This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Dustin
Pages: 1 ... 161162163 164165 ... 194
4861
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:48:16 AM »
Because it's not just a few guys, it's the massive amount of people defending them.
I can't say I've ever really seen them post such stuff that often, and I can't claim to have ever seen somebody outside the "perpetrators" defending it.
The worst thing I've seen on this site is genuine loli hentai from Chakas in Anarchy. That wasn't cool. A few pictures of non-nude, potentially-provocative loli drawings? Doesn't really bother me none.
Posting an image of a nude child? Again, that's not cool. Although it depends where you draw the line. You can have nude images of children without it being sexualised; although I don't thing genuine images of nude children should be allowed at all here and thank goodness they aren't.
It really isn't about the drawings, that's just a smaller factor at play here. The main issue is the people going around saying nude pictures of children and teenagers circulating the internet isn't a bad thing, or worse, is a good thing, and all the people defending those making those argument calling me a troll simply for caring about exploited children. Frankly there isn't a small few I'm yelling at.
I love how you keep bringing up shit that doesn't actually happen here.
Except it literally did. Do we need to bring back up the anonymous message thread to confirm it?
This ruins your point entirely.
Do you not understand that people say whatever the fuck they want, true or not if it's anonymous?
It wasn't an anonymous post. It was only an anonymous post that started the argument.
And you assume that people are actually being serious in supporting it?
Yes, for some people it's a natural attraction. But that's why you take measures to prevent those people from actually assaulting children. That doesn't defend pedophilia, that's just acknowledging its existence.
I don't think you actually went back to thread. As I said, people were arguing, mainly, that nude pictures kids and teens take of themselves should be allowed to circulate the internet.
4862
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:33:46 AM »
Because it's not just a few guys, it's the massive amount of people defending them.
I can't say I've ever really seen them post such stuff that often, and I can't claim to have ever seen somebody outside the "perpetrators" defending it.
The worst thing I've seen on this site is genuine loli hentai from Chakas in Anarchy. That wasn't cool. A few pictures of non-nude, potentially-provocative loli drawings? Doesn't really bother me none.
Posting an image of a nude child? Again, that's not cool. Although it depends where you draw the line. You can have nude images of children without it being sexualised; although I don't thing genuine images of nude children should be allowed at all here and thank goodness they aren't.
It really isn't about the drawings, that's just a smaller factor at play here. The main issue is the people going around saying nude pictures of children and teenagers circulating the internet isn't a bad thing, or worse, is a good thing, and all the people defending those making those argument calling me a troll simply for caring about exploited children. Frankly there isn't a small few I'm yelling at.
I love how you keep bringing up shit that doesn't actually happen here.
Except it literally did. Do we need to bring back up the anonymous message thread to confirm it?
This ruins your point entirely.
Do you not understand that people say whatever the fuck they want, true or not if it's anonymous?
It wasn't an anonymous post. It was only an anonymous post that started the argument.
4863
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:25:21 AM »
Because it's not just a few guys, it's the massive amount of people defending them.
I can't say I've ever really seen them post such stuff that often, and I can't claim to have ever seen somebody outside the "perpetrators" defending it.
The worst thing I've seen on this site is genuine loli hentai from Chakas in Anarchy. That wasn't cool. A few pictures of non-nude, potentially-provocative loli drawings? Doesn't really bother me none.
Posting an image of a nude child? Again, that's not cool. Although it depends where you draw the line. You can have nude images of children without it being sexualised; although I don't thing genuine images of nude children should be allowed at all here and thank goodness they aren't.
It really isn't about the drawings, that's just a smaller factor at play here. The main issue is the people going around saying nude pictures of children and teenagers circulating the internet isn't a bad thing, or worse, is a good thing, and all the people defending those making those argument calling me a troll simply for caring about exploited children. Frankly there isn't a small few I'm yelling at.
I love how you keep bringing up shit that doesn't actually happen here.
