5161
Gaming / Re: What's the Mad Max game like?
« on: August 30, 2015, 11:17:52 AM »
It's literally an AC game with a car in a desert.
Basically, it looks shit.
Basically, it looks shit.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 5161
Gaming / Re: What's the Mad Max game like?« on: August 30, 2015, 11:17:52 AM »
It's literally an AC game with a car in a desert.
Basically, it looks shit. 5162
Gaming / Re: This is still my favorite part in all of Halo 2« on: August 30, 2015, 11:10:30 AM »best fightRegret's boss fight was pretty bad. Not as bad as Tartarus' though, but that isn't saying much.That Didact boss fight though... 5163
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 01:24:48 AM »
Spoiler threads are fair game though, as long as the title is labelled as such, because they're intended for spoiler discussion
5164
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 01:20:42 AM »as long as you tell people it's a spoiler for whatever the discussion at hand is before they open it, yeah, you can post spoiler images in a spoiler tag.Wait what? Would this ban someone for not labeling a spoiler?No 5165
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 01:18:41 AM »
I'm not for a stricter ruleset, just a more consistent one, and if you do somehow manage to break the rules, suffer harsher punishment.
5166
Gaming / Re: New Halo 5 screenshots (Blue Team)« on: August 30, 2015, 01:15:00 AM »Okay?Still don't give a single fuck about this game.Good for you, I guess. If it didn't exist I'd be none the wiser, so that's a bogus argument. 5167
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 01:13:25 AM »they weren't suggesting 3 - 4 months. they wer discussing how long something should be labelled under the spoiler warningI was never against a week. I just saw that you and Cheat were talking about 4-6 months as a punishment on the first page, which got me freaked out.I'd agree with that, but anything over a week for any type of spoiler is far too long.Oh, now, see? Even Class is with us on the 1 week plan. 5168
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 01:11:39 AM »Wait what? Would this ban someone for not labeling a spoiler?No Accidental spoilers wouldn't result in a ban. Just a polite request to label it as such. 5169
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 01:10:18 AM »
Building off of my previous post
Purposefully posting spoilers to ruin something for a bunch of people is classed as malicious intent, and should be treated the same as any other post with malicious intent. 5170
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 01:03:41 AM »
Like, seriously.
You have to put effort in to break the rules and get banned here because it's so lax. If you actually manage to break the rules then you absolutely deserve a ban longer than a day because you're knowingly doing something you shouldn't be knowing full well you'll get banned. 5171
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 12:59:51 AM »If you can call out members, spam, and harass people without even getting a three day ban, spoiling a shitty game franchise shouldn't garner a month long ban. That's ridiculous.and that right there is th exact problem with the way this site is run 5172
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 12:58:14 AM »spoilers aren't subjective. they're pretty objective.Well given the situation I would say these spoilers as a good example. It's obvious how much trouble it's caused so quell that by showing it's not tolerated. By letting someone get off with something like this shows weakness and cracks in the rules. however, prehistoric's rules were down to subjectivity. 5173
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 12:54:36 AM »a dead forum, yeahi'm not trying to be horrible, but you're a monitor, and only have been for like what, 3 days?Highly unlikely, a nice idea on paper but in application its far too susceptible to abuse, a person can edit out what they don't like or just flat out lock threads when things don't go their way. Even if the staff gives it to more "responsible" members, there have always been cases of members who have generally been more calm to lose their cool. Its just not going to be a thing, sorry. 5174
Gaming / Re: "Gatsby sent us to hell, but we're going even deeper." | 2 Days Remain« on: August 30, 2015, 12:54:01 AM »5175
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 12:53:04 AM »
A month is a bit too harsh if the punishment system is to remain how it is, but a day is pretty fucking lenient.
I've been banned longer for less. 5176
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 12:50:49 AM »i'm not trying to be horrible, but you're a monitor, and only have been for like what, 3 days?Highly unlikely, a nice idea on paper but in application its far too susceptible to abuse, a person can edit out what they don't like or just flat out lock threads when things don't go their way. Even if the staff gives it to more "responsible" members, there have always been cases of members who have generally been more calm to lose their cool. Its just not going to be a thing, sorry. you're hardly one to know the ins and outs of forum moderation. 5177
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 12:35:55 AM »>the consequence would be minor because he only did it twicehe posted 5 big spoilers, and reposted a previous oneBut why? That barely constitutes a minor nuisance.One month bans for a spoiler will not happen, I can guarantee you that much. >he actually did it more than double that >nope still not deserving of a harsher punishment fucking get real 5178
Septagon / Re: Regarding Spoilers« on: August 30, 2015, 12:32:10 AM »he posted 5 big spoilers, and reposted a previous oneBut why? That barely constitutes a minor nuisance.One month bans for a spoiler will not happen, I can guarantee you that much. that's not a minor offence 5180
Gaming / Re: "Gatsby sent us to hell, but we're going even deeper." | 2 Days Remain« on: August 30, 2015, 12:06:52 AM »
I think I might have some sleeping disorder
5181
Gaming / Re: "Gatsby sent us to hell, but we're going even deeper." | 2 Days Remain« on: August 30, 2015, 12:06:10 AM »
Ain't no time for sleep, yo'
5182
Gaming / Re: "Gatsby sent us to hell, but we're going even deeper." | 2 Days Remain« on: August 30, 2015, 12:01:48 AM »
Oh shit, it's 6am.
How'd that happen? Gotta get up for work. 5183
Gaming / Re: "Gatsby sent us to hell, but we're going even deeper." | 2 Days Remain« on: August 30, 2015, 12:00:02 AM »
Can confirm
5184
Gaming / Re: New Halo 5 screenshots (Blue Team)« on: August 29, 2015, 11:58:42 PM »Still don't give a single fuck about this game.Good for you, I guess. You'll probably playing Bungie's abortion of a game, won't you? 5185
Gaming / Re: This Somewhat Explains Some Islands On GTA I guess.« on: August 29, 2015, 11:57:12 PM »Whoah, what the fuck?the san andreas from gta san andreas or the san andreas from gta v? separate universes 5186
Gaming / Re: "Gatsby sent us to hell, but we're going even deeper." | 2 Days Remain« on: August 29, 2015, 11:52:35 PM »
MGSV: Day 0 | Fission Mailed
5187
Gaming / Re: New Halo 5 screenshots (Blue Team)« on: August 29, 2015, 11:45:30 PM »
"You are assassins. Weak and timid, you hide in the shadows"
"Says the alien shit-heel who invented active-camo" Jonah is mah boi 5188
Gaming / Re: New Halo 5 screenshots (Blue Team)« on: August 29, 2015, 11:41:39 PM »i still want a headhunter game, 343Pilot is still the best EVA variation anyway. 5189
Gaming / Re: "Gatsby sent us to hell, but we're going even deeper." | 2 Days Remain« on: August 29, 2015, 11:40:52 PM »
Turn off your console
|