Total Members Voted: 28
Quote from: Thrasher on December 13, 2017, 04:42:31 PMNice deflection.Do you even know what that word means? Lmao why are you so mad anyways.QuoteThis game runs like shit, but it's okay because it's not the "definitive edition".Yeah, it's a port. The game is still in early access on Xbox. It doesn't run like shit, I've seen plenty of Xbox streams and the game runs pretty good compared to PC.
Nice deflection.
This game runs like shit, but it's okay because it's not the "definitive edition".
Quote from: Thrasher on December 13, 2017, 06:52:04 PMQuote from: challengerX on December 13, 2017, 05:56:30 PMQuote from: Thrasher on December 13, 2017, 04:42:31 PMNice deflection.Do you even know what that word means? Lmao why are you so mad anyways.QuoteThis game runs like shit, but it's okay because it's not the "definitive edition".Yeah, it's a port. The game is still in early access on Xbox. It doesn't run like shit, I've seen plenty of Xbox streams and the game runs pretty good compared to PC.Okay bro. You go defend shit developers and terrible games.Millions of people wouldn't buy and play it on a consistent basis if it was bad.
Quote from: challengerX on December 13, 2017, 05:56:30 PMQuote from: Thrasher on December 13, 2017, 04:42:31 PMNice deflection.Do you even know what that word means? Lmao why are you so mad anyways.QuoteThis game runs like shit, but it's okay because it's not the "definitive edition".Yeah, it's a port. The game is still in early access on Xbox. It doesn't run like shit, I've seen plenty of Xbox streams and the game runs pretty good compared to PC.Okay bro. You go defend shit developers and terrible games.
Filling Asuna with 15 years worth of semen IS a masterpiece
Quote from: Luciana on December 13, 2017, 08:08:38 PMFilling Asuna with 15 years worth of semen IS a masterpieceExpecially when it comes to rape scene at the end of season 2, when even the most passionate fans of this show admit that this show is BAD worst haters of this show find out exactly why this show IS a masterpiece.
Tell me how it's a bad game.
Quote from: MarKhan on December 13, 2017, 08:27:08 PMQuote from: Luciana on December 13, 2017, 08:08:38 PMFilling Asuna with 15 years worth of semen IS a masterpieceExpecially when it comes to rape scene at the end of season 2, when even the most passionate fans of this show admit that this show is BAD worst haters of this show find out exactly why this show IS a masterpiece.I was quoting the light novel but yeah, that entire thing made me uncomfortable. I think it's still season 1, just the second half.Or wait, do you mean with the creepy boy creeping up in Shina or whatever her name is
Quote from: Chaos Metal Dragon on December 13, 2017, 08:07:19 PMQuote from: challengerX on December 13, 2017, 07:06:36 PMQuote from: Thrasher on December 13, 2017, 06:52:04 PMQuote from: challengerX on December 13, 2017, 05:56:30 PMQuote from: Thrasher on December 13, 2017, 04:42:31 PMNice deflection.Do you even know what that word means? Lmao why are you so mad anyways.QuoteThis game runs like shit, but it's okay because it's not the "definitive edition".Yeah, it's a port. The game is still in early access on Xbox. It doesn't run like shit, I've seen plenty of Xbox streams and the game runs pretty good compared to PC.Okay bro. You go defend shit developers and terrible games.Millions of people wouldn't buy and play it on a consistent basis if it was bad.by that logic shit like Sword Art Online, Vanilla Destiny, and the Bayformers Movies must be genuine masterpieces.Not at all, actually. How many people played Destiny today concurrently? At least a 1.5 million were playing PUBG. The developers listen to community feedback and have regularly updated the game and added completely free content. It's coming out of early access in one week. Microsoft latched onto the success so they could get it on the Xbox.Tell me how it's a bad game. Make an actual point and don't go for the low hanging fruit of "heheh... well actually just cause it's really popular and everybody plays it could still be fucking terrible lol". Make an actual point with some originality.