Except it literally did. Do we need to bring back up the anonymous message thread to confirm it?
4864
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:24:38 AM »
Because it's not just a few guys, it's the massive amount of people defending them. There's a difference between defending and pointing out how ridiculously you're reacting to certain people's responses.
Guess what? I actually think pedophilia is fucking disgusting. But you didn't ask my opinion, you just assumed I was defending people that supposedly think it's okay because I agreed with everyone else that you should just leave.
Then would you like to join the group of people who are arguing for no other reason but that they don't like me?
4865
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:22:28 AM »
Because it's not just a few guys, it's the massive amount of people defending them.
I can't say I've ever really seen them post such stuff that often, and I can't claim to have ever seen somebody outside the "perpetrators" defending it.
The worst thing I've seen on this site is genuine loli hentai from Chakas in Anarchy. That wasn't cool. A few pictures of non-nude, potentially-provocative loli drawings? Doesn't really bother me none.
Posting an image of a nude child? Again, that's not cool. Although it depends where you draw the line. You can have nude images of children without it being sexualised; although I don't thing genuine images of nude children should be allowed at all here and thank goodness they aren't.
It really isn't about the drawings, that's just a smaller factor at play here. The main issue is the people going around saying nude pictures of children and teenagers circulating the internet isn't a bad thing, or worse, is a good thing, and all the people defending those making those argument calling me a troll simply for caring about exploited children. Frankly there isn't a small few I'm yelling at.
4866
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:18:30 AM »
Oh, can't take the criticism of your retarded ideology?
I was referring to Nuka. My retarded ideology? Antipedophilia is retarded to you? Oh well that's comforting to know that I'm only dealing with the mentally ill here.
Oh no, NUKA.
And not your anti-pedophilia. It's more your thing of statically refusing to consider lowering the AoC below 18 and grouping up people who think that as pedophiles. Your paranoia is retarded. It's not so 50-year olds can fuck 14-year olds. it's so 14-year olds can fuck each other and not be forced to pay dearly for it. Anti-pedophilia laws are doing absolutely nothing to stop pedophilia, and it's only punishing "children" innocently having sex.
Children aren't getting arrested for having sex or pursuing relationships. I literally have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
*yawns*
Are you even trying anymore? Arresting and punishment aren't the same thing. I think you're the one with no idea what you're talking about.
Sorry but mommy and daddy telling their kids they can't have sex or pursue relationships has nothing to do with the AoC. Nor does your imaginary concept that kids are getting arrested for having sex with people their own age.
LOL!
When did I ever state that kids are getting arrested for having sex with people their own age? You're literally making shit up as you go along.
"it's so 14-year olds can fuck each other and not be forced to pay dearly for it. Anti-pedophilia laws are doing absolutely nothing to stop pedophilia, and it's only punishing "children" innocently having sex."
Anything else?
Again, never said that they would get arrested. Once. The biggest problem is that there's a big stigma against it largely because the laws relating to it are so uncompromising.
Stop beating around the bush and tell me exactly what you mean when you say AoC laws affect the ability for younger people of the same/similar age to have sex or pursue relationships?
I'd love to, but I think it's a better idea to just sit back and watch as you continue making an ass of yourself.
Or what you mean to say is you want the AoC to be lowered for no other reason than what I could only assume is pedophilic in nature. Or am I really supposed to sit here and think that you have your rebuttal ready and you just don't feel like explaining?
4867
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:14:52 AM »
calling me a troll because I think that nude pictures of children should not be circulating the internet.
Yeah, I don't think anybody did that.
You flew off the handle about Verbatim saying something you somehow thought would logically support the removal of AoC laws and then made a massive thread about it accusing the entire forum of paedophile culture.
I can understand those who post loli/anime shit, I just try to steer clear of it. However, how the fuck do you expect people to react when you kick in the door and start screaming paedophile culture just because of a few guys in the corner doing their own shit?
Because it's not just a few guys, it's the massive amount of people defending them.
