Quote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:25:07 PMQuote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:14:02 PMBravo is always on /r/Halo, and he assures people that literally everything on that subreddit is read thoroughly, and they know what people are saying. I don't doubt that, because Bravo's a really good community manager, but I doubt 343 higher-ups actually listen to what he tells them. "Okay Bravo, what's the feedback on the game?""Well, everyone says the core gameplay is really good. But they're disappointed with the lack of customs game options, gamemodes, map variety, and social playlists." "Mmmm, okay. But we know better than them, so let's just keep doing what we're doing. We are the game designers, after all!""B-But the community says-""FUCK THE COMMUNITY. THE PEOPLE WANT REMIXES AND BREAKOUT."Or, we can take the more logical route and realize these content updates have schedules that have been planned out, and they can't fuck over the schedules of nearly finished Content Updates to rush out what the community wants.Or, 343 could have released a finished product in the first place with a substantial amount of content in it, rather than rushing it for muh Q4 release and then re-adding removed features (that should be standard) under the guise of free updates.
Quote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:14:02 PMBravo is always on /r/Halo, and he assures people that literally everything on that subreddit is read thoroughly, and they know what people are saying. I don't doubt that, because Bravo's a really good community manager, but I doubt 343 higher-ups actually listen to what he tells them. "Okay Bravo, what's the feedback on the game?""Well, everyone says the core gameplay is really good. But they're disappointed with the lack of customs game options, gamemodes, map variety, and social playlists." "Mmmm, okay. But we know better than them, so let's just keep doing what we're doing. We are the game designers, after all!""B-But the community says-""FUCK THE COMMUNITY. THE PEOPLE WANT REMIXES AND BREAKOUT."Or, we can take the more logical route and realize these content updates have schedules that have been planned out, and they can't fuck over the schedules of nearly finished Content Updates to rush out what the community wants.
Bravo is always on /r/Halo, and he assures people that literally everything on that subreddit is read thoroughly, and they know what people are saying. I don't doubt that, because Bravo's a really good community manager, but I doubt 343 higher-ups actually listen to what he tells them. "Okay Bravo, what's the feedback on the game?""Well, everyone says the core gameplay is really good. But they're disappointed with the lack of customs game options, gamemodes, map variety, and social playlists." "Mmmm, okay. But we know better than them, so let's just keep doing what we're doing. We are the game designers, after all!""B-But the community says-""FUCK THE COMMUNITY. THE PEOPLE WANT REMIXES AND BREAKOUT."
Dude, they implemented a "FInd a Player" function months ago so you can access the file share of anyone you want.
Or, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.
Quote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:22:37 PMDude, they implemented a "FInd a Player" function months ago so you can access the file share of anyone you want.Which is still vastly subpar to the systems of old.
Quote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:39:37 PMOr, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.Scenario 1: What you're saying is false:Then 343 rushed the game. Scenario 2: What you're saying is true. Then they are fucking idiots.
Quote from: Fagcicle on December 04, 2015, 12:39:39 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:22:37 PMDude, they implemented a "FInd a Player" function months ago so you can access the file share of anyone you want.Which is still vastly subpar to the systems of old.The File Browser system was mostly filled with shit content. If I wanted the good gametypes, I just searched for the player who had them through the File Browser, which is identical to what I'm doing when I use the Find a Player function.Besides, Bungie Favorites > File Browser.
Quote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 12:31:42 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:25:07 PMQuote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:14:02 PMBravo is always on /r/Halo, and he assures people that literally everything on that subreddit is read thoroughly, and they know what people are saying. I don't doubt that, because Bravo's a really good community manager, but I doubt 343 higher-ups actually listen to what he tells them. "Okay Bravo, what's the feedback on the game?""Well, everyone says the core gameplay is really good. But they're disappointed with the lack of customs game options, gamemodes, map variety, and social playlists." "Mmmm, okay. But we know better than them, so let's just keep doing what we're doing. We are the game designers, after all!""B-But the community says-""FUCK THE COMMUNITY. THE PEOPLE WANT REMIXES AND BREAKOUT."Or, we can take the more logical route and realize these content updates have schedules that have been planned out, and they can't fuck over the schedules of nearly finished Content Updates to rush out what the community wants.Or, 343 could have released a finished product in the first place with a substantial amount of content in it, rather than rushing it for muh Q4 release and then re-adding removed features (that should be standard) under the guise of free updates.Or, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.
