This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Girl of Mystery
Pages: 1 ... 113114115 116117 ... 778
3421
« on: October 08, 2015, 09:06:16 PM »
Exactly. The closest thing I can think of was the Mantis boss fight in MGS1 with the "Hideo" screen thing. That shit was cool back in the day.
Arkham Asylum and Saints Row 4 had fake game fuck ups
That's what Verb is saying though.
Low FPS or resolution could be just like that. If the creator thinks it will suit their vision better, then yeah, it's better than having 30 or 60 stable FPS.
He's talking about entire games though Nobody wants that
3422
« on: October 08, 2015, 08:56:23 PM »
Exactly. The closest thing I can think of was the Mantis boss fight in MGS1 with the "Hideo" screen thing. That shit was cool back in the day.
Arkham Asylum and Saints Row 4 had fake game fuck ups
3423
« on: October 08, 2015, 08:49:29 PM »
Holy shit you're eyes are all so healthy. Mine are all black and baggy lol underneath. Damn.
you're not alone. i have dark circles under my eyes too it actually isn't always to do with health either. it's usually heredity
3424
« on: October 08, 2015, 08:06:21 PM »
18 day HYPE!
19
its 8th
8 + 18 = 26
26 midnight = H5
+ fuck you
It's 19 days until October 27th
http://halo5countdown.com/
check the days
what is 27 - 8?
It's 19 days counting today
literally nobody says "ohh it's x days and x hours until x"
fuccboi
but 18 days sounds better than 19
>.<
fuuuu
19
19
19
19
19
18 days and 7 hours?
Now it's 18 days
3425
« on: October 08, 2015, 07:36:45 PM »
I'm always hearing of these quest breaking glitches. But I never run into them.
The only game that's ever fucked me over and prevented me from advancing is Skyrim (multiple times). But I expect nothing else from Bethesda.
I haven't had major Skyrim problems. Though I did mess it up with my Mods so I had to restart. Witcher 3 I've had no problems with except one quests. Forgot the name of it. It's on Skellige I think. And it involves killing a Werewolf in some sacred place. I could kill him, but a part of the quest telling to me do something else like investigate or whatever wouldn't advance.
I had to restart Skyrim twice because it had a quest breaking bug.
Is it the quest with the werewolf that is starving but everything he eats turns to ash, and he comes back if you kill him?
Yes, it's that one. Speaking of that, how far did you get? I know you said the other day you put the game on hold. Did you actually finish the main story at least?
No. I'm not even halfway. Last thing I did was helping Eskel hunt down the Forktail. Regarding the werewolf quest. There's something you have to feed him after beating him (but don't select to kill him.) Can't remember what you had to feed him though.
3426
« on: October 08, 2015, 07:15:58 PM »
KENNY IS THE TRUE PROTAGONIST OF TWD
3427
« on: October 08, 2015, 07:13:41 PM »
I'm always hearing of these quest breaking glitches. But I never run into them.
The only game that's ever fucked me over and prevented me from advancing is Skyrim (multiple times). But I expect nothing else from Bethesda.
I haven't had major Skyrim problems. Though I did mess it up with my Mods so I had to restart. Witcher 3 I've had no problems with except one quests. Forgot the name of it. It's on Skellige I think. And it involves killing a Werewolf in some sacred place. I could kill him, but a part of the quest telling to me do something else like investigate or whatever wouldn't advance.
I had to restart Skyrim twice because it had a quest breaking bug. Is it the quest with the werewolf that is starving but everything he eats turns to ash, and he comes back if you kill him?
3428
« on: October 08, 2015, 07:10:32 PM »
PC gaming just lacks the convenience of console/handheld gaming, and I think that in most cases it's worth the trade-off.
How does it lack the convenience in terms of console? You mean sitting on a couch and playing? I can understand that.
Which you can do with a PC
3429
« on: October 08, 2015, 07:01:47 PM »
I'm always hearing of these quest breaking glitches. But I never run into them.
The only game that's ever fucked me over and prevented me from advancing is Skyrim (multiple times). But I expect nothing else from Bethesda.
3430
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:43:25 PM »
The hoops you jump through to try and not be wrong are ridiculous sometimes. This is one of those times.
3431
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:41:27 PM »
God your mental gymnastics are ridiculous
Some things are objective. Framerate is one of those things.
The only thing objective about frame rate is that some rates are lower, and some rates are higher.
Whether or not some rates are better or worse is subjective.
And that it objectively performs worse the lower it gets. Especially below 30. The hoops you jump through to try and not be wrong are ridiculous sometimes. This is one of those times.
3432
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:36:13 PM »
God your mental gymnastics are ridiculous
Some things are objective. Framerate is one of those things.
3433
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:34:22 PM »
It's Chapter 5: Urban Warfare from Uncharted 2.
3434
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:30:31 PM »
Oh yeah.
30fps during storms when?
3435
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:28:22 PM »
Yeah. Good job gleaning my fucking point.