4868
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:13:48 AM »
Oh, can't take the criticism of your retarded ideology?
I was referring to Nuka. My retarded ideology? Antipedophilia is retarded to you? Oh well that's comforting to know that I'm only dealing with the mentally ill here.
Oh no, NUKA.
And not your anti-pedophilia. It's more your thing of statically refusing to consider lowering the AoC below 18 and grouping up people who think that as pedophiles. Your paranoia is retarded. It's not so 50-year olds can fuck 14-year olds. it's so 14-year olds can fuck each other and not be forced to pay dearly for it. Anti-pedophilia laws are doing absolutely nothing to stop pedophilia, and it's only punishing "children" innocently having sex.
Children aren't getting arrested for having sex or pursuing relationships. I literally have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
*yawns*
Are you even trying anymore? Arresting and punishment aren't the same thing. I think you're the one with no idea what you're talking about.
Sorry but mommy and daddy telling their kids they can't have sex or pursue relationships has nothing to do with the AoC. Nor does your imaginary concept that kids are getting arrested for having sex with people their own age.
LOL!
When did I ever state that kids are getting arrested for having sex with people their own age? You're literally making shit up as you go along.
"it's so 14-year olds can fuck each other and not be forced to pay dearly for it. Anti-pedophilia laws are doing absolutely nothing to stop pedophilia, and it's only punishing "children" innocently having sex."
Anything else?
Again, never said that they would get arrested. Once. The biggest problem is that there's a big stigma against it largely because the laws relating to it are so uncompromising.
Stop beating around the bush and tell me exactly what you mean when you say AoC laws affect the ability for younger people of the same/similar age to have sex or pursue relationships?
4869
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:08:26 AM »
Oh, can't take the criticism of your retarded ideology?
I was referring to Nuka. My retarded ideology? Antipedophilia is retarded to you? Oh well that's comforting to know that I'm only dealing with the mentally ill here.
Oh no, NUKA.
And not your anti-pedophilia. It's more your thing of statically refusing to consider lowering the AoC below 18 and grouping up people who think that as pedophiles. Your paranoia is retarded. It's not so 50-year olds can fuck 14-year olds. it's so 14-year olds can fuck each other and not be forced to pay dearly for it. Anti-pedophilia laws are doing absolutely nothing to stop pedophilia, and it's only punishing "children" innocently having sex.
Children aren't getting arrested for having sex or pursuing relationships. I literally have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
*yawns*
Are you even trying anymore? Arresting and punishment aren't the same thing. I think you're the one with no idea what you're talking about.
Sorry but mommy and daddy telling their kids they can't have sex or pursue relationships has nothing to do with the AoC. Nor does your imaginary concept that kids are getting arrested for having sex with people their own age.
LOL!
When did I ever state that kids are getting arrested for having sex with people their own age? You're literally making shit up as you go along.
"it's so 14-year olds can fuck each other and not be forced to pay dearly for it. Anti-pedophilia laws are doing absolutely nothing to stop pedophilia, and it's only punishing "children" innocently having sex." Anything else?
4870
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:06:25 AM »
]Pedophile acceptance more specifically. I understand pedophiles can't help themselves. What can be helped is everyone else defending policies that exploit children.
Where do you draw the line? Where does an image of a child become exploitative or sexualised? Does it only require a paedophile to wank to an image of an 11-year-old in a bikini for it to be a problem?
I'm talking about this problem with the culture here. The opinions and discussions about how people were/are calling me a troll because I think that nude pictures of children should not be circulating the internet. I'd like to get into the more philosophical discussion of what pedophilic actions are harmful and what are not, but now isn't the time.
4871
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:03:08 AM »
Oh, can't take the criticism of your retarded ideology?
I was referring to Nuka. My retarded ideology? Antipedophilia is retarded to you? Oh well that's comforting to know that I'm only dealing with the mentally ill here.
I feel so loved.
Why can't you take actual opposing arguments without whining like a little bitch about it?
