Quote from: Tyger on May 09, 2016, 05:13:07 PMWhat's the point of reviewing a 6 year old game on a forum where 99% of the posters have already played it?The point of every review that's ever existed? To give your organized opinion on something.
What's the point of reviewing a 6 year old game on a forum where 99% of the posters have already played it?
Quote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 03:18:04 PMQuote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 03:04:24 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 02:58:04 PMQuote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 01:50:38 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 09:41:45 AMQuote from: Pepsi on May 09, 2016, 09:38:49 AMQuoteReach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplayi disagreeQuotethat offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities. Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned, Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different. what the fuck is this post formatting? are you high?QuoteThere are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. False. Tons of playlists in Reach where you choose different weapons via loadout menu. Paradiso and Spire were awful. Countdown wasn't terrible but it wasn't good. The only good map in that game was Zealot, and even then they had to remove the space level to make it playable from a competitive standpoint. You couldn't beat me in any Halo game because I'm actually good and you have a bunch of water in your skull where your brain should be.*Sigh* Invasion is literally the only mode where you can choose your loadout. You spent way too much time in customs. Paradiso was an awesome, map. It was vehicle focused map. Spire offered many types of engagements. I could easily beat you.Invasion was not the only loadout playlist, what the fuck are you talking about? I almost never played custom games. Those maps were fucking garbage.And, just for the record.Your Reach page on HTR.http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=dbd%20halo%20legendAnd here's mine.http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=oh%20typhlosionNotice a difference? I do. You're terrible.
Quote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 03:04:24 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 02:58:04 PMQuote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 01:50:38 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 09:41:45 AMQuote from: Pepsi on May 09, 2016, 09:38:49 AMQuoteReach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplayi disagreeQuotethat offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities. Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned, Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different. what the fuck is this post formatting? are you high?QuoteThere are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. False. Tons of playlists in Reach where you choose different weapons via loadout menu. Paradiso and Spire were awful. Countdown wasn't terrible but it wasn't good. The only good map in that game was Zealot, and even then they had to remove the space level to make it playable from a competitive standpoint. You couldn't beat me in any Halo game because I'm actually good and you have a bunch of water in your skull where your brain should be.*Sigh* Invasion is literally the only mode where you can choose your loadout. You spent way too much time in customs. Paradiso was an awesome, map. It was vehicle focused map. Spire offered many types of engagements. I could easily beat you.
Quote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 02:58:04 PMQuote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 01:50:38 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 09:41:45 AMQuote from: Pepsi on May 09, 2016, 09:38:49 AMQuoteReach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplayi disagreeQuotethat offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities. Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned, Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different. what the fuck is this post formatting? are you high?QuoteThere are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. False. Tons of playlists in Reach where you choose different weapons via loadout menu. Paradiso and Spire were awful. Countdown wasn't terrible but it wasn't good. The only good map in that game was Zealot, and even then they had to remove the space level to make it playable from a competitive standpoint. You couldn't beat me in any Halo game because I'm actually good and you have a bunch of water in your skull where your brain should be.
Quote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 01:50:38 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 09:41:45 AMQuote from: Pepsi on May 09, 2016, 09:38:49 AMQuoteReach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplayi disagreeQuotethat offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities. Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned, Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different.
Quote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 09:41:45 AMQuote from: Pepsi on May 09, 2016, 09:38:49 AMQuoteReach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplayi disagreeQuotethat offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities. Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned, Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different.
Quote from: Pepsi on May 09, 2016, 09:38:49 AMQuoteReach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplayi disagreeQuotethat offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities.
QuoteReach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplayi disagree
Reach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplay
that offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities.
There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything.
Quote from: SecondClass on May 09, 2016, 05:14:59 PMQuote from: Tyger on May 09, 2016, 05:13:07 PMWhat's the point of reviewing a 6 year old game on a forum where 99% of the posters have already played it?The point of every review that's ever existed? To give your organized opinion on something. that's definitely not the reason for most reviews tbh and you know this
Quote from: SecondClass on May 09, 2016, 05:14:59 PMQuote from: Tyger on May 09, 2016, 05:13:07 PMWhat's the point of reviewing a 6 year old game on a forum where 99% of the posters have already played it?The point of every review that's ever existed? To give your organized opinion on something.or see if you want to buy a gamei mean i dont do that but i know people who do
That's a tertiary reason some people read reviews, but it's certainly not the reason they exist or why people write them.
That's literally the only reason for reviews. If you think the point of them is ANYTHING apart from that, you're part of the problem.
