So the reason why the Covenant remnant's armor and equipment looks different now is because they're surplus. If that is the case then why aren't we seeing any Covies wearing armor from Halo's Reach, 1, 2 and 3 which are using equipment from those games as well? Wouldn't left over equipment from Halo 3 be far more numerous since they were made more recently than the equipment the Covies are using now? If I walk into a surplus store I'm going to find more equipment from a war like Vietnam than WW2 due to Nam being more recent. The same thing should be applying for Halo 4 and 5.
Holy shit why does 343 insist on the carry frigates inside a bigger ship memeSPACE IS A VACCUUMTHEY DON'T NEED TO BE ON THE INSIDEALL THAT MEANS IS THEY TAKE AGES TO DEPLOY WHEN YOU GET IN A FIGHT FOR NO GOOD REASON INSTEAD OF CONTRIBUTING TO DEFENSE BY STICKING IN THE FLEETJesus christ I fuckinh hate everything Infinity stands far. It fails to do anything well from a logical standpoint and has no fucking reason to exist. REEEEEEEEEEEE
Quote from: BaconShelf on August 30, 2017, 05:06:14 AMHoly shit why does 343 insist on the carry frigates inside a bigger ship memeSPACE IS A VACCUUMTHEY DON'T NEED TO BE ON THE INSIDEALL THAT MEANS IS THEY TAKE AGES TO DEPLOY WHEN YOU GET IN A FIGHT FOR NO GOOD REASON INSTEAD OF CONTRIBUTING TO DEFENSE BY STICKING IN THE FLEETJesus christ I fuckinh hate everything Infinity stands far. It fails to do anything well from a logical standpoint and has no fucking reason to exist. REEEEEEEEEEEEBUNGiE was doing this already with Covenant Supercarriers, which is what Infinity is anyway. It also operates in atmosphere as we've seen multiple times. If they were on the outside they'd be more suceptable to attacks and in the case of Halo 4 when the ship crashed, they and nonevent onboard would have been turned to pankakes.
Quote from: Chaos Metal Dragon on August 30, 2017, 07:45:26 AMQuote from: BaconShelf on August 30, 2017, 05:06:14 AMHoly shit why does 343 insist on the carry frigates inside a bigger ship memeSPACE IS A VACCUUMTHEY DON'T NEED TO BE ON THE INSIDEALL THAT MEANS IS THEY TAKE AGES TO DEPLOY WHEN YOU GET IN A FIGHT FOR NO GOOD REASON INSTEAD OF CONTRIBUTING TO DEFENSE BY STICKING IN THE FLEETJesus christ I fuckinh hate everything Infinity stands far. It fails to do anything well from a logical standpoint and has no fucking reason to exist. REEEEEEEEEEEEBUNGiE was doing this already with Covenant Supercarriers, which is what Infinity is anyway. It also operates in atmosphere as we've seen multiple times. If they were on the outside they'd be more suceptable to attacks and in the case of Halo 4 when the ship crashed, they and nonevent onboard would have been turned to pankakes.The CSO is also ridiculously stupid.That aside, your argument is stupid. If they were attached via docking clamps on the outside you'd just need to sever the connection by quickly disconnecting it. Even then, that's such a ridiculously specific scenario that would never happen in normal circumstances that it's still a bullshit explanation.
Quote from: BaconShelf on August 30, 2017, 05:06:14 AMJesus christ I fuckinh hate everything Infinity stands far. It fails to do anything well from a logical standpoint and has no fucking reason to exist. REEEEEEEEEEEEWe've also gone from cool and unique names like The Pillar of Autumn, In Amber Clad, etc. to basic shit like Infinity
Jesus christ I fuckinh hate everything Infinity stands far. It fails to do anything well from a logical standpoint and has no fucking reason to exist. REEEEEEEEEEEE
rise of decimus when
Jono.jpeg
Quote from: BaconShelf on August 30, 2017, 09:30:06 AMQuote from: Chaos Metal Dragon on August 30, 2017, 07:45:26 AMQuote from: BaconShelf on August 30, 2017, 05:06:14 AMHoly shit why does 343 insist on the carry frigates inside a bigger ship memeSPACE IS A VACCUUMTHEY DON'T NEED TO BE ON THE INSIDEALL THAT MEANS IS THEY TAKE AGES TO DEPLOY WHEN YOU GET IN A FIGHT FOR NO GOOD REASON INSTEAD OF CONTRIBUTING TO DEFENSE BY STICKING IN THE FLEETJesus christ I fuckinh hate everything Infinity stands far. It fails to do anything well from a logical standpoint and has no fucking reason to exist. REEEEEEEEEEEEBUNGiE was doing this already with Covenant Supercarriers, which is what Infinity is anyway. It also operates in atmosphere as we've seen multiple times. If they were on the outside they'd be more suceptable to attacks and in the case of Halo 4 when the ship crashed, they and nonevent onboard would have been turned to pankakes.The CSO is also ridiculously stupid.That aside, your argument is stupid. If they were attached via docking clamps on the outside you'd just need to sever the connection by quickly disconnecting it. Even then, that's such a ridiculously specific scenario that would never happen in normal circumstances that it's still a bullshit explanation.But how would they get the crew effeiciently into an external ship in case of an emergency?
