Quote from: Cheat on November 11, 2014, 12:09:48 AMHalo 2 online multiplayer was enough to hook me, but the anniversary campaign, new forge items/features, and Halo 5 beta had me completely gaga.And it's also the first and only (as of yet) Halo on Xbox One. My 360 was starting to seem a little stale...This is why Microsoft never learns anything.No one votes with their wallets anymore. :/
Halo 2 online multiplayer was enough to hook me, but the anniversary campaign, new forge items/features, and Halo 5 beta had me completely gaga.And it's also the first and only (as of yet) Halo on Xbox One. My 360 was starting to seem a little stale...
Quote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:20:44 AMQuote from: Cheat on November 11, 2014, 12:09:48 AMHalo 2 online multiplayer was enough to hook me, but the anniversary campaign, new forge items/features, and Halo 5 beta had me completely gaga.And it's also the first and only (as of yet) Halo on Xbox One. My 360 was starting to seem a little stale...This is why Microsoft never learns anything.No one votes with their wallets anymore. :/I am. I completely approve of Halo 2 Anniversary with a lot of other cool shit added onto it (which is what I consider the MCC) and so I'm going to buy it and play the hell out of it because it's something I will enjoy for...dare I say years?
Are you really this mad or is this a poor attempt at a joke?
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:24:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:22:15 AMQuote from: PSU on November 11, 2014, 12:06:57 AMBut I can't play Halo 2 online in 60fps and 1080p.....The fact that people actually give a shit about framerate being 60FPS just shows that no one gives a fuck about gameplay anymore in this day and age.>People care about 60fps>Don't care about gameplayFramerate directly affects gameplay. Especially an FPS game.I don't recall fucks like you complaining about framerate when Halo 3 was out.
Quote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:22:15 AMQuote from: PSU on November 11, 2014, 12:06:57 AMBut I can't play Halo 2 online in 60fps and 1080p.....The fact that people actually give a shit about framerate being 60FPS just shows that no one gives a fuck about gameplay anymore in this day and age.>People care about 60fps>Don't care about gameplayFramerate directly affects gameplay. Especially an FPS game.
Quote from: PSU on November 11, 2014, 12:06:57 AMBut I can't play Halo 2 online in 60fps and 1080p.....The fact that people actually give a shit about framerate being 60FPS just shows that no one gives a fuck about gameplay anymore in this day and age.
But I can't play Halo 2 online in 60fps and 1080p.....
In case no one has figured it out yet, this was a troll thread.At least I got a couple people mad.
Quote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:27:03 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:24:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:22:15 AMQuote from: PSU on November 11, 2014, 12:06:57 AMBut I can't play Halo 2 online in 60fps and 1080p.....The fact that people actually give a shit about framerate being 60FPS just shows that no one gives a fuck about gameplay anymore in this day and age.>People care about 60fps>Don't care about gameplayFramerate directly affects gameplay. Especially an FPS game.I don't recall fucks like you complaining about framerate when Halo 3 was out.So people aren't allowed to want something that improves a game now? Some dev you are.
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:18:23 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:15:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:13:22 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:10:21 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?The zoom feature, not the change of sight/scope.Yes, it is still a magnification. Thing is, that it's a gimmicky magnification that has no conceivable reason for being implemented other than to attract the CoD-type player.Something is different? It's obviously done to attract CoD players. - Assassin11D7Really? So, why would they change something like that in a way that requires an animation that takes the dev team more time to do, adds clutter to the zoomed in screen, and offers no positive on a whim? What other reason is there? If you disagree, then clearly you have a well-founded reason to oppose me, right? Let's hear it.
Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:15:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:13:22 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:10:21 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?The zoom feature, not the change of sight/scope.Yes, it is still a magnification. Thing is, that it's a gimmicky magnification that has no conceivable reason for being implemented other than to attract the CoD-type player.Something is different? It's obviously done to attract CoD players. - Assassin11D7
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:13:22 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:10:21 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?The zoom feature, not the change of sight/scope.Yes, it is still a magnification. Thing is, that it's a gimmicky magnification that has no conceivable reason for being implemented other than to attract the CoD-type player.
Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:10:21 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?The zoom feature, not the change of sight/scope.
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?
Quote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb more
Quote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.
