Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - CIS

Pages: 123 45 ... 112
61
Serious / Re: Google fired an engineer over his opinions.
« on: August 08, 2017, 10:05:38 PM »
An employee publicly defames his employer and is fired. Explain the problem like I'm five, because I'm not seeing it.

Edit: so was the memo private? Because then I see the problem.

He posted a report he made to the Google private message boards where he just goes on about typical evopsych stuff regarding how men and women tend to lean towards different professions due to biology and such. That was about it from what I've gathered. I hardly see how it would count as defaming his employer.

Edit: Here's a link to the report itself. It seems innocuous.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.pdf

62
Serious / Google fired an engineer over his opinions.
« on: August 08, 2017, 09:54:23 PM »
https://www.wired.com/story/james-damore-author-google-memo-might-sue/


Quote
The former Google employee who was fired after posting a missive criticizing the company's diversity efforts calls his dismissal illegal and says he is "exploring all possible legal remedies."
James Damore said via email on Monday night that he was told he was fired for "'perpetuating gender stereotypes.'"
Damore, a senior software engineer who had worked at Google since December 2013, posted the 10-page note on an internal Google discussion board late last week, criticizing what he called Google's liberal leanings and its training around "unconscious bias," particularly with regard to women. The document cited purported principles of evolutionary psychology to argue that women are unsuited to be good engineers because they are more interested in people than ideas.
On his LinkedIn profile, Damore lists a “PhD, Systems Biology” from Harvard in 2013. However, a representative from Harvard tells WIRED that Damore did not complete a PhD. He completed a master’s degree in systems biology in 2013.
The “Google memo,” as it became known on Twitter, went viral over the weekend, generating fierce criticism from other Google employees and many others outside the company.
Google executives initially appeared to be caught off guard by the document and the uproar. Danielle Brown, the company's new vice president of diversity and inclusion, posted a response late Saturday that both criticized some of the statements in Damore's missive and said Google sought an "open, inclusive environment" that accommodates multiple political views.
On Monday, however, Google CEO Sundar Pichai sent a company-wide email saying that Damore had violated the company's Code of Conduct by "advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace." News of Pichai's email surfaced just moments before word that Damore had been fired.
In the email exchange with WIRED on Monday night, Damore said he wrote the document "to express my concerns about the terms and conditions of my working environment, and to bring up potentially illegal behavior." He said he had filed a complaint, formally known as a charge, with the National Labor Relations Board. He also claimed that California law prohibits firing or coercing workers for their political views. Damore did not respond to a request for an interview.

In case you haven't heard of this, Google (more like Skynet) decided to fire an engineer for wrongthink, Julian Assange offered him a job, and he's likely going to sue Google. If you needed one more reason to dislike Google, then here it is.

63
The Flood / Re: Only one more week online.
« on: July 19, 2017, 06:53:09 PM »
I'm surprised you people still pay attention to the site ranks.

64
The Flood / Re: Why do you always say what you believe?
« on: July 18, 2017, 10:02:52 PM »
Go prep your bull, Cuckson.

65
The Flood / Re: Answers, Part 2
« on: June 23, 2017, 08:12:24 PM »
When will you taking questions for part three of the Q&A?

66
The Flood / All of Verbatim's opinions are objective fact.
« on: June 16, 2017, 09:05:10 PM »
Anyone who says otherwise is a stupid fuck and is objectively wrong.

67
Gaming / Re: Should I buy the Nintendo Switch or a PC?
« on: June 07, 2017, 10:16:05 PM »
Why is this even a question?
because breath of the wild is an amazing game that he may not want to miss out on until christmas
I've heard that Breath of the Wild is a great game, so I can understand why someone would buy a Switch for that. What are some other planned exclusives for the Switch that are practically guaranteed to be great? A console is going to need more than one great exclusive title to justify a purchase for most people.
in this case i disagree—that's how good breath of the wild is

but at the moment, it's pretty much all it has if you're not into goofy fighting games or rereleases of wii u games
To be honest, Breath of the Wild just looked like a copycat of what a lot of Western RPGs like Witcher 3 and The Elder Scrolls do to me. I'm probably wrong, and I'd like to be wrong.
botw shits on those both of those titles

In your opinion, what are some of the game's best features?

