My only problem is that he tries to draw a line in the sand between "actual DLC" and "content that's being taken out that they just call DLC," and I just don't see a point in drawing that line. I don't see how it's possible for you to say this DLC is okay, but this DLC over here is bad. It's pretty much just arbitrary opinion-based bullshit.
Either you're okay with all of it, or you're okay with none of it. You can't say this DLC over here is bad, just because you don't personally think it's worth it. Someone else might disagree with you. Meanwhile, you might think that DLC over there is actually good, and totally worth the money. Then I download it, and I think it's a bunch of garbage. There's no standard to that.
I don't care what individuals think is worth it. It's bad in principle, regardless of its quality, regardless of anyone's opinion.