Quote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?
Quote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.
I think you need another break.
Quote from: Cheat on November 11, 2014, 12:27:05 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:20:44 AMQuote from: Cheat on November 11, 2014, 12:09:48 AMHalo 2 online multiplayer was enough to hook me, but the anniversary campaign, new forge items/features, and Halo 5 beta had me completely gaga.And it's also the first and only (as of yet) Halo on Xbox One. My 360 was starting to seem a little stale...This is why Microsoft never learns anything.No one votes with their wallets anymore. :/I am. I completely approve of Halo 2 Anniversary with a lot of other cool shit added onto it (which is what I consider the MCC) and so I'm going to buy it and play the hell out of it because it's something I will enjoy for...dare I say years?Cheat, you're a really cool dude and I'm sure you're a smart guy, but Microsoft was right when they believed that their consumers are all idiots, because they'll buy just about anything.
Quote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:30:58 AMIn case no one has figured it out yet, this was a troll thread.At least I got a couple people mad.Good. Honestly. I didn't want to have to call you fucking stupid for this.
Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:26:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:18:23 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:15:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:13:22 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:10:21 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?The zoom feature, not the change of sight/scope.Yes, it is still a magnification. Thing is, that it's a gimmicky magnification that has no conceivable reason for being implemented other than to attract the CoD-type player.Something is different? It's obviously done to attract CoD players. - Assassin11D7Really? So, why would they change something like that in a way that requires an animation that takes the dev team more time to do, adds clutter to the zoomed in screen, and offers no positive on a whim? What other reason is there? If you disagree, then clearly you have a well-founded reason to oppose me, right? Let's hear it.Because they can. That's literally the only reason needed.And the new zoom takes up as much of the screen as the old BR does.
Quote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:29:09 AMQuote from: Cheat on November 11, 2014, 12:27:05 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:20:44 AMQuote from: Cheat on November 11, 2014, 12:09:48 AMHalo 2 online multiplayer was enough to hook me, but the anniversary campaign, new forge items/features, and Halo 5 beta had me completely gaga.And it's also the first and only (as of yet) Halo on Xbox One. My 360 was starting to seem a little stale...This is why Microsoft never learns anything.No one votes with their wallets anymore. :/I am. I completely approve of Halo 2 Anniversary with a lot of other cool shit added onto it (which is what I consider the MCC) and so I'm going to buy it and play the hell out of it because it's something I will enjoy for...dare I say years?Cheat, you're a really cool dude and I'm sure you're a smart guy, but Microsoft was right when they believed that their consumers are all idiots, because they'll buy just about anything.You're thinking Destiny and CoD (which I hear the latter was kind of good, but I still don't care for the series). I love Halo. I've loved Halo since Halo 2, which was my first real FPS experience after Goldeneye on the N64.They haven't tricked me into anything. I watched the videos and read the articles and I'm stoked because it's fucking Halo 2 in HD!, not because it was hyped. I'll probably end up ruining this disk from playing it so often, like I did to my old Halo 3 disk after playing it every day after school and on weekends.This shit is the ultimate LAN party game and it's more of a social experience than Destiny will ever be. Shit is going to go down in custom games with MCC and it will be incredible. Why aren't you on board with this?
Still trying to justify your peasanthood Deci?
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:34:10 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:26:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:18:23 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:15:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:13:22 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:10:21 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?The zoom feature, not the change of sight/scope.Yes, it is still a magnification. Thing is, that it's a gimmicky magnification that has no conceivable reason for being implemented other than to attract the CoD-type player.Something is different? It's obviously done to attract CoD players. - Assassin11D7Really? So, why would they change something like that in a way that requires an animation that takes the dev team more time to do, adds clutter to the zoomed in screen, and offers no positive on a whim? What other reason is there? If you disagree, then clearly you have a well-founded reason to oppose me, right? Let's hear it.Because they can. That's literally the only reason needed.And the new zoom takes up as much of the screen as the old BR does.The old BR didn't have the sides of a scope/rds in the FoV. Mainly because, you were actually zoomed in through a scope, not the camera zooming in.And I'm sorry, if you really think that something like that is done on a freakin' whim, then I don't think you have a clue what you're talking about.
Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:36:30 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:34:10 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:26:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:18:23 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:15:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:13:22 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:10:21 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?The zoom feature, not the change of sight/scope.Yes, it is still a magnification. Thing is, that it's a gimmicky magnification that has no conceivable reason for being implemented other than to attract the CoD-type player.Something is different? It's obviously done to attract CoD players. - Assassin11D7Really? So, why would they change something like that in a way that requires an animation that takes the dev team more time to do, adds clutter to the zoomed in screen, and offers no positive on a whim? What other reason is there? If you disagree, then clearly you have a well-founded reason to oppose me, right? Let's hear it.Because they can. That's literally the only reason needed.And the new zoom takes up as much of the screen as the old BR does.The old BR didn't have the sides of a scope/rds in the FoV. Mainly because, you were actually zoomed in through a scope, not the camera zooming in.And I'm sorry, if you really think that something like that is done on a freakin' whim, then I don't think you have a clue what you're talking about.The FOV of the new BR is the same as the FOV of the old BR regardless of being able to see the sides of the scope.Where did I say it's done on a whim? Just because they went with a design change doesn't mean it's "hurr they r apeeling to cod kiddies".
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:41:07 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:36:30 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:34:10 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:26:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:18:23 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:15:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:13:22 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:10:21 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?The zoom feature, not the change of sight/scope.Yes, it is still a magnification. Thing is, that it's a gimmicky magnification that has no conceivable reason for being implemented other than to attract the CoD-type player.Something is different? It's obviously done to attract CoD players. - Assassin11D7Really? So, why would they change something like that in a way that requires an animation that takes the dev team more time to do, adds clutter to the zoomed in screen, and offers no positive on a whim? What other reason is there? If you disagree, then clearly you have a well-founded reason to oppose me, right? Let's hear it.Because they can. That's literally the only reason needed.And the new zoom takes up as much of the screen as the old BR does.The old BR didn't have the sides of a scope/rds in the FoV. Mainly because, you were actually zoomed in through a scope, not the camera zooming in.And I'm sorry, if you really think that something like that is done on a freakin' whim, then I don't think you have a clue what you're talking about.The FOV of the new BR is the same as the FOV of the old BR regardless of being able to see the sides of the scope.Where did I say it's done on a whim? Just because they went with a design change doesn't mean it's "hurr they r apeeling to cod kiddies".They are.Haven't you noticed how similar Halo and COD are starting to become?
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:41:07 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:36:30 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:34:10 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:26:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:18:23 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:15:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:13:22 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:10:21 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?The zoom feature, not the change of sight/scope.Yes, it is still a magnification. Thing is, that it's a gimmicky magnification that has no conceivable reason for being implemented other than to attract the CoD-type player.Something is different? It's obviously done to attract CoD players. - Assassin11D7Really? So, why would they change something like that in a way that requires an animation that takes the dev team more time to do, adds clutter to the zoomed in screen, and offers no positive on a whim? What other reason is there? If you disagree, then clearly you have a well-founded reason to oppose me, right? Let's hear it.Because they can. That's literally the only reason needed.And the new zoom takes up as much of the screen as the old BR does.The old BR didn't have the sides of a scope/rds in the FoV. Mainly because, you were actually zoomed in through a scope, not the camera zooming in.And I'm sorry, if you really think that something like that is done on a freakin' whim, then I don't think you have a clue what you're talking about.The FOV of the new BR is the same as the FOV of the old BR regardless of being able to see the sides of the scope.Where did I say it's done on a whim? Just because they went with a design change doesn't mean it's "hurr they r apeeling to cod kiddies".There is no logical alternative. Again, if you think there is, outright say it. Design decisions don't happen on a whim, you've acknowledged that now, so what other reasons could there be?Yes, and being able to see the sides of the sights is screen clutter, which equals taking up more space.
Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:43:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:41:07 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:36:30 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:34:10 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:26:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:18:23 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:15:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:13:22 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:10:21 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?The zoom feature, not the change of sight/scope.Yes, it is still a magnification. Thing is, that it's a gimmicky magnification that has no conceivable reason for being implemented other than to attract the CoD-type player.Something is different? It's obviously done to attract CoD players. - Assassin11D7Really? So, why would they change something like that in a way that requires an animation that takes the dev team more time to do, adds clutter to the zoomed in screen, and offers no positive on a whim? What other reason is there? If you disagree, then clearly you have a well-founded reason to oppose me, right? Let's hear it.Because they can. That's literally the only reason needed.And the new zoom takes up as much of the screen as the old BR does.The old BR didn't have the sides of a scope/rds in the FoV. Mainly because, you were actually zoomed in through a scope, not the camera zooming in.And I'm sorry, if you really think that something like that is done on a freakin' whim, then I don't think you have a clue what you're talking about.The FOV of the new BR is the same as the FOV of the old BR regardless of being able to see the sides of the scope.Where did I say it's done on a whim? Just because they went with a design change doesn't mean it's "hurr they r apeeling to cod kiddies".There is no logical alternative. Again, if you think there is, outright say it. Design decisions don't happen on a whim, you've acknowledged that now, so what other reasons could there be?Yes, and being able to see the sides of the sights is screen clutter, which equals taking up more space.Your claim isn't even logical to begin with. Changing something to make it look new doesn't mean in the slightest that it was done to appeal to CoD players. It's an aesthetic design choice. Simple as that.The FOV is the same, so it's not taking up more space.
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:49:07 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:43:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:41:07 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:36:30 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:34:10 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:26:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:18:23 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:15:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:13:22 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:10:21 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?The zoom feature, not the change of sight/scope.Yes, it is still a magnification. Thing is, that it's a gimmicky magnification that has no conceivable reason for being implemented other than to attract the CoD-type player.Something is different? It's obviously done to attract CoD players. - Assassin11D7Really? So, why would they change something like that in a way that requires an animation that takes the dev team more time to do, adds clutter to the zoomed in screen, and offers no positive on a whim? What other reason is there? If you disagree, then clearly you have a well-founded reason to oppose me, right? Let's hear it.Because they can. That's literally the only reason needed.And the new zoom takes up as much of the screen as the old BR does.The old BR didn't have the sides of a scope/rds in the FoV. Mainly because, you were actually zoomed in through a scope, not the camera zooming in.And I'm sorry, if you really think that something like that is done on a freakin' whim, then I don't think you have a clue what you're talking about.The FOV of the new BR is the same as the FOV of the old BR regardless of being able to see the sides of the scope.Where did I say it's done on a whim? Just because they went with a design change doesn't mean it's "hurr they r apeeling to cod kiddies".There is no logical alternative. Again, if you think there is, outright say it. Design decisions don't happen on a whim, you've acknowledged that now, so what other reasons could there be?Yes, and being able to see the sides of the sights is screen clutter, which equals taking up more space.Your claim isn't even logical to begin with. Changing something to make it look new doesn't mean in the slightest that it was done to appeal to CoD players. It's an aesthetic design choice. Simple as that.The FOV is the same, so it's not taking up more space.An aesthetic design choice that 100% mirrors how it functions in CoD and other modern FPS games. So, that has absolutely no correlation at all, and couldn't possibly have been a leading factor that caused 343i to make that change?It's blocking part of the screen. The edges of the scope/sight are blocking parts of the screen.
Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:52:07 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:49:07 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:43:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:41:07 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:36:30 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:34:10 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:26:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:18:23 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:15:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:13:22 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:10:21 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?The zoom feature, not the change of sight/scope.Yes, it is still a magnification. Thing is, that it's a gimmicky magnification that has no conceivable reason for being implemented other than to attract the CoD-type player.Something is different? It's obviously done to attract CoD players. - Assassin11D7Really? So, why would they change something like that in a way that requires an animation that takes the dev team more time to do, adds clutter to the zoomed in screen, and offers no positive on a whim? What other reason is there? If you disagree, then clearly you have a well-founded reason to oppose me, right? Let's hear it.Because they can. That's literally the only reason needed.And the new zoom takes up as much of the screen as the old BR does.The old BR didn't have the sides of a scope/rds in the FoV. Mainly because, you were actually zoomed in through a scope, not the camera zooming in.And I'm sorry, if you really think that something like that is done on a freakin' whim, then I don't think you have a clue what you're talking about.The FOV of the new BR is the same as the FOV of the old BR regardless of being able to see the sides of the scope.Where did I say it's done on a whim? Just because they went with a design change doesn't mean it's "hurr they r apeeling to cod kiddies".There is no logical alternative. Again, if you think there is, outright say it. Design decisions don't happen on a whim, you've acknowledged that now, so what other reasons could there be?Yes, and being able to see the sides of the sights is screen clutter, which equals taking up more space.Your claim isn't even logical to begin with. Changing something to make it look new doesn't mean in the slightest that it was done to appeal to CoD players. It's an aesthetic design choice. Simple as that.The FOV is the same, so it's not taking up more space.An aesthetic design choice that 100% mirrors how it functions in CoD and other modern FPS games. So, that has absolutely no correlation at all, and couldn't possibly have been a leading factor that caused 343i to make that change?It's blocking part of the screen. The edges of the scope/sight are blocking parts of the screen.An aesthetic design choice that still functions exactly how it has always functioned. But by your logic, they would have done the same to every other weapon, which they didn't.It blocks just as much as the screen as the old BR zoom does.
