Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Desty

Pages: 1 ... 238239240 241242 ... 353
7171
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 04:30:34 PM »
I have to respect someone who's a demon at tetris
Technically I'm a god.

7172
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?
« on: January 24, 2016, 04:28:35 PM »
Also, no. It's easy to think that we're in the safe 'cause the government is doing stuff for us, but they're essentially protecting their cattle.
I haven't stated that government is infallible, at all. Actually, that's entirely wrong. The point is that certain natural rights are given in exchange for the security of society, to protect their other rights and assets. This is the social contract. Government governs solely by the power invested in it by the people.

For a people to thrive, a government must be in place to support that growth, and give it direction. Supporting government isn't blindly accepting everything that's given: it's making sure that it continues to support the needs of the people.
Yeah, that sounds like what you'd read from a philosophy book. Do you think that is the case in real life?

For people to thrive? That's useful if the government doesn't have any goals except to improve the country, but a government may have other plans. Let's take World War One for example. The war essentially happened because nations wanted to see who were the superior kind. They chose to invest in a pretty much pointless war instead of focusing on improving the well being of the people.
Eh, you're kind of oversimplifying WWI a bit
Yeah, I know.

but a foolproof example of how governments might not want the best for their people is North Korea.

The reason why I'm not so eloquent is because this really isn't my area. I've very little experience discussing these kinds of things.

7173
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?
« on: January 24, 2016, 04:18:19 PM »
Government is established to support the people. Ergo, supporting the government is the best course to support the people.
I'm guessing that you base the assumption on the current task of the government from the populace's POV, correct?
Based on the social contract, Magna Carta, and John Locke's Treatises of Government.
I don't know what all that is, and I don't need to to see a different POV.

You should too. Here's the lead:
The government governs.
Who are the subjects? By what power do they remain governed?

People allow themselves to be governed in return for protection (primarily through the rule of civil law). The law of nature isn't sustainable; it proceeds society, and if that society decays into despotism, it follows as well. That's a shitty way of summing up Locke's second Treatise, but I would recommend you look into them.
"I need these people to work for me, so I will hire them, then I will make them do my jobs. Great, now I have enough money and power to make these areas mine, and if people wish to live in them I will tax them. Oh no, people are revolting, I better improve living conditions so that they don't bring me down."
People don't revolt because of a necessary use of the power invested in the governing power, they revolt because of extensive overreach, corruption, or totalitarianism. If that so happens, a return to the law of nature follows and the cycle begins anew.
The point I was trying to make is that the person who got all of those things, or all of that power in other words, wasn't an authorative figure. He just wanted to make money and get power because he could. Thing is, he was smart enough to realize that he couldn't be so careless, and so he appealed to the people a little. The people become content, and he's on his way to make more money and gain more power.
But he is an authority figure. You don't have to be authoritative to have authority.
That's what I said? I was trying to say that authoritative figures are normal blokes, and not these great people, only I said it the other way around.

7174
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?
« on: January 24, 2016, 04:16:52 PM »
Also, no. It's easy to think that we're in the safe 'cause the government is doing stuff for us, but they're essentially protecting their cattle.
I haven't stated that government is infallible, at all. Actually, that's entirely wrong. The point is that certain natural rights are given in exchange for the security of society, to protect their other rights and assets. This is the social contract. Government governs solely by the power invested in it by the people.

For a people to thrive, a government must be in place to support that growth, and give it direction. Supporting government isn't blindly accepting everything that's given: it's making sure that it continues to support the needs of the people.
Yeah, that sounds like what you'd read from a philosophy book. Do you think that is the case in real life?

For people to thrive? That's useful if the government doesn't have any goals except to improve the country, but a government may have other plans. Let's take World War One for example. The war essentially happened because nations wanted to see who were the superior kind. They chose to invest in a pretty much pointless war instead of focusing on improving the well being of the people.

Another example of how governments might not want the best for their people is North Korea.

7175
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?
« on: January 24, 2016, 04:08:17 PM »
Government is established to support the people. Ergo, supporting the government is the best course to support the people.
I'm guessing that you base the assumption on the current task of the government from the populace's POV, correct?
Based on the social contract, Magna Carta, and John Locke's Treatises of Government.
I don't know what all that is, and I don't need to to see a different POV.

You should too. Here's the lead:
The government governs.
Who are the subjects? By what power do they remain governed?

People allow themselves to be governed in return for protection (primarily through the rule of civil law). The law of nature isn't sustainable; it proceeds society, and if that society decays into despotism, it follows as well. That's a shitty way of summing up Locke's second Treatise, but I would recommend you look into them.
"I need these people to work for me, so I will hire them, then I will make them do my jobs. Great, now I have enough money and power to make these areas mine, and if people wish to live in them I will tax them. Oh no, people are revolting, I better improve living conditions so that they don't bring me down."
People don't revolt because of a necessary use of the power invested in the governing power, they revolt because of extensive overreach, corruption, or totalitarianism. If that so happens, a return to the law of nature follows and the cycle begins anew.
The point I was trying to make is that the person who got all of those things, or all of that power in other words, wasn't an authorative figure. He just wanted to make money and get power because he could. Thing is, he was smart enough to realize that he couldn't be so careless, and so he appealed to the people a little. The people become content, and he's on his way to make more money and gain more power.

