This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Alternative Facts
Pages: 1 ... 899091 9293 ... 306
2701
« on: November 10, 2015, 06:44:51 PM »
because they
FHITE
RANDOM YELLING
2702
« on: November 10, 2015, 06:42:54 PM »
> Question about Infrastructure
> Never mentions Infrastructure
GG Santorum
> More Whining about Questions they Don't Want to Answer, More Bitching
GG All of you
2703
« on: November 10, 2015, 06:39:32 PM »
Christie cannot give an answer without "HILARY CLINTON IS BAD, K?"
There he goes again...
Take a shot every time her name is mentioned.
2704
« on: November 10, 2015, 06:35:41 PM »
Christie cannot give an answer without "HILARY CLINTON IS BAD, K?"
2705
« on: November 10, 2015, 06:32:19 PM »
That was legit by Huckabee. We need to take care of our own first before helping foreigners.
The notion that "America is always called upon to do the most!" is so laughable though, when you have Germany and numerous other European countries accepting tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of refugees. Also, hypocritical as it's been widely stated by him and other religious conservatives that we need to do more to help the Christians!
2706
« on: November 10, 2015, 06:27:49 PM »
Santorum is such a shitty orator.
Huckabee is a fucking hypocrite.
I see nothing is new?
2707
« on: November 10, 2015, 05:21:51 PM »
HEY ASSHOLE ICY
YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE WHICH THREAD TO POST IN
LIKE A TRUE DEMOCRACY
What?
2708
« on: November 10, 2015, 04:48:42 PM »
PEOPLE DIED FOR THIS.
I would hardly say that people died for you to say whatever you want.
And why is that?
Because there has never been a war that we fought in over "My right to say what I want!" It's always been about more pressing issues Revolution was about creating our own nation with representation that we lacked in the British government at the time, Civil War was about slavery and the divide between North and South, World Wars had nothing to do with speech, War on Terror is...not even sure what to describe it as.
At most, it's simply a nice right that was thrown in during out creation as a union and has become common in democracies.
These people were killed because they exercised their right to freely express themselves.
Freedom of Expression =/= Freedom of Speech
There's quite a few important differences.
speech is a form of expression
And yet, they are two distinctly separate rights.
2709
« on: November 10, 2015, 04:41:31 PM »
PEOPLE DIED FOR THIS.
I would hardly say that people died for you to say whatever you want.
And why is that?
Because there has never been a war that we fought in over "My right to say what I want!" It's always been about more pressing issues Revolution was about creating our own nation with representation that we lacked in the British government at the time, Civil War was about slavery and the divide between North and South, World Wars had nothing to do with speech, War on Terror is...not even sure what to describe it as.
At most, it's simply a nice right that was thrown in during out creation as a union and has become common in democracies.
These people were killed because they exercised their right to freely express themselves.
Freedom of Expression =/= Freedom of Speech There's quite a few important differences.
2710
« on: November 10, 2015, 04:29:45 PM »
PEOPLE DIED FOR THIS.
I would hardly say that people died for you to say whatever you want.
And why is that?
Because there has never been a war that we fought in over "My right to say what I want!" It's always been about more pressing issues Revolution was about creating our own nation with representation that we lacked in the British government at the time, Civil War was about slavery and the divide between North and South, World Wars had nothing to do with speech, War on Terror is...not even sure what to describe it as. At most, it's simply a nice right that was thrown in during out creation as a union and has become common in democracies.
2711
« on: November 10, 2015, 04:26:56 PM »
This is poorly done.
I can explain more if needed.
Please do.
Fine, let's begin with the most visible problem - the decision of state decisions (Maryland and Illinois going Republican, while Louisiana and Mississippi going Democrat) shows a clear failure to understand political trends and voting demographics in these states. Let's go back seven years to the 2008 election between McCain and Obama and focus on the two southern states, Louisiana and Mississippi, shall we?  Notice the South - it's a red blockade. Now, forward 4 years to 2012:  Even more red, with North Carolina flipping. Both states also have an extremely strong minority presence (See below) and large wealth disparity conditions, with some of the highest cases of extreme poverty. These groups tend to overwhelmingly vote Democratic, but even Obama, who had large majority of support from said groups, could not flip a dominating, Souther Republican force. Even if Sanders were to overcome his issues with the black voter base, he wouldn't nearly gain the amount of support that Obama had in the 2008 General (Hope! Change!), and therefore would fail to flip the state. The fact that they think Sanders could cut into the Southern GOP blockade in two of the most Republican states (And not even carry North Carolina, a battleground state and more Democratic) starts to shed doubt on their verdict in the other states. I'm also curious as to how they got a Sanders/Bush General, and how the information was collected. Septy, if you could link me?
