F..forgers come back
343 steps back
I don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.Hardly finished, the last Bungie Halo game launched with Forge and File Browser. And BTB, Nice to see Halo 5 just catching up now. fyi Reach launched in 2010.
Quote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:06:24 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.Hardly finished, the last Bungie Halo game launched with Forge and File Browser. And BTB, Nice to see Halo 5 just catching up now. fyi Reach launched in 2010.It was a full game that launched with everything promised. It was finished whether or not you think there was a small amount of content. My argument still works either way.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 06:20:00 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:06:24 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.Hardly finished, the last Bungie Halo game launched with Forge and File Browser. And BTB, Nice to see Halo 5 just catching up now. fyi Reach launched in 2010.It was a full game that launched with everything promised. It was finished whether or not you think there was a small amount of content. My argument still works either way.So you're accepting it has less content than previous games?It certainly did not meet the Halo standard.
Quote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:46:49 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 06:20:00 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:06:24 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.Hardly finished, the last Bungie Halo game launched with Forge and File Browser. And BTB, Nice to see Halo 5 just catching up now. fyi Reach launched in 2010.It was a full game that launched with everything promised. It was finished whether or not you think there was a small amount of content. My argument still works either way.So you're accepting it has less content than previous games?It certainly did not meet the Halo standard.On launch it did. Again, look at my fucking point. My god.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 07:26:56 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:46:49 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 06:20:00 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:06:24 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.Hardly finished, the last Bungie Halo game launched with Forge and File Browser. And BTB, Nice to see Halo 5 just catching up now. fyi Reach launched in 2010.It was a full game that launched with everything promised. It was finished whether or not you think there was a small amount of content. My argument still works either way.So you're accepting it has less content than previous games?It certainly did not meet the Halo standard.On launch it did. Again, look at my fucking point. My god.I'm obviously talking about the lacking Launch... 343 just need to git gud.
Quote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 07:33:24 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 07:26:56 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:46:49 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 06:20:00 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:06:24 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.Hardly finished, the last Bungie Halo game launched with Forge and File Browser. And BTB, Nice to see Halo 5 just catching up now. fyi Reach launched in 2010.It was a full game that launched with everything promised. It was finished whether or not you think there was a small amount of content. My argument still works either way.So you're accepting it has less content than previous games?It certainly did not meet the Halo standard.On launch it did. Again, look at my fucking point. My god.I'm obviously talking about the lacking Launch... 343 just need to git gud.Again, read my fucking point. My god.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 08:01:07 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 07:33:24 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 07:26:56 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:46:49 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 06:20:00 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:06:24 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.Hardly finished, the last Bungie Halo game launched with Forge and File Browser. And BTB, Nice to see Halo 5 just catching up now. fyi Reach launched in 2010.It was a full game that launched with everything promised. It was finished whether or not you think there was a small amount of content. My argument still works either way.So you're accepting it has less content than previous games?It certainly did not meet the Halo standard.On launch it did. Again, look at my fucking point. My god.I'm obviously talking about the lacking Launch... 343 just need to git gud.Again, read my fucking point. My god.You're not getting the Last Word.
Quote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 08:22:37 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 08:01:07 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 07:33:24 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 07:26:56 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:46:49 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 06:20:00 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:06:24 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.Hardly finished, the last Bungie Halo game launched with Forge and File Browser. And BTB, Nice to see Halo 5 just catching up now. fyi Reach launched in 2010.It was a full game that launched with everything promised. It was finished whether or not you think there was a small amount of content. My argument still works either way.So you're accepting it has less content than previous games?It certainly did not meet the Halo standard.On launch it did. Again, look at my fucking point. My god.I'm obviously talking about the lacking Launch... 343 just need to git gud.Again, read my fucking point. My god.You're not getting the Last Word.Because I am!
Quote from: Little Willie on April 21, 2016, 08:33:16 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 08:22:37 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 08:01:07 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 07:33:24 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 07:26:56 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:46:49 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 06:20:00 PMQuote from: Tsukuyomi Blade on April 21, 2016, 06:06:24 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 21, 2016, 05:24:45 PMI don't get the "delay the game" argument with Halo 5. The game was finished. It had enough content to ship and all other content is being released for free over time. It was still gonna take the same amount of time to finish other content either way so why not just give the game to people anyway since it was ready? I really don't get how delaying a finished game would have changed anything. We get the same amount of content either way, but in this situation we get the content sooner rather than later.Hardly finished, the last Bungie Halo game launched with Forge and File Browser. And BTB, Nice to see Halo 5 just catching up now. fyi Reach launched in 2010.It was a full game that launched with everything promised. It was finished whether or not you think there was a small amount of content. My argument still works either way.So you're accepting it has less content than previous games?It certainly did not meet the Halo standard.On launch it did. Again, look at my fucking point. My god.I'm obviously talking about the lacking Launch... 343 just need to git gud.Again, read my fucking point. My god.You're not getting the Last Word.Because I am!I'l continue this forever!
