Quote from: Corrupt Setter on March 25, 2015, 11:00:47 PMQuote from: Tyger on March 25, 2015, 10:15:58 PMQuote from: Luciana on March 25, 2015, 08:12:19 PMAt least we can all agree Dark Souls 2 "hard for the sake of hard" is a fact. Those stupid add on's for bosses and what not are just retarded, and all they do is the same 3 swings.1. Left2. Right3. Thrust/sweep oh you hated fighting 2 gargoyles at once? Here, fight 6.That was the stupidest thing ever. I was only able to complete it once. I didn't even think it was possible when I first started trying to beat them. with 40 faith they get like two shotted by great lightning spear >.> that's the only way I ever killed them
Quote from: Tyger on March 25, 2015, 10:15:58 PMQuote from: Luciana on March 25, 2015, 08:12:19 PMAt least we can all agree Dark Souls 2 "hard for the sake of hard" is a fact. Those stupid add on's for bosses and what not are just retarded, and all they do is the same 3 swings.1. Left2. Right3. Thrust/sweep oh you hated fighting 2 gargoyles at once? Here, fight 6.That was the stupidest thing ever. I was only able to complete it once. I didn't even think it was possible when I first started trying to beat them.
Quote from: Luciana on March 25, 2015, 08:12:19 PMAt least we can all agree Dark Souls 2 "hard for the sake of hard" is a fact. Those stupid add on's for bosses and what not are just retarded, and all they do is the same 3 swings.1. Left2. Right3. Thrust/sweep oh you hated fighting 2 gargoyles at once? Here, fight 6.
At least we can all agree Dark Souls 2 "hard for the sake of hard" is a fact. Those stupid add on's for bosses and what not are just retarded, and all they do is the same 3 swings.1. Left2. Right3. Thrust/sweep
Quote from: Azumarill on March 25, 2015, 07:40:39 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on March 25, 2015, 07:37:32 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on March 25, 2015, 07:36:25 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on March 25, 2015, 07:33:18 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on March 25, 2015, 07:30:35 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on March 25, 2015, 07:25:37 PMI heard it sucks as hard as DS2Besides it getting praised by pretty much everyone?-No shields-Aggressively hardGuys were le good becuz we make game real dificilSo you don't have any actual reasons as to why it's bad?Its not bad I just don't like the idea of making game for the purpose of being hard.gimme a cgimme an agimme an sgimme a ugimme another agimme an lwhats that spell?C A S U A L!>i'm such a true hardcore gamer guys look at me I play this game because it's hard so it makes me feel validated>wut is this fun bullshit lol r u a casulI mean I haven't even spent more than like 30 minutes on a souls game but goddamn your attitude is retarded as fuck
Quote from: Mistanosejob on March 25, 2015, 07:37:32 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on March 25, 2015, 07:36:25 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on March 25, 2015, 07:33:18 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on March 25, 2015, 07:30:35 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on March 25, 2015, 07:25:37 PMI heard it sucks as hard as DS2Besides it getting praised by pretty much everyone?-No shields-Aggressively hardGuys were le good becuz we make game real dificilSo you don't have any actual reasons as to why it's bad?Its not bad I just don't like the idea of making game for the purpose of being hard.gimme a cgimme an agimme an sgimme a ugimme another agimme an lwhats that spell?C A S U A L!
Quote from: BritishLemön on March 25, 2015, 07:36:25 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on March 25, 2015, 07:33:18 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on March 25, 2015, 07:30:35 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on March 25, 2015, 07:25:37 PMI heard it sucks as hard as DS2Besides it getting praised by pretty much everyone?-No shields-Aggressively hardGuys were le good becuz we make game real dificilSo you don't have any actual reasons as to why it's bad?Its not bad I just don't like the idea of making game for the purpose of being hard.
Quote from: Mistanosejob on March 25, 2015, 07:33:18 PMQuote from: BritishLemön on March 25, 2015, 07:30:35 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on March 25, 2015, 07:25:37 PMI heard it sucks as hard as DS2Besides it getting praised by pretty much everyone?-No shields-Aggressively hardGuys were le good becuz we make game real dificilSo you don't have any actual reasons as to why it's bad?
Quote from: BritishLemön on March 25, 2015, 07:30:35 PMQuote from: Mistanosejob on March 25, 2015, 07:25:37 PMI heard it sucks as hard as DS2Besides it getting praised by pretty much everyone?-No shields-Aggressively hardGuys were le good becuz we make game real dificil
Quote from: Mistanosejob on March 25, 2015, 07:25:37 PMI heard it sucks as hard as DS2Besides it getting praised by pretty much everyone?
