Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Desty

Pages: 1 ... 281282283 284285 ... 353
8461
The Flood / Re: What was your first R-rated movie?
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:47:49 PM »
Wait, what? Fuck that, Verbatim. Kids should be desensitized to sex and violence, because then it wouldn't be a huge thing, and they wouldn't get crazy ideas. Violence? That's damage to your body that your mind dislikes to experience because it's detrimental to your health. Instead of being scared of getting wounded, they'd be careful not to get wounded.

Sex? Nowadays some fucked up kids discover porn and then go on to rape other kids, but if they were desensitized to it, they wouldn't do it, because they wouldn't feel strongly for it.

What's your reasoning here, Verb-a-Tim?

8462
The Flood / Re: check out this funny video!
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:41:58 PM »
wtf is this thread

8463
The Flood / Re: What was your first R-rated movie?
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:40:48 PM »
Quote
it still upsets me that kids are watching R-rated films without their parents' permission. Anyway, I digress:
Why?
Because they're not old enough. Duh.
What were to happen if they did watch an r-rated movie?
They would probably see stuff that they would be better off seeing if they were actually of age.

Kids don't need to be so desensitized to sex and violence as we adults are. And if you think they should be, then you're a disgusting fuckbag.
You're assuming kids are stupid assholes who can't think straight, and in most cases that's true, but there are the normal kids who are fine with watching violence and sex. Yes it affects them a bit badly, and takes up their time, but that applies to adults as well.


8464
The Flood / Re: Don't worry, Pip
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:33:50 PM »
the

8465
The Flood / Re: When did you watch your first porn?
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:33:14 PM »
are people that watched porn at a super early age more apt to have some fucked up fetishes?
It depends. They will however not like all fetishes, and unlike unsure people, they'll be sure of their fetishes.

8466
The Flood / Re: When did you watch your first porn?
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:30:53 PM »
Never have never want to
Really? That's pretty cool actually.

8467
The Flood / Re: What was your first R-rated movie?
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:28:33 PM »
Quote
it still upsets me that kids are watching R-rated films without their parents' permission. Anyway, I digress:
Why?
Because they're not old enough. Duh.
What were to happen if they did watch an r-rated movie?

8468
The Flood / Re: Jive Turkeys ass is not human (pics) (sfw)
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:27:41 PM »
God you are a faggot.
You're the one on an internet forum looking at a picture of a 17 year old boys asscheeks lmfao

Do yourself a favor and kill yourself
You're 17?
he is

8469
The Flood / Re: Don't worry, Pip
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:27:15 PM »
my goal is to bone at least 5 hot moms I picked up at a grocery store
What's stopping you?
Myself
What's stopping you?
Me
I would've been able to do this all day, but I gotta sleep.

8470
The Flood / Re: Don't worry, Pip
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:25:21 PM »
my goal is to bone at least 5 hot moms I picked up at a grocery store
What's stopping you?
Myself
What's stopping you?

8471
The Flood / Re: Don't worry, Pip
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:23:12 PM »
my goal is to bone at least 5 hot moms I picked up at a grocery store
What's stopping you?

8472
The Flood / Re: Jive Turkeys ass is not human (pics) (sfw)
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:22:11 PM »
isnt it a bunch of dudes here? why do you want us to look at your butt?

gay.
The better question is why would you want to click on a thread that has a man's ass on it?

If anyone's gay it's you.

8474
The Flood / Don't worry, Pip
« on: October 20, 2015, 02:09:46 PM »


Spoiler
but for real, what is your goal? You won't achieve a muscular body if you do cardio for half the time.

8475
The Flood / Re: Idea for a rage comic
« on: October 20, 2015, 01:38:55 PM »


Omg I can totally picture this lol
I made this thread 10 minutes after I woke up

You've got to be some kind of genius, funny stuff man lol.
This reply pleases me

Spoiler
but tbh it doesn't, I'm neutral after reading this reply
I don't understand
I'm sorry, man, there was no point in that reply. It was a platitude.

8476
The Flood / Re: Idea for a rage comic
« on: October 20, 2015, 01:17:42 PM »


Omg I can totally picture this lol
I made this thread 10 minutes after I woke up

You've got to be some kind of genius, funny stuff man lol.
This reply pleases me

Spoiler
but tbh it doesn't, I'm neutral after reading this reply

8477
The Flood / Re: What was your first R-rated movie?
« on: October 20, 2015, 01:16:36 PM »
Quote
it still upsets me that kids are watching R-rated films without their parents' permission. Anyway, I digress:
Why?

8478
The Flood / Re: Idea for a rage comic
« on: October 20, 2015, 01:15:12 PM »
Omg I can totally picture this lol
I made this thread 10 minutes after I woke up

8479
The Flood / Re: Dipper and Mabel incest is super hot
« on: October 20, 2015, 01:14:32 PM »
Lilo and bitch Nexus

8480
Serious / Re: SQS: Once lost, can trust ever be fully regained?
« on: October 20, 2015, 01:12:10 PM »
Sure, but it's only catchy because it rhymes. "Again. Ever." Doesn't have a good ring to it, and thus it's easier to spot the discrepancy.

Does it matter? Yes, in two ways. One is that you worded it like that, and I believe that when people show emotions etc they want attention and possibly help. The other way is my "training". If I spot stuff like that I get dopamine for being right, and in turn I become more experienced.
It's not simple redundancy if it's for effect. And people do use other combinations than "never-ever", because it's not that they rhyme; it's that restating the definitiveness of your position confirms the nature of it.