2712
« on: November 10, 2015, 04:07:37 PM »
Deci.
2713
« on: November 10, 2015, 03:49:58 PM »
Yes.
2714
« on: November 10, 2015, 03:49:13 PM »
PEOPLE DIED FOR THIS. I would hardly say that people died for you to say whatever you want.
2715
« on: November 10, 2015, 02:53:24 PM »
I expected worse.
2716
« on: November 10, 2015, 02:47:11 PM »
I don't think I can trust the people that voted Lindsey Graham as senator
If it makes you feel better, he doesn't even have 1% in the poll.
2717
« on: November 10, 2015, 02:44:34 PM »
>South Carolina
Shitty state, but quite important in (at least) the primary election. It's been known to make or break numerous campaigns.
2718
« on: November 10, 2015, 02:40:40 PM »
Surprise me with some fabulous.
Swap Bad Dragon for #Fabulous and we have a deal
2719
« on: November 10, 2015, 02:07:24 PM »
Fallout is a terrible series.
Who put you on the planet
God.
but god isn't real!
How else would a creature as beautiful as me exist?
2720
« on: November 10, 2015, 01:57:43 PM »
Fallout is a terrible series.
Who put you on the planet
God.
2721
« on: November 10, 2015, 01:54:56 PM »
Fallout is a terrible series.
2722
« on: November 10, 2015, 01:53:11 PM »
69% ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Shoulda put the 74% statistic.
2723
« on: November 10, 2015, 01:52:26 PM »
Surprise me with some fabulous.
2724
« on: November 10, 2015, 01:19:23 PM »
GOP PollDemocrat PollWashington (CNN)Ben Carson has surged in South Carolina to pull just ahead of Donald Trump -- a statistical dead heat -- in the Republican presidential primary in the key early state, according to a new poll.
In the Monmouth University poll released Monday, Carson led the Republican primary field with support from 28% of likely Republican South Carolina voters. Trump was close behind, at 27%, and no other candidates were within the margin of error.
The numbers are a shift from Monmouth's last South Carolina poll in late August, where Trump doubled Carson, 30% to 15%.
The numbers are also a shift from the CNN/ORC poll of South Carolina Republican primary voters in October, where Trump was ahead of Carson 36% to 18%.
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio continued his trend of good polling results after a strong debate performance, coming in third behind the two front-runners with 11%.
Texas Sen. Ted Cruz was in fourth, at 9%, and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush was in fifth, at 7%. No one else topped 2%. Hillary Clinton has a commanding lead over Bernie Sanders in South Carolina, according to the results of a new poll released Tuesday.
Clinton has the support of 69 percent of likely voters in South Carolina's Democratic primary, while the independent Vermont senator trails with just 21 percent, according to the latest Monmouth University Poll. Former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley barely registers, with just 1 percent support.
South Carolina's Democratic primary is open to supporters of other parties, including Republicans and independents. When the poll's respondents are limited to self-described Democrats likely to vote in the primary, Clinton's lead is ever higher: 74 percent to Sanders' 16 percent.
The former secretary of state, who lost the 2008 South Carolina primary to then-Sen. Barack Obama, leads with African Americans — three out of four believe she would do an “excellent” or “good” job as president. Just over half feel the same about Sanders.
Clinton also has high favorable ratings (81 percent) compared with 7 percent unfavorable. Sanders has a 58 percent favorability rating, with 13 unfavorable and O’Malley has 18 percent favorable, 18 percent unfavorable.
The telephone poll was conducted Nov. 5-8 with 400 likely South Carolina Democratic primary voters. The margin of error is plus or minus 4.9 percentage points.
2725
« on: November 10, 2015, 12:33:45 PM »
This is poorly done.
I can explain more if needed.
2726
« on: November 09, 2015, 09:38:07 PM »
Ew
2727
« on: November 09, 2015, 08:13:37 PM »
Who do you want to ban first?
Choose carefully.
2728
« on: November 09, 2015, 08:09:12 PM »
I try to do the absolute least.
Thanks tenure.
2729
« on: November 09, 2015, 08:07:41 PM »
ITT: Your opinion is wrong because I disagree with what you critique!
2730
« on: November 09, 2015, 06:33:53 PM »
Story was a massive disappointment and serves to highlights the problems with 343.
Pages: 1 ... 899091 9293 ... 306
|
Show Posts