simply refer to threats like the one in the case.
7319
« on: November 24, 2014, 09:59:27 AM »
My unflinching, unchanging stance is that all speech deserves protection. If all ideas are not protected, freedom of speech does not exist. This does apply to the nations that outlaw Nazism and "hate speech". These restrictions are indicative of a society that does not value free thinking, they are indicative of a society that will only accept one morality and one worldview. Agree with everything but this.
7320
« on: November 24, 2014, 09:51:34 AM »
Not you guys, too.
So, you're saying there shouldn't be a limit?
Pages: 1 ... 242243244 245246 ... 306
|