Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 25, 2016, 05:02:07 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 25, 2016, 06:33:48 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 25, 2016, 02:51:06 AMQuote from: Fedorekd on April 25, 2016, 02:13:06 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 10:00:52 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 09:41:05 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 09:38:55 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later."Released for free overtime"You know, when 343 said we'd get free DLC, I honestly thought they meant original quality content. Not ripping out old options that have been in Halo as early as Combat Evolved and as late as Halo 3 and "selling" it back to us as new content. Fuck me as a consumer, right?>Ripping out options>Ignoring all content they have added to the gameThere is no point in trying to show a person who chooses to blindfold themselves the light. But hey have fun being an asshole for no reason other than to be an asshole Yes, let us look at all the new content we have for us, shall we? I'll color code it too, to make it simple to understand. Green = New and original contentYellow = Content that was available at launch in previous Halo gamesOrange = Map remixes (not original, but still new kind of)**I am not counting weapons skins or armor, as this adds nothing new to the game itself**Warzone MapsForgeGrifballForge Map remakesHalo 5 Arena Map remixesNew Halo 5 Arena MapsTheater (Theater was broken and took until mid Febuary to fix, 343 didn't talk about it and slipped it in with update patch notes)File ShareInfectionOddballAssaultSnipersBig Team BattleSorry to say, but there isn't much green there. And this is just what 343 has added to the game. This isn't even going into the limited custom game options, the rudimentary forging options, and all the gamemodes 343 has decided to leave out as of now.Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. How about you read the fucking point. It takes time to get all that into games. There is an abundance of new weapons and armor. There are new maps. Snipers and Theatre were both in from the start. You obviously are complaining for the sake of complaining. You don't understand how a game is made nor how content releasing works. Kys.Are you a 343i spokesperson or something.No, I just care about the game franchise and I am willing to make points to defend it where it deserves to be defended. I think there is a large amount of bs in Halo 5, but I am also gonna defend what 343 has done right. It's this cool new thing called caring about your investments and being a logical human being. Reskining old content is not New content...>Being this stupid You shouldn't be so hard on yourself.
Quote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 25, 2016, 06:33:48 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 25, 2016, 02:51:06 AMQuote from: Fedorekd on April 25, 2016, 02:13:06 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 10:00:52 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 09:41:05 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 09:38:55 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later."Released for free overtime"You know, when 343 said we'd get free DLC, I honestly thought they meant original quality content. Not ripping out old options that have been in Halo as early as Combat Evolved and as late as Halo 3 and "selling" it back to us as new content. Fuck me as a consumer, right?>Ripping out options>Ignoring all content they have added to the gameThere is no point in trying to show a person who chooses to blindfold themselves the light. But hey have fun being an asshole for no reason other than to be an asshole Yes, let us look at all the new content we have for us, shall we? I'll color code it too, to make it simple to understand. Green = New and original contentYellow = Content that was available at launch in previous Halo gamesOrange = Map remixes (not original, but still new kind of)**I am not counting weapons skins or armor, as this adds nothing new to the game itself**Warzone MapsForgeGrifballForge Map remakesHalo 5 Arena Map remixesNew Halo 5 Arena MapsTheater (Theater was broken and took until mid Febuary to fix, 343 didn't talk about it and slipped it in with update patch notes)File ShareInfectionOddballAssaultSnipersBig Team BattleSorry to say, but there isn't much green there. And this is just what 343 has added to the game. This isn't even going into the limited custom game options, the rudimentary forging options, and all the gamemodes 343 has decided to leave out as of now.Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. How about you read the fucking point. It takes time to get all that into games. There is an abundance of new weapons and armor. There are new maps. Snipers and Theatre were both in from the start. You obviously are complaining for the sake of complaining. You don't understand how a game is made nor how content releasing works. Kys.Are you a 343i spokesperson or something.No, I just care about the game franchise and I am willing to make points to defend it where it deserves to be defended. I think there is a large amount of bs in Halo 5, but I am also gonna defend what 343 has done right. It's this cool new thing called caring about your investments and being a logical human being. Reskining old content is not New content...>Being this stupid