Quote from: Fagcicle on December 04, 2015, 12:39:39 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:22:37 PMDude, they implemented a "FInd a Player" function months ago so you can access the file share of anyone you want.Which is still vastly subpar to the systems of old.The File Browser system was mostly filled with shit content.
Quote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:43:25 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:39:37 PMOr, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.Scenario 1: What you're saying is false:Then 343 rushed the game. Scenario 2: What you're saying is true. Then they are fucking idiots.Yes, because in the real world there are only two possible scenarios and if people don't cater to your every need, they are idiots.
Quote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:45:54 PMQuote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:43:25 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:39:37 PMOr, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.Scenario 1: What you're saying is false:Then 343 rushed the game. Scenario 2: What you're saying is true. Then they are fucking idiots.Yes, because in the real world there are only two possible scenarios and if people don't cater to your every need, they are idiots.You're not seriously suggesting they thought releasing a game with less content than destiny at launch was a 10/10 idea?When I buy a game, I expect a completed product at launch. Not six months later.
Quote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:45:54 PMQuote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:43:25 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:39:37 PMOr, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.Scenario 1: What you're saying is false:Then 343 rushed the game. Scenario 2: What you're saying is true. Then they are fucking idiots.Yes, because in the real world there are only two possible scenarios and if people don't cater to your every need, they are idiots.The extent of Halo 5's content is pathetic. Everybody knows it. Stop trying to defend 343. They bullshitted us by arguing that "Remixes" were total maps, and they had the fucking autism to say the same about Forge maps. They're stupid, stupid people.
Quote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:45:54 PMQuote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:43:25 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:39:37 PMOr, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.Scenario 1: What you're saying is false:Then 343 rushed the game. Scenario 2: What you're saying is true. Then they are fucking idiots.Yes, because in the real world there are only two possible scenarios and if people don't cater to your every need, they are idiots.You're not seriously suggesting they thought releasing a game with less content than destiny at launch was a 10/10 idea?When I buy a game, I expect a completed product at launch. Not six months later.Maybe you should've done research into the game before you bought it then? Not my fault or concern you're assmad.
Quote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:04:24 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:45:54 PMQuote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:43:25 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:39:37 PMOr, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.Scenario 1: What you're saying is false:Then 343 rushed the game. Scenario 2: What you're saying is true. Then they are fucking idiots.Yes, because in the real world there are only two possible scenarios and if people don't cater to your every need, they are idiots.You're not seriously suggesting they thought releasing a game with less content than destiny at launch was a 10/10 idea?When I buy a game, I expect a completed product at launch. Not six months later.Maybe you should've done research into the game before you bought it then? Not my fault or concern you're assmad.I guess it's my own fault for assuming 21 multiplayer maps means 21 individual maps. Or for thinking the game would have some incentive to play other than grinding for scout warthogs.
I see this is becoming heated >.>GG, don't make me bring in the hammer.
Quote from: Fagcicle on December 04, 2015, 01:19:15 PMI see this is becoming heated >.>GG, don't make me bring in the hammer.I've acquired a complete disregard in the rules as making this thread is causing me to remember why I stopped coming to this site.
Quote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:21:54 PMQuote from: Fagcicle on December 04, 2015, 01:19:15 PMI see this is becoming heated >.>GG, don't make me bring in the hammer.I've acquired a complete disregard in the rules as making this thread is causing me to remember why I stopped coming to this site.Differing opinions are lovely.Maybe take a stroll to Serious or Flood.
