This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Sandtrap
Pages: 1 ... 194195196 197198 ... 390
5851
« on: June 11, 2015, 01:50:10 PM »
When are they going to drop the shitty Halo 4 jackal design? Halo 3 and Reach had the best jackals.
Reach did a foul up though.
Every Jackal had cloudy cataract eyes for some reason.
Skirmishers were great though and need to make a return.
Gimme drone and skirmisher firefight pls. I like traversing the 9 levels of hell.
5852
« on: June 11, 2015, 01:48:34 PM »
So umm, why do people only care when it's battlefront? Nobody seems to give a shit when this kind of stuff is done for pre-orders in stuff like COD, Battlefield, and Destiny.
Unlocking 3 weapons early and a couple emotes is nothing to get worked up over honestly.
Because the games you listed are already well known for being shit.
With Battlefront?
It's adding insult to injury.
I used those as examples. Unlocking something early for pre-ordering is basically standard practice now for multiplayer games.
It's a shit practice.
Doesn't explain why only certain games on here get singled out for engaging in it.
Because like I just said. They're already notorious for being pieces of shit. There's no point in bitching about them much because they're just going to stay shit anyway.
Now, throw in a game that people had some aspiration for? Some dream of having decent content?
People be gettin' angry when they're dissappointed yet again.
Maybe you people shouldn't expect anything from major publishers to buck then trend then.
Don't look at me man. I haven't purchased a new game since Dark Souls II. That feels like a really fucking long ass time ago. I generally only expect shit and shit accessories for games these days.
5853
« on: June 11, 2015, 01:46:23 PM »
When are they going to drop the shitty Halo 4 jackal design? Halo 3 and Reach had the best jackals.
Reach did a foul up though. Every Jackal had cloudy cataract eyes for some reason.
5854
« on: June 11, 2015, 01:42:07 PM »
So umm, why do people only care when it's battlefront? Nobody seems to give a shit when this kind of stuff is done for pre-orders in stuff like COD, Battlefield, and Destiny.
Unlocking 3 weapons early and a couple emotes is nothing to get worked up over honestly.
Because the games you listed are already well known for being shit.
With Battlefront?
It's adding insult to injury.
I used those as examples. Unlocking something early for pre-ordering is basically standard practice now for multiplayer games.
It's a shit practice.
Doesn't explain why only certain games on here get singled out for engaging in it.
Because like I just said. They're already notorious for being pieces of shit. There's no point in bitching about them much because they're just going to stay shit anyway. Now, throw in a game that people had some aspiration for? Some dream of having decent content? People be gettin' angry when they're dissappointed yet again.
5855
« on: June 11, 2015, 01:35:35 PM »
So umm, why do people only care when it's battlefront? Nobody seems to give a shit when this kind of stuff is done for pre-orders in stuff like COD, Battlefield, and Destiny.
Unlocking 3 weapons early and a couple emotes is nothing to get worked up over honestly.
Because the games you listed are already well known for being shit.
With Battlefront?
It's adding insult to injury.
I used those as examples. Unlocking something early for pre-ordering is basically standard practice now for multiplayer games.
It's a shit practice.
5856
« on: June 11, 2015, 01:34:06 PM »
Hmm. Wonder if you'll play as members of blue team in co-op campaign?
You do.
In single player they're AI that you can give commands to (kill certain enemies, pick up weapons, drive vehicles)
Pls no.
No Kat's Driving.
No Jun's Sniping.
No Emile's Sniping.
Have you not played Republic Commando? That's literally what it is, but Halo.
You can actually tell them what to do instead of them doing retarded shit on their own.
Just because Reach has awful ally AI means nothing.
DUUUUUDE.
A staple of Halo is useless allies.
Every single Halo has had allies that either did nothing or hindered you when you decided to be gracious and say, give them a rocket launcher.
AI procedural thought pattern is;
1. Recieve destructive weapon from friendly player
2. Look down, pull trigger
And? Just because it has a shit staple in the past doesn't mean 5 should or will.
The Creative Director at 343 for Halo 5 was the Creative Director at LucasArts for Republic Commando.
I shall not hold my breath.
5857
« on: June 11, 2015, 01:32:43 PM »
So umm, why do people only care when it's battlefront? Nobody seems to give a shit when this kind of stuff is done for pre-orders in stuff like COD, Battlefield, and Destiny.
Unlocking 3 weapons early and a couple emotes is nothing to get worked up over honestly.
Because the games you listed are already well known for being shit. With Battlefront? It's adding insult to injury.
5858
« on: June 11, 2015, 12:48:04 PM »
Hmm. Wonder if you'll play as members of blue team in co-op campaign?
You do.
In single player they're AI that you can give commands to (kill certain enemies, pick up weapons, drive vehicles)
Pls no.
No Kat's Driving.
No Jun's Sniping.
No Emile's Sniping.
Have you not played Republic Commando? That's literally what it is, but Halo.