Quote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:56:54 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:52:07 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:49:07 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:43:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:41:07 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:36:30 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:34:10 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:26:43 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:18:23 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:15:15 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:13:22 AMQuote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 11, 2014, 12:10:21 AMQuote from: BritishLemön on November 11, 2014, 12:08:53 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:07:34 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:05:12 AMQuote from: Decimator Omega on November 11, 2014, 12:04:18 AMQuote from: Nexus on November 11, 2014, 12:03:00 AMI think you need another break.I think people like you need to vote with your wallet more often and not spend money on this cash cow.Why you mad though?^ And that's just the tip of the ice berg.>a feature that has been on the BR since H2Pleb moreA Holographic Sight that is used in a traditional ADS fashion is from Halo 2?The zoom feature, not the change of sight/scope.Yes, it is still a magnification. Thing is, that it's a gimmicky magnification that has no conceivable reason for being implemented other than to attract the CoD-type player.Something is different? It's obviously done to attract CoD players. - Assassin11D7Really? So, why would they change something like that in a way that requires an animation that takes the dev team more time to do, adds clutter to the zoomed in screen, and offers no positive on a whim? What other reason is there? If you disagree, then clearly you have a well-founded reason to oppose me, right? Let's hear it.Because they can. That's literally the only reason needed.And the new zoom takes up as much of the screen as the old BR does.The old BR didn't have the sides of a scope/rds in the FoV. Mainly because, you were actually zoomed in through a scope, not the camera zooming in.And I'm sorry, if you really think that something like that is done on a freakin' whim, then I don't think you have a clue what you're talking about.The FOV of the new BR is the same as the FOV of the old BR regardless of being able to see the sides of the scope.Where did I say it's done on a whim? Just because they went with a design change doesn't mean it's "hurr they r apeeling to cod kiddies".There is no logical alternative. Again, if you think there is, outright say it. Design decisions don't happen on a whim, you've acknowledged that now, so what other reasons could there be?Yes, and being able to see the sides of the sights is screen clutter, which equals taking up more space.Your claim isn't even logical to begin with. Changing something to make it look new doesn't mean in the slightest that it was done to appeal to CoD players. It's an aesthetic design choice. Simple as that.The FOV is the same, so it's not taking up more space.An aesthetic design choice that 100% mirrors how it functions in CoD and other modern FPS games. So, that has absolutely no correlation at all, and couldn't possibly have been a leading factor that caused 343i to make that change?It's blocking part of the screen. The edges of the scope/sight are blocking parts of the screen.An aesthetic design choice that still functions exactly how it has always functioned. But by your logic, they would have done the same to every other weapon, which they didn't.It blocks just as much as the screen as the old BR zoom does.What are you trying to say exactly? Well, they did make it so you have an ADS animation for every weapon in the game they've shown off thus far, so...
4 games at 1080p 60fpsMultiplayer for a game that was disconnected a few years agoHalo 1 playable online for consoleForge revamped to what fans have asked for100 multiplayer maps on one discRemastered and updated campaign with terminalsAccess to H5 beta so 343 learns what to improve a year aheadNew mini seriesYeah, TOTALLY wasting money, because The Last of Us totally was worth getting again when it was only one game with no changes, at the same cost with the MCC
...
