Quote from: Keyu on December 15, 2014, 06:55:45 PMIf you are fine with this getting pulled I don't see how you could argue against GTA being pulled. i wouldn't argue against GTA being pulled eitheri wouldn't be for it, by any means, but all i'm saying is... i can't find it within me to care that much if the game doesn't have any artistic merit (or... personal merit, in GTA's case)
If you are fine with this getting pulled I don't see how you could argue against GTA being pulled.
Quote from: Sly Instinct on December 15, 2014, 07:02:06 PMQuote from: Kupo on December 15, 2014, 06:50:16 PMQuote from: Keyu on December 15, 2014, 06:46:56 PMQuote from: Kupo on December 15, 2014, 06:44:03 PM"Censorship"There is nothing in the definition of censorship that suggest it only applies to govts. Steam is censoring it from their software. They have that right. I'm not debating that. I'm debating whether its the right thing to do.I think the game very clearly crossed the line of what's acceptable to put in a game. Something in the vein of Manhunt or Super Columbine Massacre RPG. It would be an extremely poor business decision on Valve's part to sell the game on Steam.Yeah people are totally going to cut business with Valve/Steam because one shitty edgy game is on the market for the few who want it. I can almost guarantee a majority of the people complaining are tumblr blogging retards. If you don't play the game it literally has no effect on you. it COMPLETELY effects EVERYONE in the gaming industry, if we let terrible games like this slide by, what does that say about the industry as a whole? if valve keeps this mass murder sim on greenlight it only proves the point of Jack Thompson and soccer moms trying to censor the industry as a whole.
Quote from: Kupo on December 15, 2014, 06:50:16 PMQuote from: Keyu on December 15, 2014, 06:46:56 PMQuote from: Kupo on December 15, 2014, 06:44:03 PM"Censorship"There is nothing in the definition of censorship that suggest it only applies to govts. Steam is censoring it from their software. They have that right. I'm not debating that. I'm debating whether its the right thing to do.I think the game very clearly crossed the line of what's acceptable to put in a game. Something in the vein of Manhunt or Super Columbine Massacre RPG. It would be an extremely poor business decision on Valve's part to sell the game on Steam.Yeah people are totally going to cut business with Valve/Steam because one shitty edgy game is on the market for the few who want it. I can almost guarantee a majority of the people complaining are tumblr blogging retards. If you don't play the game it literally has no effect on you.
Quote from: Keyu on December 15, 2014, 06:46:56 PMQuote from: Kupo on December 15, 2014, 06:44:03 PM"Censorship"There is nothing in the definition of censorship that suggest it only applies to govts. Steam is censoring it from their software. They have that right. I'm not debating that. I'm debating whether its the right thing to do.I think the game very clearly crossed the line of what's acceptable to put in a game. Something in the vein of Manhunt or Super Columbine Massacre RPG. It would be an extremely poor business decision on Valve's part to sell the game on Steam.
Quote from: Kupo on December 15, 2014, 06:44:03 PM"Censorship"There is nothing in the definition of censorship that suggest it only applies to govts. Steam is censoring it from their software. They have that right. I'm not debating that. I'm debating whether its the right thing to do.
"Censorship"
Quote from: Kupo on December 15, 2014, 06:50:16 PMI think the game very clearly crossed the line of what's acceptable to put in a game. Something in the vein of Manhunt or Super Columbine Massacre RPG. It would be an extremely poor business decision on Valve's part to sell the game on Steam.But Manhunt is on Steam.
I think the game very clearly crossed the line of what's acceptable to put in a game. Something in the vein of Manhunt or Super Columbine Massacre RPG. It would be an extremely poor business decision on Valve's part to sell the game on Steam.
Quote from: D4C on December 15, 2014, 07:34:43 PMQuote from: Kupo on December 15, 2014, 06:50:16 PMI think the game very clearly crossed the line of what's acceptable to put in a game. Something in the vein of Manhunt or Super Columbine Massacre RPG. It would be an extremely poor business decision on Valve's part to sell the game on Steam.But Manhunt is on Steam.Yeah, I don't know ._.Maybe because the media hasn't cared about Manhunt in years...? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Censorship is bad.
Now, if it was being censored out of saying the word "FUCK" or "CUNT" or "FAGGOT" or anything else, then I'd agree with you. Censorship of words is petty, but again, I wouldn't even call this censorship.
Quote from: Verbatim on December 16, 2014, 11:17:13 AMNow, if it was being censored out of saying the word "FUCK" or "CUNT" or "FAGGOT" or anything else, then I'd agree with you. Censorship of words is petty, but again, I wouldn't even call this censorship.I think you should be banned for this post. Those words are gross, homophobic, and sexist. I don't think Cheat should allow those words on here. I don't want them to represent the Sep7agon community. Its like like a filter for a fish tank. I don't want to swim in shit. SpoilerAny argument for censorship is one that can be used against you by someone else.
Quote from: Keyu on December 16, 2014, 04:46:18 PMQuote from: Verbatim on December 16, 2014, 11:17:13 AMNow, if it was being censored out of saying the word "FUCK" or "CUNT" or "FAGGOT" or anything else, then I'd agree with you. Censorship of words is petty, but again, I wouldn't even call this censorship.I think you should be banned for this post. Those words are gross, homophobic, and sexist. I don't think Cheat should allow those words on here. I don't want them to represent the Sep7agon community. Its like like a filter for a fish tank. I don't want to swim in shit. SpoilerAny argument for censorship is one that can be used against you by someone else.If that's honestly how you felt about it, I would say that you were will within your right....So... You failed.
And this site would promptly turn to shit.
Deciding not to host a disgusting game about murdering people just for the sake of murdering them was a bold statement, and I fully supported it.
GabeN backing down and apologizing doesn't make him the champion of free speech, it just makes him seem like a little bitch that is afraid of upsetting devs. This game is bad for the industry.
It's not censorship. Steam has zero responsibility to endorse games it doesn't support, for whatever reason. Deciding not to host a disgusting game about murdering people just for the sake of murdering them was a bold statement, and I fully supported it.
Seems like a dumb game anyway,
Quote from: True Turquoise on December 17, 2014, 06:41:21 AMSeems like a dumb game anyway,GOAT SIMULATOR
Quote from: H̲u̲r̲t̲f̲u̲l̲T̲u̲r̲k̲e̲y on December 17, 2014, 10:52:32 AMIt's not censorship. Steam has zero responsibility to endorse games it doesn't support, for whatever reason. Deciding not to host a disgusting game about murdering people just for the sake of murdering them was a bold statement, and I fully supported it. Shit. I guess we better take down all games that involve killing then.Bye bye CoD. Bye bye GTA. Bye bye Halo. Bye bye Battlefield. Bye bye the vast majority of the video game industry.
Quote from: H̲u̲r̲t̲f̲u̲l̲T̲u̲r̲k̲e̲y on December 17, 2014, 10:52:32 AMDeciding not to host a disgusting game about murdering people just for the sake of murdering them was a bold statement, and I fully supported it. That's pretty much the point to every shooter multiplayer so we might as well ban those too right? Killing enemy players just for the heck of it.
Just wondering if you guys are legitimately retarded because you can't distinguish between Hatred and any other shooter.
Valve pulls 'Hatred' from Steam Greenlight. | Updated