Quote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 01:18:28 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:04:24 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:45:54 PMQuote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:43:25 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:39:37 PMOr, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.Scenario 1: What you're saying is false:Then 343 rushed the game. Scenario 2: What you're saying is true. Then they are fucking idiots.Yes, because in the real world there are only two possible scenarios and if people don't cater to your every need, they are idiots.You're not seriously suggesting they thought releasing a game with less content than destiny at launch was a 10/10 idea?When I buy a game, I expect a completed product at launch. Not six months later.Maybe you should've done research into the game before you bought it then? Not my fault or concern you're assmad.I guess it's my own fault for assuming 21 multiplayer maps means 21 individual maps. Or for thinking the game would have some incentive to play other than grinding for scout warthogs.Well, yeah. After Halo 4, everyone seemed to vow to never again buy into Halo blindly. Well, here we are at Halo 5, and look what's happened.
Quote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:20:52 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 01:18:28 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:04:24 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:45:54 PMQuote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:43:25 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:39:37 PMOr, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.Scenario 1: What you're saying is false:Then 343 rushed the game. Scenario 2: What you're saying is true. Then they are fucking idiots.Yes, because in the real world there are only two possible scenarios and if people don't cater to your every need, they are idiots.You're not seriously suggesting they thought releasing a game with less content than destiny at launch was a 10/10 idea?When I buy a game, I expect a completed product at launch. Not six months later.Maybe you should've done research into the game before you bought it then? Not my fault or concern you're assmad.I guess it's my own fault for assuming 21 multiplayer maps means 21 individual maps. Or for thinking the game would have some incentive to play other than grinding for scout warthogs.Well, yeah. After Halo 4, everyone seemed to vow to never again buy into Halo blindly. Well, here we are at Halo 5, and look what's happened.I never did that, though. After halo 4, I thought 343 were a good studio. But I guess schlerf leaving and a new attitude to make the game only ranked has made 343 very different from the people who made 4.
Quote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 01:31:14 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:20:52 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 01:18:28 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:04:24 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:45:54 PMQuote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:43:25 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:39:37 PMOr, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.Scenario 1: What you're saying is false:Then 343 rushed the game. Scenario 2: What you're saying is true. Then they are fucking idiots.Yes, because in the real world there are only two possible scenarios and if people don't cater to your every need, they are idiots.You're not seriously suggesting they thought releasing a game with less content than destiny at launch was a 10/10 idea?When I buy a game, I expect a completed product at launch. Not six months later.Maybe you should've done research into the game before you bought it then? Not my fault or concern you're assmad.I guess it's my own fault for assuming 21 multiplayer maps means 21 individual maps. Or for thinking the game would have some incentive to play other than grinding for scout warthogs.Well, yeah. After Halo 4, everyone seemed to vow to never again buy into Halo blindly. Well, here we are at Halo 5, and look what's happened.I never did that, though. After halo 4, I thought 343 were a good studio. But I guess schlerf leaving and a new attitude to make the game only ranked has made 343 very different from the people who made 4.Throughout Halo 5's development in the past year, 343i's been continually stating that they never want Halo 4 to happen again.
Quote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:34:36 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 01:31:14 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:20:52 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 01:18:28 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:04:24 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:45:54 PMQuote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:43:25 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:39:37 PMOr, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.Scenario 1: What you're saying is false:Then 343 rushed the game. Scenario 2: What you're saying is true. Then they are fucking idiots.Yes, because in the real world there are only two possible scenarios and if people don't cater to your every need, they are idiots.You're not seriously suggesting they thought releasing a game with less content than destiny at launch was a 10/10 idea?When I buy a game, I expect a completed product at launch. Not six months later.Maybe you should've done research into the game before you bought it then? Not my fault or concern you're assmad.I guess it's my own fault for assuming 21 multiplayer maps means 21 individual maps. Or for thinking the game would have some incentive to play other than grinding for scout warthogs.Well, yeah. After Halo 4, everyone seemed to vow to never again buy into Halo blindly. Well, here we are at Halo 5, and look what's happened.I never did that, though. After halo 4, I thought 343 were a good studio. But I guess schlerf leaving and a new attitude to make the game only ranked has made 343 very different from the people who made 4.Throughout Halo 5's development in the past year, 343i's been continually stating that they never want Halo 4 to happen again.Good for them, they made even worse decisions with Halo 5 : )
Quote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 01:31:14 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:20:52 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 01:18:28 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:04:24 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:45:54 PMQuote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:43:25 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:39:37 PMOr, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.Scenario 1: What you're saying is false:Then 343 rushed the game. Scenario 2: What you're saying is true. Then they are fucking idiots.Yes, because in the real world there are only two possible scenarios and if people don't cater to your every need, they are idiots.You're not seriously suggesting they thought releasing a game with less content than destiny at launch was a 10/10 idea?When I buy a game, I expect a completed product at launch. Not six months later.Maybe you should've done research into the game before you bought it then? Not my fault or concern you're assmad.I guess it's my own fault for assuming 21 multiplayer maps means 21 individual maps. Or for thinking the game would have some incentive to play other than grinding for scout warthogs.Well, yeah. After Halo 4, everyone seemed to vow to never again buy into Halo blindly. Well, here we are at Halo 5, and look what's happened.I never did that, though. After halo 4, I thought 343 were a good studio. But I guess schlerf leaving and a new attitude to make the game only ranked has made 343 very different from the people who made 4.I mean Jeez as much of a disaster as the Master Chief Collection was at least they got the damn ranking system in terms of having competitive and social right in that game. What the hell made them them into such Nazis about ranks? When they added infection to MCC matchmaking they didn't rank it.