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 25, 2016, 02:51:06 AMQuote from: Fedorekd on April 25, 2016, 02:13:06 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 10:00:52 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 09:41:05 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 09:38:55 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later."Released for free overtime"You know, when 343 said we'd get free DLC, I honestly thought they meant original quality content. Not ripping out old options that have been in Halo as early as Combat Evolved and as late as Halo 3 and "selling" it back to us as new content. Fuck me as a consumer, right?>Ripping out options>Ignoring all content they have added to the gameThere is no point in trying to show a person who chooses to blindfold themselves the light. But hey have fun being an asshole for no reason other than to be an asshole Yes, let us look at all the new content we have for us, shall we? I'll color code it too, to make it simple to understand. Green = New and original contentYellow = Content that was available at launch in previous Halo gamesOrange = Map remixes (not original, but still new kind of)**I am not counting weapons skins or armor, as this adds nothing new to the game itself**Warzone MapsForgeGrifballForge Map remakesHalo 5 Arena Map remixesNew Halo 5 Arena MapsTheater (Theater was broken and took until mid Febuary to fix, 343 didn't talk about it and slipped it in with update patch notes)File ShareInfectionOddballAssaultSnipersBig Team BattleSorry to say, but there isn't much green there. And this is just what 343 has added to the game. This isn't even going into the limited custom game options, the rudimentary forging options, and all the gamemodes 343 has decided to leave out as of now.Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. How about you read the fucking point. It takes time to get all that into games. There is an abundance of new weapons and armor. There are new maps. Snipers and Theatre were both in from the start. You obviously are complaining for the sake of complaining. You don't understand how a game is made nor how content releasing works. Kys.Are you a 343i spokesperson or something.No, I just care about the game franchise and I am willing to make points to defend it where it deserves to be defended. I think there is a large amount of bs in Halo 5, but I am also gonna defend what 343 has done right. It's this cool new thing called caring about your investments and being a logical human being. Reskining old content is not New content...
Quote from: Fedorekd on April 25, 2016, 02:13:06 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 10:00:52 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 09:41:05 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 09:38:55 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later."Released for free overtime"You know, when 343 said we'd get free DLC, I honestly thought they meant original quality content. Not ripping out old options that have been in Halo as early as Combat Evolved and as late as Halo 3 and "selling" it back to us as new content. Fuck me as a consumer, right?>Ripping out options>Ignoring all content they have added to the gameThere is no point in trying to show a person who chooses to blindfold themselves the light. But hey have fun being an asshole for no reason other than to be an asshole Yes, let us look at all the new content we have for us, shall we? I'll color code it too, to make it simple to understand. Green = New and original contentYellow = Content that was available at launch in previous Halo gamesOrange = Map remixes (not original, but still new kind of)**I am not counting weapons skins or armor, as this adds nothing new to the game itself**Warzone MapsForgeGrifballForge Map remakesHalo 5 Arena Map remixesNew Halo 5 Arena MapsTheater (Theater was broken and took until mid Febuary to fix, 343 didn't talk about it and slipped it in with update patch notes)File ShareInfectionOddballAssaultSnipersBig Team BattleSorry to say, but there isn't much green there. And this is just what 343 has added to the game. This isn't even going into the limited custom game options, the rudimentary forging options, and all the gamemodes 343 has decided to leave out as of now.Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. How about you read the fucking point. It takes time to get all that into games. There is an abundance of new weapons and armor. There are new maps. Snipers and Theatre were both in from the start. You obviously are complaining for the sake of complaining. You don't understand how a game is made nor how content releasing works. Kys.Are you a 343i spokesperson or something.No, I just care about the game franchise and I am willing to make points to defend it where it deserves to be defended. I think there is a large amount of bs in Halo 5, but I am also gonna defend what 343 has done right. It's this cool new thing called caring about your investments and being a logical human being.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 10:00:52 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 09:41:05 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 09:38:55 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later."Released for free overtime"You know, when 343 said we'd get free DLC, I honestly thought they meant original quality content. Not ripping out old options that have been in Halo as early as Combat Evolved and as late as Halo 3 and "selling" it back to us as new content. Fuck me as a consumer, right?