In some contexts, 1fps would be a better choice than 1000000000000000fps. Then why use the shit comparison if you knew it was shit, you fucking berk? Not objectively. Maybe input latency and visual feedback latency is part of the game/experience.
Then it's a shit game and the developers are utter morons.
3436
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:25:28 PM »
30fps in Crookback Bog and Novigrad when?
3437
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:23:13 PM »
If you get 1st place in a race, did you lose? Because you got the lowest possible number?
Literally the worst comparison ever. The numbers have different meanings in the different contexts, you utter twonk. 30fps is the bottom line. It's below this number when things like input latency and visual feedback latency come into play. These things are bad.
3438
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:18:49 PM »
If a developer chooses to develop a game that runs below 30fps, then they're a stupid and shitty developer. lol
Why.
"Because 30fps is objectively worse than 60fps."
How.
I said below 30fps. Not at 30fps. I have no issue with games being 30fps.
3439
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:17:29 PM »
Ideally, it wouldn't.
Consoles limit what can be done.
Not if it's a good console.
Consoles as they are right now are just PCs, but limited. Obviously.
Thats not a good console then....because its limiting to what we can do.
Youre running around in circles here.
I'm saying we could MAKE a GOOD console that isn't limited. God fucking damn.
Go ahead and call that a "PC" if you want, but the point is, I don't like console wars and it would be better if there was just one gaming platform. Maybe two--home and mobile. But that's it.
That would only be a bad thing though. The competition is a good thing and helps the industry.
3440
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:16:05 PM »
You really can't though. I am.
Framerate of movies and games aren't the same.
Movies don't suffer from stuff like input latency and visual feedback like games do, both of which are tied directly to the framerate. But I'm saying it's possible for game developers to say, "Artistically, I think it would be better if this game ran at a low frame rate."
Not because it's "more cinematic"--whatever that even means. But for other reasons. I don't know.
Wanting to give an authentic '80s gaming experience. I don't fucking know.
I'm saying it's conceivable for 30fps to be better, so no amount of frames-per-second can be objectively "better" than another.
If a developer chooses to develop a game that runs below 30fps, then they're a stupid and shitty developer.
3441
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:04:07 PM »
We're not talking about movies (even though they run at 24 fps for the majority of them) If film directors can make artistic decisions like that, game developers can, too.
It doesn't work like that.
Two completely different forms of media.
Just because it's fine and works for movies doesn't mean it's fine and works for games.
I disagree. Strongly.
You really can't though. Framerate of movies and games aren't the same. Movies don't suffer from stuff like input latency and visual feedback like games do, both of which are tied directly to the framerate.
3442
« on: October 08, 2015, 06:01:30 PM »
And I'd love to hear your explanation for the existence of console exclusives
Console exclusives shouldn't exist. I hate the fact that there are multiple consoles on the market--I think there should just be one gaming console, period, and then none of us would be having this debate.
You're right.
The PC would be better without all the consoles inflating the market :^)
Wouldn't even be a PC, ideally. Would be its own game console.
Ideally, it wouldn't. Consoles limit what can be done.
3443
« on: October 08, 2015, 05:56:28 PM »
We're not talking about movies (even though they run at 24 fps for the majority of them) If film directors can make artistic decisions like that, game developers can, too.
It doesn't work like that. Two completely different forms of media. Just because it's fine and works for movies doesn't mean it's fine and works for games.
3444
« on: October 08, 2015, 05:47:33 PM »
The bottom line should always be the games. Not how the games perform--but the games.
even if they ran like shit? performance is something that matters
3445
« on: October 08, 2015, 05:45:30 PM »
rocket league
That's also on PS4
3446
« on: October 08, 2015, 05:41:41 PM »
Damn, Verb. For a guy that brought up the "argument pyramid" when we were talking about drugs, you're sure quick on the draw with that ad hominem :^)
Calling you a dumbass =/= ad hominem.
Ad hominem would be if I said, "You don't know, because you're German" or something stupid like that.
Generic insults aren't ad hominem.
Calling someone a dumbass is ad hominem. You're verbally attacking her/him.
3447
« on: October 08, 2015, 05:39:26 PM »
She can be fat with a pretty face.
contradiction
I can give plenty of pictures as an example...
Fat people are objectively ugly
This woman is ugly?
Fat people are objectively ugly
3448
« on: October 08, 2015, 05:36:08 PM »
She can be fat with a pretty face.
contradiction
I can give plenty of pictures as an example...
Fat people are objectively ugly
3449
« on: October 08, 2015, 05:30:47 PM »
She can be fat with a pretty face.
contradiction
3450
« on: October 08, 2015, 05:29:40 PM »
Have you even played Metal Gear 1?
He's a complete cunt.
pffft there's nothing wrong with wanting to killing "your" own clone.
Spoiler C'mon man, Venom's like a saint compared to BB, y'know, before his dip into "insanity"
Venom is just as much of a cunt as Big Boss is.
Pages: 1 ... 113114115 116117 ... 778
|
Show Posts