7171
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 04:30:34 PM »I have to respect someone who's a demon at tetrisTechnically I'm a god.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 7171
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 04:30:34 PM »I have to respect someone who's a demon at tetrisTechnically I'm a god. 7172
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?« on: January 24, 2016, 04:28:35 PM »Yeah, I know.Eh, you're kind of oversimplifying WWI a bitYeah, that sounds like what you'd read from a philosophy book. Do you think that is the case in real life?Also, no. It's easy to think that we're in the safe 'cause the government is doing stuff for us, but they're essentially protecting their cattle.I haven't stated that government is infallible, at all. Actually, that's entirely wrong. The point is that certain natural rights are given in exchange for the security of society, to protect their other rights and assets. This is the social contract. Government governs solely by the power invested in it by the people. but a foolproof example of how governments might not want the best for their people is North Korea. The reason why I'm not so eloquent is because this really isn't my area. I've very little experience discussing these kinds of things. 7173
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?« on: January 24, 2016, 04:18:19 PM »That's what I said? I was trying to say that authoritative figures are normal blokes, and not these great people, only I said it the other way around.But he is an authority figure. You don't have to be authoritative to have authority.The point I was trying to make is that the person who got all of those things, or all of that power in other words, wasn't an authorative figure. He just wanted to make money and get power because he could. Thing is, he was smart enough to realize that he couldn't be so careless, and so he appealed to the people a little. The people become content, and he's on his way to make more money and gain more power.People don't revolt because of a necessary use of the power invested in the governing power, they revolt because of extensive overreach, corruption, or totalitarianism. If that so happens, a return to the law of nature follows and the cycle begins anew."I need these people to work for me, so I will hire them, then I will make them do my jobs. Great, now I have enough money and power to make these areas mine, and if people wish to live in them I will tax them. Oh no, people are revolting, I better improve living conditions so that they don't bring me down."Who are the subjects? By what power do they remain governed?I don't know what all that is, and I don't need to to see a different POV.Based on the social contract, Magna Carta, and John Locke's Treatises of Government.Government is established to support the people. Ergo, supporting the government is the best course to support the people.I'm guessing that you base the assumption on the current task of the government from the populace's POV, correct? 7174
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?« on: January 24, 2016, 04:16:52 PM »Yeah, that sounds like what you'd read from a philosophy book. Do you think that is the case in real life?Also, no. It's easy to think that we're in the safe 'cause the government is doing stuff for us, but they're essentially protecting their cattle.I haven't stated that government is infallible, at all. Actually, that's entirely wrong. The point is that certain natural rights are given in exchange for the security of society, to protect their other rights and assets. This is the social contract. Government governs solely by the power invested in it by the people. For people to thrive? That's useful if the government doesn't have any goals except to improve the country, but a government may have other plans. Let's take World War One for example. The war essentially happened because nations wanted to see who were the superior kind. They chose to invest in a pretty much pointless war instead of focusing on improving the well being of the people. Another example of how governments might not want the best for their people is North Korea. 7175
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?« on: January 24, 2016, 04:08:17 PM »The point I was trying to make is that the person who got all of those things, or all of that power in other words, wasn't an authorative figure. He just wanted to make money and get power because he could. Thing is, he was smart enough to realize that he couldn't be so careless, and so he appealed to the people a little. The people become content, and he's on his way to make more money and gain more power.People don't revolt because of a necessary use of the power invested in the governing power, they revolt because of extensive overreach, corruption, or totalitarianism. If that so happens, a return to the law of nature follows and the cycle begins anew."I need these people to work for me, so I will hire them, then I will make them do my jobs. Great, now I have enough money and power to make these areas mine, and if people wish to live in them I will tax them. Oh no, people are revolting, I better improve living conditions so that they don't bring me down."Who are the subjects? By what power do they remain governed?I don't know what all that is, and I don't need to to see a different POV.Based on the social contract, Magna Carta, and John Locke's Treatises of Government.Government is established to support the people. Ergo, supporting the government is the best course to support the people.I'm guessing that you base the assumption on the current task of the government from the populace's POV, correct? 7176
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?« on: January 24, 2016, 04:05:03 PM »
Also, no. It's easy to think that we're in the safe 'cause the government is doing stuff for us, but they're essentially protecting their cattle.
