This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Desty
Pages: 1 ... 288289290 291292 ... 353
8671
« on: October 06, 2015, 09:54:25 AM »
This is a huge contradiciton.
Me: What I propose as an answer to this situation is that we choose our own intelligent results. Logic that is intelligent.
You: This is nonsencial. Logic is by definition intelligent. m8 r u srs? Me: This is an example of unintelligent logic prevailing because it's good logic.
You: Logic cannot be good or bad, it just is. I was talking about the quality of the logic; and saying that logic is good or bad can also mean that the facts that make up the logic are sequential to each other, or if it's bad logic; not sequential. Me: we're stupid, and so is nature.
You: This is by far the most nonsensical comment you made. If you believe everything is stupid. Then what you wrote is stupid, because you are not intelligent enough to write anything coherent because you are stupid. First off, I don't believe that everything is stupid. The fact that anything is possible, yet we choose the poor things is what made me make this thread. Secondly, yeah, I am stupid, but stupid can try to be smart, and it can become smarter. I believe that human beings aren't rational, but rationalising. Me: and so is nature.
You: Again, nonsensical. Nature is not something that can be 'dumb' or 'intelligent', it just is. Nature is just what it is, and that's the point. It could be more, but because of simplicity being chosen due to logic, we're left with not-as-good-as-can-be products. Don't get me wrong, I think that it's amazing what evolution has made us into, but we should use the capacity for betterment to its fullest extent. Me: we choose our own intelligent results.
You: Not as bad as your other comments but how can one determine if a result is intelligent beforehand if the person you said by your definition is already stupid? As is the system of logic they are working under. I answered this with "stupid can become smarter, but still be stupid"
8672
« on: October 06, 2015, 09:33:08 AM »
Your argument (I suppose you are trying to outline one?) is incredibly disjointed. Your area of inquisition states that you wil be looking into history, I was curious when I read that and thought you would have an interesting point to make.
However, from my understanding you are arguing for a literal mind of binary. Black or white, yes or no, 1 or 0. Where is your dislike of all of history present here? Did you forget that that was relevant to your argument? Also, the idea of having a binary mind, is inherently impossible. Not only that, it is objectively inferior to having a 'flowing' mind as Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, Virgil, Homer, Cicero, Plautus and Aeschylus will confirm.
I don't understand what point you are trying to make, if any. What does your example of abortion have to do with your distaste of common occurances in reality and history and why is a binary mind even remotely preferable? What are you referring to by reality?
Abortion? I'm talking about parents abusing a child, and that instead of being intelligent and walk away from the relationship and survive on its own, it's incapable of doing so, and thus it tries to be even closer to the parents. It's a reaction to a situation that has been seen as the most favourable to surviving, and thus the reaction has been inherited by most of us.
This reaction has been favoured throughout history - or other peoples' realities, or lives, whatever you want to call what has happened in the past - even though it's not an intelligent one. It makes sense from a logical perspective, but the fact that it's logical, yet not intelligent, leaves us with the conclusion that to apply logic that's not intelligent, the situation must be stupid. That situation is us humans; we're stupid, and so is nature.
What I'm saying is that I don't like how nature has brought forth results.
What I propose as an answer to this situation is that we choose our own intelligent results. Logic that is intelligent.
Another example of logic that is stupid:
This bright genius who has the potential to solve the question of converting salt water to sweet water in an efficient way so that there won't ever be any problems concerning drinkable water is killed by his village because he stands out. They don't really think intelligently, but more primally, because in the past, people who stood out could be a danger to your tribe, and this trait has now shown itself.
This is an example of unintelligent logic prevailing because it's good logic.
I'll reread to see if I need to change stuff after I eat food.
Are you purposely trying to contradict every single point you make? I'm not sure if you're trolling or not anymore. But since your reply is so long, you are probably serious.
In which case I see no point in 'arguing' further. There are too many logical fallacies, disconnects and straight up contradictions for me to ignore.
How am I contradicting myself?
8673
« on: October 06, 2015, 08:16:34 AM »
>be me
>pre order game at gamestop month b4 release
>game releases
>they call to tell me my games ready for pick-up
>hyped.jpg
>go to pick it up
>arrive at GameStop
>walk up to counter, give required info
>"I'm sorry, we have no records of your pre-order"
>areyoukiddingme.png
>Fucking GameStop
Maybe you should've showed them the receipt?