You can actually tell them what to do instead of them doing retarded shit on their own.
Just because Reach has awful ally AI means nothing.
DUUUUUDE. A staple of Halo is useless allies. Every single Halo has had allies that either did nothing or hindered you when you decided to be gracious and say, give them a rocket launcher. AI procedural thought pattern is; 1. Recieve destructive weapon from friendly player 2. Look down, pull trigger
5859
« on: June 11, 2015, 12:36:14 PM »
Hmm. Wonder if you'll play as members of blue team in co-op campaign?
You do.
In single player they're AI that you can give commands to (kill certain enemies, pick up weapons, drive vehicles)
Pls no. No Kat's Driving. No Jun's Sniping. No Emile's Sniping.
5860
« on: June 11, 2015, 12:32:22 PM »
Kill yourself
Slash isn't here man
Kill Slash then kill yourself
You can't kill an idea
But you can kill those who have the idea in their head
But you can't kill kill yourself
Sure you can. Just kill yourself when you're in the afterlife.
That doesn't sound like a very salubrious idea.
It sounds like a very recherché interpretation to me.
5861
« on: June 11, 2015, 12:25:10 PM »
Kill yourself
Slash isn't here man
Kill Slash then kill yourself
You can't kill an idea
But you can kill those who have the idea in their head
But you can't kill kill yourself
Sure you can. Just kill yourself when you're in the afterlife.
5862
« on: June 11, 2015, 12:24:07 PM »
Hmm. Wonder if you'll play as members of blue team in co-op campaign?
5863
« on: June 11, 2015, 01:18:53 AM »
Ever ponder about the fact that there are people out in the world who aren't a part of the big wide interconnected system?
The Sentinelese are an indigenous people of the Andaman Islands, in the Bay of Bengal. They inhabit North Sentinel Island, which lies westward off the southern tip of the Great Andaman archipelago. They are noted for resisting attempts at contact by outsiders. The Sentinelese maintain an essentially hunter-gatherer society subsisting through hunting, fishing, and collecting wild plants. There is no evidence of either agricultural practices or methods of producing fire. Their language remains unclassified.
Their island is an integral part of and administered by the Indian Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. In practice, however, the Sentinelese exercise complete autonomy over their affairs and the involvement of the Indian authorities is restricted to occasional monitoring, even more infrequent and brief visits, and generally discouraging any access or approaches to the island. It is therefore de facto autonomous.
From 1967 onwards, the Indian authorities in Port Blair embarked on a limited programme of attempts at contacting the Sentinelese, under the management of the Director of Tribal Welfare and anthropologist T. N. Pandit. These "Contact Expeditions" consisted of a series of planned visits which would progressively leave "gifts", such as coconuts, on the shores, in an attempt to coax the Sentinelese from their hostile reception of outsiders. For a while, these seemed to have some limited success; however, the programme was discontinued in the late 1990s following a series of hostile encounters resulting in several deaths in a similar programme practised with the Jarawa people of South and Middle Andaman Islands and because of the danger of introducing diseases.
In 2006, Sentinelese archers killed two fishermen who were fishing illegally within range of the island. The archers later drove off, with a volley of arrows, the helicopter that was sent to retrieve the bodies.
Is it not interesting and somewhat fascinating that people out there in the world exist in such states? Totally independant, doing their own thing. And adament about their separation as well.
Strange world.
5864
« on: June 11, 2015, 12:44:17 AM »
There's a line, for me personally. When you get to the worst of the worst? No. Don't waste resources keeping them locked up for years. Don't give them comforts and care while they're locked up waiting to get a definitive sentence.
You take them out back, and you fucking old yeller them.
And not even that. I want you to imagine this. You've a wife/husband. You've kids. Hell, even just a friend or family. Some person breaks into their home, does some measure of horrible shit to them, and then kills them.
Ask yourself. Would you stand for it? You, personally. Would you let that stand?
I wouldn't. I'd take it on myself to kill them. No other person, no judge or executioner. I wouldn't give a shit at that point. Somebody takes everything away from me like that, with no thought or remorse over it? Unacceptable. Fuck other people dirtying their hands. I'd do it myself.
Sad truth is, some people cannot be fixed. And those that can't? Hit the off switch.
5865
« on: June 11, 2015, 12:32:32 AM »
What? No fat chicks?
Was expecting them.
5866
« on: June 11, 2015, 12:30:28 AM »
You're a good old neutral. You've got your golden moments. And then the not so gold.
Not someone to call a friend. But, not someone to take too seriously either.
5867
« on: June 10, 2015, 02:25:48 PM »
Incest is family marrying, not having sex, first of all. So it's not "wrong" in the way you put it. Like being a trap, it's the normalization of it that would be wrong. The acceptance - most of all, the forced acceptance. If you think that trannies are gross (they are) like everyone did just ten years ago, you're a bigot. You're "transphobic". We invent all of these sensationalist BS causes every decade or so to feel important. It's getting to the point where I'd be considered a bad person if I refused to sleep with someone because they're a trap. That's my main issue. While I wouldn't want to be within 500 feet of a tranny, my actual issue is how society treats them.