Quote from: BaconShelf on August 30, 2017, 09:30:06 AMQuote from: Chaos Metal Dragon on August 30, 2017, 07:45:26 AMQuote from: BaconShelf on August 30, 2017, 05:06:14 AMHoly shit why does 343 insist on the carry frigates inside a bigger ship memeSPACE IS A VACCUUMTHEY DON'T NEED TO BE ON THE INSIDEALL THAT MEANS IS THEY TAKE AGES TO DEPLOY WHEN YOU GET IN A FIGHT FOR NO GOOD REASON INSTEAD OF CONTRIBUTING TO DEFENSE BY STICKING IN THE FLEETJesus christ I fuckinh hate everything Infinity stands far. It fails to do anything well from a logical standpoint and has no fucking reason to exist. REEEEEEEEEEEEBUNGiE was doing this already with Covenant Supercarriers, which is what Infinity is anyway. It also operates in atmosphere as we've seen multiple times. If they were on the outside they'd be more suceptable to attacks and in the case of Halo 4 when the ship crashed, they and nonevent onboard would have been turned to pankakes.The CSO is also ridiculously stupid.That aside, your argument is stupid. If they were attached via docking clamps on the outside you'd just need to sever the connection by quickly disconnecting it. Even then, that's such a ridiculously specific scenario that would never happen in normal circumstances that it's still a bullshit explanation.I don't know or care much about any of this, but it seems to make sense. Big ship with big defenses can take a big beating. Smaller ships on the inside remain safe in the event of an attack until crew can board and get ready. Having them on the outside seems like it would make them highly vulnerable to missiles or bombing runs, as well as much more difficult and risky to board efficiently.
the other day my friends and i were talking bout once halo 3 is backwards compat, we might go back and get a higher rank, i was a major and my friend was a brigadier 2so, are you guys gonna play any of the BC halos again? do you guys remember what rank you were in h3?
After replying the 343 level I realized that the video recording of the Marine group getting wiped out by the Flood is based off of the Marine group in Aliens. Both groups make their way through an empty structure and they reach their goal area which becomes their undoing
Is this Mr. Admirals Reddit account? https://www.reddit.com/r/halo/comments/5ofeix/why_does_the_halo_community_hate_halo_so_much/?st=j76fdbbg&sh=2f5fb3e8
woo i love having useless teammateswhenever my friend n I play, i tend to say it's really just the two of us, we easily coulda won that game
Quote from: Alphy on September 05, 2017, 01:41:51 AMwoo i love having useless teammateswhenever my friend n I play, i tend to say it's really just the two of us, we easily coulda won that gameOh you don't understand useless teammates until you play with me on Amateur Chieftain Memorabilia Spoiler
Quote from: Chaos Metal Dragon on September 06, 2017, 07:11:50 PMI liked how the whole point of the Cortana rampancy story arc in 4 was all for nothing. But 343 are good story tellers, after all, that's what the apologists say.
Quote from: Boomdeyadah on September 07, 2017, 02:59:50 AMQuote from: Chaos Metal Dragon on September 06, 2017, 07:11:50 PMI liked how the whole point of the Cortana rampancy story arc in 4 was all for nothing. But 343 are good story tellers, after all, that's what the apologists say.Don't forget about John being more of a character rather than him being a walking brick like what he was in Bungie's Halo's. Every story aspect of Halo 4 ended up being for nothing due to the way 343 handled the story after that game. The Didact was killed off in a comic and he wasn't mentioned once in Halo 5 nor was the composer, the Halo ring we seen in Halo 4 was nothing more than a background image, the guy we played as in Spartan OPS was supposed to be on Locke's generic and boring team which didn't happen and the elite villain from Spartan OPS ended up being killed off withing the start of Halo 5. Halo 4 may as well be fan fiction due to every story aspect of it being forgotten or changed and Halo 5 being the start of this so called trilogy. For some odd reason 343 basically rebooted the trilogy with Halo 5 and it shows badly. You could literally remove Halo 4 from the trilogy and nothing would change due to how pointless that game is now story wise.