Sorry but there aren't any opposing arguments as to why pedophilia should be acceptable. Try if you like a big boy who isn't afraid of the government swarming your home.
I haven't even debated anything about pedophilia at all you with you or anyone on this forum for that matter, so... what?
No, you're grouped with the more annoying bunch that are defending them.
4872
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:02:23 AM »
Oh, can't take the criticism of your retarded ideology?
I was referring to Nuka. My retarded ideology? Antipedophilia is retarded to you? Oh well that's comforting to know that I'm only dealing with the mentally ill here.
Oh no, NUKA.
And not your anti-pedophilia. It's more your thing of statically refusing to consider lowering the AoC below 18 and grouping up people who think that as pedophiles. Your paranoia is retarded. It's not so 50-year olds can fuck 14-year olds. it's so 14-year olds can fuck each other and not be forced to pay dearly for it. Anti-pedophilia laws are doing absolutely nothing to stop pedophilia, and it's only punishing "children" innocently having sex.
Children aren't getting arrested for having sex or pursuing relationships. I literally have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
*yawns*
Are you even trying anymore? Arresting and punishment aren't the same thing. I think you're the one with no idea what you're talking about.
Sorry but mommy and daddy telling their kids they can't have sex or pursue relationships has nothing to do with the AoC. Nor does your imaginary concept that kids are getting arrested for having sex with people their own age.
4873
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:00:40 AM »
Antipedophilia is retarded to you?
That depends on whether or not you think paedophiles are inherently immoral/wrong/disgusting.
Pedophile acceptance more specifically. I understand pedophiles can't help themselves. What can be helped is everyone else defending policies that exploit children.
4874
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:56:46 AM »
Oh, can't take the criticism of your retarded ideology?
I was referring to Nuka. My retarded ideology? Antipedophilia is retarded to you? Oh well that's comforting to know that I'm only dealing with the mentally ill here.
I feel so loved.
Why can't you take actual opposing arguments without whining like a little bitch about it?
Sorry but there aren't any opposing arguments as to why pedophilia should be acceptable. Try if you like a big boy who isn't afraid of the government swarming your home.
4875
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:55:32 AM »
Oh, can't take the criticism of your retarded ideology?
I was referring to Nuka. My retarded ideology? Antipedophilia is retarded to you? Oh well that's comforting to know that I'm only dealing with the mentally ill here.
Oh no, NUKA.
And not your anti-pedophilia. It's more your thing of statically refusing to consider lowering the AoC below 18 and grouping up people who think that as pedophiles. Your paranoia is retarded. It's not so 50-year olds can fuck 14-year olds. it's so 14-year olds can fuck each other and not be forced to pay dearly for it. Anti-pedophilia laws are doing absolutely nothing to stop pedophilia, and it's only punishing "children" innocently having sex.
Children aren't getting arrested for having sex or pursuing relationships. I literally have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
4876
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:48:24 AM »
Oh, can't take the criticism of your retarded ideology?
I was referring to Nuka. My retarded ideology? Antipedophilia is retarded to you? Oh well that's comforting to know that I'm only dealing with the mentally ill here.
4877
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:46:21 AM »
Please leave. As I've stated many times before, the age of consent logically should be 14.
Someone wants to bang their grandma.
SecondClass is an adult.
4878
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:45:49 AM »
Sort of like a mute, but to go the other way.
4879
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:30:37 AM »
For somebody who got supremely butt-flustered when you were being impersonated on b.next - and probably rightfully so since the whole community turned against you - to the point where you'd blame Door and I when we'd done nothing, why do you seem to be reaching for the exact same consequence now, by yourself?
Because I will not accept a truth that this forum is okay with pedophilia. There are those posting images of sexualized drawings of children; there are those saying the AoC needs to be lowered by four or five years; there are those who think it's okay for nude pictures of teens and preteens should circulate the internet; and then there is everyone else defending those people. I call it pedophile culture, others would just simply call the FBI.