>Ripping out options>Ignoring all content they have added to the gameThere is no point in trying to show a person who chooses to blindfold themselves the light. But hey have fun being an asshole for no reason other than to be an asshole Yes, let us look at all the new content we have for us, shall we? I'll color code it too, to make it simple to understand. Green = New and original contentYellow = Content that was available at launch in previous Halo gamesOrange = Map remixes (not original, but still new kind of)**I am not counting weapons skins or armor, as this adds nothing new to the game itself**Warzone MapsForgeGrifballForge Map remakesHalo 5 Arena Map remixesNew Halo 5 Arena MapsTheater (Theater was broken and took until mid Febuary to fix, 343 didn't talk about it and slipped it in with update patch notes)File ShareInfectionOddballAssaultSnipersBig Team BattleSorry to say, but there isn't much green there. And this is just what 343 has added to the game. This isn't even going into the limited custom game options, the rudimentary forging options, and all the gamemodes 343 has decided to leave out as of now.Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. How about you read the fucking point. It takes time to get all that into games. There is an abundance of new weapons and armor. There are new maps. Snipers and Theatre were both in from the start. You obviously are complaining for the sake of complaining. You don't understand how a game is made nor how content releasing works. Kys.Are you a 343i spokesperson or something.
Quote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 10:00:52 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 09:41:05 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 09:38:55 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later."Released for free overtime"You know, when 343 said we'd get free DLC, I honestly thought they meant original quality content. Not ripping out old options that have been in Halo as early as Combat Evolved and as late as Halo 3 and "selling" it back to us as new content. Fuck me as a consumer, right?>Ripping out options>Ignoring all content they have added to the gameThere is no point in trying to show a person who chooses to blindfold themselves the light. But hey have fun being an asshole for no reason other than to be an asshole Yes, let us look at all the new content we have for us, shall we? I'll color code it too, to make it simple to understand. Green = New and original contentYellow = Content that was available at launch in previous Halo gamesOrange = Map remixes (not original, but still new kind of)**I am not counting weapons skins or armor, as this adds nothing new to the game itself**Warzone MapsForgeGrifballForge Map remakesHalo 5 Arena Map remixesNew Halo 5 Arena MapsTheater (Theater was broken and took until mid Febuary to fix, 343 didn't talk about it and slipped it in with update patch notes)File ShareInfectionOddballAssaultSnipersBig Team BattleSorry to say, but there isn't much green there. And this is just what 343 has added to the game. This isn't even going into the limited custom game options, the rudimentary forging options, and all the gamemodes 343 has decided to leave out as of now.Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. How about you read the fucking point. It takes time to get all that into games. There is an abundance of new weapons and armor. There are new maps. Snipers and Theatre were both in from the start. You obviously are complaining for the sake of complaining. You don't understand how a game is made nor how content releasing works. Kys.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 09:41:05 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 09:38:55 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later."Released for free overtime"You know, when 343 said we'd get free DLC, I honestly thought they meant original quality content. Not ripping out old options that have been in Halo as early as Combat Evolved and as late as Halo 3 and "selling" it back to us as new content. Fuck me as a consumer, right?>Ripping out options>Ignoring all content they have added to the gameThere is no point in trying to show a person who chooses to blindfold themselves the light. But hey have fun being an asshole for no reason other than to be an asshole Yes, let us look at all the new content we have for us, shall we? I'll color code it too, to make it simple to understand. Green = New and original contentYellow = Content that was available at launch in previous Halo gamesOrange = Map remixes (not original, but still new kind of)**I am not counting weapons skins or armor, as this adds nothing new to the game itself**Warzone MapsForgeGrifballForge Map remakesHalo 5 Arena Map remixesNew Halo 5 Arena MapsTheater (Theater was broken and took until mid Febuary to fix, 343 didn't talk about it and slipped it in with update patch notes)File ShareInfectionOddballAssaultSnipersBig Team BattleSorry to say, but there isn't much green there. And this is just what 343 has added to the game. This isn't even going into the limited custom game options, the rudimentary forging options, and all the gamemodes 343 has decided to leave out as of now.
