18661
The Flood / Re: why doesn't Lemon blam off?
« on: January 07, 2015, 04:46:44 PM »Why don't you just say fuck?It's censored.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 18661
The Flood / Re: why doesn't Lemon blam off?« on: January 07, 2015, 04:46:44 PM »Why don't you just say fuck?It's censored. 18662
The Flood / Re: why doesn't Lemon blam off?« on: January 07, 2015, 04:45:20 PM »
God that thread
18663
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 04:43:52 PM »CE, 2 and 4.Screw that.IKR? Halo 3 is pretty rubbish though, innit? 18664
The Flood / Re: guess the non-stem major's college debt« on: January 07, 2015, 04:42:02 PM »Want to see a room full of virgins?Want to see a room full of burger flippers? Walk into a non-STEM class 18665
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 04:39:56 PM »Screw that.IKR? Halo 3 is pretty rubbish though, innit? 18666
The Flood / Re: Do you cross your 7's?« on: January 07, 2015, 04:23:42 PM »
Yep.
It feels wrong not to. 18667
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 04:20:57 PM »The rest of what you referred to is once again, fucking subjective.Umm, no. The lack of plot and characterisation is objective. 18668
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 04:18:11 PM »It doesn't work like that, mate. Sorry.Thinking CE is good invalidates your opinions.Lol, someone missed out on Reach MP.lol someone is wrong It's riddled with terrible shit. 18669
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 04:12:41 PM »It's a typical alien shoot'em'up whose only stand out points are simply mechanics and ideas that were new at the time, but are commonplace now, so now it's just a typical alien shoot'em'upWe know the Halo franchise is an alien shoot'em up. Thanks Captain Obvious. Quote Chief being Ur-Didact descendedNigga what're you smoking? Quote it's objectively inferior to every other Halo game.Reach is objectively the worst Halo game to date. 18670
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 04:01:40 PM »Lol, someone missed out on Reach MP.lol someone is wrong Quote Also, remember the difference between FACT and OPINION, it's your OPINION that it wasn't fun, it's FACT that a lot of people did enjoy Reach, it's your OPINION how historically important it is, and it's my OPINION that CE is the worst Halo. It's your OPINION that is exactly oppositeThinking Reach is good invalidates your opinions. Sorry. 18671
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 03:59:20 PM »You need a course that teaches you that the internet is srs bsns.Objectively it's a very well designed game in terms of functionality.>implying Reach isn't objectively shitSubjectivityI'm not basing any of this on nostalgia.Actually CE was essentially just your generic alien shoot em up plotline, with a slight twist to it. Not saying Reach's narrative was stellar, but as far as sophistication goes, CE was pretty simple.Because CE is a good game with a good campaign that has a good consistent plot and story throughout the whole campaign, doesn't shit on already existing canon, doesn't have terribly written characters and doesn't consist of a brown and grey colour pallet.Then why did they release Halo CEA?A re-master could be okay for soon, but no re-makes until 2020, 10 years is how long it should be, no more no less.It should get neither. It's not a well designed game because AAs, bloom, sword block, terrible AI, and it's shitty maps exist. Plot is objectively shit considering there isn't one until the last couple missions. Characterisation is objectively shit considering it's pretty much entirely non-existent. 18672
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 03:53:37 PM »Still ignoring the fact that CE just is not fun to play at all, not even Co-op. It's aged awfully, it's important in history but it's not very good anymore.Except that's not even remotely factual. Reach isn't fun to play at all, not even in co-op. It's not aged, but it's just flat out awful, it's an unimportant part of history and it's not good in the slightest, as it has always been. 18673
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 03:50:06 PM »>implying Reach isn't objectively shitSubjectivityI'm not basing any of this on nostalgia.Actually CE was essentially just your generic alien shoot em up plotline, with a slight twist to it. Not saying Reach's narrative was stellar, but as far as sophistication goes, CE was pretty simple.Because CE is a good game with a good campaign that has a good consistent plot and story throughout the whole campaign, doesn't shit on already existing canon, doesn't have terribly written characters and doesn't consist of a brown and grey colour pallet.Then why did they release Halo CEA?A re-master could be okay for soon, but no re-makes until 2020, 10 years is how long it should be, no more no less.It should get neither. 18674
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 03:43:57 PM »What quality?Oh I don't know. Maybe the good, likeable characters or the fun open levels. And you know, if you paid attention to the game, you'd know why you have to escort the Engineer. It's a pretty big plot point in the game. Not paying attention to the story and then criticising it isn't a valid way to debate a game and claim it's bad because of something that's your own fault, and it honestly just makes you look stupid and ignorant. Quote And what side content? The only side content there was is the Audio Logs and that's it. There's no skulls to find, there's no other collectibles to unlock, and not that many easter eggs to find.I said nice bit of side content. I never said anything about the quantity. And Sadie's story is actually very good. Quote I'll get more enjoyment playing any multiplayer than ODST's bland Firefight mode.I'll get more enjoyment out of ODST's firefight than I would any bland multiplayer. 18675
Gaming / Re: Happy New Years Days from Bungie« on: January 07, 2015, 03:23:58 PM »
Fuck off Bungie
18676
The Flood / Re: BAHAHAHAHA stay mad, Muhammed haters« on: January 07, 2015, 03:22:27 PM »
I think Zesty's turban is chafing
18677
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 03:19:33 PM »There are some that think it's good, but they aren't people so what they think is irrelevant and invalid.Don't worry.its really hard for me to tell anymore. there are so many people who dont know what they're talking about i just kind of roll with it when i see stupid shit.nigga he was being sarcasticI want to see Bloom in 1080p/60fps.bloom is a terrible fps mechanic... 18678
The Flood / Re: BAHAHAHAHA stay mad, Muhammed haters« on: January 07, 2015, 03:17:44 PM »
Holy shit this thread.