68
Gaming / Re: Should I buy the Nintendo Switch or a PC?
« on: June 07, 2017, 10:12:10 PM »
Why is this even a question?
because breath of the wild is an amazing game that he may not want to miss out on until christmas
I've heard that Breath of the Wild is a great game, so I can understand why someone would buy a Switch for that. What are some other planned exclusives for the Switch that are practically guaranteed to be great? A console is going to need more than one great exclusive title to justify a purchase for most people.
in this case i disagree—that's how good breath of the wild is

but at the moment, it's pretty much all it has if you're not into goofy fighting games or rereleases of wii u games

To be honest, Breath of the Wild just looked like a copycat of what a lot of Western RPGs like Witcher 3 and The Elder Scrolls do to me. I'm probably wrong, and I'd like to be wrong.

69
Gaming / Re: Should I buy the Nintendo Switch or a PC?
« on: June 07, 2017, 10:07:04 PM »
Why is this even a question?
because breath of the wild is an amazing game that he may not want to miss out on until christmas

I've heard that Breath of the Wild is a great game, so I can understand why someone would buy a Switch for that. What are some other planned exclusives for the Switch that are practically guaranteed to be great? A console is going to need more than one great exclusive title to justify a purchase for most people.

70
Gaming / Re: Should I buy the Nintendo Switch or a PC?
« on: June 07, 2017, 09:49:09 PM »
Why is this even a question?

71
The Flood / Re: Opinion of you thread, opinion of me thread
« on: May 28, 2017, 02:33:42 AM »
Go ahead and judge me.
In Chris' group people did NOT seem to like you, and I always thought you'd be an unpleasant person to communicate with. I don't know what you did in Chris' group besides spam (with maybe too much passion?) BBC but you're not unpleasant. It was nice vcing with you in discord chat... Most of the time. You ARE odd though, especially around contents of dial gold and smegma. Sometimes you'd seem a little TOO fixated on an uncomfortable subject, but I understand wanting to just mess with people ;)

If I recall correctly, the reason I was so reviled in that group was because of the aforementioned black dick spamming, and the fact that I would always go out of my way to start drama whenever the opportunity presented itself. It was a long time ago, though. Moreover, I don't recall ever voice chatting with you in Discord. What was the last time we talked in Discord, and what's your username on there?

72
The Flood / Re: Opinion of you thread, opinion of me thread
« on: May 27, 2017, 03:35:07 AM »
Go ahead and judge me.

73
The Flood / Re: Working in manual labour has made me so racist.
« on: May 19, 2017, 10:44:46 AM »
I don't know about you but I work really fucking hard at my job. I do my absolute best everyday at work.
You're not white

And there you go, hence I work fucking hard.
What do you do?

Currently I'm a machinist. I help create aircraft parts using a caliper and micrometer and a CNC machine, this last week I was even using a sand disk to square ends of parts, which requires a respirator mask and goggles, its tough shit but I was able to do it. I'm about to have a position change starting next week. No more 3 day weekends and I'll be getting more experience in measuring and blue print reading this time around. Of course I'll be trying this out and if I'm not happy with the results within the first week, I can still remain a machinist, but I think I'm going to prefer QC much more. 10 hours a day of machining and squaring ends is really exhausting, as well as dangerous. Safety is very important at my workplace.

Pay will still be the same. I'm not gonna get a raise until a year later if anything, the boss likes having me around.

Congrats on getting stable, full-time work. That sounds like a good gig right there.

74
The Flood / Re: Messages for Users from Sandtrap
« on: May 17, 2017, 08:50:03 PM »
I'd like to see what he wrote about me, CIS.

75
The Flood / Re: Chris-Chan is selling his old shirt for $25k
« on: April 21, 2017, 08:36:59 PM »
why would anybody give this person attention

let alone money

Because a lot of people are stupid, and he's a symbol of 4chan's legacy and culture.

76
The Flood / Vlogging with Deci
« on: April 10, 2017, 01:30:19 AM »
YouTube

77
Serious / Re: Why should we care?
« on: March 23, 2017, 09:32:10 PM »
Because you're severely depressed and need to see a competent professional who can help you. You should be able to find psychiatric help through your health care provider.
She's tried seeking professional help a number of times already to tepid results. I don't mean to speak for her but yeah.

I'm genuinely sorry to hear about that.

78
Serious / Re: Why should we care?
« on: March 23, 2017, 08:35:32 PM »
It's in the title. Yeah, it's vague, but-- in a general sense-- why should we? It only leads to further suffering, so why hurt ourselves ever more?

I don't care if the answer is philosophical, scientific, or religious; I just need a good answer as to why it hurts so much to live.

Because you're severely depressed and need to see a competent professional who can help you. You should be able to find psychiatric help through your health care provider. 