Quote from: ChaosMetalDragon on April 21, 2016, 05:18:47 PMQuote from: True Turquoise on April 21, 2016, 04:56:43 PMF..forgers come backThey never left. In fact there's still a massive shitstorm going on regarding the community cartographerswhich wouldn't of been a problem if there was a file browser from the start
Quote from: True Turquoise on April 21, 2016, 04:56:43 PMF..forgers come backThey never left. In fact there's still a massive shitstorm going on regarding the community cartographers
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 04:34:21 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:25:46 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon on April 21, 2016, 05:18:47 PMQuote from: True Turquoise on April 21, 2016, 04:56:43 PMF..forgers come backThey never left. In fact there's still a massive shitstorm going on regarding the community cartographerswhich wouldn't of been a problem if there was a file browser from the startIt has been a problem since Reach.the entire community didn't need to rely on bungie and youtube to find maps because we had the file browser with tags to show what was most popular and what matched the search terms you put in
Quote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:25:46 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon on April 21, 2016, 05:18:47 PMQuote from: True Turquoise on April 21, 2016, 04:56:43 PMF..forgers come backThey never left. In fact there's still a massive shitstorm going on regarding the community cartographerswhich wouldn't of been a problem if there was a file browser from the startIt has been a problem since Reach.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 04:43:10 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:39:10 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 04:34:21 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:25:46 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon on April 21, 2016, 05:18:47 PMQuote from: True Turquoise on April 21, 2016, 04:56:43 PMF..forgers come backThey never left. In fact there's still a massive shitstorm going on regarding the community cartographerswhich wouldn't of been a problem if there was a file browser from the startIt has been a problem since Reach.the entire community didn't need to rely on bungie and youtube to find maps because we had the file browser with tags to show what was most popular and what matched the search terms you put inThat has nothing to do with the CC issue.I'm talking about forgers not relying on the cartographers to get shit out there to the community. Maps and gametypes used to spread around organically with the built in file broswer.
Quote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:39:10 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 04:34:21 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:25:46 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon on April 21, 2016, 05:18:47 PMQuote from: True Turquoise on April 21, 2016, 04:56:43 PMF..forgers come backThey never left. In fact there's still a massive shitstorm going on regarding the community cartographerswhich wouldn't of been a problem if there was a file browser from the startIt has been a problem since Reach.the entire community didn't need to rely on bungie and youtube to find maps because we had the file browser with tags to show what was most popular and what matched the search terms you put inThat has nothing to do with the CC issue.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 05:12:54 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:48:45 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 04:43:10 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:39:10 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 04:34:21 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:25:46 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon on April 21, 2016, 05:18:47 PMQuote from: True Turquoise on April 21, 2016, 04:56:43 PMF..forgers come backThey never left. In fact there's still a massive shitstorm going on regarding the community cartographerswhich wouldn't of been a problem if there was a file browser from the startIt has been a problem since Reach.the entire community didn't need to rely on bungie and youtube to find maps because we had the file browser with tags to show what was most popular and what matched the search terms you put inThat has nothing to do with the CC issue.I'm talking about forgers not relying on the cartographers to get shit out there to the community. Maps and gametypes used to spread around organically with the built in file broswer.Dude. Reach had the exact same problem. The CC issue has nothing to do with fileshare systems.okay but that's not what I'm talking aboutI'm talking about how not having a file browser cripples both forgers and the player
Quote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:48:45 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 04:43:10 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:39:10 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 04:34:21 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:25:46 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon on April 21, 2016, 05:18:47 PMQuote from: True Turquoise on April 21, 2016, 04:56:43 PMF..forgers come backThey never left. In fact there's still a massive shitstorm going on regarding the community cartographerswhich wouldn't of been a problem if there was a file browser from the startIt has been a problem since Reach.the entire community didn't need to rely on bungie and youtube to find maps because we had the file browser with tags to show what was most popular and what matched the search terms you put inThat has nothing to do with the CC issue.I'm talking about forgers not relying on the cartographers to get shit out there to the community. Maps and gametypes used to spread around organically with the built in file broswer.Dude. Reach had the exact same problem. The CC issue has nothing to do with fileshare systems.
Quote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 08:59:12 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 05:16:38 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 05:12:54 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:48:45 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 04:43:10 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:39:10 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 04:34:21 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:25:46 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon on April 21, 2016, 05:18:47 PMQuote from: True Turquoise on April 21, 2016, 04:56:43 PMF..forgers come backThey never left. In fact there's still a massive shitstorm going on regarding the community cartographerswhich wouldn't of been a problem if there was a file browser from the startIt has been a problem since Reach.the entire community didn't need to rely on bungie and youtube to find maps because we had the file browser with tags to show what was most popular and what matched the search terms you put inThat has nothing to do with the CC issue.I'm talking about forgers not relying on the cartographers to get shit out there to the community. Maps and gametypes used to spread around organically with the built in file broswer.Dude. Reach had the exact same problem. The CC issue has nothing to do with fileshare systems.okay but that's not what I'm talking aboutI'm talking about how not having a file browser cripples both forgers and the playerThat has nothing to do with CC.dude shut the fuck up
Quote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 05:16:38 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 05:12:54 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:48:45 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 04:43:10 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:39:10 PMQuote from: Mr Whiteflame on April 22, 2016, 04:34:21 PMQuote from: Varg on April 22, 2016, 04:25:46 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon on April 21, 2016, 05:18:47 PMQuote from: True Turquoise on April 21, 2016, 04:56:43 PMF..forgers come backThey never left. In fact there's still a massive shitstorm going on regarding the community cartographerswhich wouldn't of been a problem if there was a file browser from the startIt has been a problem since Reach.the entire community didn't need to rely on bungie and youtube to find maps because we had the file browser with tags to show what was most popular and what matched the search terms you put inThat has nothing to do with the CC issue.I'm talking about forgers not relying on the cartographers to get shit out there to the community. Maps and gametypes used to spread around organically with the built in file broswer.Dude. Reach had the exact same problem. The CC issue has nothing to do with fileshare systems.okay but that's not what I'm talking aboutI'm talking about how not having a file browser cripples both forgers and the playerThat has nothing to do with CC.
halo 5 now ha sa file browser