I really do feel bad for the people that say Reach was their first Halo
Reach was worse than Halo 4, and that's saying something
Secondclass part of the problem confirmed
Quote from: SecondClass on May 09, 2016, 05:24:38 PMThat's a tertiary reason some people read reviews, but it's certainly not the reason they exist or why people write them.Quote from: SecondClass on May 09, 2016, 05:23:01 PMThat's literally the only reason for reviews. If you think the point of them is ANYTHING apart from that, you're part of the problem.> literally the only reason
Quote from: Pepsi on May 09, 2016, 05:34:18 PMQuote from: SecondClass on May 09, 2016, 05:24:38 PMThat's a tertiary reason some people read reviews, but it's certainly not the reason they exist or why people write them.Quote from: SecondClass on May 09, 2016, 05:23:01 PMThat's literally the only reason for reviews. If you think the point of them is ANYTHING apart from that, you're part of the problem.> literally the only reasonTwo different things. Learn to read.
Quote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 03:19:40 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 03:18:04 PMQuote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 03:04:24 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 02:58:04 PMQuote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 01:50:38 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 09:41:45 AMQuote from: Pepsi on May 09, 2016, 09:38:49 AMQuoteReach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplayi disagreeQuotethat offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities. Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned, Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different. what the fuck is this post formatting? are you high?QuoteThere are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. False. Tons of playlists in Reach where you choose different weapons via loadout menu. Paradiso and Spire were awful. Countdown wasn't terrible but it wasn't good. The only good map in that game was Zealot, and even then they had to remove the space level to make it playable from a competitive standpoint. You couldn't beat me in any Halo game because I'm actually good and you have a bunch of water in your skull where your brain should be.*Sigh* Invasion is literally the only mode where you can choose your loadout. You spent way too much time in customs. Paradiso was an awesome, map. It was vehicle focused map. Spire offered many types of engagements. I could easily beat you.Invasion was not the only loadout playlist, what the fuck are you talking about? I almost never played custom games. Those maps were fucking garbage.And, just for the record.Your Reach page on HTR.http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=dbd%20halo%20legendAnd here's mine.http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=oh%20typhlosionNotice a difference? I do. You're terrible.did you just stat check someone for a forum argument in the year of our lord 2010+3x2wew
It's not a Halo thread until Azu finds an excuse to flop his dick out on the table.
Quote from: Mr. Psychologist on May 09, 2016, 05:20:26 PMQuote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 03:19:40 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 03:18:04 PMQuote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 03:04:24 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 02:58:04 PMQuote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 01:50:38 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 09:41:45 AMQuote from: Pepsi on May 09, 2016, 09:38:49 AMQuoteReach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplayi disagreeQuotethat offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities. Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned, Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different. what the fuck is this post formatting? are you high?QuoteThere are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. False. Tons of playlists in Reach where you choose different weapons via loadout menu. Paradiso and Spire were awful. Countdown wasn't terrible but it wasn't good. The only good map in that game was Zealot, and even then they had to remove the space level to make it playable from a competitive standpoint. You couldn't beat me in any Halo game because I'm actually good and you have a bunch of water in your skull where your brain should be.*Sigh* Invasion is literally the only mode where you can choose your loadout. You spent way too much time in customs. Paradiso was an awesome, map. It was vehicle focused map. Spire offered many types of engagements. I could easily beat you.Invasion was not the only loadout playlist, what the fuck are you talking about? I almost never played custom games. Those maps were fucking garbage.And, just for the record.Your Reach page on HTR.http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=dbd%20halo%20legendAnd here's mine.http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=oh%20typhlosionNotice a difference? I do. You're terrible.did you just stat check someone for a forum argument in the year of our lord 2010+3x2wewProblem? He's bad and I can prove it with math. It's relevant to OP, too, since it's quite obvious that he doesn't really understand the game. Bad player, bad review.