4880
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:25:17 AM »
I actually don't have anyone muted.
But actually the government legitimately does go after those who advocate pedophilia acceptance, look up NAMBLA if you don't believe me. Anyway, lowering the AoC to 14 years old still falls under the larger umbrella of pedophilia, and it's disgusting and wrong.
So you lied. Good to know.
And the government can "go after me" all they want. Holding the opinion that the AoC should be lowered to 14 isn't a crime, and I've broken no law for posting that opinion on the Internet and reiterating it in real life. You can call it disgusting all you want, that's your opinion. The simple fact of the matter is that unless someone on here posts or supports CP, the FBI has no legal authority to prosecute.
There are multiple members here that support CP. Your point?
Mind backing that up with evidence? Nobody here seriously supports CP.
I can point you to four users that spam drawings of sexualized pictures of children here. I can point you to many more who think it's acceptable.
So cause I spam meatspin, I'm a big fan of tranny porn? Lol.
Doesn't mean just because you spam something, it means that you actually support it. And mind naming those 4 users?
You're missing the point.
Lol. Now that I actually challenged your point, I'm "missing the point" now? You don't seem to get the difference between spamming and supporting something. And you never said those 4 users. I'm waiting. Or are you gonna continue making an ass of yourself?
Ossku, True, Yutaka, Waifu
And I'm not going to continue this any further if you're going to make an idiotic claim that 'they don't mean it.' You want some real world advise? An FBI watch dog does not interpret whether or not someone is serious when they say they're going to bomb an airplane, they act as if they are serious.
LOL
You're so fucking predictable. Those guys just spam anime crap. Please don't tell me that you think that anime is even remotely in the same league as real life. And don't even think that comparing Anime and actual CP is even close to comparing a fake and real bomb threat. Cheat made it clear that he would delete any actual CP, and despite how retarded most of those users may be, they aren't going to post CP or even real sexualized images involving children. I don't see how you're comparing some dumb anime pictures to Child Pornography. You don't seem to have any idea what you're talking about.
The thread has little to do with them, it has to do with the culture of the forum in which everyone is very nonchalant about the horrors of child exploitation. Go ahead and continue to defend it though. The internet makes it especially easy for the FBI to track what you do and where you go.
>implying that I'm defending CP
And what the fuck do you think this is, some anti-Pedophilia group? No. This is just some forum where we talk shit about each other and have fun. None of us really care about trying to legalize or further restrict CP because it affects none of us. If you're looking for anti-Pedophilia spammed everywhere, find an activist forum. Just please don't clog up this forum.
Once again you're misunderstanding. When people make arguments about how nude photos of children should be allowed to circulate through the internet is the point where one has to simply stop.
4881
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:17:57 AM »
I actually don't have anyone muted.
But actually the government legitimately does go after those who advocate pedophilia acceptance, look up NAMBLA if you don't believe me. Anyway, lowering the AoC to 14 years old still falls under the larger umbrella of pedophilia, and it's disgusting and wrong.
So you lied. Good to know.
And the government can "go after me" all they want. Holding the opinion that the AoC should be lowered to 14 isn't a crime, and I've broken no law for posting that opinion on the Internet and reiterating it in real life. You can call it disgusting all you want, that's your opinion. The simple fact of the matter is that unless someone on here posts or supports CP, the FBI has no legal authority to prosecute.
There are multiple members here that support CP. Your point?
Mind backing that up with evidence? Nobody here seriously supports CP.
I can point you to four users that spam drawings of sexualized pictures of children here. I can point you to many more who think it's acceptable.
So cause I spam meatspin, I'm a big fan of tranny porn? Lol.
Doesn't mean just because you spam something, it means that you actually support it. And mind naming those 4 users?
You're missing the point.
Lol. Now that I actually challenged your point, I'm "missing the point" now? You don't seem to get the difference between spamming and supporting something. And you never said those 4 users. I'm waiting. Or are you gonna continue making an ass of yourself?
