Honestly, to me, after three, the series just took a nose dive down a cliff for me. Do I really want to come back to it?Granted, if it's post Reaper/Crucible firing, then that means they'd have to choose a canon ending, which they were against in the first place.Then they'd likely want to run damage control, or could, with all the bits and oppurtunities they missed. Seriously, they had so many good oppurtunities for moments in 3 and they just dropped the ball.The point is, do I really want to do that again? Do I really fucking want to invest my time in characters and a story, and then, when the big finale comes up, have everything stepped on and tossed around like an angry fucking toddler in a lego pile?Personally, no.Because what's left of the series? There's either post crucible firing, in which case that becomes a damage control mess, or there's a prequal, in which case we already know what the fuck happened.
Quote from: Sandtrap on November 08, 2014, 07:58:10 AMHonestly, to me, after three, the series just took a nose dive down a cliff for me. Do I really want to come back to it?Granted, if it's post Reaper/Crucible firing, then that means they'd have to choose a canon ending, which they were against in the first place.Then they'd likely want to run damage control, or could, with all the bits and oppurtunities they missed. Seriously, they had so many good oppurtunities for moments in 3 and they just dropped the ball.The point is, do I really want to do that again? Do I really fucking want to invest my time in characters and a story, and then, when the big finale comes up, have everything stepped on and tossed around like an angry fucking toddler in a lego pile?Personally, no.Because what's left of the series? There's either post crucible firing, in which case that becomes a damage control mess, or there's a prequal, in which case we already know what the fuck happened.Or they could just ignore ME3 completely? Have a brand new story with little reference to the previous games events? Honestly I would want a new story with new characters. Wouldn't even have to be a trilogy. Just a one game deal would be great. (although knowing EA that's probably not going to happen)
Quote from: UnwornUniform on November 08, 2014, 08:04:37 AMQuote from: Sandtrap on November 08, 2014, 07:58:10 AMHonestly, to me, after three, the series just took a nose dive down a cliff for me. Do I really want to come back to it?Granted, if it's post Reaper/Crucible firing, then that means they'd have to choose a canon ending, which they were against in the first place.Then they'd likely want to run damage control, or could, with all the bits and oppurtunities they missed. Seriously, they had so many good oppurtunities for moments in 3 and they just dropped the ball.The point is, do I really want to do that again? Do I really fucking want to invest my time in characters and a story, and then, when the big finale comes up, have everything stepped on and tossed around like an angry fucking toddler in a lego pile?Personally, no.Because what's left of the series? There's either post crucible firing, in which case that becomes a damage control mess, or there's a prequal, in which case we already know what the fuck happened.Or they could just ignore ME3 completely? Have a brand new story with little reference to the previous games events? Honestly I would want a new story with new characters. Wouldn't even have to be a trilogy. Just a one game deal would be great. (although knowing EA that's probably not going to happen)And how would you do that without making it seem like everybody wasn't talking about the elephant in the room?"Yo dawgs, there's a dead reaper in your backyard, you gonna clean that up?"Spoiler
I think people will buy Mass Effect 4 regardless of what direction it takes.
Nope, don't like the series.
Will you buy Mass Effect 4?