Quote from: challengerX on December 13, 2017, 07:06:36 PMQuote from: Thrasher on December 13, 2017, 06:52:04 PMQuote from: challengerX on December 13, 2017, 05:56:30 PMQuote from: Thrasher on December 13, 2017, 04:42:31 PMNice deflection.Do you even know what that word means? Lmao why are you so mad anyways.QuoteThis game runs like shit, but it's okay because it's not the "definitive edition".Yeah, it's a port. The game is still in early access on Xbox. It doesn't run like shit, I've seen plenty of Xbox streams and the game runs pretty good compared to PC.Okay bro. You go defend shit developers and terrible games.Millions of people wouldn't buy and play it on a consistent basis if it was bad.by that logic shit like Sword Art Online, Vanilla Destiny, and the Bayformers Movies must be genuine masterpieces.
Most Disappointing: AndromedaWorst game: Knack 2
Quote from: Jono on November 24, 2017, 08:00:26 PMMost Disappointing: AndromedaWorst game: Knack 2Did I really say Knack 2? I meant CoD: WW2
Quote from: Jono on December 15, 2017, 04:39:43 AMQuote from: Jono on November 24, 2017, 08:00:26 PMMost Disappointing: AndromedaWorst game: Knack 2Did I really say Knack 2? I meant CoD: WW2Whats the difference?
Quote from: FatherlyNick on December 15, 2017, 01:06:15 PMQuote from: Jono on December 15, 2017, 04:39:43 AMQuote from: Jono on November 24, 2017, 08:00:26 PMMost Disappointing: AndromedaWorst game: Knack 2Did I really say Knack 2? I meant CoD: WW2Whats the difference?Knack 2 is probably an average game whereas WW2 is complete basura in every category
How? How do you mannage to fuck up when you literally just had to coppy-paste old Cod weapon stats and weapon models?This isn't even like MCC where they had less than a year and a budget of of fingernail dirt to Port 4 games on to new hardware while still building Halo 5.It's just CoD without all the new shit. You've been doing this shit since the dawn of time. The game is already made. How do you fuck that up?
Quote from: Chaos Metal Dragon on December 15, 2017, 10:12:06 PMHow? How do you mannage to fuck up when you literally just had to coppy-paste old Cod weapon stats and weapon models?This isn't even like MCC where they had less than a year and a budget of of fingernail dirt to Port 4 games on to new hardware while still building Halo 5.It's just CoD without all the new shit. You've been doing this shit since the dawn of time. The game is already made. How do you fuck that up?It's made by Sledgehammer, they are incompetent and flat out retarded when it comes to making CoD games. Don't let the WWII-theme fool you because this game is hands down one of the WORST CoD games ever made. And stop believing the "3 year development" lies that Activision says because WW2 was datamined and people found exo suits and advanced movement in the game's code. This leads to the speculation that this game was developed in an extremely short amount of time after the backlash that IW got. It all adds up because the game is horrendously buggy and extremely lacks polish in all areas. Advanced Warfare 2 was rumored to already be in development at the time of IW's pre release and post release.Activison knew that people are sick of the future stuff and slapped this clusterfuck of a game to try and make up all the money they lost with IW.I played the game for 2 weeks and stopped because of how bad it is and I'm not gonna wait for any fixes because the damage has already been done. World at War is nearly 10 years old and the fact that a game that old is better in every single category than the new one that has the same setting is embarrassing.
As someone who worked on CoD - I can confirm, they DO take three years a pop.
Just because they found traces of IW in the WW2 code, just means that they are not stupid enough to throw out an engine and write a fresh one.
Objects are not deleted because some thing depend on the object count. To save time, they might remove the asset but keep the reference. Going through every routine to check what it (and how many) things it expects would take a lot of time.
Quote from: FatherlyNick on December 16, 2017, 04:21:38 AMAs someone who worked on CoD - I can confirm, they DO take three years a pop. Since you want to be a smartass explain to me why CoD games have shipped with less content, polish, and stability in a "3 year development" cycle than the ones that were made before it that were on the 360 and PS3 that took less time to make.Quote Just because they found traces of IW in the WW2 code, just means that they are not stupid enough to throw out an engine and write a fresh one. Yes they are. Activision are greedy fucks and they want to make up all the money they lost with IW. It's clear that they run these developers with an iron fist. If Advanced Warfare 2 was made and just released, they wouldn't even come close to what they made from WW2 sales and supply drops.Quote Objects are not deleted because some thing depend on the object count. To save time, they might remove the asset but keep the reference. Going through every routine to check what it (and how many) things it expects would take a lot of time.3 years is plenty of time to create a game, test play it, and fix any bug or anything else wrong with it before it is released. WW2 is a game that was just put together in half a year to make a quick buck and lacks the soul, creativity, immersion, and everything else that World at War features nearly 10 years ago.