79
Serious / Re: Love PewDiePie's response to the media
« on: February 18, 2017, 01:19:17 PM »
and these are people who don't have a prejudiced bone in their bodies
Verby, come on now

Let's be honest with ourselves, here

Are you really trying to say that Sep7 is a site without any traces of prejudice?

Do you think you're without prejudice?

80
Serious / Re: isnt it funny?
« on: February 18, 2017, 01:11:59 PM »
Cheat should just give everyone a link to the Sep7agon Discord room and shut down the site.

81
Serious / Re: I might end up selling this account
« on: February 09, 2017, 04:01:55 PM »
With that said, you're likely Cheat. Only the staff would break their own rules.

 ::)

And here you are not doing anything again. Allowing people to troll on the serious board in this thread. This was suppose to be a legitimate discussion god dammit.

"TEACHER! TEACHER! THEY'RE CALLING ME AN IDIOT AGAIN! GIVE THEM DETENTION, TEACHER!"

82
Serious / Re: I might end up selling this account
« on: February 09, 2017, 03:50:57 PM »
You're such a fucking crybaby dude LOL

Great, here we go again. Cheat on his Foman account each time I make a thread about anything, or a post and this account only replies to my posts and threads.

Cheat, why can't you just say this shit on your own account? I already know its you. There's no point in hiding it.

At this point, you're basically a one-man circus show for the entire forum to laugh at.

83
Serious / Re: I might end up selling this account
« on: February 09, 2017, 03:34:35 PM »
$800 is the lowest the bid will go. No exceptions. No other currency. It must be actual USD. Anyone that lives outside of the united states will need to convert their currency to USD and it must be equal to $800 or higher.

Are you really asking for someone to pay $800 to own your account on a random, backwater Internet forum?

Seriously. Deci. Come on.

What the fuck do you expect me to do? Keep getting shit from alt accounts like JebBush and Foman? I just want some change. Me selling my account was only an idea.

Deci.

It. Is. A. Backwater. Internet. Forum.

Why why why do you bring this attention to yourself? Your account is nothing, it has no value. No one's account on here is worth more than maybe a ripped dollar bill found in a gay stripper's thong.

You are literally repeating the cycle again and bringing more bad attention to yourself.

If that's the case than this website isn't worth 4 fucking grand.

And I was just trying to have a legitimate discussion about it, I didn't flat out say "Here, I'm selling my account" it was just an idea.

It was a horrible idea.

84
Serious / Re: I might end up selling this account
« on: February 09, 2017, 03:31:04 PM »
I will give you $8 for your account

Do you seriously expect me to sell my Sep7agon profile to you for $8?

Even though as I said CLEARLY in the OP that this is all currently on paper and its not set in stone.

$800 is the lowest the bid will go. No exceptions. No other currency. It must be actual USD. Anyone that lives outside of the united states will need to convert their currency to USD and it must be equal to $800 or higher.


85
The Flood / Re: Were you baptized?
« on: February 08, 2017, 10:58:53 PM »
At a protestant church, yes.

86
The Flood / Re: Let's see your computer wallpaper
« on: February 08, 2017, 10:55:15 PM »


This is probably the best wallpaper in the thread.

87
Serious / Re: Has Bungie finally done something worthwhile after Halo?
« on: February 08, 2017, 07:52:23 PM »
Is this the virtue signalling that the angry man on YouTube warned me about?

Was it ever a legitimate term?
When it was an actual sociological term with a different meaning than today, yeah.

I'm afraid to google it for fear of becoming an MRA.

Enter the void
https://www.google.com/search?q=virtue+signalling&oq=virtue+signalling&aqs=chrome.0.0l6.2865j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

88
The Flood / Re: The Dogma of Human Nature
« on: February 08, 2017, 05:12:46 PM »

89
Serious / Re: Trump fires acting Attorney General
« on: January 30, 2017, 11:31:08 PM »
There's already a thread.

Sorry. Lock then.

90
Serious / Trump fires acting Attorney General
« on: January 30, 2017, 11:29:42 PM »
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/30/us/politics/trump-immigration-ban-memo.html

Spoiler
Quote
WASHINGTON — President Trump fired his acting attorney general on Monday night, removing her as the nation’s top law enforcement officer after she defiantly refused to defend his executive order closing the nation’s borders to refugees and people from predominantly Muslim countries.