7176
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?
« on: January 24, 2016, 04:05:03 PM »
Also, no. It's easy to think that we're in the safe 'cause the government is doing stuff for us, but they're essentially protecting their cattle.

7177
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?
« on: January 24, 2016, 04:02:41 PM »
Government is established to support the people. Ergo, supporting the government is the best course to support the people.
I'm guessing that you base the assumption on the current task of the government from the populace's POV, correct?
Based on the social contract, Magna Carta, and John Locke's Treatises of Government.
I don't know what all that is, and I don't need to to see a different POV.

You should too. Here's the lead:
The government governs.
Who are the subjects? By what power do they remain governed?

People allow themselves to be governed in return for protection (primarily through the rule of civil law). The law of nature isn't sustainable; it proceeds society, and if that society decays into despotism, it follows as well. That's a shitty way of summing up Locke's second Treatise, but I would recommend you look into them.
"I need these people to work for me, so I will hire them, then I will make them do my jobs. Great, now I have enough money and power to make these areas mine, and if people wish to live in them I will tax them. Oh no, people are revolting, I better improve living conditions so that they don't bring me down."


7178
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:58:28 PM »
That's quite respectable.

7179
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:49:13 PM »
We'll see next week we'll see
Wait, so you're choosing to go offline for a week?

7180
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:45:09 PM »
Yeah, I can use this week to improve still do you want to keep on playing?
I'm sorry, but why? There's no competition from your side, and you're playing the game then bam, an insta-KO.

You'd do better to play against other people.

7181
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:42:09 PM »
Still, it was pretty fun to play Tetris again.

but our match was pretty much me having sex with a partner just lying there motionless.

7182
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:41:15 PM »
Outclassed.

3-0 and 19 lines sent vs 1 line sent in all the matches pretty much.

You don't have to go offline for a week, but if you don't you're banned from betting against me.

7183
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:35:19 PM »
I sent you an invite

7184
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:33:22 PM »
nvm got it

7185
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:31:45 PM »
Same, about 2 years.

Dude, I can't find a way to play against just you. Do you have the facebook version?

7186
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:27:06 PM »
How do I play against you? also, nice, you're familiar with the game

7187
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:23:19 PM »
I'm already refreshing my inbox

7188
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:19:58 PM »
I'm on the "add friend" thing, but I need a name.

http://www.tetrisfriends.com/friends/index.php

Desty3

7189
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:18:48 PM »
Let's play chess.
Sure, but after I play Tetris with the other person since I want to play as much as I can, and I am quite bad at chess, but a god on Tetris (Tetris God is the highest rank).
I just want to play for fun though. I don't want to kick you off the site.
What's the fun in that? I'm not a chess player, so I don't enjoy chess like you might.

7190
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:17:24 PM »
Oh you want to play me right now?
Yeah, why not? It's 22:16 and I've got school tomorrow. After school I've got mma, so I won't be home until about 20 hours.


7191
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:16:19 PM »
Government is established to support the people. Ergo, supporting the government is the best course to support the people.
I'm guessing that you base the assumption on the current task of the government from the populace's POV, correct?
Based on the social contract, Magna Carta, and John Locke's Treatises of Government.
I don't know what all that is, and I don't need to to see a different POV.

You should too. Here's the lead:
The government governs.

7192
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:14:53 PM »
Why are you taking so long?

7193
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:10:28 PM »
Tetris for 300 Alex.
You're on

What site do you wanna use?
Anything is fine, I'll beat you anyways. :^3
Alright, with that attitude I'm guessing you don't have a full ranked Tetris game on Facebook Tetris Battle 2p, so I'm just gonna create some new account on this site and play against you from level one
http://www.tetrisfriends.com/users/register.php?saveGame=true&linkTag=nav

7194
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:02:22 PM »
Tetris for 300 Alex.
You're on

What site do you wanna use?

7195
Gaming / Re: Desty's Weekly Gaming Challenge
« on: January 24, 2016, 03:02:00 PM »
Let's play chess.
Sure, but after I play Tetris with the other person since I want to play as much as I can, and I am quite bad at chess, but a god on Tetris (Tetris God is the highest rank).

7196
Serious / Re: Are you pro-establishment or populist?
« on: January 24, 2016, 02:51:44 PM »
Government is established to support the people. Ergo, supporting the government is the best course to support the people.
I'm guessing that you base the assumption on the current task of the government from the populace's POV, correct?

7197
The Flood / Re: Am I honestly that bad of a poster.
« on: January 24, 2016, 10:20:43 AM »
You're not a bad poster, just a mediocre person. Changing yourself would be difficult.
On what basis, may I ask?
You may, but I'm not gonna answer.


7198
The Flood / Re: Did any user's birth make you cry?
« on: January 24, 2016, 10:16:40 AM »

7199
The Flood / Re: Did any user's birth make you cry?
« on: January 24, 2016, 10:16:14 AM »
Your son's.

It was a crime for you to procreate.
Didn't he adopt?

7200
The Flood / Re: Am I honestly that bad of a poster.
« on: January 24, 2016, 10:15:28 AM »
You're not a bad poster, just a mediocre person. Changing yourself would be difficult.

Pages: 1 ... 238239240 241242 ... 353