Quote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 09:38:55 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later."Released for free overtime"You know, when 343 said we'd get free DLC, I honestly thought they meant original quality content. Not ripping out old options that have been in Halo as early as Combat Evolved and as late as Halo 3 and "selling" it back to us as new content. Fuck me as a consumer, right?>Ripping out options>Ignoring all content they have added to the gameThere is no point in trying to show a person who chooses to blindfold themselves the light. But hey have fun being an asshole for no reason other than to be an asshole
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later."Released for free overtime"You know, when 343 said we'd get free DLC, I honestly thought they meant original quality content. Not ripping out old options that have been in Halo as early as Combat Evolved and as late as Halo 3 and "selling" it back to us as new content. Fuck me as a consumer, right?
I don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.
Quote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 25, 2016, 11:31:48 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 25, 2016, 05:02:07 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 25, 2016, 06:33:48 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 25, 2016, 02:51:06 AMQuote from: Fedorekd on April 25, 2016, 02:13:06 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 10:00:52 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 09:41:05 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 09:38:55 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later."Released for free overtime"You know, when 343 said we'd get free DLC, I honestly thought they meant original quality content. Not ripping out old options that have been in Halo as early as Combat Evolved and as late as Halo 3 and "selling" it back to us as new content. Fuck me as a consumer, right?>Ripping out options>Ignoring all content they have added to the gameThere is no point in trying to show a person who chooses to blindfold themselves the light. But hey have fun being an asshole for no reason other than to be an asshole Yes, let us look at all the new content we have for us, shall we? I'll color code it too, to make it simple to understand. Green = New and original contentYellow = Content that was available at launch in previous Halo gamesOrange = Map remixes (not original, but still new kind of)**I am not counting weapons skins or armor, as this adds nothing new to the game itself**Warzone MapsForgeGrifballForge Map remakesHalo 5 Arena Map remixesNew Halo 5 Arena MapsTheater (Theater was broken and took until mid Febuary to fix, 343 didn't talk about it and slipped it in with update patch notes)File ShareInfectionOddballAssaultSnipersBig Team BattleSorry to say, but there isn't much green there. And this is just what 343 has added to the game. This isn't even going into the limited custom game options, the rudimentary forging options, and all the gamemodes 343 has decided to leave out as of now.Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. How about you read the fucking point. It takes time to get all that into games. There is an abundance of new weapons and armor. There are new maps. Snipers and Theatre were both in from the start. You obviously are complaining for the sake of complaining. You don't understand how a game is made nor how content releasing works. Kys.Are you a 343i spokesperson or something.No, I just care about the game franchise and I am willing to make points to defend it where it deserves to be defended. I think there is a large amount of bs in Halo 5, but I am also gonna defend what 343 has done right. It's this cool new thing called caring about your investments and being a logical human being. Reskining old content is not New content...>Being this stupid You shouldn't be so hard on yourself.This nigga must play Destiny cause he is desperate for his Last Word to drop.