"sexual intercourse between closely related persons." "the crime of sexual intercourse, cohabitation, or marriage between persons within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity wherein marriage is legally forbidden." Oh look you're cherry picking the definition of incest. And, cherry picking and generalizing again. "like everyone did just ten years ago" Big generalization. "It's getting to the point where I'd be considered a bad person if I refused to sleep with someone because they're a trap." Very simple counter if you get shit for something like that. Stating and enforcing that those kind of people don't attract you. Simple. And, last thing here. "trannies are gross (they are)" "I'd champion your right to do it any day, but that doesn't make it any less disgusting." Hypocritical. Would defend their right to do so. But when their back is turned call them out on it. No. You wouldn't defend shit. And, even more so. You don't respect them. Not saying you have to. But you put up a sham and a front. And as soon as you don't need it? True opinion shows. Spineless thing to do. Not that it matters. It's you. That's your deal. But you've not given any valid reason why it's wrong. Which makes your original statement mere opinion with no real basis other than what your own eyes see and judge. Conversation over. Point still stands. I LOL.
5868
« on: June 10, 2015, 01:59:44 PM »
You've yet to give me a valid reason as to why it's wrong.
There's no such thing as, "It's just wrong."
It can't be "Just wrong" without reasons.
Know why incest is wrong? Genes. Stagnation. If everybody inbred then there would be no strong and adaptable gene pool. Mutations and code errors in genes would make mutations and unhealthy offspring.
That's why incest is wrong on a factual statement and level.
Now.
Your turn. Give me your reasons why it's wrong.
5869
« on: June 10, 2015, 01:53:18 PM »
I actually have one.
"lol" doesn't count.
Not saying you don't have one. But it's thinly veiled. Has no real support, or backup other than your personal opinion on the matter.
To clarify. It's rather funny that you'd say it being a socially accepted thing in our society is sick when you're known for using various forms of drugs.
When body modification is already present and accepted in our society anyway.
Being a tranny is far worse than smoking weed or getting piercings, man. Is that really your argument? "You smoke lol so how can you say this completely other thing is bad?"
Hokay. Tell my why being a tranny is bad. Your explanation of why it's bad to be one, or, bad to have the alterations done.
5870
« on: June 10, 2015, 01:41:13 PM »
5871
« on: June 10, 2015, 01:36:53 PM »
I actually have one.
"lol" doesn't count.
Not saying you don't have one. But it's thinly veiled. Has no real support, or backup other than your personal opinion on the matter. To clarify. It's rather funny that you'd say it being a socially accepted thing in our society is sick when you're known for using various forms of drugs. When body modification is already present and accepted in our society anyway.
5872
« on: June 10, 2015, 01:27:25 PM »
You shouldn't.
But, I will.
I lol.
What a compelling argument
Exactly. It's a perfect fit to match yours.
5873
« on: June 10, 2015, 01:25:31 PM »
certainly nothing worth starting a campaign over, that's for sure
You've an outside perspective Verb. You didn't invest into the series. When you become invested in a series. And from the get go, the series implies and leads along a direction up to the finale, and then in the last five minutes throws everything away? That blows, Verb. And, they could have done so much more with the ending. They actually had the potential to pull off a true mindfuck on gamers if you investigate The Indoctrination Theory.
5874
« on: June 10, 2015, 01:21:57 PM »
You shouldn't.
But, I will. I lol.
5875
« on: June 10, 2015, 01:20:44 PM »
really? because i read that you didn't have any choice at that point
i guess i was lied to
so there really is nothing wrong, then
Apart from being dissappointing and diverging from the series's established themes and mechanics. And riddled with plot holes. Yes. Absolutely nothing wrong. At all.
5876
« on: June 10, 2015, 01:17:03 PM »
Good on him. The fact that being a tranny is socially accepted in our society is sick.
I lol.
5877
« on: June 10, 2015, 01:14:19 PM »
after reading about what makes the ending so supposedly bad, the only thing that i see a problem with is
Spoiler when the illusive man shoots and kills you if you don't take the renegade option
if you were building a purely paragon shepard across your entire run, it's game over for you
that's stupid
the rest was absolutely fine though If you're good guy shepard you can sweet talk the pistol out of his hands and sweet talk IM into bed.
5878
« on: June 10, 2015, 01:07:02 PM »
>Mysterious Space death cuddlefish
>Made by some glowy kid thing
>Glowy kid thing made by undersea alien cuddlefish
Thanks.
5879
« on: June 10, 2015, 12:39:51 PM »
>Nobody knows this is OnlyAfro
5880
« on: June 10, 2015, 12:11:57 PM »
Nope.
Pages: 1 ... 194195196 197198 ... 390
|
Show Posts
