What's your definition of terrible? Be specific. You're the one saying a critically acclaimed game is bad.
Again, this is a meme tier post. Halo 3 had a great story and tied up the trilogy nicely.
>magic>ranged weaponsIt's an RPG. This genre isn't exactly known for the best combat. But like I said, that's my main problem with The Elder Scrolls as a franchise. The combat could be better.
They were an issue. For the first month. The game ran perfectly smooth after that; and ran perfectly smooth from the start for most people.
haha ebin xD
Quote from: Prime Megaten on January 07, 2016, 05:42:13 PMOblivion is a better game than Skyrim (sans Hearthfire, my DLC-fu), but I can never get past the potato faces nowadays.Hearthfire seriously
Oblivion is a better game than Skyrim (sans Hearthfire, my DLC-fu), but I can never get past the potato faces nowadays.
Again, you're not being specific. You're saying they're boring. Boring how?And it seems that even if you do get choices, people complain about the choices you get. Mass Effect, for example. There's just no pleasing people like you.
As opposed to what? Witcher can barely call what it has a combo system.
The Witcher games are honestly extremely boring to me. Protagonist is boring and lifeless, combat is meh tier at best with no insanely powerful magic to make up for the sub par sword fighting.
There's literally nothing wrong with him.
Quote from: Prime Megaten on January 07, 2016, 05:49:14 PMQuote from: challengerX on January 07, 2016, 05:47:29 PMQuote from: Prime Megaten on January 07, 2016, 05:42:13 PMOblivion is a better game than Skyrim (sans Hearthfire, my DLC-fu), but I can never get past the potato faces nowadays.Hearthfire seriouslyBuildings sims are great, even if they are super simple.Ok
Quote from: challengerX on January 07, 2016, 05:47:29 PMQuote from: Prime Megaten on January 07, 2016, 05:42:13 PMOblivion is a better game than Skyrim (sans Hearthfire, my DLC-fu), but I can never get past the potato faces nowadays.Hearthfire seriouslyBuildings sims are great, even if they are super simple.
Quote from: Prime Megaten on January 07, 2016, 06:34:12 PMQuote from: challengerX on January 07, 2016, 05:55:23 PMQuote from: Prime Megaten on January 07, 2016, 05:49:14 PMQuote from: challengerX on January 07, 2016, 05:47:29 PMQuote from: Prime Megaten on January 07, 2016, 05:42:13 PMOblivion is a better game than Skyrim (sans Hearthfire, my DLC-fu), but I can never get past the potato faces nowadays.Hearthfire seriouslyBuildings sims are great, even if they are super simple.Okohho ho ho
Quote from: challengerX on January 07, 2016, 05:55:23 PMQuote from: Prime Megaten on January 07, 2016, 05:49:14 PMQuote from: challengerX on January 07, 2016, 05:47:29 PMQuote from: Prime Megaten on January 07, 2016, 05:42:13 PMOblivion is a better game than Skyrim (sans Hearthfire, my DLC-fu), but I can never get past the potato faces nowadays.Hearthfire seriouslyBuildings sims are great, even if they are super simple.Okoh
No you didn't. You aren't going into detail at all.
It's by about what you say, it's about the game having a shitty attempt at a combo system.
And I'm talking about the franchise as a whole, beyond just combat.
So like a Mage character in Oblivion.
I didn't "literally" say there are no problems when I LITERALLY said they were problems. Three times now. Every game has bugs and glitches. People always exaggerate how bad they are in Bethesda's games.
What's retarded about the other Dragons? What's wrong with Alduin being a more powerful version of other dragons?
Have you guys even played Dragons Dogma?
Quote from: Mandalore the Unstoppable on January 07, 2016, 07:17:11 PMHave you guys even played Dragons Dogma?I don't see how it's relevant tbh.
The dragons have awful AI. Like, more retarded than AC's AI.Alduin was marginally "more powerful". He was no different than an Ancient Dragon, albeit with a unique skin.Underwhelming is a massive understatement.
Quote from: Prime Megaten on January 07, 2016, 07:18:13 PMQuote from: Mandalore the Unstoppable on January 07, 2016, 07:17:11 PMHave you guys even played Dragons Dogma?I don't see how it's relevant tbh.The combat system makes anything in Elder Scrolls like like childs play, which it already is. You don't need DD to tell you that.
Quote from: Luciana on January 08, 2016, 04:44:09 PMSkyrim's writing wasn't really all that great, Chally, and neither was the presentation of it.Presentation actually bugged me a shit ton in Skyrim as compared to other games. Combat is the best in Skyrim, though combat has never been the strength of any Elder Scrolls game. Something they should probably take a look at. The Witchers is far more in depth, challenging, and consistent, and while being a mage may be flashy, standing in front of an enemy while just holding RT to blow ice, while he does the same to you, is not really that fantastic.stand in front of my penis and press RT to blow
Skyrim's writing wasn't really all that great, Chally, and neither was the presentation of it.Presentation actually bugged me a shit ton in Skyrim as compared to other games. Combat is the best in Skyrim, though combat has never been the strength of any Elder Scrolls game. Something they should probably take a look at. The Witchers is far more in depth, challenging, and consistent, and while being a mage may be flashy, standing in front of an enemy while just holding RT to blow ice, while he does the same to you, is not really that fantastic.
What always gets me is how many people put in 50+, 100+, or even 200+ hours into these games and then a few years later say it's shallow and boring.
Daggerfall was the real highlight of the Elder Scrolls seriesIt all went downhill from there
remember TESIV?