Quote from: Jono on December 16, 2017, 12:07:52 AMQuote from: Chaos Metal Dragon on December 15, 2017, 10:12:06 PMHow? How do you mannage to fuck up when you literally just had to coppy-paste old Cod weapon stats and weapon models?This isn't even like MCC where they had less than a year and a budget of of fingernail dirt to Port 4 games on to new hardware while still building Halo 5.It's just CoD without all the new shit. You've been doing this shit since the dawn of time. The game is already made. How do you fuck that up?It's made by Sledgehammer, they are incompetent and flat out retarded when it comes to making CoD games. Don't let the WWII-theme fool you because this game is hands down one of the WORST CoD games ever made. And stop believing the "3 year development" lies that Activision says because WW2 was datamined and people found exo suits and advanced movement in the game's code. This leads to the speculation that this game was developed in an extremely short amount of time after the backlash that IW got. It all adds up because the game is horrendously buggy and extremely lacks polish in all areas. Advanced Warfare 2 was rumored to already be in development at the time of IW's pre release and post release.Activison knew that people are sick of the future stuff and slapped this clusterfuck of a game to try and make up all the money they lost with IW.I played the game for 2 weeks and stopped because of how bad it is and I'm not gonna wait for any fixes because the damage has already been done. World at War is nearly 10 years old and the fact that a game that old is better in every single category than the new one that has the same setting is embarrassing.As someone who worked on CoD - I can confirm, they DO take three years a pop. Just because they found traces of IW in the WW2 code, just means that they are not stupid enough to throw out an engine and write a fresh one. Objects are not deleted because some thing depend on the object count. To save time, they might remove the asset but keep the reference. Going through every routine to check what it (and how many) things it expects would take a lot of time.
Quote from: FatherlyNick on December 16, 2017, 04:21:38 AMQuote from: Jono on December 16, 2017, 12:07:52 AMQuote from: Chaos Metal Dragon on December 15, 2017, 10:12:06 PMHow? How do you mannage to fuck up when you literally just had to coppy-paste old Cod weapon stats and weapon models?This isn't even like MCC where they had less than a year and a budget of of fingernail dirt to Port 4 games on to new hardware while still building Halo 5.It's just CoD without all the new shit. You've been doing this shit since the dawn of time. The game is already made. How do you fuck that up?It's made by Sledgehammer, they are incompetent and flat out retarded when it comes to making CoD games. Don't let the WWII-theme fool you because this game is hands down one of the WORST CoD games ever made. And stop believing the "3 year development" lies that Activision says because WW2 was datamined and people found exo suits and advanced movement in the game's code. This leads to the speculation that this game was developed in an extremely short amount of time after the backlash that IW got. It all adds up because the game is horrendously buggy and extremely lacks polish in all areas. Advanced Warfare 2 was rumored to already be in development at the time of IW's pre release and post release.Activison knew that people are sick of the future stuff and slapped this clusterfuck of a game to try and make up all the money they lost with IW.I played the game for 2 weeks and stopped because of how bad it is and I'm not gonna wait for any fixes because the damage has already been done. World at War is nearly 10 years old and the fact that a game that old is better in every single category than the new one that has the same setting is embarrassing.As someone who worked on CoD - I can confirm, they DO take three years a pop. Just because they found traces of IW in the WW2 code, just means that they are not stupid enough to throw out an engine and write a fresh one. Objects are not deleted because some thing depend on the object count. To save time, they might remove the asset but keep the reference. Going through every routine to check what it (and how many) things it expects would take a lot of time.You worked on CoD?
Poll
Worst Game of 2017?