Quote from: BaconShelf on April 25, 2016, 01:36:03 PMPizza camouflage ODSTsAs they drop down from orbit you faintly hear the word "pizzzaaaaa" until it gets louder and louder and finally crash lands
Pizza camouflage ODSTs
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 25, 2016, 11:47:58 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 25, 2016, 11:31:48 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 25, 2016, 05:02:07 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 25, 2016, 06:33:48 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 25, 2016, 02:51:06 AMQuote from: Fedorekd on April 25, 2016, 02:13:06 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 10:00:52 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 09:41:05 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 24, 2016, 09:38:55 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later."Released for free overtime"You know, when 343 said we'd get free DLC, I honestly thought they meant original quality content. Not ripping out old options that have been in Halo as early as Combat Evolved and as late as Halo 3 and "selling" it back to us as new content. Fuck me as a consumer, right?>Ripping out options>Ignoring all content they have added to the gameThere is no point in trying to show a person who chooses to blindfold themselves the light. But hey have fun being an asshole for no reason other than to be an asshole Yes, let us look at all the new content we have for us, shall we? I'll color code it too, to make it simple to understand. Green = New and original contentYellow = Content that was available at launch in previous Halo gamesOrange = Map remixes (not original, but still new kind of)**I am not counting weapons skins or armor, as this adds nothing new to the game itself**Warzone MapsForgeGrifballForge Map remakesHalo 5 Arena Map remixesNew Halo 5 Arena MapsTheater (Theater was broken and took until mid Febuary to fix, 343 didn't talk about it and slipped it in with update patch notes)File ShareInfectionOddballAssaultSnipersBig Team BattleSorry to say, but there isn't much green there. And this is just what 343 has added to the game. This isn't even going into the limited custom game options, the rudimentary forging options, and all the gamemodes 343 has decided to leave out as of now.Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. How about you read the fucking point. It takes time to get all that into games. There is an abundance of new weapons and armor. There are new maps. Snipers and Theatre were both in from the start. You obviously are complaining for the sake of complaining. You don't understand how a game is made nor how content releasing works. Kys.Are you a 343i spokesperson or something.No, I just care about the game franchise and I am willing to make points to defend it where it deserves to be defended. I think there is a large amount of bs in Halo 5, but I am also gonna defend what 343 has done right. It's this cool new thing called caring about your investments and being a logical human being. Reskining old content is not New content...>Being this stupid You shouldn't be so hard on yourself.This nigga must play Destiny cause he is desperate for his Last Word to drop. That must be the cause of your salt... if you're good enough, you'l get it someday.
Most of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMMost of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it? Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and more playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.
Quote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 04:31:36 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMMost of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it? Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.It was never cut up, my god.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMMost of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it? Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.
Every game has a release schedule made by both the devs and publishers. So to account for the time they had, they put in all core features to keep a fun game for the time needed and added in the features they couldn't get in
for launch for free.
There was never any cut content or features.
The only thing that has come out about the game is that there might have been some major story changes late in the game.
It was never cut up, my god. Halo 5 was not rushed.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 02:27:06 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 04:31:36 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMMost of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it? Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.It was never cut up, my god.Then what's the appropriate word to use for the way it launched? 343 still had to cut the game into pieces for its launch and what is being released after.QuoteEvery game has a release schedule made by both the devs and publishers. So to account for the time they had, they put in all core features to keep a fun game for the time needed and added in the features they couldn't get inLike I said above Bungie managed to launch Halo 2 with more playlists and game modes than Halo 5 despite the game being rushed. Since Halo 5 was not rushed then there's no good reason at all other than stupidity for the way it launched. It's pathetic that Halo 2 which basically got scrapped near launch ended up launching with more content than what Halo 5 did. Quotefor launch for free.It sure is nice of them to not charge us for content which has been included in the other games which they launched with. QuoteThere was never any cut content or features.If there was never cut content then why was grifball recently added as a game type and we're soon to get the infection game type? I it wasn't cut then it would have been already in the game since release. For features we ended up getting forge some months after the game came out. We're hardly getting new content, we're getting content over a period of months which already has been made for previous Halo's. QuoteThe only thing that has come out about the game is that there might have been some major story changes late in the game.Just like Halo 2 which had a far better launch content wise.