8674
« on: October 06, 2015, 08:15:19 AM »
What the fuck is going on here
It's time the community shows some real emotions, and tbh you're really cool
8675
« on: October 06, 2015, 08:14:45 AM »
It's true, he did nothing wrong.
8676
« on: October 06, 2015, 08:07:55 AM »
If there were ever an evil dragon he'd best it. If there were ever slavery on his turf he'd start a revolution. If tjere wassss shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhh. No more threads
8677
« on: October 06, 2015, 06:47:32 AM »
Who are you people?
I would say Cheat, but it's more of an idol worship kind of relationship
8678
« on: October 06, 2015, 06:43:30 AM »
8679
« on: October 06, 2015, 06:08:20 AM »
Your argument (I suppose you are trying to outline one?) is incredibly disjointed. Your area of inquisition states that you wil be looking into history, I was curious when I read that and thought you would have an interesting point to make.
However, from my understanding you are arguing for a literal mind of binary. Black or white, yes or no, 1 or 0. Where is your dislike of all of history present here? Did you forget that that was relevant to your argument? Also, the idea of having a binary mind, is inherently impossible. Not only that, it is objectively inferior to having a 'flowing' mind as Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, Virgil, Homer, Cicero, Plautus and Aeschylus will confirm.
I don't understand what point you are trying to make, if any. What does your example of abortion have to do with your distaste of common occurances in reality and history and why is a binary mind even remotely preferable? What are you referring to by reality?
Abortion? I'm talking about parents abusing a child, and that instead of being intelligent and walk away from the relationship and survive on its own, it's incapable of doing so, and thus it tries to be even closer to the parents. It's a reaction to a situation that has been seen as the most favourable to surviving, and thus the reaction has been inherited by most of us. This reaction has been favoured throughout history - or other peoples' realities, or lives, whatever you want to call what has happened in the past - even though it's not an intelligent one. It makes sense from a logical perspective, but the fact that it's logical, yet not intelligent, leaves us with the conclusion that to apply logic that's not intelligent, the situation must be stupid. That situation is us humans; we're stupid, and so is nature. What I'm saying is that I don't like how nature has brought forth results. What I propose as an answer to this situation is that we choose our own intelligent results. Logic that is intelligent. Another example of logic that is stupid: This bright genius who has the potential to solve the question of converting salt water to sweet water in an efficient way so that there won't ever be any problems concerning drinkable water is killed by his village because he stands out. They don't really think intelligently, but more primally, because in the past, people who stood out could be a danger to your tribe, and this trait has now shown itself. This is an example of unintelligent logic prevailing because it's good logic. I'll reread to see if I need to change stuff after I eat food.
8680
« on: October 04, 2015, 02:55:45 PM »
You lost me.
It's hard for me to put myself out of the loop when I'm in it.
If there are any points that are unclear that you'd want me to clarify, then you'll simply have to point them out.
The entire thing seems abstract as fuck. I feel like a complex and unorthadox line of thought led to that summary. By the time I get halfway through I've already forgotten the starting points.
Yeah, I should really get down to Earth with my replies more.
That might help a bit. Although that's just me. I'm not exactly the best at putting things together these days. Takes a little bit of time to collect all my marbles, I think.
The blame is on me, trust me. When I type stuff, I don't really care that much about the readers.
8681
« on: October 04, 2015, 02:51:16 PM »
You lost me.
It's hard for me to put myself out of the loop when I'm in it.
If there are any points that are unclear that you'd want me to clarify, then you'll simply have to point them out.
The entire thing seems abstract as fuck. I feel like a complex and unorthadox line of thought led to that summary. By the time I get halfway through I've already forgotten the starting points.
Yeah, I should really get down to Earth with my replies more.
8682
« on: October 04, 2015, 02:45:59 PM »
The mom that has it rough isn't gonna have it good once she/he takes drugs, but instead, the price of drugs will sink the mom furhter down in debt. Drugs in that case give an escape, but sometimes an escape isn't what's needed. Unless the escape is a solution, don't take it, and face your problems. Living in constant suffering is no way to live, and if you're in such a situation you should focus on finding ways out of there, and not spend time on finding small pauses from the situation. You can't say that the solution to human suffering is to not be human.
You define being humans as something we all are, and yes, that is right, we are all humans. We all have the same type of organs, and similar appearances, but aside from that anything you define as human is your own thoughts. Is it considered not human if you go against your desire to rape a hot person? Desires and emotions are primal, and rape falls into that category, just like taking drugs to escape reality, or eating too much. Consider a situation where the raper has gone through really bad stuff. Is it justifiable then?