Quote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:34:36 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 01:31:14 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:20:52 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 01:18:28 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:04:24 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:45:54 PMQuote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:43:25 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:39:37 PMOr, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.Scenario 1: What you're saying is false:Then 343 rushed the game. Scenario 2: What you're saying is true. Then they are fucking idiots.Yes, because in the real world there are only two possible scenarios and if people don't cater to your every need, they are idiots.You're not seriously suggesting they thought releasing a game with less content than destiny at launch was a 10/10 idea?When I buy a game, I expect a completed product at launch. Not six months later.Maybe you should've done research into the game before you bought it then? Not my fault or concern you're assmad.I guess it's my own fault for assuming 21 multiplayer maps means 21 individual maps. Or for thinking the game would have some incentive to play other than grinding for scout warthogs.Well, yeah. After Halo 4, everyone seemed to vow to never again buy into Halo blindly. Well, here we are at Halo 5, and look what's happened.I never did that, though. After halo 4, I thought 343 were a good studio. But I guess schlerf leaving and a new attitude to make the game only ranked has made 343 very different from the people who made 4.Throughout Halo 5's development in the past year, 343i's been continually stating that they never want Halo 4 to happen again.I presumed that meant catering to all the community. Not just one segment of it.
Quote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 01:35:35 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:34:36 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 01:31:14 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:20:52 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 01:18:28 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 01:04:24 PMQuote from: Bacon on December 04, 2015, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:45:54 PMQuote from: Winy on December 04, 2015, 12:43:25 PMQuote from: Mr. Admirals on December 04, 2015, 12:39:37 PMOr, we can realize this content model was planned from the beginning and wasn't done to reach a Q4 release.Scenario 1: What you're saying is false:Then 343 rushed the game. Scenario 2: What you're saying is true. Then they are fucking idiots.Yes, because in the real world there are only two possible scenarios and if people don't cater to your every need, they are idiots.You're not seriously suggesting they thought releasing a game with less content than destiny at launch was a 10/10 idea?When I buy a game, I expect a completed product at launch. Not six months later.Maybe you should've done research into the game before you bought it then? Not my fault or concern you're assmad.I guess it's my own fault for assuming 21 multiplayer maps means 21 individual maps. Or for thinking the game would have some incentive to play other than grinding for scout warthogs.Well, yeah. After Halo 4, everyone seemed to vow to never again buy into Halo blindly. Well, here we are at Halo 5, and look what's happened.I never did that, though. After halo 4, I thought 343 were a good studio. But I guess schlerf leaving and a new attitude to make the game only ranked has made 343 very different from the people who made 4.Throughout Halo 5's development in the past year, 343i's been continually stating that they never want Halo 4 to happen again.Good for them, they made even worse decisions with Halo 5 : )Yet you managed to make an equally bad decision by buying Halo 4 and then Halo 5. Let the hate flow through you...
Halo 5 Content Update 2 - Cartographer's Gift