I heard it sucks as hard as DS2
Quote from: Tyger on March 25, 2015, 11:08:32 PMQuote from: Corrupt Setter on March 25, 2015, 11:00:47 PMQuote from: Tyger on March 25, 2015, 10:15:58 PMQuote from: Luciana on March 25, 2015, 08:12:19 PMAt least we can all agree Dark Souls 2 "hard for the sake of hard" is a fact. Those stupid add on's for bosses and what not are just retarded, and all they do is the same 3 swings.1. Left2. Right3. Thrust/sweep oh you hated fighting 2 gargoyles at once? Here, fight 6.That was the stupidest thing ever. I was only able to complete it once. I didn't even think it was possible when I first started trying to beat them. with 40 faith they get like two shotted by great lightning spear >.> that's the only way I ever killed themThe gaygoyles in II were a lot like the four kings. The faster you killed them, the less of a problem their numbers become. The longer you wait, and the more you wittle each gargoyle down instead of focusing all power on one at a time, the more showed up.They activate based on the total boss health bar. New game +3 with a greathammer, the slowest weapons in the game and they still haven't given me much trouble. Those midgets on the other hand....
Quote from: Sandtrap on March 25, 2015, 11:40:35 PMQuote from: Tyger on March 25, 2015, 11:08:32 PMQuote from: Corrupt Setter on March 25, 2015, 11:00:47 PMQuote from: Tyger on March 25, 2015, 10:15:58 PMQuote from: Luciana on March 25, 2015, 08:12:19 PMAt least we can all agree Dark Souls 2 "hard for the sake of hard" is a fact. Those stupid add on's for bosses and what not are just retarded, and all they do is the same 3 swings.1. Left2. Right3. Thrust/sweep oh you hated fighting 2 gargoyles at once? Here, fight 6.That was the stupidest thing ever. I was only able to complete it once. I didn't even think it was possible when I first started trying to beat them. with 40 faith they get like two shotted by great lightning spear >.> that's the only way I ever killed themThe gaygoyles in II were a lot like the four kings. The faster you killed them, the less of a problem their numbers become. The longer you wait, and the more you wittle each gargoyle down instead of focusing all power on one at a time, the more showed up.They activate based on the total boss health bar. New game +3 with a greathammer, the slowest weapons in the game and they still haven't given me much trouble. Those midgets on the other hand....Those gnomes are fucking xxx faze clan drangleic division quickscopers with their bows I swear
Why does everyone think DS2 was so hard? Shrine of Amana unpatched and the snowstorm area in the DLC were terrible, but other than that?
Quote from: Tyger on March 26, 2015, 06:30:14 AMQuote from: Flee on March 26, 2015, 05:00:19 AMWhy does everyone think DS2 was so hard? Shrine of Amana unpatched and the snowstorm area in the DLC were terrible, but other than that? it wasn't that it was hard, it was that rather than making interesting boss mechanics they just did stuff like "here fight multiple bosses at once "Dark souls 2 is much easier than dark souls 1 imoYeah, boss design is definitely lacking in most of DS2. There still are certain gems though, like Darklurker.
Quote from: Flee on March 26, 2015, 05:00:19 AMWhy does everyone think DS2 was so hard? Shrine of Amana unpatched and the snowstorm area in the DLC were terrible, but other than that? it wasn't that it was hard, it was that rather than making interesting boss mechanics they just did stuff like "here fight multiple bosses at once "Dark souls 2 is much easier than dark souls 1 imo
So people basically already beating this game? ö.ô
It is pretty funny that people who shit all over Destiny, praise Bloodborne. They are the same, focused entirely on gameplay and the world. Bloodborne has little story and no character development. Yay for double standards.
Quote from: Noëlle on March 27, 2015, 12:36:48 PMIt is pretty funny that people who shit all over Destiny, praise Bloodborne. They are the same, focused entirely on gameplay and the world. Bloodborne has little story and no character development. Yay for double standards.As Brute said. Destiny was lobotomized game. And I played the demo when it was released, which was 25% of the retail game. So here's some key differences.While arguably, both Bloodborne and Destiny have a central focus on the world and gameplay, those are the only similarities. And they're not even really similar.In a dark souls-ish, spiritual successor type game, the world itself, the characters you meet, the weapons, the creatures, are the story. They all tell a fragmented story left to interpretation to the player. But the clues are all there. And one can argue that a game doesn't need to be character driven to tell a good, or interesting story. It can still be immersive without your central character having a personality.And the souls-ish series excels at this. Destiny, on the other hand, had no interesting outside characters to even remember. Half the NPC's were just projectile vomit vendors who basically projectile vomited you quests and weapons.And while Destiny was a pretty, beautiful well done world, it lacked something special. Atmosphere. It was like a painting with nothing in it. Essentially, you could say Destiny and Bloodborne do focus on the same things. But Bloodborne actually knows what it's doing and plays to it's strengths, were Destiny sort of knew what it was doing and then it got lobotomized.The difference here is the quality of the delivery.
Quote from: Noëlle on March 27, 2015, 12:36:48 PMIt is pretty funny that people who shit all over Destiny, praise Bloodborne. They are the same, focused entirely on gameplay and the world. Bloodborne has little story and no character development. Yay for double standards. I hope you're trolling
What does Bloodborne do different than Dark Souls?