In an escalating crisis for his 10-day-old administration, the president declared in a statement that Sally Q. Yates, who had served as deputy attorney general under President Barack Obama, had betrayed the administration by announcing that Justice Department lawyers would not defend Mr. Trump’s order against legal challenges.

The president replaced Ms. Yates with Dana J. Boente, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, saying that he would serve as attorney general until Congress acts to confirm Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama.

At 11:42 p.m., in his first act as the acting attorney general, Mr. Boente announced that he was rescinding Ms. Yates’s order.

Citing the earlier finding by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel that the immigration order was “lawful on its face and properly drafted,” he said that “I hereby rescind former Acting Attorney General Sally Q. Yates January 30, 2017, guidance and direct the men and women of the Department of Justice to do our sworn duty and to defend the lawful orders of our President.”

White House officials said that Mr. Boente was sworn in at 9 p.m., but it did not provide details about who performed the ceremony. In a statement, Mr. Boente pledged to “defend and enforce the laws of our country.”

At 9:15 p.m., Ms. Yates received a hand-delivered letter at the Justice Department that informed her that she was fired. Signed by John DeStefano, one of Mr. Trump’s White House aides, the letter informed Ms. Yates that “the president has removed you from the office of Deputy Attorney General of the United States.”

After Reince Priebus, the White House chief of staff, received reassurances from Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, that the confirmation was on track, aides took their recommendation to Mr. Trump in the White House residence.

The president decided quickly: She has to go, he told them.

The official statement from Mr. Spicer accused Ms. Yates of failing to fulfill her duty to defend a “legal order designed to protect the citizens of the United States” that had been approved by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel.

“It is time to get serious about protecting our country,” Mr. Spicer said in the statement. He accused Democrats of holding up the confirmation of Mr. Sessions for political reasons. “Calling for tougher vetting for individuals traveling from seven dangerous places is not extreme. It is reasonable and necessary to protect our country.”

Former Justice Department officials said the president’s action would send a deep shudder through an agency that was already on edge as officials anticipated an ideological overhaul once Mr. Session takes over. One former senior official said that department lawyers would be unnerved by the firing.

Democrats, meanwhile, hailed Ms. Yates as a principled defender of what she thought was right. Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, said in a statement that the “attorney general should be loyal and pledge fidelity to the law, not the White House. The fact that this administration doesn’t understand that is chilling.”

Mr. Boente has told the White House that he is willing to sign off on Mr. Trump’s executive order on refugees and immigration, according to Joshua Stueve, a spokesman for the United States attorney’s office in Alexandria, Va., where Mr. Boente has served as the top prosecutor since 2015.

Mr. Boente, who has been a prosecutor with the Justice Department for 31 years, had no hesitation about accepting the acting attorney general’s job given his “seniority and loyalty” to the department, Mr. Stueve said in a telephone interview on Monday night.

As acting attorney general, Ms. Yates was the only person at the Justice Department authorized to sign applications for foreign surveillance warrants. Administrations of both parties have interpreted surveillance laws as requiring foreign surveillance warrants be signed only by Senate-confirmed Justice Department officials. Mr. Boente was Senate-confirmed as United States attorney and, though the situation is unprecedented, the White House said he was authorized to sign the warrants.

Ms. Yates’s decision had effectively overruled a finding by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, which had already approved the executive order “with respect to form and legality.”

Ms. Yates said her determination in deciding not to defend the order was broader, however, and included questions not only about the order’s lawfulness, but also whether it was a “wise or just” policy. She also alluded to unspecified statements the White House had made before signing the order, which she factored into her review.

Mr. Trump initially responded to the letter with a post on Twitter at 7:45 p.m., complaining that the Senate’s delay in confirming his Cabinet nominees had resulted in leaving Ms. Yates in place.

“The Democrats are delaying my cabinet picks for purely political reasons,” Mr. Trump said. “They have nothing going but to obstruct. Now have an Obama A.G.”

Ms. Yates’s letter transforms the confirmation of Mr. Trump’s attorney general nominee, Mr. Sessions, into a referendum on the immigration order. Action in the Senate could come as early as Tuesday.

The decision by the acting attorney general is a remarkable rebuke by a government official to a sitting president that recalls the dramatic “Saturday Night Massacre” in 1973, when President Richard M. Nixon fired his attorney general and deputy attorney general for refusing to dismiss the special prosecutor in the Watergate case.

That case prompted a constitutional crisis that ended when Robert Bork, the solicitor general, acceded to Mr. Nixon’s order and fired Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor.

This reeks of authoritarianism.

Pages: 123 45 ... 112