Quote from: Batch on December 17, 2015, 09:01:54 PM

Quote from: Verbatim on December 17, 2015, 04:42:30 PM

Quote from: Batch on December 17, 2015, 04:28:17 PM

God you've come full circle right back to this. You were doing well being....not retarded for most of the year.

yeah please ignore the fact that the last two responses were 100% cordial in nature, you fuck

I will little fish.

So you admit you're a worthless, petty cunt.

Why haven't you killed  yourself yet. You don't like life, no one is obviously going to pick up your messed up mindset, and you clearly don't want to add to society in expansion.  So unless you want to kill us all, why are you still alive?

Why haven't you killed  yourself yet. You don't like life, no one is obviously going to pick up your messed up mindset, and you clearly don't want to add to society in expansion.  So unless you want to kill us all, why are you still alive?

You've asked me this stupid question about thirty thousand times, and I've answered it each and every time.

Why you expect me to continue repeating myself, I'll probably never know.

You're suffering bub, just let it go.

All hail the conquering request.

Or we can do both.

Why not focus on real world issues that are far more worse instead of video game ones? By doing that modern feminist would achieve something and far more people would support them and take them seriously. It's hard to take feminist seriously when they're fighting for a female video game character rights instead of a real world women rights.

Nobody is saying this, you fucking retard.

My point is that an image of a women in a video game is not going to do any damage to women where they can't become president. You're making it seem like it does but in reality it does nothing at all harmful to them. What does harm women are the treatment they get in places like the Middle East. You're calling yourself a feminist but it seems like you only care more about a video game characters rights than a female in real life. A video game character rights should be the last thing on your mind when some girl get killed for being rapped.

t objectively doesn't.

For the slavery aspect of the game you're kidnapping Pokemon to be used to fight other Pokemon until you release  them. Going to that lab to choose which starter Pokemon you want for fighting is no different than going to the slave market to find which black person you want as a farm slave. Good or bad there is no difference between having a Pokemon fighting under your control and having a black person doing faring for you under your control. They are both your slaves under you set them free which might never happen until you die.

For the dog fighting aspect it's easy to tell what I mean by that. Yes these Pokemon fight to evolve, but it's completely different wen it's being done under a trainer. These trainers are having Pokemon fighting each other for either money or badges which yes can be for the Pokemon's benefit, but in the end it's more for the trainer. Having dogs killing each other for money is no different than having Pokemon killing each other for it which actually happened in one of the games. Gary's mouse Pokemon did end up dying because of a battle he fought with the player. Pokemon does have a dark side to it which you are simply ignoring.

All hail the conquering request.

That request never happened in the game so it's not real