Quote from: SecondClass on May 09, 2016, 05:51:50 PMQuote from: Pepsi on May 09, 2016, 05:34:18 PMQuote from: SecondClass on May 09, 2016, 05:24:38 PMThat's a tertiary reason some people read reviews, but it's certainly not the reason they exist or why people write them.Quote from: SecondClass on May 09, 2016, 05:23:01 PMThat's literally the only reason for reviews. If you think the point of them is ANYTHING apart from that, you're part of the problem.> literally the only reasonTwo different things. Learn to read.what you dont think people write reviews thinking someone might decide whether to buy it based on what you sayis that not why people put in "if youre thinking of buying this game"
It's not a Halo thread until some halftard posts something patently wrong about the games. I just don't like when people spread bad information is all, and it so happens that a lot of the people on this forum who post about Halo are thumbless morons. All I'm doing is giving people a reality check =]
Quote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 06:33:56 PMQuote from: Mr. Psychologist on May 09, 2016, 05:20:26 PMQuote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 03:19:40 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 03:18:04 PMQuote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 03:04:24 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 02:58:04 PMQuote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 01:50:38 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on May 09, 2016, 09:41:45 AMQuote from: Pepsi on May 09, 2016, 09:38:49 AMQuoteReach is a well polished FPS,that offers the classic Halo gameplayi disagreeQuotethat offers the classic Halo gameplay, with the addition of Armor Abilities. Only insofar as there are guns. Armor abilities weren't the only diverging mechanic. Loadouts alone - There are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. - with were a huge step away from core classic Halo gameplay. Across the board, map design was extremely different too - Yea, the maps were not the best, but Reach did have some really good maps, like paradiso, Spire, Countdown. Map quality is not a feature of classic halo. - (reach's maps were the worst the series had seen by a long shot before halo 4 came out). Then there's the addition of bloom & different player physics. Again... read the whole review, bloom is mentioned, Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games - I have played every single Halo game (spartan Assault/Strike/Halo Online are jokes so they don't count) , or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded - I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach. , but anyone with half a brain who has played CE/H2/H3 can see that Reach's default multiplayer is almost NOTHING like them. It takes some steps away from them, but is not that different. what the fuck is this post formatting? are you high?QuoteThere are no loadouts.... I have already mentioned in the review, that people start of with a armor ability, you can not choose weapons or anything. False. Tons of playlists in Reach where you choose different weapons via loadout menu. Paradiso and Spire were awful. Countdown wasn't terrible but it wasn't good. The only good map in that game was Zealot, and even then they had to remove the space level to make it playable from a competitive standpoint. You couldn't beat me in any Halo game because I'm actually good and you have a bunch of water in your skull where your brain should be.*Sigh* Invasion is literally the only mode where you can choose your loadout. You spent way too much time in customs. Paradiso was an awesome, map. It was vehicle focused map. Spire offered many types of engagements. I could easily beat you.Invasion was not the only loadout playlist, what the fuck are you talking about? I almost never played custom games. Those maps were fucking garbage.And, just for the record.Your Reach page on HTR.http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=dbd%20halo%20legendAnd here's mine.http://legacy.halotracker.com/Reach/ReachStats.aspx?GamerTag=oh%20typhlosionNotice a difference? I do. You're terrible.did you just stat check someone for a forum argument in the year of our lord 2010+3x2wewProblem? He's bad and I can prove it with math. It's relevant to OP, too, since it's quite obvious that he doesn't really understand the game. Bad player, bad review.1v1 Bro
People who don't jack off to snipedown, and farm for 50/0 K/Ds every match of war-zone aren't allowed to have an opinion. That is the only way anybody is allowed to enjoy themselves.
Quote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 06:44:09 PMIt's not a Halo thread until some halftard posts something patently wrong about the games. I just don't like when people spread bad information is all, and it so happens that a lot of the people on this forum who post about Halo are thumbless morons. All I'm doing is giving people a reality check =] I'm not arguing against you there. But in every situation where you've asserted somebody is wrong about x feature of a Halo title, you invariably bring up their stats compared to yours, as if their authority on understanding certain features of the game hinges solely on how they perform competitively.
Quote from: Azumarill on May 09, 2016, 06:33:56 PMPeople who don't jack off to snipedown, and farm for 50/0 K/Ds every match of war-zone aren't allowed to have an opinion. That is the only way anybody is allowed to enjoy themselves.He actually believes this.
Quote from: Pepsi on May 09, 2016, 06:23:19 PMQuote from: SecondClass on May 09, 2016, 05:51:50 PMQuote from: Pepsi on May 09, 2016, 05:34:18 PMQuote from: SecondClass on May 09, 2016, 05:24:38 PMThat's a tertiary reason some people read reviews, but it's certainly not the reason they exist or why people write them.Quote from: SecondClass on May 09, 2016, 05:23:01 PMThat's literally the only reason for reviews. If you think the point of them is ANYTHING apart from that, you're part of the problem.> literally the only reasonTwo different things. Learn to read.what you dont think people write reviews thinking someone might decide whether to buy it based on what you sayis that not why people put in "if youre thinking of buying this game"Good reviewers don't write because they want to influence game sales, they do it because they want to give their two cents on the game's quality.
I could beat your ass anyday on Halo 2 Classic, or Reach.
Maybe you're talking out of your ass because you never really played the good Halo games, or maybe you have played them and are just bad/retarded
Halo: Reach - Review - By me