8683
« on: October 04, 2015, 02:35:11 PM »
History isn't real. As far as I'm concerned anything pre 1900 never happened
m8 I know my posts don't make sense, so I wasn't expecting anything, so no need to try to add a comment.
8684
« on: October 04, 2015, 02:33:58 PM »
You lost me.
It's hard for me to put myself out of the loop when I'm in it. If there are any points that are unclear that you'd want me to clarify, then you'll simply have to point them out.
8685
« on: October 04, 2015, 02:31:02 PM »
Lieutenant Dan was the shit
8686
« on: October 04, 2015, 02:29:27 PM »
I'm not reading that
too long tbh
8687
« on: October 04, 2015, 02:28:54 PM »
I dislike the logic that has prevailed in our reality, because it is a primal and simple one. Children cling onto their parents the more they get hit and screamed at, because on their own they'd probably not survive, and thus they need to invoke some sort of sympathy from someone who can help them live long enough for them to live by themselves. The child is ignorant of what choices it has, and even if it were to be informed there are set boundries in its head that are hard to overcome, thus it sticks with its abusive parents. Our minds are limiting, and in our limitation we fail to do what we later realize would've been the right action. In this case the child would've been able to go to some adoption house where it'd be treated better than where he/she currently is, but because of commitment to the parents that idea isn't even gonna get any consideration. The child is a slave to poor decisions. My proposition to solving the case of what to do in some situations, and the need for guidance is for one to create their own morals and goals that are absolute rules that can only be questioned if one were to change to another side completely. As an example there is pro-life vs anti-life. If you're against life you either kill yourself, or others, whereas if you're for life you do w/e you've decided to do. There is no in-between; either you're committed, or you change side. Without any sort of self made guidelines, we ask what the purpose of life is, as if there is one that would illuminate you once you heard it. It annoys me to hear this from my peers, and even older people. Spoiler The thing also goes for wars and other crimes that most would see as ugly things. Humans naturally try to assert more power over other, or matching ones, but when they encounter a person that's vastly superior to them, they try to find ways of destroying that person out of paranoia. If we had full control over our brains we'd not only be able to survive more injuries, be able to sleep quickly knowing that we won't be harmed in our sleep, and we'd be able to be productive.
8688
« on: October 04, 2015, 01:54:38 PM »
and a genius  (((((((
stop
He's a genius?
Not even close.
At least you're hot.
8689
« on: October 04, 2015, 01:47:45 PM »
and a genius (((((((
stop
He's a genius?
8690
« on: October 04, 2015, 01:12:09 PM »
i cant tell if your avvie is a girl or guy
fucking aryans
He's a japanese anime man who coloured his hair blonde to show off masculinity.
he failed
8691
« on: October 04, 2015, 01:04:51 PM »
Remember when Foman went drinking with a user's mom? She showed him her titties.
Did anyone ever figure out who it was?
8692
« on: October 04, 2015, 01:03:04 PM »
i cant tell if your avvie is a girl or guy
fucking aryans
He's a japanese anime man who coloured his hair blonde to show off masculinity.
8693
« on: October 04, 2015, 01:02:04 PM »
Shameless. Absolutely shameless.
I know, right? You could probably pull off being bald if you tried, but people care more about what's going on outside the bed than what's going on in the bed.
8694
« on: October 04, 2015, 12:58:29 PM »
Personally, I'd go bald. I'd kill myself if I had anything less than 9 inches.
Oh my god stop
Your fault for not understanding the logic.
8695
« on: October 04, 2015, 12:56:14 PM »
Would you rather win a trillion dollars or get shot in the leg
Obviously the money.
8696
« on: October 04, 2015, 12:55:39 PM »
Personally, I'd go bald. I'd kill myself if I had anything less than 9 inches.
8697
« on: October 04, 2015, 12:52:29 PM »
have an 8 inch dick, or go bald?
8698
« on: October 04, 2015, 12:37:30 PM »
His name was Sprungli
8699
« on: October 04, 2015, 12:34:45 PM »
Oh, hahaha, you got me, Desty!
Please don't give me attention.
8700
« on: October 04, 2015, 12:32:55 PM »
Oh, hahaha, you got me, Desty!
Pages: 1 ... 288289290 291292 ... 353
|
Show Posts