Quote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 07:20:43 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 02:27:06 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 04:31:36 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMMost of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it? Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.It was never cut up, my god.Then what's the appropriate word to use for the way it launched? 343 still had to cut the game into pieces for its launch and what is being released after.QuoteEvery game has a release schedule made by both the devs and publishers. So to account for the time they had, they put in all core features to keep a fun game for the time needed and added in the features they couldn't get inLike I said above Bungie managed to launch Halo 2 with more playlists and game modes than Halo 5 despite the game being rushed. Since Halo 5 was not rushed then there's no good reason at all other than stupidity for the way it launched. It's pathetic that Halo 2 which basically got scrapped near launch ended up launching with more content than what Halo 5 did. Quotefor launch for free.It sure is nice of them to not charge us for content which has been included in the other games which they launched with. QuoteThere was never any cut content or features.If there was never cut content then why was grifball recently added as a game type and we're soon to get the infection game type? I it wasn't cut then it would have been already in the game since release. For features we ended up getting forge some months after the game came out. We're hardly getting new content, we're getting content over a period of months which already has been made for previous Halo's. QuoteThe only thing that has come out about the game is that there might have been some major story changes late in the game.Just like Halo 2 which had a far better launch content wise.How about you show any proof for you claims, like, at all?
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 07:43:46 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 07:20:43 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 02:27:06 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 04:31:36 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMMost of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it? Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.It was never cut up, my god.Then what's the appropriate word to use for the way it launched? 343 still had to cut the game into pieces for its launch and what is being released after.QuoteEvery game has a release schedule made by both the devs and publishers. So to account for the time they had, they put in all core features to keep a fun game for the time needed and added in the features they couldn't get inLike I said above Bungie managed to launch Halo 2 with more playlists and game modes than Halo 5 despite the game being rushed. Since Halo 5 was not rushed then there's no good reason at all other than stupidity for the way it launched. It's pathetic that Halo 2 which basically got scrapped near launch ended up launching with more content than what Halo 5 did. Quotefor launch for free.It sure is nice of them to not charge us for content which has been included in the other games which they launched with. QuoteThere was never any cut content or features.If there was never cut content then why was grifball recently added as a game type and we're soon to get the infection game type? I it wasn't cut then it would have been already in the game since release. For features we ended up getting forge some months after the game came out. We're hardly getting new content, we're getting content over a period of months which already has been made for previous Halo's. QuoteThe only thing that has come out about the game is that there might have been some major story changes late in the game.Just like Halo 2 which had a far better launch content wise.How about you show any proof for you claims, like, at all?What do I need proof of to back up my claims?
Quote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 07:46:59 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 07:43:46 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 07:20:43 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 02:27:06 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 04:31:36 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMMost of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it? Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.It was never cut up, my god.Then what's the appropriate word to use for the way it launched? 343 still had to cut the game into pieces for its launch and what is being released after.QuoteEvery game has a release schedule made by both the devs and publishers. So to account for the time they had, they put in all core features to keep a fun game for the time needed and added in the features they couldn't get inLike I said above Bungie managed to launch Halo 2 with more playlists and game modes than Halo 5 despite the game being rushed. Since Halo 5 was not rushed then there's no good reason at all other than stupidity for the way it launched. It's pathetic that Halo 2 which basically got scrapped near launch ended up launching with more content than what Halo 5 did. Quotefor launch for free.It sure is nice of them to not charge us for content which has been included in the other games which they launched with. QuoteThere was never any cut content or features.If there was never cut content then why was grifball recently added as a game type and we're soon to get the infection game type? I it wasn't cut then it would have been already in the game since release. For features we ended up getting forge some months after the game came out. We're hardly getting new content, we're getting content over a period of months which already has been made for previous Halo's. QuoteThe only thing that has come out about the game is that there might have been some major story changes late in the game.Just like Halo 2 which had a far better launch content wise.How about you show any proof for you claims, like, at all?What do I need proof of to back up my claims?That any content was cut from the game? The furthest you could go is Forge and even then it was told from before launch and given a date of release. Nothing was cut, because it wasn't fucking made you fucking idiot.