18679
The Flood / Re: I never take showers« on: January 07, 2015, 03:15:30 PM »Because you're poorSo... a washcloth?My sister keeps one in the shower and I have no idea what the hell you're supposed to do with it 18680
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 03:13:29 PM »nigga he was being sarcasticI want to see Bloom in 1080p/60fps.bloom is a terrible fps mechanic... 18681
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 03:07:44 PM »A campaign that can be easily beaten in 4-5 hours on the laughingly easy Legendary difficulty mode. My few friends and I completed it in about that time while trying to deal with the horrendous lag.Still longer than the shit that has been shovelled out for the past god knows how many years now. And it's still a quality campaign regardless of the length. There's a nice bit of side content too. Quote Firefight mode was fun for a week but got stale and boring fast because its the same skulls and same enemies every round. The only enemies that were different were vehicles if you played on a vehicle supported map.Hmm, so just like an actual multiplayer then. Same thing over and over. 18682
The Flood / Re: BAHAHAHAHA stay mad, Muhammed haters« on: January 07, 2015, 03:01:55 PM »I can't tell if you're serious or not.lol what? Is Zesty a Muslim or some shit?Yeah, didn't you know? I love all of the comfort that religion brings into my life, and I'd be lost without it. 18683
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 03:00:13 PM »And then theres you who basically force your beliefs unto othersNo 18684
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 02:58:35 PM »I want to see Bloom in 1080p/60fps.1080p 60fps sword block and armour lock 18685
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 02:57:40 PM »It was a £40 game with a brilliant campaign and great co-op mode.You're right, it wasn't a $60 game.the odst campaign was fantastic. it wasnt a $60 game, but it was very very good for what it was.Except ODST doesn't deserve any of the praise it gets apart from the soundtrack.Halos 1-3 are like the original Star Wars movies... aka the best ones.ODST is more like the original Star Wars: The Clone Wars series than any of the prequel movies. its supplementary material to the canon that happens to be just as good in its own way as the original product... dont even begin to compare odst to reach and h4 It's one of the best for a reason. Significantly better than Halo 3 too. 18686
Gaming / Re: "Halo Reach and Halo 4 are not Halo games like Halo 3, 2 and CE."« on: January 07, 2015, 02:54:02 PM »>thinks Reach is one of the best Halo gamesLol, thinking CE is the best Halo is just silly, at least every other Halo has SOMETHING interesting happeningNow the Halo fanbase will become marginally better because it has one less Reach-liking retard.Wow, your opinion is totally new to me and I really value your contribution, I guess i'll just go and kill myself nowReach was unique, neither 4 or 2 can hold a candle to it. 3 is probably closest to CE in terms of how it plays, which I dislike in comparison to 2 and Reachewwwwwwwwwwwwwwww Your opinion is literally invalid, mate. And to say CE has nothing happening is just flat out retarded. 18687
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 02:49:10 PM »I'm not basing any of this on nostalgia.Actually CE was essentially just your generic alien shoot em up plotline, with a slight twist to it. Not saying Reach's narrative was stellar, but as far as sophistication goes, CE was pretty simple.Because CE is a good game with a good campaign that has a good consistent plot and story throughout the whole campaign, doesn't shit on already existing canon, doesn't have terribly written characters and doesn't consist of a brown and grey colour pallet.Then why did they release Halo CEA?A re-master could be okay for soon, but no re-makes until 2020, 10 years is how long it should be, no more no less.It should get neither. CE is literally leaps and bounds ahead of Reach in terms of quality, story (regardless of it not being that original) and characters. 18688
Gaming / Re: >There are people that want Halo Reach Anniversary« on: January 07, 2015, 02:44:41 PM »Are we just going to ignore the fact that the campaign's level design is appalling, repetitiveThe level design is far from appalling, even if it's a bit repetitive. It has big and open explorable environments instead of being linear hallway FPS #5647532257 Quote and that half the campaign is either the same premise in a different location or a different location with the same premiseYou just repeated yourself within the same sentence. Well done you bellend. Quote having to complete CE is a chore when compared to 2, 3, ODST, Wars and ReachUmm, no. It's as much of a chore as any other Halo game. Reach is an utterly abysmal entry to the series. It's plot is only present in the last couple of missions. It's characters are dogshit tier and cliché as fuck with the personality and development of a brick (Jorge being somewhat of an exception). The campaign levels are literally ripped out of the MP, which has shit maps. It's AI is laughably shit. It downright shits on canon. Grey and brown is an ugly colour pallet It must be hard being an ottist. 18690
The Flood / Re: BAHAHAHAHA stay mad, Muhammed haters« on: January 07, 2015, 02:26:06 PM »
lol what? Is Zesty a Muslim or some shit?
|