And that's not true, especially when you're using a specific personal example to explain your point. And that's nice that you want to help people, but it seems more like probing (which isn't fun unless it's asked for).
What? "it's that restating the definitiveness of your position confirms the nature of it". That quote is a fancy way of saying "The extra word backs it up, dawg". Is the extra word really needed to convey your message? No, it adds effect. Why would you want to put emphasis on an emotional point if you just want to convey your message? My guess would be because you're expressing your feelings, and that isn't necessary in this thread. If it were in "Flood", then you'd be fine, but this thread is in Serious, where there's more importance on discussion and such, and you did a good job on that reply, but the "ever" really didn't fit in there.
God. And I thought I was pedantic.

just shut up
Excuse me?

8481
The Flood / Re: Gym workouts?
« on: October 20, 2015, 08:22:36 AM »
>taking your phone with you to the gym
Lol

I should have said

"I was at the gym"

THIS IS AFTER
You're not gonna make it, Pip

8482
The Flood / Re: Gym workouts?
« on: October 20, 2015, 08:08:53 AM »
tfw grip strength isn't high enough for god's hand

8483
The Flood / Re: Gym workouts?
« on: October 20, 2015, 07:54:57 AM »
I'm at the gym, and I started wondering what kind of workouts you guys do, if you work out at all.

So what is your Workout Ruotine?

Usually I halve my hour at the gym up between Cardio and Muscle building
>"Usually I halve my hour at the gym up between Cardio and Muscle building"
you're not gonna make it bruh

8484
Gaming / The plot of Destiny
« on: October 20, 2015, 07:53:41 AM »
YouTube

Shit's not interactive enough for me to buy it.

8485
The Flood / Re: Redundant phrases thread?
« on: October 20, 2015, 07:36:59 AM »
A hamburger with bread

8486
Serious / Re: SQS: Once lost, can trust ever be fully regained?
« on: October 20, 2015, 12:41:19 AM »
Sure, but it's only catchy because it rhymes. "Again. Ever." Doesn't have a good ring to it, and thus it's easier to spot the discrepancy.

Does it matter? Yes, in two ways. One is that you worded it like that, and I believe that when people show emotions etc they want attention and possibly help. The other way is my "training". If I spot stuff like that I get dopamine for being right, and in turn I become more experienced.
It's not simple redundancy if it's for effect. And people do use other combinations than "never-ever", because it's not that they rhyme; it's that restating the definitiveness of your position confirms the nature of it.

And that's not true, especially when you're using a specific personal example to explain your point. And that's nice that you want to help people, but it seems more like probing (which isn't fun unless it's asked for).
What? "it's that restating the definitiveness of your position confirms the nature of it". That quote is a fancy way of saying "The extra word backs it up, dawg". Is the extra word really needed to convey your message? No, it adds effect. Why would you want to put emphasis on an emotional point if you just want to convey your message? My guess would be because you're expressing your feelings, and that isn't necessary in this thread. If it were in "Flood", then you'd be fine, but this thread is in Serious, where there's more importance on discussion and such, and you did a good job on that reply, but the "ever" really didn't fit in there.

Use personal experiences all you want, I'd have ignored it normally, but you put emotion into your reply at the end.

I don't like to help people, but I recognize that people want to talk, but other people keep interrupting them, and then when there's a pause, the interrupted person gets to talk, but now the subject has changed direction, and the interrupter wants to bring up other points, but it'd be rude to interrupt the subject. People want to say a lot of things, I don't, and therefore I am a listener. I will not listen to you, but your brain. You would obviously not want me to hear your secrets and past, because that's a weakness, and we don't know each other, so that's asking for defeat. I am however interested in all that which isn't said, because it is you, and not your outer demeanor.

Not sure if that ^ makes any sense

8487
The Flood / Idea for a rage comic
« on: October 20, 2015, 12:25:28 AM »
When I woke up I got the idea of making a comic where the person says that his dream job is being a comic illustrator or w/e they're called, and then the other person asks "That's what you wanna be?" Then the guy answers "no". He wakes up at the last panel.

Spoiler

8488
Septagon / Re: I didn't request shit psy
« on: October 19, 2015, 01:29:46 PM »
OHHHHHHHHH!!!!!! OH MY FUCKING GOD WREKT

8489
Serious / Re: SQS: Once lost, can trust ever be fully regained?
« on: October 19, 2015, 01:00:17 PM »
Never for the same situation. If I tell a friend something in confidence and they tell everyone about it, I will never trust that person with secrets again. Ever.
Ever? that's a bit redundant, so are you A) imagining up a scenario in your head, or
B) Remembering an event in your life where something like this has happened?
Redundant? "Never ever" is not an uncommon choice to use in combination.

And it's B, but does that really matter?
Sure, but it's only catchy because it rhymes. "Again. Ever." Doesn't have a good ring to it, and thus it's easier to spot the discrepancy.

Does it matter? Yes, in two ways. One is that you worded it like that, and I believe that when people show emotions etc they want attention and possibly help. The other way is my "training". If I spot stuff like that I get dopamine for being right, and in turn I become more experienced.

8490
The Flood / Re: I sold my dog for twice the rice
« on: October 19, 2015, 02:54:00 AM »
YouTube

Everyone together now.

Dun-dundun, Dun dundun,
Dun-dundun, Dun dundun x8

Pages: 1 ... 281282283 284285 ... 353