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 07:52:08 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 07:46:59 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 07:43:46 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 07:20:43 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 02:27:06 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 04:31:36 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMMost of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it? Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.It was never cut up, my god.Then what's the appropriate word to use for the way it launched? 343 still had to cut the game into pieces for its launch and what is being released after.QuoteEvery game has a release schedule made by both the devs and publishers. So to account for the time they had, they put in all core features to keep a fun game for the time needed and added in the features they couldn't get inLike I said above Bungie managed to launch Halo 2 with more playlists and game modes than Halo 5 despite the game being rushed. Since Halo 5 was not rushed then there's no good reason at all other than stupidity for the way it launched. It's pathetic that Halo 2 which basically got scrapped near launch ended up launching with more content than what Halo 5 did. Quotefor launch for free.It sure is nice of them to not charge us for content which has been included in the other games which they launched with. QuoteThere was never any cut content or features.If there was never cut content then why was grifball recently added as a game type and we're soon to get the infection game type? I it wasn't cut then it would have been already in the game since release. For features we ended up getting forge some months after the game came out. We're hardly getting new content, we're getting content over a period of months which already has been made for previous Halo's. QuoteThe only thing that has come out about the game is that there might have been some major story changes late in the game.Just like Halo 2 which had a far better launch content wise.How about you show any proof for you claims, like, at all?What do I need proof of to back up my claims?That any content was cut from the game? The furthest you could go is Forge and even then it was told from before launch and given a date of release. Nothing was cut, because it wasn't fucking made you fucking idiot.Maybe cut is the wrong wording then.343 Industries launched a game that was missing key core gametypes and features unique and special to the Halo franchise. Instead of giving worthwhile DLC, they instead "sell" these key core gametypes and features to us as "Free DLC", instead of a normal DLC line we would see and expect from a regular Halo game. Instead of giving a full package that the fans expected up front, we are being given the game a piece at a time.Does that make sense to you now?
Quote from: Dapper Droid on April 26, 2016, 07:57:01 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 07:52:08 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 07:46:59 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 07:43:46 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 07:20:43 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 02:27:06 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 04:31:36 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMMost of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it? Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.It was never cut up, my god.Then what's the appropriate word to use for the way it launched? 343 still had to cut the game into pieces for its launch and what is being released after.QuoteEvery game has a release schedule made by both the devs and publishers. So to account for the time they had, they put in all core features to keep a fun game for the time needed and added in the features they couldn't get inLike I said above Bungie managed to launch Halo 2 with more playlists and game modes than Halo 5 despite the game being rushed. Since Halo 5 was not rushed then there's no good reason at all other than stupidity for the way it launched. It's pathetic that Halo 2 which basically got scrapped near launch ended up launching with more content than what Halo 5 did. Quotefor launch for free.It sure is nice of them to not charge us for content which has been included in the other games which they launched with. QuoteThere was never any cut content or features.If there was never cut content then why was grifball recently added as a game type and we're soon to get the infection game type? I it wasn't cut then it would have been already in the game since release. For features we ended up getting forge some months after the game came out. We're hardly getting new content, we're getting content over a period of months which already has been made for previous Halo's. QuoteThe only thing that has come out about the game is that there might have been some major story changes late in the game.Just like Halo 2 which had a far better launch content wise.How about you show any proof for you claims, like, at all?What do I need proof of to back up my claims?That any content was cut from the game? The furthest you could go is Forge and even then it was told from before launch and given a date of release. Nothing was cut, because it wasn't fucking made you fucking idiot.Maybe cut is the wrong wording then.343 Industries launched a game that was missing key core gametypes and features unique and special to the Halo franchise. Instead of giving worthwhile DLC, they instead "sell" these key core gametypes and features to us as "Free DLC", instead of a normal DLC line we would see and expect from a regular Halo game. Instead of giving a full package that the fans expected up front, we are being given the game a piece at a time.Does that make sense to you now?In that case. REFER TO THE FIRST POINT I MADE ON THIS TOPIC =