Ossku, True, Yutaka, Waifu
And I'm not going to continue this any further if you're going to make an idiotic claim that 'they don't mean it.' You want some real world advise? An FBI watch dog does not interpret whether or not someone is serious when they say they're going to bomb an airplane, they act as if they are serious.
LOL
You're so fucking predictable. Those guys just spam anime crap. Please don't tell me that you think that anime is even remotely in the same league as real life. And don't even think that comparing Anime and actual CP is even close to comparing a fake and real bomb threat. Cheat made it clear that he would delete any actual CP, and despite how retarded most of those users may be, they aren't going to post CP or even real sexualized images involving children. I don't see how you're comparing some dumb anime pictures to Child Pornography. You don't seem to have any idea what you're talking about.
The thread has little to do with them, it has to do with the culture of the forum in which everyone is very nonchalant about the horrors of child exploitation. Go ahead and continue to defend it though. The internet makes it especially easy for the FBI to track what you do and where you go.
4882
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:09:32 AM »
I actually don't have anyone muted.
But actually the government legitimately does go after those who advocate pedophilia acceptance, look up NAMBLA if you don't believe me. Anyway, lowering the AoC to 14 years old still falls under the larger umbrella of pedophilia, and it's disgusting and wrong.
So you lied. Good to know.
And the government can "go after me" all they want. Holding the opinion that the AoC should be lowered to 14 isn't a crime, and I've broken no law for posting that opinion on the Internet and reiterating it in real life. You can call it disgusting all you want, that's your opinion. The simple fact of the matter is that unless someone on here posts or supports CP, the FBI has no legal authority to prosecute.
There are multiple members here that support CP. Your point?
Mind backing that up with evidence? Nobody here seriously supports CP.
I can point you to four users that spam drawings of sexualized pictures of children here. I can point you to many more who think it's acceptable.
So cause I spam meatspin, I'm a big fan of tranny porn? Lol.
Doesn't mean just because you spam something, it means that you actually support it. And mind naming those 4 users?
You're missing the point.
Lol. Now that I actually challenged your point, I'm "missing the point" now? You don't seem to get the difference between spamming and supporting something. And you never said those 4 users. I'm waiting. Or are you gonna continue making an ass of yourself?
Ossku, True, Yutaka, Waifu And I'm not going to continue this any further if you're going to make an idiotic claim that 'they don't mean it.' You want some real world advise? An FBI watch dog does not interpret whether or not someone is serious when they say they're going to bomb an airplane, they act as if they are serious.
4883
« on: September 13, 2014, 03:58:43 AM »
I actually don't have anyone muted.
But actually the government legitimately does go after those who advocate pedophilia acceptance, look up NAMBLA if you don't believe me. Anyway, lowering the AoC to 14 years old still falls under the larger umbrella of pedophilia, and it's disgusting and wrong.
So you lied. Good to know.
And the government can "go after me" all they want. Holding the opinion that the AoC should be lowered to 14 isn't a crime, and I've broken no law for posting that opinion on the Internet and reiterating it in real life. You can call it disgusting all you want, that's your opinion. The simple fact of the matter is that unless someone on here posts or supports CP, the FBI has no legal authority to prosecute.
There are multiple members here that support CP. Your point?
Mind backing that up with evidence? Nobody here seriously supports CP.
I can point you to four users that spam drawings of sexualized pictures of children here. I can point you to many more who think it's acceptable.
So cause I spam meatspin, I'm a big fan of tranny porn? Lol.
Doesn't mean just because you spam something, it means that you actually support it. And mind naming those 4 users?
You're missing the point.
4884
« on: September 13, 2014, 03:54:28 AM »
I actually don't have anyone muted.
But actually the government legitimately does go after those who advocate pedophilia acceptance, look up NAMBLA if you don't believe me. Anyway, lowering the AoC to 14 years old still falls under the larger umbrella of pedophilia, and it's disgusting and wrong.