7177
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?« on: January 24, 2016, 04:02:41 PM »"I need these people to work for me, so I will hire them, then I will make them do my jobs. Great, now I have enough money and power to make these areas mine, and if people wish to live in them I will tax them. Oh no, people are revolting, I better improve living conditions so that they don't bring me down."Who are the subjects? By what power do they remain governed?I don't know what all that is, and I don't need to to see a different POV.Based on the social contract, Magna Carta, and John Locke's Treatises of Government.Government is established to support the people. Ergo, supporting the government is the best course to support the people.I'm guessing that you base the assumption on the current task of the government from the populace's POV, correct? 7178
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:58:28 PM »
That's quite respectable.
7179
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:49:13 PM »We'll see next week we'll seeWait, so you're choosing to go offline for a week? 7180
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:45:09 PM »Yeah, I can use this week to improve still do you want to keep on playing?I'm sorry, but why? There's no competition from your side, and you're playing the game then bam, an insta-KO. You'd do better to play against other people. 7181
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:42:09 PM »
Still, it was pretty fun to play Tetris again.
but our match was pretty much me having sex with a partner just lying there motionless. 7182
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:41:15 PM »
Outclassed.
3-0 and 19 lines sent vs 1 line sent in all the matches pretty much. You don't have to go offline for a week, but if you don't you're banned from betting against me. 7183
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:35:19 PM »
I sent you an invite
7185
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:31:45 PM »
Same, about 2 years.
Dude, I can't find a way to play against just you. Do you have the facebook version? 7186
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:27:06 PM »
How do I play against you? also, nice, you're familiar with the game
7187
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:23:19 PM »
I'm already refreshing my inbox
7188
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:19:58 PM »
I'm on the "add friend" thing, but I need a name.
http://www.tetrisfriends.com/friends/index.php Desty3 7189
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:18:48 PM »What's the fun in that? I'm not a chess player, so I don't enjoy chess like you might.I just want to play for fun though. I don't want to kick you off the site.Let's play chess.Sure, but after I play Tetris with the other person since I want to play as much as I can, and I am quite bad at chess, but a god on Tetris (Tetris God is the highest rank). 7190
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:17:24 PM »Oh you want to play me right now?Yeah, why not? It's 22:16 and I've got school tomorrow. After school I've got mma, so I won't be home until about 20 hours. 7191
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?« on: January 24, 2016, 03:16:19 PM »I don't know what all that is, and I don't need to to see a different POV.Based on the social contract, Magna Carta, and John Locke's Treatises of Government.Government is established to support the people. Ergo, supporting the government is the best course to support the people.I'm guessing that you base the assumption on the current task of the government from the populace's POV, correct? You should too. Here's the lead: The government governs. 7192
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:14:53 PM »
Why are you taking so long?
7193
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:10:28 PM »Alright, with that attitude I'm guessing you don't have a full ranked Tetris game on Facebook Tetris Battle 2p, so I'm just gonna create some new account on this site and play against you from level oneAnything is fine, I'll beat you anyways. :^3Tetris for 300 Alex.You're on http://www.tetrisfriends.com/users/register.php?saveGame=true&linkTag=nav 7194
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:02:22 PM »Tetris for 300 Alex.You're on What site do you wanna use? 7195
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge« on: January 24, 2016, 03:02:00 PM »Let's play chess.Sure, but after I play Tetris with the other person since I want to play as much as I can, and I am quite bad at chess, but a god on Tetris (Tetris God is the highest rank). 7196
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?« on: January 24, 2016, 02:51:44 PM »Government is established to support the people. Ergo, supporting the government is the best course to support the people.I'm guessing that you base the assumption on the current task of the government from the populace's POV, correct? 7197
The Flood / Re: Am I honestly that bad of a poster.« on: January 24, 2016, 10:20:43 AM »You may, but I'm not gonna answer.You're not a bad poster, just a mediocre person. Changing yourself would be difficult.On what basis, may I ask? 7198
The Flood / Re: Did any user's birth make you cry?« on: January 24, 2016, 10:16:40 AM »Enderlol what 7199
The Flood / Re: Did any user's birth make you cry?« on: January 24, 2016, 10:16:14 AM »Your son's.Didn't he adopt? 7200
The Flood / Re: Am I honestly that bad of a poster.« on: January 24, 2016, 10:15:28 AM »
You're not a bad poster, just a mediocre person. Changing yourself would be difficult.
|