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 08:03:48 PMQuote from: Dapper Droid on April 26, 2016, 07:57:01 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 07:52:08 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 07:46:59 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 07:43:46 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 07:20:43 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 02:27:06 PMQuote from: Little Willie on April 26, 2016, 04:31:36 AMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 24, 2016, 11:42:27 PMMost of those are new content? It's not like you can just reskin all the shit from past games idiot. What was 343's reason for releasing Halo 5 which was cut up worse than a Michael Myers victim when Bungie manged to release Halo 3 on a new system without butchering it? Even Halo 2 managed to launch with all the game types and playlists than Halo 5 despite how rushed it was.It was never cut up, my god.Then what's the appropriate word to use for the way it launched? 343 still had to cut the game into pieces for its launch and what is being released after.QuoteEvery game has a release schedule made by both the devs and publishers. So to account for the time they had, they put in all core features to keep a fun game for the time needed and added in the features they couldn't get inLike I said above Bungie managed to launch Halo 2 with more playlists and game modes than Halo 5 despite the game being rushed. Since Halo 5 was not rushed then there's no good reason at all other than stupidity for the way it launched. It's pathetic that Halo 2 which basically got scrapped near launch ended up launching with more content than what Halo 5 did. Quotefor launch for free.It sure is nice of them to not charge us for content which has been included in the other games which they launched with. QuoteThere was never any cut content or features.If there was never cut content then why was grifball recently added as a game type and we're soon to get the infection game type? I it wasn't cut then it would have been already in the game since release. For features we ended up getting forge some months after the game came out. We're hardly getting new content, we're getting content over a period of months which already has been made for previous Halo's. QuoteThe only thing that has come out about the game is that there might have been some major story changes late in the game.Just like Halo 2 which had a far better launch content wise.How about you show any proof for you claims, like, at all?What do I need proof of to back up my claims?That any content was cut from the game? The furthest you could go is Forge and even then it was told from before launch and given a date of release. Nothing was cut, because it wasn't fucking made you fucking idiot.Maybe cut is the wrong wording then.343 Industries launched a game that was missing key core gametypes and features unique and special to the Halo franchise. Instead of giving worthwhile DLC, they instead "sell" these key core gametypes and features to us as "Free DLC", instead of a normal DLC line we would see and expect from a regular Halo game. Instead of giving a full package that the fans expected up front, we are being given the game a piece at a time.Does that make sense to you now?In that case. REFER TO THE FIRST POINT I MADE ON THIS TOPIC =Woah, calm down there bucko.Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.Your first point is based upon the thought that if the game had been delayed that it still would've taken the same amount of time to develop the content. That is just blatantly false. The "DLC" we receive is not given to us as soon as it is finished. It is given out at certain periods of time to ensure that the game tries to keep a stable population, so they can milk those REQ packs as long as possible. For example, the Halo CE pistol. We saw evidence of that as early as the first half of 2015, yet we didn't even receive the DLC "pack" it was in until February of 2016. That DLC pack contained grifball, a new map, a pelican in Forge, and weapon and armor skins. Using this data, we can assume that as of right now, 343 has all the DLC completed and is just testing between now and the set release date by Microsoft.Unless 343 Industries are so incompetent that they require 9 months to develop 2 weapons from previous games, a pelican model, 1 map, and some skins, a delayed Halo 5 would've only set the game back to March of 2016. But, that's counting ALL content, while the only thing we're complaining about is content that was in previous Halo games, but not in this one.So, if we're just talking about gametypes and Forge here, then the game would probably only need to be delayed until mid January at the ABSOLUTE LATEST. If this had happened, Halo 5 would be more in line with previous Halo games, have better player retention, have a larger custom game community, and just overall greater support for the game and not having the fans feel cheated or ripped off.
You are still giving no proof at fucking all. You are just annoying me at this point. If you aren't gonna give any proof then just shut up dude.
From what I hear, 343 takes so long to come out with the gametypes because they've have a tough time with the engine, this includes Race in Halo 4.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 26, 2016, 08:34:33 PMYou are still giving no proof at fucking all. You are just annoying me at this point. If you aren't gonna give any proof then just shut up dude.Proof of what? It's using common sense.
Taken King didn't have a raid at launch :^) (that and Kings Fall is boring as fuck)
Quote from: SpartanT on April 27, 2016, 04:48:36 AMTaken King didn't have a raid at launch :^) (that and Kings Fall is boring as fuck)Vanilla didn't have one either. VoG took what? a moth to come out?
halo 5 now ha sa file browser