So you lied. Good to know.
And the government can "go after me" all they want. Holding the opinion that the AoC should be lowered to 14 isn't a crime, and I've broken no law for posting that opinion on the Internet and reiterating it in real life. You can call it disgusting all you want, that's your opinion. The simple fact of the matter is that unless someone on here posts or supports CP, the FBI has no legal authority to prosecute.
There are multiple members here that support CP. Your point?
Mind backing that up with evidence? Nobody here seriously supports CP.
I can point you to four users that spam drawings of sexualized pictures of children here. I can point you to many more who think it's acceptable.
4885
« on: September 13, 2014, 03:48:43 AM »
I actually don't have anyone muted.
But actually the government legitimately does go after those who advocate pedophilia acceptance, look up NAMBLA if you don't believe me. Anyway, lowering the AoC to 14 years old still falls under the larger umbrella of pedophilia, and it's disgusting and wrong.
So you lied. Good to know.
And the government can "go after me" all they want. Holding the opinion that the AoC should be lowered to 14 isn't a crime, and I've broken no law for posting that opinion on the Internet and reiterating it in real life. You can call it disgusting all you want, that's your opinion. The simple fact of the matter is that unless someone on here posts or supports CP, the FBI has no legal authority to prosecute.
http://legacy.utsandiego.com/news/metro/20050217-2208-manboy-daily.html"unless someone on here posts or supports CP" There are multiple members here that support CP. Your point?
4886
« on: September 13, 2014, 03:43:04 AM »
I'm an idiot for thinking you were going to post a news article about how scientists are studying how the atmosphere can actually repair itself, but no, it's just another shitpost.
I'm sick and feel bad. It was hinted with the lots and lots of p:s.
Honestly with the way this site is going, this is probably one of the better threads we've had in a while.
4887
« on: September 13, 2014, 03:40:47 AM »
ITT: Le Dustin transforming into Kinder
The only abnormality I see in myself in the context of this argument is that I care what you faggots think. I cannot come to the conclusion that I am in the wrong for not defending pedophilia, child porn, etc. Yet so many of you are coming into this thread and siding with the pedophiles and calling me a troll for standing against it and I cannot bring myself to understand why.
Well I can, you guys really aren't intelligent and you're clearly being manipulated.
If you think we're being manipulated, I'm scared to think about what you're being manipulated by.
Probably common human law that frowns upon the exploitation of children. But hey, who am I to know what's manipulating me to not find it okay to have sex with children.
4888
« on: September 13, 2014, 03:39:12 AM »
If there's one thing conservatives can do well, it's beating the living shit out of scumbags like you and making sure the whole of society and everyone you ever fucking knew is aware that you're a sex offender. Goodbye and goodnight, faggots.
So supporting lowered AoC laws = sex offender? What kind of shit-tier argument is this?
Wait, Dustin has me muted. Why am I responding to this bait?
I actually don't have anyone muted. But actually the government legitimately does go after those who advocate pedophilia acceptance, look up NAMBLA if you don't believe me. Anyway, lowering the AoC to 14 years old still falls under the larger umbrella of pedophilia, and it's disgusting and wrong.
4889
« on: September 13, 2014, 03:29:40 AM »
ITT: Le Dustin transforming into Kinder
The only abnormality I see in myself in the context of this argument is that I care what you faggots think. I cannot come to the conclusion that I am in the wrong for not defending pedophilia, child porn, etc. Yet so many of you are coming into this thread and siding with the pedophiles and calling me a troll for standing against it and I cannot bring myself to understand why. Well I can, you guys really aren't intelligent and you're clearly being manipulated.
4890
« on: September 13, 2014, 03:24:41 AM »
I'm an idiot for thinking you were going to post a news article about how scientists are studying how the atmosphere can actually repair itself, but no, it's just another shitpost.
Pages: 1 ... 161162163 164165 ... 194
|
Show Posts